Session 1 November 2025

Could this be related to an alignment and/or sol's companion? It could be a remnant of Venus cometary properties too.

On this day, back in the 17th century:


Venus's ashen light: the mysterious glow from the dark-side of second planet from the Sun

For hundreds of years, astronomers have pondered whether there is any truth to testimonies of a glow illuminating the dark side of Venus.
The ashen light of Venus is rather like an astronomical ghost story: it would be easy to dismiss the phenomenon as a romantic relic of a bygone era were it not for a small number of observations by planetary astronomers well into the 21st century. Will we ever solve the riddle of the ashen light?

The story starts in the 17th century. On the evening of 9 January 1643, Italian astronomer Giovanni Riccioli turned his telescope towards Venus. On that date Venus would have appeared as a crescent, with a phase of about 29%.

Riccioli noticed that the dark side of the planet – which is normally invisible – appeared to be glowing with a faint greyish light that he called ‘The ashen light of Venus’.


The next reported sighting came in 1714 when William Derham, who was a Canon of Windsor, observed it with his telescope and described the ashen light as a ‘dull rusty colour’.

Sir William Herschel also observed the phenomenon on a number of occasions.

The British astronomer Thomas William Webb caught sight of the light on 31 January 1878 with his 9.4-inch reflector.

Using magnifications of 90x and 212x, he noticed that the light had a slight brown-ish cast.

Webb may well have been the first person to recommend using an eyepiece with an occulting bar – a device that hides the brilliant crescent to reduce glare.

20th century sightings of Venus's ashen light

There were many sightings of the ashen light in the 20th century: in 1940, 1953, 1956 and 1957 a number of observers reported sightings on consecutive nights to the British Astronomical Association.

Dale Cruikshank, a planetary scientist at NASA Ames Research Center together with William K Hartmann, also a planetary scientist, made an interesting observation of Venus in 1962.

On 12 November at 7pm, when Venus was at inferior conjunction, both Cruikshank and Hartmann observed the night side of the planet enclosed within a thin ring of light (this would have been the extended cusps of Venus).

The night side seemed to be glowing with a brownish colour, quite different from the surrounding blue sky. The effect was not uniform and appeared to be strongest closest to the thin crescent.

Sir Patrick Moore was another veteran planetary observer who recorded Venus's ashen light.

Although he sighted it numerous times during his long observing career, the event that convinced him of the reality of the light occurred on 27 May 1980.

Using his 15-inch reflector at 300x magnification, Patrick described the effect as ‘striking’, with the ashen light strongly resembling the effect of earthshine on the Moon.

[...]
 
Could this be related to an alignment and/or sol's companion? It could be a remnant of Venus cometary properties too.

On this day, back in the 17th century:
Yes, there were apparently quite a few phenomena like that during that time, eg. glowing sword of Orion or many instances of red skies. It could have been caused by Birkeland plasma currents between the Sun and the companion on closest approach.

I looked a bit into it and it seems that these Birkeland plasma currents would have had a chaotic structure, not just one or two big filaments. So whenever one of the planets passed through one of these, there could have been visible effects like the Ashen light of Venus.
 
I had been working on this post in December but then Christmas stuff hit and I didn't return to it in time and it got deleted. This is a reconstruction.

I had the idea of comparing the Ark of the Covenant and the Transdimentional Atomic Remolecularizer. Here are several sections pertaining to the AotC.

Nov. 7, 1994
Q: (L) What was the "Ark of the Covenant?"

A:
Power cell.

Q:
(L) What was the origin of this power cell?

A:
Lizards given to the Jews to use for manipulation of others.

Q:
(L) Why was it that if you came close to this object or touched it you would die?

A:
Energy overload; scrambling by reverse electromagnetism.

Q:
(L) What is reverse electromagnetism?

A:
Turned inward.

Q:
(L) What effect does it produce?

A:
Liquification of matter.

Q:
(L) Well, that is pleasant. This "cell" was kept in an ornate box of some sort, is that correct?

A:
Yes.

Q:
(L) Why was it only the priests who could handle it?

A:
Only those who would not try to use for selfish reasons.

Q:
(L) But then did just coming near it injure a person?

A:
Yes.

Q:
(L) Well why were these individuals able to come near it?

