I had been working on this post in December but then Christmas stuff hit and I didn't return to it in time and it got deleted. This is a reconstruction.
I had the idea of comparing the
Ark of the Covenant and the
Transdimentional Atomic Remolecularizer. Here are several sections pertaining to the AotC.
Nov. 7, 1994
Apr. 11, 1998
So, the AotC gets connected to the TDARM at Oak Island in this session but that doesn't mean they are the same thing.
This next session is very interesting which is known as the
Mirror Session where Laura uses "the mirror" under hypnosis. Vincent Bridges was very interested in the AotC (and the Grail) and its current location, which is not revealed.
July 5, 2001
Here, the Kabbalah Tree and the AotC get associated together but not as a 1:1 comparison. The AotC/
time machine is described as being the size of a very large bread box and sounds like it "goes inside the field". I find Laura's description of "the field it produces is the important thing", very interesting when looking at the Tree of Life/Knowledge with the Apkallu standing next to it. My interpretation would be that the AotC "power cell" generates an EM field and that's what the Apkallu are interacting with. Is it possible that this 'field' is invisible?
And then the description of the Kabbalah Tree itself is very interesting too: a very fluid place; ropes, strings, structures; living light; vast network; infinite... . What is this network of connecting fluid ropes of living light? It sounds like this network is the actual 'tree' with branches made out of plasma (?). Does this 'tree' act as a hyperdimensional multipurpose node for accessing information, communication, travel (time travel?), power generation, charging 'purses', healing, body duplication? Is this network being artistically depicted as the Tree of Knowledge/Life where every 'flower' is another node, all accessed by thoughts?
View attachment 115091
This next part is just an idea and I don't really know where I'm going with it. Laura's other description that the visual representation of the core of
every 4D being as being almost that of a
tubular stick got me thinking about the centre of the 'tree' where there is a six-piece 'trunk' of sorts - three-ring base, trunk, three-ring middle, trunk, three-ring top, flower head - which could be 'tubular stick' in shape. Sort of makes me think of the magnetic field created by two bar magnets.
View attachment 115092
I mean, 4D birds on 3D Earth are called Rods, they look kinda tubular, just with wings. Like I said, I'm not sure where I'm going with this bit.
Lastly, Laura's date of the origination of the AotC being 10,000 BC would put it right around the same time as the Pyramids and Stonehenge. Well, I think it's older then that, imo.
Aug. 23, 2001
What I find interesting about this section is the mention of Sumeria and I can't help but think of the Apkallu panels.
Feb. 26, 2002
Dec. 9, 2017
Reading these sections, if I understand it correctly, I get the impression that the AotC, the "Gift of God" and "Mother Stone", was originally a 4D STO device because it's frequency was consciously tuned for a range of multiple possibility vectors with such precision that the narrowness of STS gifts were not capable of building one, but it appears that they could still use it. Or could they?
In the Nov. 7, 1994 session above, the "power cell" was given to the Jews by the Lizzies so they could manipulate others, but then only certain people with a non-selfish energy field - "only those who would not try to use it for selfish reasons" - could use it; ie: the priests. Any other person would receive an energy overload and become liquified by reverse electromagnetism. So, this further suggests an STO oriented creation.
But then, how is it that 4D STS could use such a device? Even if they gave it to a proxy, those proxies would still be using it for selfish reasons through 4D STS. I had a thought that 4D STS maybe created their own version of the AotC known as the TDARM. Because they could be powered magnetically by the Pyramids, are used for abductions and replications, it suggests an STS origin. Could the Jews have been given a TDARM, masquerading as the AotC, instead?
Anyway, at some point, the AotC was in the possession of STS (I'm assuming in it's ornate box so people wouldn't be liquified) and was later reclaimed by an STO mission and subsequently hidden by a frequency fence that allows STS to only have a general idea of it's location. Hence the attempt by Vincent Bridges to try and locate it via Laura, apparently, which failed.
This device first existed on Kantek and was used to transport some Kantekkians off the planet to Earth. I'm assuming it was in 4D STS possession when the planet exploded because it was given to Akhenaten
by them... and then stolen by Sara and given to Abraham.
STS wants the AofC because it's a
trans-density device.
Feb. 2, 2003
Lastly, there's this thing about 'elevators' that popped into my mind.
Mar. 18, 1995
Nov. 4, 1995
Jan. 25, 2025
The C's mentioned the AotC is a trans-density device as is the TDARM (
Jan. 21, 1995).
