Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[Cosmos]

What if Kirks life marks a very significant birth of a new chapter in american history? More specifically, I mean his last months among the living, and most significantly of all, his death and the way he died? And could it be that the birth of that new chapter is NOT how “the PTB“ (or at least some powerful forces within it) imagined it to be in his last months and now in the early times after his death? Or they didn’t even consider that possibility as a result of his murder? Could it be that Kirk created with his life and death the first real grassroots movement/force in the US outside the 2 party system that has a REAL chance to break the 2 party system? Will TPUSA itself (and/or something that evolves out of that or similar forces in the future) be a new force and/or party that will have SERIOUS chances against the democrats and republicans in the future?

 

[Cosmos]

What happens with TPUSA in the future should be interesting to watch and especially what type of things will be aired on Kirks show and how his wife Erika will handle the situation from now on. I‘m afraid the PTB might not like what she will do at all and maybe also the way in which TPUSA will develop from now on.

 

[JEEP]

What happens with TPUSA in the future should be interesting to watch and especially what type of things will be aired on Kirks show and how his wife Erika will handle the situation from now on.

What I think is one of the biggest tragedies of Kirk's elimination, is the enormous role he was playing in connecting with young men, in a similar way Jordan Peterson was first doing. Young men have taken a beating in this upside down world of rabid feminism, me too, and the woke/DEI extremism. It's been pointed out how much he was able to connect with them and restore their own sense of pride and ego to be men! And, more - righteous men of honor. I just don't see Erika as a substitute for that, but maybe I'm wrong.

 

[Laurentien2]

Look at this still image from Robinson on the roof lowering his "hoodie" before jumping. The hoodie make a straight horizontal line. Something obviously solid and straight like maybe a riffle. Still image 3:56 and see the hoodie.

As well when he goes over the edge, you distinctly see that the "hoodie" hide something solid as it make a straight line up. A hoodie is soft fabric and do not stand up.

 

[Ant22]

Firstly because of what Erika said in her memorial of Kirk shortly after he was killed, pretty much giving the impression to not let his legacy die and bring those who did it to justice. Secondly, because Kirk himself described her as much more conservative and far less moderate,here:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968692791120109860

And thirdly because the people close to Kirk and his show said that Erika said “she knows everything“ after she got a call after the assassination where somebody “very important“ asked her “how much do you know?“ and that Kirk told them if anything ever happened to him that Erika should head TPUSA:

Thing is, the fact that Erika is much more conservative and less moderate than Charlie may not be such a good thing. I’d risk a guess that Charlie did as well as he did precisely because his views were more moderate. The further you go to the right the less tolerance and openness to discourse there is. And that’s the exact opposite of what’s needed at the moment.

Same thing goes for the left really. It’s the moderates on the left that Charlie had the biggest chance of getting through to. The extreme leftie types don’t seem to be even capable of processing an opposing view point - let alone changing their mind.

When you combine the above with her husband allegedly being killed by a leftie (I don’t know whether she believes the official narrative about the perpetrator) it may mean she ends up being much more hardcore in her views and approaches. Which will put her and the entire organisation at risk of becoming a useful instrument in sowing further divide and discord between left and right. And that will further the PTB agenda - not derail it.

 

[Cosmos]

What is thus far the most likely entry and exit point of the bullet on the neck that people have figured out SOLELY on the videos that show Kirk being shot WITHOUT taking into account from where the shot might have come from?

 

[Ricardo]

fwiw , his body reaction seems to indicate front , but hard to tell if there's no plate vest for a bullet to bounce off , since no visible exit wound otherwise, which would be more explicit if neck is entry , a 30.06 round would likely damage parts of head if it had bounced of a plate and was vectored to head, since turbulence of impact would make it spin / tumble or fragment. The certain visible damage is column , after the fact of both of his arms clenching up and hands closing .

 

[JEEP]

What is thus far the most likely entry and exit point of the bullet on the neck that people have figured out SOLELY on the videos that show Kirk being shot WITHOUT taking into account from where the shot might have come from?

I think, first, it's been agreed the shot sounded distinctly like a rifle, not a handgun, so one would think a long-range shot. Doesn't that eliminate a shot from behind and perhaps the side as well?

I'm satisfied with the Sonar21 shockwave explanation regarding the front of Charlie's shirt and maybe his necklace was the primary source for that movement up particularly since we're being told there was no vest. One of the vids didn't show any behind the ear wires, so that seemingly eliminates wires going around the neck and down his front. It was reported his ear was bleeding and the explanation was the (wireless?) earpiece was violently forced out of his ear by the bullet shockwave impact. And a least two vids seemed to show something flying from his ear. Vid evidence strongly suggest entry wound as it would be so much bigger and with a different bleed response than what was seen. At this point, we don't really know what size or kind of bullet he was struck with, or even if it was a bullet or something else. Too many unknowns. The movement of his body also indicates a shot from the front that impacted the brain/spinal cord. No visual evidence of a wound to the back or side of the head - Frank Turek certainly didn't say anything about more than one wound.

I'm wondering about what was speculated to be a muzzle flash from Charlie's far right side. Was that a reflection on glass, meaning the flash was actually from a more frontal position, depending on the angle of the glass I suppose.

Lastly, the guy from Texas got the vid that showed a campus camera could capture the roof where Tyler supposedly shot from, but that footage hasn't been shown assuming the camera was working. The FBI's poor and incomplete footage of the exit from the roof certainly gives credence to a coverup and false narrative being formulated. It's possible, though, it's known by them he isn't the guy, but revealing too much now will prevent apprehension of the real culprit/s?

EDIT: Is it possible the ear bleed was from an entry wound assuming there was no earpiece either, but why wouldn't the neck exit wound be bigger - and where did the bullet go if it really was a bullet that hit him? Would that shot account for Charlie's head an body movements?