A:
Nonselfish energy field.

Q:
(L) So it could tune into thought fields?

A:
Yes.

Apr. 11, 1998
Q: Ummm, in reading this funny book I just finished {I believe it was “Fingerprints of the Gods” by Graham Hancock}, I discovered that there is the tradition of the Ark of the Covenant being in Ethiopia. This guy did a bunch of research on it, and it seems possible that it is there, and that it may even be active. Is it, in fact, in the church of St. Mary of Zion in Ethiopia?

A: No.

Q:
Where is it?

A:
If we were to reveal this to you, it would be akin to giving a hand grenade to a baby!! [There are probably other reasons but the previous mention of "liquification of matter" comes to mind. Nevertheless, this might be a confirmation that such a device actually exists on this planet.]

Q: Well, I just thought I would ask! What I found out was that this wonderful Hakluyt Society that chronicled the funny business in the Canary Islands {which I had read previously, and which claimed that the Ark of the covenant was there} also kept track of the goings on in Ethiopia. One of the things they told about was the carrying of the Ark in procession by red or blond headed guys. And there was the Croix Patte of the Templars on a number of objects in Ethiopia. The Rose Croix. Did we have Templars there, or what was going on? Was the Ark there and was it then taken somewhere else?

A: The Ark of the Covenant is not what you think it is.

Q:
You guys said that it was a power cell. I don't have some sort of romantic idea of it. I can accept that. But there are all these stories about it and a lot of people have mythologized it. What do you mean by saying such a thing. What is the Ark?

A:
See Oak Island.

{Trans-dimensional Atomic Remolecularizer?}

Q:
It seems that the Templars were in charge of building the Cathedral at Chartres, and there is a tableaux on one of the porches of Melchizedek and the Queen of Sheba. Equidistant between them is the Ark of the Covenant in a cart. Melchizedek is holding a cup that is supposed to be the Holy Grail. Inside this cup is a cylindrical object of stone. What is this?

A: Greater sight.

So, the AotC gets connected to the TDARM at Oak Island in this session but that doesn't mean they are the same thing.

This next session is very interesting which is known as the Mirror Session where Laura uses "the mirror" under hypnosis. Vincent Bridges was very interested in the AotC (and the Grail) and its current location, which is not revealed.

July 5, 2001
Ark: Can you see kabbalah tree? Its real structure? Through all the densities?

Laura: Umm! As close a representation as there is, it seems is...

VB: [Interrupting] Can you allow yourself to see it by looking through the mirror...

Laura: [Apparently ignoring VB] Now this is very strange.

VB: Describe it.

Laura: Aaaah! This is a very fluid place! Whooo!

VB: Describe it. How do you mean "fluid?"

Laura: Ahh! Well, light doesn't go in straight beams here. It... it ... it's like ropes or strings. You ask about kaballah tree and suddenly I see ropes and strings, structures... the object that we draw as the kaballah tree is very structured and static and has nothing to do with the real thing! Here it is - and it's almost indescribable.

VB:
Keep looking. What happens as you just watch? Can you still see the tree?

Laura: Yes, it's living light that moves and connects like a vast network with infinite...


VB: [Interrupts] Can you show Laura the time machine?

Laura: Would YOU like to see the time machine?

VB: Sure. Can you show Laura the time machine?

Laura: That's an inappropriate request.

VB: Why so?

Laura: It's not phrased properly.

VB: Can Laura see the time machine?

Laura: Would YOU like to see the time machine?

VB: I would like for Laura to see the time machine and describe it to us.

Laura: It seems to be an object about the size of a very large breadbox. It emanates a field, or a glowing beam. I'm not sure if you only have to be in contact with it, or stand in the beam, or if you just stand near it. It's clear that one does not get "inside" it, like in the movies. The field it produces is the important thing.
The beam is like in the movie where they shine the beams up in the sky and wave them around; it's like that, only it has a shape. It's not long, straight and tubular, it's more cone shaped. So yes, there it is, it's...

VB: [Interrupts] Now I want you to stay focused...

Laura [Ignoring the interruption] ...it has angles to it, metal plates, and the structure itself is like some sort of geometric tubing...

VB: Will Laura be able to remember and draw it?