This is what I'm thinking: there are two devices that have similar hyperdimensional and trans-density capabilities but are of different alignments; the TDARM has been written out of history and the AotC is masking them; the ToK/L is an artistic interpretation of an EM node that is an access point to an infinite hyperdimensional network.
My other thought is that there was only one technological device, the TDARM, and the AotC is like the Philosophers Stone (the C's did refer to the AotC as the "Mother Stone", after all).
As a side note, remember the
Toltec statues that appeared to be holding a "purse" where Puma proposed that those were guns of some sort?
Nov. 4, 1994
You have produced a very thought provoking analysis here. My one major query though is whether we are confusing two different things here, i.e. the Ark (the power cell) and the Grail, which were objects that formed the focus of attention of two separate factions according to the C's:
Q: (L) So, we have a whole different set of clues to look at here. Alrighty then! Was what we are calling the Ark of the Covenant at Baalbek?
A: No. But there were certainly those who had advanced knowledge.
Q: (L) I hate it when they do that: blow my theory to bits. Was there a "grail faction" and an "ark faction?"
A: Pretty much.
Q: (L) Was Baalbek built by the Ark Faction or the Grail Faction?
A: It was Ark Faction.
Q: (Galahad) Well, we got that part right. (L) Once before we discussed Nefertiti and Sarah being one and the same person. We have now been discussing the idea, based on some significant clues in ancient documents, that this individual was also Helen of Troy. Is this, in fact, a useful idea to follow? Is it a correct assessment of the clues?
A: Indeed!
More on Nefertiti, Sarah and Helen later.
The Ark of the Covenant, as described in the Bible, is merely an ornate box made of gold and wood that seems to have belonged to Pharaoh Akhenaten until it was stolen by his wife Queen Nefertiti (in her guise as the biblical Rachel) and given to her lover Abraham/Moses to whom she became a wife in the guise of the biblical Sarah. Indeed, the British archaeologist Howard Carter discovered a very similar Ark box in the tomb of Tutankhamun who was Pharaoh Akhenaten and Nefertiti's son.
The Ark was therefore just an ornate box for carrying things, including the Ten Commandments, Aaron's Rod (was this just a code for the 4D power cell perhaps?) and maybe a store of monoatomic gold, the white shew bread of the Pharaohs, a substance (the Philosopher's Stone) that would be the focus of alchemists for centuries afterwards - consider here that Moses was a prince of Egypt and would have been trained and educated by the High Priests of Egypt, a training which would have included the alchemical secrets that he seemed to put to good use when he forced the rebellious children of Israel to ingest the powdered-down gold of the Golden Calf.
The Ark of the Covenant also seems to have acted as a receiving device, perhaps radio signals or crude TV signals from the Lizzies posing as Yahweh, which apparently emerged from between the two gold cherubs mounted on the 'Mercy Seat' or lid of the Ark. The C's hinted at this function here:
Q: Another thing: I researched the word
Emerald, and that it is derived from the word orient, which is
Orion, and that they go back to words from which we also derive
Aurora and
gold. Is there something about the element gold, such as the atomic number, or anything, that is a specific frequency of light that is important?
A:
Gold, when heated to its liquidation temperature, gives off energy waves which, when properly channelled, open the door to higher density experience. Clue to this is in the way that gold can be an effective transceiver of radio waves and transdimensional communications.
However, I would suggest that Abraham/Moses also possessed the Grail, which the C's have never actually described to us.
I personally think the Grail is in fact the pure crystal skull that the Knights Templar possessed and called Baphomet (the Baptism of Wisdom), which to this day has never been found. I believe it is what lies behind the Celtic legend of the magical, talking Head of Bran ([A]bram) that was supposed to have been buried under what is now Tower Hill in London (the new Troy) and the singing, decapitated head of Orpheus. It may also underly the legend of the head of the Gorgon Medusa (all those writhing snakes being symbolic of knowledge) that the Greek hero Perseus recovered in what is basically an early form of Grail quest - Perseus being the mythical founder of the Perseid family, whose descendants evidently included Pharaoh Akhenaten, who possessed the Ark and the Grail, and his surviving daughter Princess Meritaten, who I think is the biblical Hagar the Egyptian maid servant who became a concubine to Abraham and, until she bore him a son Ishmael, was the last living member of the Perseid family as well as being the Kore mentioned by the C's.
