Tucker Carlson interviews & ideologies

(Haven't watched it, but seems his last episode goes off the chemtrails rails. Gosh, in some ways Tucker is such a rookie!)

Part of the problem why Tucker probably more easily falls for stuff like that is that he doesn’t seem to be very inclined to think like an engineer, scientist or builder. When you are more inclined to think that way you can easily come up with a whole array of justified and rather easy counter arguments that are hard to overlook in quite a number of the claims the chemtrail crowd is making including the guy he interviewed. I watched a couple of minutes and gave up because the guy is making statements and assumptions that can hardly square with reality at least in the way he is thinking about “chemtrails“. By the way, Candace seems to have similar tendencies of not thinking in engineering/science/building terms, and that is IMO likely the reason she is inclined to think the way she does about the moon stuff and also in things like what mechanisms exactly could have killed Kirk.
 
Candice on the Kirk case, and Tucker on the Crooks case.

Tucker Exposes Trump Would-Be Assassin Thomas Crooks' Social Media History, The FBI Coverup, And More Strangeness​

by Tyler Durden
Friday, Nov 14, 2025

"In late September, Carlson's team received an anonymous tip from someone who said they had gained access to some of Crooks' online accounts,"

"It turns out that Crooks was hardly an online ghost," Carlson reports. "And yet, federal investigators lied and told us there was no trace of him online."

"First, that Thomas Crooks was not some secretive lone wolf who never warned anyone that he was planning on violence. Just the opposite."

"Carlson also points out that Crooks had an unbelievably 'lucky day' the day of the shooting, which the FBI is stonewalling the public over."

"For example"...

&

"More Weirdness"...


Full article and videos below:


 
I really don't know what to say about this interview.... Is this why people are turning away from those 'talking heads' on MSM platforms?

A resounding yes, in part. The thing is folks like Tucker, and those we've been following, not only bring good information to light (that never seems to see the light of day in the legacy media as we know), but also, through their own experience - and having thought through the logical fallacies and rhetorical nonsense of pundits like this guy Harry Cole - are able to reasonably and effectively argue their positions and demolish the status quo coverage of a particular issue.

The line of propaganda, or the narratives that gets pushed by those in positions power are increasingly then seen for the crap that it is. And those who want to promulgate the crap just don't know what to do about it anymore - but try and lay it on even thicker; which then has the result of making the lies and tactics of lie-telling even more obvious to those paying attention.
 
I really don't know what to say about this interview.... Is this why people are turning away from those 'talking heads' on MSM platforms?

Tucker is now very well practiced at handling these manipulative conversations. He has had to deal with a lot of petty tyrants to become a master at handling the obnoxious media. Wonder what else he will encounter.
 
Had a listen to the following TCN show. Tucker opens alone, speaking on a variety of subjects - interesting views, until around the 44:00 minute mark when he begins an interview with Nalin. Who is that, and yet the headline makes it evident that Nalin, is Nikki Haley’s son (paste Nikki's name in SOTT.net search and all becomes self-evident).

It is a good time not to judge a son or daughter by the parents (or the parents by their children), as Nalin is nothing like his mum - disagrees with her on most major issues, yet again, she is his mum - Tucker was respectful of that.

Enjoyed the listen, was impressed with him.

Note: one will have to watch this on Tucker's site as it is not widely posted yet:

Why Is Nick Fuentes So Popular? Nikki Haley's Son Explains.​


 
…until around the 44:00 minute mark when he begins an interview with Nalin. Who is that, and yet the headline makes it evident that Nalin, is Nikki Haley’s son (paste Nikki's name in SOTT.net search and all becomes self-evident).

It is a good time not to judge a son or daughter by the parents (or the parents by their children), as Nalin is nothing like his mum - disagrees with her on most major issues, yet again, she is his mum - Tucker was respectful of that.

Started to watch it. Obviously, I would tend to be skeptical. Generally speaking the saying “the apple doesn’t fall far away from the tree“ seems to be a thing although I would say that there are quite some exceptions to “the rule“.