Laura: Actually, in a funny sort of way, it's similar to the shape of the static tree of life on it's side, doubled and inverted like having a mobius twist...

VB: Is this the Ark?


Laura: Yeah... it...

VB: Ark. Noah's Ark. The Ark of the covenant... the Ark of Time...

Laura: The object of which you speak, goes inside... it's the field...

VB: Now, keep looking, and stay outside the mirror; could you show Laura, so she can describe it for us, where, in time, this machine originates?

Laura: Ah! That's odd. The answer comes as 10,000 BC.


VB: Where is it in our immediate future?

Laura: Yes.

VB: Can you show Laura where it is in the immediate future?

Laura: In the immediate future.

VB: Can you show her where on the planet it is, when it enters our future?

Laura: At the appropriate time.

VB: Why is this not the appropriate time?

Laura: Because there would be danger.


VB: Stay on your side... 10,000 BC. Where has it been between then and the immediate future?

Laura: It's been found and used numerous times. It was used for very negative purposes, and it was deemed appropriate to retrieve it and...

...

Laura: Well, this is funny, have you ever seen a cartoon with a pencil being? [Laughs] Oh, that's funny. That's what it's like.

VB: The stick figure is like dowsing rods?

Laura: No. That's... that's... [Laughter] What a play on words! They are so funny! Core. You know the words "core being?" Well, it's not a joke! [Laughter] Just think of yourself as a light being, in a sense, and in another, as not so amorphous as some people would think. There is some plasticity. You know how in this reality, the solid substance seems to be what it is and we have no control over it? Well, in 4th density, there is amorphous substance all around, and there is the "core being," who can assemble this substance by an act of will. It then becomes more structured in the same way food, in our reality, becomes your body, though here it takes a long period of assimilating and converting. There, it is rather quick. There is the core being - and it's really a core!

VB: Like an apple core?

Laura: No, a core - like tubular almost. But you know, most people don't utilize it as such, because they like to play with the materials available. It's more fun. But, it's not necessary, and under different circumstance, they can remove all those things exactly the same way we take off our clothes. [Inaudible] It's just more valuable.

VB: Now, you are using "you." Is that a general term, or is the stick figure me?

Laura: Anybody in 4th density.

VB: Are we in 4th density?

Laura: I am.

VB: So that's YOU, you are seeing in 4th density?

Laura: Me and others.

VB: So the stick figure is you in 4th density?

Laura: It is the visual representation of the core being of any 4th density individual. It is the essence.

Here, the Kabbalah Tree and the AotC get associated together but not as a 1:1 comparison. The AotC/time machine is described as being the size of a very large bread box and sounds like it "goes inside the field". I find Laura's description of "the field it produces is the important thing", very interesting when looking at the Tree of Life/Knowledge with the Apkallu standing next to it. My interpretation would be that the AotC "power cell" generates an EM field and that's what the Apkallu are interacting with. Is it possible that this 'field' is invisible?

And then the description of the Kabbalah Tree itself is very interesting too: a very fluid place; ropes, strings, structures; living light; vast network; infinite... . What is this network of connecting fluid ropes of living light? It sounds like this network is the actual 'tree' with branches made out of plasma (?). Does this 'tree' act as a hyperdimensional multipurpose node for accessing information, communication, travel (time travel?), power generation, charging 'purses', healing, body duplication? Is this network being artistically depicted as the Tree of Knowledge/Life where every 'flower' is another node, all accessed by thoughts?

Apkallu and the Sacred Tree.jpg


This next part is just an idea and I don't really know where I'm going with it. Laura's other description that the visual representation of the core of every 4D being as being almost that of a tubular stick got me thinking about the centre of the 'tree' where there is a six-piece 'trunk' of sorts - three-ring base, trunk, three-ring middle, trunk, three-ring top, flower head - which could be 'tubular stick' in shape. Sort of makes me think of the magnetic field created by two bar magnets.

Dual Bar Magnets with Iron Filings.jpg


I mean, 4D birds on 3D Earth are called Rods, they look kinda tubular, just with wings. Like I said, I'm not sure where I'm going with this bit.

Lastly, Laura's date of the origination of the AotC being 10,000 BC would put it right around the same time as the Pyramids and Stonehenge. Well, I think it's older then that, imo.