I would not even rule out that Meritaten was a guardian of the Grail (as she was described as a "seer" - see more below on this - and took part in religious rituals overseen by her father) and may have even taken it with her when she was forced out of the Israelite camp and abandoned in the desert of Paran or wilderness after falling out with her mother Nefertiti/Sarah, as depicted in the biblical story of the maid servant Hagar.
Indeed, I think that Meritaten was also the Greek mythical figure of Helle, who with her twin brother Phrixus (Ishmael?) rode on a Golden Ram to Colchis (Britain) to escape the murderous plans of their stepmother, although she then fell off into the sea and supposedly drowned in what is today called the Hellespont that is named after her. However, the C's questioned this narrative and queried whether she did in fact drown:
Q: (Galahad) Is the importance of Argos related to the myth of Jason and the Argonauts?
A: Yup.
Q: (Galahad) Does it have something to do with the individuals who flew away on the Ram?
A: Mmmmm .... And did she really drown?
Q: (Galahad) Is it a significant fact that this girl's name was similar to Helen of Troy?
A: Could be a clue. All those stories of escape from confinement and flying and cataclysm...? Who was imprisoned? Why? Good night. [MJF: Perhaps it was the Grail confined within the Ark?]
The Golden Ram was later smelted down and turned into the
Golden Fleece that was subsequently sought by the hero
Jason and his Argonaut crew, which, of course, is yet another Grail quest story. However, I believe that Meritaten/Hagar/Helle is also to be discovered in the legendary figure of
Princess Scota, who in the
Scotichronicon, a chronicle written by a Scottish Abbott. Walter Bower in 1444, is described as being the daughter of an Egyptian Pharoah who drowned in the Nile, which evidently would seem to be Akhenaten:
Q: (L) Did Akhenaten go mad as I have surmised?
A: Pretty much.
Q: (L) Did he fall in the Nile and get eaten by a crocodile as the story about one pharaoh suggests?
A: No Crocodile.
Q: So, he just fell in and drowned?
A: More like he was "helped."
Meritaten supposedly lived in the 14th century BC, although the C's seem to push this back to the 17th century BC due to modern errors in dating. If she did come to the British Isles as legend describes, is there any evidence to support an Egyptian presence here in the mid-14th century BC. The discovery in the late 1930's of the well preserved remains of Egyptian sailing vessels carbon dated to the mid-14th century BC at North Ferriby in Yorkshire on the Humber Estuary into which the River Trent flows, as well as the discovery of a blue faience neckless of the type worn by her brother Tutankhamen on the body of a teenage boy discovered in an ancient grave located in the hills of Tara in Ireland in the early 1950's, seems to back up the theory of Egyptian contact in that period. The fact that five Egyptian boats were discovered on an estuary into which the River Trent flows also makes me think of what the C's said here about Baphomet:
Q: What is the definition of the god 'Baphomet,' if they did, indeed, worship such?
A: The holder of the Trent.
Q: What is THAT?
A: Seek.
But "Trent" can also mean "three", which may connect us with the "Troad", which links us back to Troy ("three" or trois in French) and the Anatolian peninsula where Troy was meant to have been located according to Heinrich Schliemann:
Q: (L) Arcadia was a Greek province. You have made many references to Troy, which was located in what is now Turkey. A lot of funny stuff tracks back there. And, Troy means 'three.' Interesting.
And:
Q: Then, you also said: 'quite simply we would say, where is Arcadia?' Arcadia ...
A: You need to work on that one. The answers to these mysteries are not easily solved, but well worth it!
Q: The chief thing I noticed about Arcadia was, the Arcadians were the enemies of the Trojans, they were the creators of the Trojan Horse - a huge deception... and the Celts are supposed to be the descendants of the refugees from Troy. And, when Hitler came along, one of his ideals was to resurrect Arcadia, and that Germany was going to be the new Arcadia and destroy the 'old corrupt civilization,' which was Troy. Troy is 'three' and is connected to 'Ilium,' and I guess what my question is here is: just who's on first?
A: Who is on second?
Moreover, there is a theory that the skull which the Templars possessed (Baphomet) was triple faceted, a bit like the Roman god Janus who looked both ways to the past and the future. Indeed, there were three Gorgon sisters but Perseus could only kill Medusa. Was this because she represented the present whilst her two sisters represented the past and future, which are unobtainable to 3D mortals?