From what I have seen he seems to make sense and comes across as decent. Having said that I would stay on guard and wouldn’t discount ideas like him going to Tucker and “explaining his views“ “that align“ somewhat with famous and influential Fuentes and the new generations as a whole - as possibly being a plan/ruse for him to come to the political stage in the future and get lots of votes.
 
Last edited:
Started to watch it. Obviously, I would tend to be skeptical. Generally speaking the saying “the apple doesn’t fall far away from the tree“ seems to be a thing although I would say that there are quite some exceptions to “the rule“.

From what I have seen he seems to make sense and comes across as decent. Having said that I would stay on guard and wouldn’t discount ideas like him going to Tucker and “explaining his views“ “that align“ somewhat with famous and influential Fuentes and the new generations as a whole - as possibly being a plan/ruse for him to come to the political stage in the future and get lots of votes.

Yes, for sure it will take time to see what happens with him. I'm not even sure why Tucker had him on, yet it might have something to do with his response to Liz Chaney, the day her dad (y'all know Dick) died. Tucker apologized for his actions in front of Nalin, for what he had said to her, even though he detests Liz (did not see/hear what he said).

While it is true concerning the apple falling close to the tree, many see enough, disagree enough, have even been damaged enough by parent(s), singular or plural, that they learn not to repeat and go in a different direction. While growing up in a political household like that (under a Dick, Nikki or Hilary etcetera) could be a real flip of the coin in how you would turn out - suppose, though, in the end it is one's FRV state that determines.
 
Tucker Carlson interview on The Shawn Ryan show. It's long at 3:15:59 hrs. I'm about a quarter of the way through and enjoying it.


00:00 Welcome
02:01 Spiritual Warfare and the Search for Clarity
03:46 Leadership, Solitude, and the Burden of Responsibility
10:31 The Dangers of Winning and the Power of Truth
21:33 Harsh Realities and Corruption in Leadership
49:23 Supernatural Forces, and Influence
58:17 The Power of Words and Moral Obligation
01:30:54 Chaos, Order, and Historical Reflections
01:44:47 Leadership, Betrayal, and Personal Codes
01:54:18 Interviewing Controversial Figures and Public Criticism
02:07:11 The Future of Politics
02:30:30 Break Return: Excavator Adventures and Dark Musings
02:32:29 Leadership Lies, Exploitation, and Online Cults
02:41:34 Corruption in Law Enforcement and Resource Allocation
02:53:38 Economic Challenges and Debt Systems
03:09:15 Documentary Projects and Final Reflections
 
Watched a new interview with Tucker.

One thing I noted is how Tucker is now also saying that he can’t/won’t vote anymore (likely following Candace lead) unless someone is there who actually addresses and handles the biggest issues such as “Israel“, or more appropriately, the totally corrupt system in America which doesn’t only include “Israel“ but many things going wrong which are fueled by a whole system of alphabet soup agencies and players.

Secondly, it was interesting to hear him say things that sound like he suspects America to move away from a so called democracy to something else (for good or bad). It sounds like he is expecting quite big chances and turmoil in the US in the coming years, perhaps coming close to a revolution of sorts (for good or bad). It sounds like Tucker might be thinking that the system could be broken beyond repair.

I think the likelihood is good that Tucker is right.

Edit: Spelling
 
Last edited:
So, the above IMO represents more significant indication that MAGA is justifiably/understandably dead now, at least in connection with what Trump and company are doing. Unless Trump/team shift significantly they are done IMO (in the sense that the majority of Americans correctly don’t go along with that nonsense any longer).

I bet that Trump can’t and won’t do what would be needed. Let’s see how Vance will position himself until the next election. He could be an interesting and capable guy:

 
The following interview, which is, unfortunately, behind the paywall (albeit I think the 6 bucks a month is great value for money), contained some fascinating segments.


The first three segment deals with the covid lab leak hypothesis, bioweapon labs and their connection with the CIA, and gain of function research, and doesn''t provide anything that is new to this forum in my opinion. The fourth segment, however, which deals with how the PTB targeted Dr Huff after he spurned their efforts to silence him on these topics, and his response to same, are, I think, great examples of how 'knowledge protects' and how to joyfully combat petty tyrants. He seems to revel in deploying the skills he learned in the military and intelligence services against the forces trying to silence him.