Aug. 23, 2001
Q: (L) Well, I still have to deal with this King David issue. He was like a Robin Hood. Now, in another direction, what's this deal about Abraham talking to God. Is this where the whole monotheism came in?

A: Close.

Q: (L) So, it started out with Abraham and his tribe. Did he have reinforcements of his Levite brothers who came and joined his tribe from Hittite land?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Are there any details of this story that I haven't covered that I ought to?

A: David was a Levite.

Q: (L) Was he of the line of Abraham?

A: No.

Q: (L) Did he come from "Hittite land?"

A: Close.

Q: (L) How many generations before he was born did his family come to the area of Palestine?

A: 5.

Q: (L) Were they relatives of Abraham?

A: Somewhat.

Q: (L) Distantly related. So, what did David do? Came along and gathered the people together?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Did they, or did they not, have the Ark of the Covenant? Was this given to this group of people by 4th density?

A:
Close.

Q:
(L) Who was it originally given to?

A:
Abraham.

Q:
(L) Who gave it to him?

A:
Sara.

Q:
(L) Is the story of Rachel stealing the household gods from her father may have really been the story of Sara stealing the Ark from Akhenaten?

A:
Yes.

Q:
(L) No wonder Akhenaten was hot to follow them. He wasn't after Sara, he wanted his Ark back.

A:
Yes.

Q:
(L) Who gave the Ark to Akhenaten?

A:
STS 4th Density.

Q:
(L) I begin to smell a rat! We have read that David's grandmother, Ruth, was a Moabite. That story is a whole other mystery too. Okay, where does the story the Jews tell about being imprisoned, enslaved, crushed, etc come from? What is the source of this tribal memory of being in captivity?

A:
Sumerian concept.

Q:
(L) Okay, that makes sense. So the Sumerian contribution to the Bible stories mix is the enslavement idea. They had this ancient legend of having been genetically created to be slaves. They were servants to the gods, but not the Pharaoh.

What I find interesting about this section is the mention of Sumeria and I can't help but think of the Apkallu panels.

Feb. 26, 2002
Q: (L) We were making some theories about this object that Vincent Bridges was looking for - the Ark of the Covenant, or the Holy Grail. I believe that we understand that this is an object that is of great usefulness, some kind of lensing device. Is that correct?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Is this something that the STS groups - yeah, we know everybody on earth is STS, but I mean the heavy duty ones - had at one time and then lost, or lost control of?

A:
Yes.

Q:
(L) How did they lose it?

A:
It was not so much "lost" as it was "retrieved" and put away for safe keeping.

Q:
(R & L) Who retrieved it?

A:
4th density STO mission.

Q:
(L) Who is it that is looking for it? Is it 3rd density STS or 4th density?

A:
Both.

Q:
(L) If it is a 3rd density device why do 4th density critters want it?

A:
It is a trans-density device.

Q:
(L) Well if 4th density STS are so technically advanced how come they can't just make another one?

A:
This item is tuned by consciousness. It is of such a frequency that STS gifts are not capable of such precision. The range includes multiple possibility vectors. STS operates within a narrow range.

Q:
(R) So they can't make it, but they can use it. So they have to find one that is already created. (L) Is that possible? (A) Operated by consciousness. (L)They said tuned not operated. First of all we want to ask whether they mean tuned as in tuned when it was created or as tuned as in using. (A) There is this scenario that they will wait until the STO guy will find it and tune it, and still only then they will jump on 'em. (L) Right. Do you mean tuned as in the tuning of the creation or the tuning of the operation?

A:
Creation.

Q:
(A) Okay. Once it is tuned, it is tuned, right? (R) Yeah. And if it was similar to our simulation then tuning is done by exposing it to similar frequencies. (L) Or maybe assembling it by virtue of frequencies that are produced. But it still needs to be established whether or not they can see it. So we have theorized that the reason they can't find it, the only reason we can see for why they can't find it, is because for some reason it is protected by frequency or something and that they don't know where it is either. Is this correct?

A:
Mostly. They have a general idea.

Q:
What specifically prevents them from isolating the exact spot and getting it?

A:
Occlusion.

Q:
(A) What is occlusion? (R) I think that's similar to ...