However, the C's confirmed that Troy was in fact located in England in what is today the city of Cambridge, a city I know well since my five children were all born there in what was the Plain of Illum at a place called Cherry Hinton.
Q: (Altair) Did Troy ever exist as a town?
A: Yes
Q: (Altair) And if so, where was it located?
A: England.
Q: (Joe) "Where Troy Once Stood"
(Chu) Yeah, we knew that one.
It was here that the legendary siege of Troy took place, a siege precipitated supposedly by the kidnapping of Queen Helen of Greece but could it really have been more about the recovery of the Grail that Helle/Kore/Meritaten/Hagar had brought with her to Britain from the Middle East?
I say this because there is a reference in mythology to a prior event that was supposed to have triggered the Trojan War and that is the tale of the 'Apple of Discord'. Quoting from Wikipedia:
In Greek mythology, the Apple of Discord was a golden apple thrown by
Eris, the goddess of strife, at the wedding of
Peleus and
Thetis. She was not invited to the wedding and threw it out of anger to ruin the gathering (after showing up uninvited). It sparked a vanity-fueled dispute among
Hera,
Athena, and
Aphrodite that led to the
Judgement of Paris and ultimately the Trojan War. In common parlance, the "apple of discord" is the
core, kernel, or crux of an argument, or a small matter that could lead to a bigger dispute
Strange that the quote above makes reference to the "apple of discord" as being the
core, kernel, or crux of an argument given that the C's referred to Kore/Hagar (the last living member of the Perseid family) as being linked to "
blue apples" and the "
trampled leaves of wrath":
Q: (L) So, he returned the ark to the so-called angel. And then, he gave something to someone else. Previously, when I asked about this, you said that what he gave to Esau was "trampled leaves of wrath, the blue apples incarnate," and remarked that I should inquire into the "core meaning."
A: And who was "Kore?"
Q: (L) Was this Abraham's daughter?
A: It was the last living member of the Perseid family.
Q: (L) Was it a male or female?
A: Female.
Perhaps the 'Apple of Discord' also provides us with an echo or link to Sindy S-R's post above where she mentioned the 'Apple of Eden' sought by the Templars and the Assassin sect in the video game series Assassin's Creed, which my sons were great fans of by the way:
What you describe reminds me a lot of the movie and video game series Assassin's Creed.
In it, the bad guys, “The Templars,” and the good guys, “The Assassin Sect,” seek to recover “The Apple of Eden” (a technology from ancient civilizations that was used to manipulate the masses).
It's all too coincidental for my taste...
Could the Apple of Eden really be a cover for the Apple of Discord and by extension the Grail? Was the discord referred to in the tale of the Apple of Discord not have between three Greek goddesses but between Nefertiti and her daughter Meritaten instead:
Q: (L) Going back to this person - the last living member of the Perseid family - who was handed over by Abraham in his Jacob persona to someone else, who was this person handed over to and why?
A: For protection from the fury of "Helen." [Nefertiti)
Q: (L) So, there is a reflection of that in the story of Hagar the Egyptian. Who was she handed over to?
A: The "Dragon Slayers." [MJF: who may have been the Tuatha de Danann of Irish folklore]
For a long time I wondered whether the dating of the Siege of Troy could tie in with the timeframe of Meritaten since I thought that the Trojan War had occurred long before her time. However, the C's have since confirmed that Troy was in existence up until 1100 BC, thus long after Meritaten's death:
(The Mexicans) Was Troy the dominating force in the region before its fall?
A: Yes
Q: (The Mexicans) Did it get destroyed during the events of 1627/8 BC? [MJF: The eruption of Thera that eventually brought around Akhenaten's downfall.]
A: No. 1100 BCE.
So, if she had come to the British Isles as legend holds, the numerous members of her large Egyptian/Canaanite retinue would have had plenty of time to establish a dominant and advanced civilisation here. The $64,000 question is though, could she have brought the Grail with here and, if so, with the fall of Troy did it subsequently find its way back to Israel?
As you correctly point out, the C's referred to this object, the Grail, as the Mother stone or Merkhaba. It was this object or device, which transported (functioning as a TDARM) a group of Kentakkians to Earth over 80,000 years ago. However, the device on Oak Island was supposedly buried there originally 10,000 years ago by the Lizzies and, as you pointed out, the hypnosis session with Vincent Bridges spoke of the Ark dating back to 10,000 BC, which is long after the destruction of Kantek, so in my view it could not have been the Ark that saved the group of Kantekkian refugees:
VB: Is this the Ark?