There was, however, a striking statement he made which I was surprised to find Tucker endorsing - or, if endorsement is an exaggeration, at least failing to critique. It concerns his view of how the covid criminals should be dealt with, and I've taken the liberty of providing the transcript of that short section, paywall notwithstanding (if not ok then please remove mods):

Dr Huff...If the investigation warrants then criminal charges could be brought under UCMJ in a classified setting. So basically a classified trial which exists then set a time period of five to ten years to release the results of that criminal trial publicly. Obviously if someone's found guilty and they're imprisoned you'll know that there are some wrongdoing. My greatest concern is that if there were more nefarious opponents of this, now is not the time to release that information publicly. Because the world sits on the cusp of a global war. And I'm actually sort of following our leaders here.

Tucker [01:30:34] That is a very balanced view, let me just say. Well, thank you. For those who would dismiss you as a wacko, I don't know what I think of that, I haven't thought of it until you said it, but I think that's kind of a window into the way that you think, which is in a restrained and responsible way.

It immediately reminded me of the Nexus Seven documents, and the idea that its best to keep people in the dark - for their own sake, of course...


Its a complex issue and I'm unsure where i stand on it to be honest. Does the concept of external considering scale? Perhaps. But probably not in this particular instance.
 
Tucker interviews a musician named, John Rich - suppose I should know who he is and did not.

John is a country music superstar, or he is rather successful (he discusses) along with being a deep Christian who can cite scriptures with probably the best of them. Something compelled me to watch it, to listen to the guy. Rich goes through his carrier, which as said, he was successful with it, yet in his words he was saying that he had hit a wall because success became the illusion when he realized that it is not the same as someone being significant. What does that mean, he explains it.

Rich journeys through this phase, and starts realizing things about himself, and as a Christian, and also other Christians (including their pastors) who may attempt to say the right things yet are given passed down lines and interpretations (not much different than Judaic Rabbinical interpretations out of the Talmud (Mishnah from out of the Torah, if understood) or the jihadis warped views twisted out of the Koran. Later in the talk, he speak of the dispensational Christians who misinterpret, and that he had written a song called Revelations, which, apparently, set the pulpits pounding that included death threats because he was telling them, you ain't going to be raptured. Well, one can imagine that some would not be pleased.

He sits down and gets serious on the subject of evil, the evil that comes for our children. He speaks of Diddy Combs (evil) and also Charlie Kirk (one gets the subtle impression that he is no fan of those now in control of TPUSA after Kirk was assassinated). Rich relates that his wife had attended a DHS cyber information session on predators, and how they work through apps to get at one's children - outside of any parental awareness of it, and just how widespread the predators have become (at the time, John did not know anything about this). John cites that in the U.S.A. alone, something like 38 million cyber predator cases have been brought forward, and if children are taken, only 1% are ever found. Rich covers a lot of this, which caused him to recently write “The Righteous Hunter" - have not watched it, yet he describes its making and it is not for the feint of heart. On Facebook:

“The Righteous Hunter” will shock, anger and embolden parents to protect their kids. As for the predators who see this? I pray you become paralyzed by the Fear of God, and the American Parent. (VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED) Pls repost & download here:

At the end, and I was waiting to see if Tucker would address any of this Middle East horror show, and also just how far Tucker would go if brought up, which is when he asks Rich about Israel and the Dom of the Rock business. John does not falter in saying - basically saying as people here might, that these Christians are attempting to engineer events, sow chaos, to manufacture their version of end times. In essence, it is Christian service to self, wanting Jesus for self and no others - and in his paraphrased words, God does not work that way and they have become blind to what the words say of it.

As said in the beginning, had not known who Rich was, and had even been reluctant to watch it. It took a bit to get into.

Tucker:

John Rich on the moral cowardice of some American Christians. Don’t run from evil; confront it.

 
Back
Top Bottom