A: Frequency fence.

Q:
(R) Which is similar to what we've been talking about. If you don't have the same frequency it's ... (L) Or they can set a frequency around it that these guys can't tune to and can't penetrate. (R) It becomes invisible in some sense. (L) But they can still in some way detect a region or something. But it can be like noise or something maybe; so much noise that they can't isolate the signal. Is this the reason these people keep coming after us, because they want us to help them find this thing? Is this the reason?

A: More or less. Though not the only one.

Q: (R) Well I guess another major reason is just to disrupt in general. So more or less yes, but there are other reasons. Well Jay Weidner said that they now think that Frank is going to help them find it, that he is a channel for Set. (A) We don't know if this is true. What Jay Weidner says about their hopes about Frank. If that were true they would already have Frank they would be busy with Frank and they would be leaving us alone. So, I don't think it is so important. (L) I don't either. It was just bait tossed out by Jay Weidner. (R) I was wondering about the possible positive uses of the device?

A:
Multiple. In ancient times this object was called the Gift of God. It was used to aid in the manifestation of all things needful for existence.

Q:
(A) Manifestation? (R) That sounds like Merkabah. The Matriarch Stone. The Mother Stone. (A) So it can do all kinds of things ... (R) Is this the Merkabah?

A: Mother Stone, yes.

Q:
(R) So that's it! This is the real meaning of the Merkabah. Pretty neat. And there is only one of these available. This puts a very strange aspect on all this. (L) Where was it created?

A:
Kantek.

Q:
Was this what was used to help transport the Kantekkians to Earth at the time of the destruction of their planet?

A:
Some of them. Others transported by Lizards.

Q:
(L) Well that puts a different slant on that. Alright, we notice that when we ask details about it - location, etc - the answers come very slow, details about where it is and all those things. Let's move on.

Dec. 9, 2017
Q: (L) So in other words, there is some truth to issues of good and evil in terms of STS and STO, and in terms of what can and cannot be manifested?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Don't have many people of the right orientation...

(L) I remember the C's said something one time about some kind of... what was it? The Ark of the Covenant could only be handled or used by somebody who had a pure STO profile because anybody else would be killed. Is that basically what we're looking at here?

A:
Yes. Close.

Reading these sections, if I understand it correctly, I get the impression that the AotC, the "Gift of God" and "Mother Stone", was originally a 4D STO device because it's frequency was consciously tuned for a range of multiple possibility vectors with such precision that the narrowness of STS gifts were not capable of building one, but it appears that they could still use it. Or could they?

In the Nov. 7, 1994 session above, the "power cell" was given to the Jews by the Lizzies so they could manipulate others, but then only certain people with a non-selfish energy field - "only those who would not try to use it for selfish reasons" - could use it; ie: the priests. Any other person would receive an energy overload and become liquified by reverse electromagnetism. So, this further suggests an STO oriented creation.

But then, how is it that 4D STS could use such a device? Even if they gave it to a proxy, those proxies would still be using it for selfish reasons through 4D STS. I had a thought that 4D STS maybe created their own version of the AotC known as the TDARM. Because they could be powered magnetically by the Pyramids, are used for abductions and replications, it suggests an STS origin. Could the Jews have been given a TDARM, masquerading as the AotC, instead?

Anyway, at some point, the AotC was in the possession of STS (I'm assuming in it's ornate box so people wouldn't be liquified) and was later reclaimed by an STO mission and subsequently hidden by a frequency fence that allows STS to only have a general idea of it's location. Hence the attempt by Vincent Bridges to try and locate it via Laura, apparently, which failed.

This device first existed on Kantek and was used to transport some Kantekkians off the planet to Earth. I'm assuming it was in 4D STS possession when the planet exploded because it was given to Akhenaten by them... and then stolen by Sara and given to Abraham.

STS wants the AofC because it's a trans-density device.

Feb. 2, 2003
Q: ... (L) ... Okay, onto our research. One of the questions we would like to clear up is the issue of the Holy Grail and the Ark. Is the Ark of the covenant - the ark thing given to the early pre-Mosaic Jews that you have described previously - the same as the Holy Grail?

A: No.

Q: (L) So there are two completely different technologies?

A: If you wish to term it such.