Laura: Yeah... it...
VB: Ark. Noah's Ark. The Ark of the covenant... the Ark of Time...
Laura: The object of which you speak, goes inside... it's the field...
VB: Now, keep looking, and stay outside the mirror; could you show Laura, so she can describe it for us, where, in time, this machine originates?
Laura: Ah! That's odd. The answer comes as 10,000 BC.
This object or device (if it is appropriate to call it that) was clearly an STO creation (the 'Gift of God'), whereas the C's informed us that the Ark (a power cell that seems to have had an inbuilt AI capability) was an STS created device:
A: It was finally understood by "Moses" that the danger of the object was greater than the ability of descendants to resist corruption. He handed it over to those who had created it.
Q: (Galahad) Was it STS or STO forces that created it?
A: STS.
Q: (Galahad) So, the Ark was an object created by STS. Did this amount to some sort of realization on Moses' part? Did he start to wake up?
A: Yes. The story of the "contending with the angel" was the significant turning point as well as the moment of return.
In my view, the Knights Templar discovered both the Grail and the Ark, whilst they were in the Holy Land, as perhaps indicated by their role in the building of the Cathedral of Notre Dame de Chartres and the sculptures found inside that church:
Q: It seems that the Templars were in charge of building the Cathedral at Chartres, and there is a tableaux on one of the porches of Melchizedek and the Queen of Sheba. Equidistant between them is the Ark of the Covenant in a cart. Melchizedek is holding a cup that is supposed to be the Holy Grail. Inside this cup is a cylindrical object of stone. What is this?
A: Greater sight.
Q: What?! (A) Is it a symbol or a device?
A: Why cannot it be both?
Q: (A) It can be both, but is it both?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) So, it is a device for greater sight like a crystal ball, yes?
A: Only when utilized exactly precisely.
Q: How do you execute something with this device?
A: Why should one wish to "execute" someone with this device?
Q: We don't understand...
A: Laura did say "execute."
Well the Israelites did use the Ark to execute people (their enemies) as the Bible tells us, so this suggests to me that the device the C's have in mind here is the Grail and a skull made of pure crystal is after all a stone as well as being a symbol too (think here of the pirates 'skull and crossbones' flag and skulls being used by philosophers as memento mori). The C's said the device could be used for obtaining greater sight like a crystal ball when utilized exactly precisely, which suggests to me something akin to lensing or focusing:
Q: (L) We were making some theories about this object that Vincent Bridges was looking for - the Ark of the Covenant, or the Holy Grail. I believe that we understand that this is an object that is of great usefulness, some kind of lensing device. Is that correct?
A: Yes.
This makes me wonder whether communication with the Lizzies posing as Yahweh via the Ark in the Tent of the Tabernacle was achieved by using the gold elements of the Ark along with the power cell retained inside it and the Grail deployed as a fine tuning device - think of the old crystal radio set and consider this in line with the C's quote I gave above.
But could a crystal skull like Baphomet be used as a focusing device rather as one might use crystal ball. Judging from what the C's said here, the answer is probably yes:
Q: (L) Who carved the crystal skull found in Central America? [MJF: This is a reference to the famous Mitchell-Hedges crystal skull]
A: Mayans.
Q: (L) What was the purpose of that skull?
A: Study brain. Long message follows pause: Now: skull was to learn about soul; reflective remolecularization imaging. Grays do this with abductees.
Q: (L) Through what kind of instrument.
A: Energy focusing.
And as the C's said about the Grail, it was tuned by consciousness:
A: It is a
trans-density device.
Q: (L) Well if 4th density STS are so technically advanced how come they can't just make another one?
A: This item is
tuned by consciousness. It is of such a frequency that STS gifts are not capable of such precision. The range includes multiple possibility vectors. STS operates within a narrow range.
The Mitchell-Hedges Skull is no doubt much younger than Baphomet if the latter is the Mother Stone from Kantek and probably far less sophisticated, but when it was examined by Hewlett Packard in the 1970's, it was observed to have been fashioned not only from a single crystal of quartz but also from piezo-electric silicon dioxide, precisely the type of naturally occurring quartz that is so widely used in modern electronics. It means that the skull has a positive and negative polarity, like a battery, and is capable of generating electricity.
