Tucker Carlson interviews & ideologies

(Haven't watched it, but seems his last episode goes off the chemtrails rails. Gosh, in some ways Tucker is such a rookie!)

Part of the problem why Tucker probably more easily falls for stuff like that is that he doesn’t seem to be very inclined to think like an engineer, scientist or builder. When you are more inclined to think that way you can easily come up with a whole array of justified and rather easy counter arguments that are hard to overlook in quite a number of the claims the chemtrail crowd is making including the guy he interviewed. I watched a couple of minutes and gave up because the guy is making statements and assumptions that can hardly square with reality at least in the way he is thinking about “chemtrails“. By the way, Candace seems to have similar tendencies of not thinking in engineering/science/building terms, and that is IMO likely the reason she is inclined to think the way she does about the moon stuff and also in things like what mechanisms exactly could have killed Kirk.
 
Candice on the Kirk case, and Tucker on the Crooks case.

Tucker Exposes Trump Would-Be Assassin Thomas Crooks' Social Media History, The FBI Coverup, And More Strangeness​

by Tyler Durden
Friday, Nov 14, 2025

"In late September, Carlson's team received an anonymous tip from someone who said they had gained access to some of Crooks' online accounts,"

"It turns out that Crooks was hardly an online ghost," Carlson reports. "And yet, federal investigators lied and told us there was no trace of him online."

"First, that Thomas Crooks was not some secretive lone wolf who never warned anyone that he was planning on violence. Just the opposite."

"Carlson also points out that Crooks had an unbelievably 'lucky day' the day of the shooting, which the FBI is stonewalling the public over."

"For example"...

&

"More Weirdness"...


Full article and videos below:


 
I really don't know what to say about this interview.... Is this why people are turning away from those 'talking heads' on MSM platforms?

A resounding yes, in part. The thing is folks like Tucker, and those we've been following, not only bring good information to light (that never seems to see the light of day in the legacy media as we know), but also, through their own experience - and having thought through the logical fallacies and rhetorical nonsense of pundits like this guy Harry Cole - are able to reasonably and effectively argue their positions and demolish the status quo coverage of a particular issue.

The line of propaganda, or the narratives that gets pushed by those in positions power are increasingly then seen for the crap that it is. And those who want to promulgate the crap just don't know what to do about it anymore - but try and lay it on even thicker; which then has the result of making the lies and tactics of lie-telling even more obvious to those paying attention.
 
I really don't know what to say about this interview.... Is this why people are turning away from those 'talking heads' on MSM platforms?

Tucker is now very well practiced at handling these manipulative conversations. He has had to deal with a lot of petty tyrants to become a master at handling the obnoxious media. Wonder what else he will encounter.
 
Back
Top Bottom