The experts also identified other extraordinary properties of the skull with regard to its interaction with electricity and light. The authors report:
The Hewlett-Packard team also examined the skull's unusual optical properties, such as its ability to channel light from below, so that it is focused out through the eye sockets. Apparently, this is only possible on account of the orientation of the skull's optical axis...
What this means is that light actually travels quicker through the skull in one direction than another. Jack explained that not only was the skull able to perform these incredible tricks with normal multi-directional light, but also that if you shine directional or polarized light at the skull, not only does the light pass along its optical axis quicker than in any other direction, but the skull also actually rotates that light as it travels along its axis.
So, the C's say the Mitchell-Hedges Skull made by the Mayans was used for reflective remolecularization imaging by energy focusing. This seems to take us back again to the subject of TDARMs. Could the skull have therefore been used for materialisations, for example, just as the Merkabah or Matriarch Stone was in its guise as the 'Gift of God':
A: Multiple. In ancient times this object was called the Gift of God. It was used to aid in the manifestation of all things needful for existence.
Q: (A) Manifestation? (R) That sounds like Merkabah. The Matriarch Stone. The Mother Stone. (A) So it can do all kinds of things ... (R) Is this the Merkabah?
A: Mother Stone, yes.
Q: (R) So that's it! This is the real meaning of the Merkabah. Pretty neat. And there is only one of these available. This puts a very strange aspect on all this. (L) Where was it created?
A: Kantek.
Q: Was this what was used to help transport the Kantekkians to Earth at the time of the destruction of their planet?
A: Some of them. Others transported by Lizards.
If there were other such stones (crystal skulls) like that of the Mayan Mitchell-Hedges Skull (whose ancestors were Atlanteans remember and masters of crystal technology) could they have been made in imitation of the Grail, which is why perhaps it became known as the Matriarch Stone? Could the Grail have even been the centre of a network of such skulls acting as a kind of mother board? If so, it may explain the Mayan legend of the 13 Crystal Skulls where at a pivotal time in humanity's history, the 13 crystal skulls will be reunited to awaken a new era - transforming from an old paradigm into a new world - see:
13 CRYSTAL SKULLS
Is the Grail the 13th Skull perhaps? Curious that Native American Cherokee Medicine Man,
Harley Swift-Deer Reagan is quoted as saying: "
The skulls were kept inside a pyramid in a formation of tremendous power known as the Ark."
As to crystal skulls being used as a means of communication from higher realms, I would not rule this out based on what the C's said here
Q: (L) Well, just to get the question on the record, it was are all these people making all this stuff up about what the Merkabah is?
A: But then again, what is made up and why? It is not so simple!
Q: (L) In ancient literature, something called a Merkabah is talked about, but the definition of this extremely mysterious thing has been lost down through the centuries. There have been many "explanations" from such sources as the Midrash - Jewish commentaries - but there is even argument there. It seems that, even then, nobody knew what it was. But now, we have all these New Age folks coming along who have decided that they know what it is, and it is variously described as rotating double tetrahedrons...
A: If no one knows what it is, that is as good as any other explanation.
Q: (L) I want to know what the ancients who wrote about it meant? What is the definition of the word as the ancient writers used it?
A: The original definition predates this.
Q: (L) What is the original definition that predated the ancient writings that we have access to?
A: What do you think?
Q: (L) What? Well, it's a curious word because it is composed of two words or even three: mer kaba or mer ka ba. If we think of it as three-part word, we have the Egyptian Ka, which is like the astral body, and the Ba which is similar to the Ka. I guess you could think of them as the astral body and the genetic body. Then there is the Ab which is the sort of principle element of the life in man - like the part that is of God or the soul. The Ab was represented as a red stone. It was the part of the man that expressed desire, lust, courage, wisdom, feeling, sense and intelligence. So, all of them together sort of expresses an abstract creative principle. Kaaba is Arabic for cube, and it is the square stone building in which the Black Stone is housed in Mecca. It was supposed to have been built by Ishmael and Abraham. So, with Mer, Ka, Ab, and Ba, we have a cube made up of the principal parts of the etheric self, and housing a stone. Soul stone? Mother stone?
A: By god, she's got it!
Q: (L) Okay, we've got the soul or mother stone. Or the mother of all stones. Now that we have a definition, what was it?
A: The Matriarch Stone.
Q: (L) Is the Matriarch Stone the one in Mecca?
A: Symbolism reigns supreme here.
Q: (T) Is this also the Philosopher's Stone?
A: "Stone" to those you perceive as ancients symbolized communication from "a higher source."
Q: (L) What is it about a stone that made the ancients associate it with communication?
A: Radio waves.
Q: (L) How did radio waves interact with the stone? Were they recorded by the stone; transmitted by the stone?
A: Transmission.
Q: (T) Crystals are stones. Crystals are used for radio transmissions.
A: Yes.
Before anyone mentions it, I appreciate that this applies equally to quartz rocks or stones like those used at Stonehenge in England.
If the Knights Templar possessed the Grail (Baphomet) as the C's claim, is there any legend connected to its finding in the Middle East? Well there is I believe in the curious Templar tale of The Skull of Sidon and the Lady Maraclea.
The documentation of the story dates back to the 12th century, but the version that is most known is the version written by Walter Map(p), a medieval writer who was a courtier of King Henry II of England, and the eventual Archdeacon of Oxford. Map(p)'s version of the tale is as follows;
“A great lady of Maraclea was loved by a Templar, a Lord of Sidon; but she died in her youth, and on the night of her burial, this wicked lover crept to the grave, dug up her body and violated it. Then a voice from the void bade him return in nine months time for he would find a son. He obeyed the injunction and at the appointed time he opened the grave again and found a head on the leg bones of the skeleton (skull and crossbones). The same voice bade him guard it well, for it would be the giver of all good things, and so he carried it away with him. It became his protecting genius, and he was able to defeat his enemies by merely showing them the magic head. In due course, it passed into the possession of the Order.”
Hmmm... the head would be "the giver of all good things". Sounds a lot to me like the Matriarch Stone or the Gift of God which the C's said could be "
used to aid in the manifestation of all things needful for existence."
This tale was retold during the trials of the Knights Templar by an apostolic notary named Antonio Sicci, as 'evidence' of the accusations levied against the Templar Order - accusations of heresy, blasphemy and witchcraft, and the worship of some head-like artefact.
In The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail (Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln, 1982), it is suggested that the inquisitors of the time would have realised that the woman, the young Lady of Maraclea, may have likely been of Armenian heritage, which could link back to the Armenian Church and it's Paulician sects, who practised Catharism. The church believed that those who practised Catharism also practised black magic and necromancy, which is why the church had made such an effort to wipe Catharism from history, and which is why the story was deemed probable, and guilty. Some who have read and studied this story have deemed it a possible origin of the 'skull and crossbones' insignia, which has it's own defined roots in the history of the Knights Templar. Others who have studied this story may notice similarities with other stories in myth and legend - such as the story of Medusa, who's severed head was used as a weapon by Perseus, and then the goddess Athena
As to the real secret of Rennes-le-Chateau, a village located deep within Cathar territory in a region once heavily associated with the Knights Templar, was it encoded by clever pentagonal projection by Rosicrucian artist
Nicholas Poussin in his celebrated painting of
The Shepherds of Arcadia?
Look closely and you will see that the mirror image view of the painting, as proposed by the C's, displays a skull. Did Poussin, the 'Keeper of Secrets' know something about the Grail, which he hid within his painting?
So, where is the Grail or Baphomet. My educated guess is that it is somewhere within a cave in the French Pyrenees and not far perhaps from the location of the enclave of alchemists (Perillos?) who for all their higher density abilities cannot find it due to its occlusion:
Q: What was the head worshipped by the Templars that was supposed to have been called "Baphomet?"
A: Seer of the passage.
Q: What does that mean?
A: Remember, secrets of Knights Templar were kept in caves guided by eternally burning lamps.
Which finally reminds me of a brief mention in the transcripts of a cave in the Pyrenees wherein a great treasure may be found:
Session 24 October 2009:
Q: (A***) Phew! (laughter) (Joe) Bananas are evil for everybody! (L) NO! (Joe) They're from South America and were developed by Quetzalcoatl, who dropped down out of his spaceship and said, "Eat these!" (laughter) (Scottie) Bananas were invented by the Atlanteans! (Joe) Look at them! They're yellow and bendy! (P*****) I would like to ask a question about this
dream Laura had about this treasure in a cave in the Pyrenees.
A: Wait for more on that. Not time yet.
Are we fast approaching the time when Laura should revisit that dream I wonder?