Q: (L) Why did they answer the question that way? What is the distinguishing thing between them? (A) Maybe 'as such' refers to the fact that you termed it 'technology.' Maybe this is not quite the correct term. Technology can be part of it, but maybe not the most important part. (Galahad) Is one an STS tool and the other an STO tool?

A: Yes and no.

Q: (Galahad) Thanks guys! That's real clear!

A: This is an issue that will clarify itself soon enough.

Q: (L) Is my idea correct that we can identify the presence of these more-or-less technologies by the architecture or art or megalithic structures of the different groups on the planet?

A:
To some extent, yes. But do not let that be the only clue. You might consider "lifestyle" as well as the presence and uses of metals; particularly gold vs. iron.

Q:
(L) So, we have a whole different set of clues to look at here. Alrighty then! Was what we are calling the Ark of the Covenant at Baalbek?

A: No. But there were certainly those who had advanced knowledge.

Q: (L) I hate it when they do that: blow my theory to bits. Was there a "grail faction" and an "ark faction?"

A: Pretty much.

Q: (L) Was Baalbek built by the Ark Faction or the Grail Faction?

A:
It was Ark Faction. (Oct. 20, 1994 - Baalbek was build using Sound Wave Focusing.)

Q: (Galahad) Well, we got that part right.

...

Q: (L) Was any of this radiation sickness from being around the ark as we have surmised?

A:
Not so much since it was kept contained. [In an ornate box.]

Lastly, there's this thing about 'elevators' that popped into my mind.

Mar. 18, 1995
Q: ... (F) I read something last night that said a scientist had been working at one of the bases, or he was a tech working at a super-secret complex somewhere, and he was working on something in some underground room and the elevator door opened and he saw, standing there, right before his eyes, a Lizard Being. He said that the elevator must have been malfunctioning because it wasn't supposed to stop at that level, and he wasn't supposed to see it. In another instance, someone saw two Grays working on something in a hangar and they were told by an MP to leave or they would be shot.

(L) Are these stories Frank is recounting about Lizzies being on elevators and Grays working in hangars, are these true stories or are they disinformation?

A:
True.

Q:
(L) Well, that settled that!

Nov. 4, 1995
Q: (T) We plan on staying with it, we're trying to understand this...

(L) You remember when my brother was here, they kept wanting us to come back to the subject of the bases. And we didn't, we wandered off.

(T) Our problem is, we wander a lot of the time. We're worse than Carl Sagan as a group here. We wander off on tangent ideas, and go from one thing to the next. We never stay on a subject. OK, the bases are trans-density bases; they go from the third density to the fifth; they exist in the third, fourth and fifth density all at the same time, is this correct so far?

A:
Close.

Q:
(T) Now, when a being, a soul, whatever, is in the base, do they exist in all three densities at the same time?

A: No.

Q: (L) Hold on, I've got an idea...

A: When you are in a skyscraper, do you exist on all floors at the same time?

Q: (J) No, but you have got to know where the elevator is! (L) Is there something like an elevator that can move you, if you're in these locations, from one density to another, and experience these bases, these trans-density bases, at different levels?

A: It is an elevator!

Q:
(L) OK, so these bases are points... it IS an elevator, so these bases may be places that if you are taken to them, are in them, that through these portals, or trans-density bases, you are thereby able to transit the densities?

A:
You are able anyway.

Q:
(L) OK, but are these specific locations... OK, it is an elevator... (T) Well, not an elevator as we perceive an elevator... (J) Conceptually, yes. It's a conveyance, it's a method.

A: No.

Q: (T) No, that it isn't an elevator as we perceive it? (L) Is it an elevator for...

A:
Literally.

Q:
(L) It is literally an elevator?

A:
Yes.

Q: (L) So you go there to get on to go to different densities?

A:
Yes.

Q:
(T) So, it is that easy?

A:
Yes.

Q:
(L) So you go to these bases, to go to different densities...

A:
Although, it is possible to enter 4th and 5th in other ways too!

Jan. 25, 2025
Q: (Approaching Infinity & Joe) How can you have a literal elevator that can take a person from 3D to 5D?

A: Don't think of it as an elevator such as those who are familiar with. Think of it as a high tech version of "Beam me up, Scottie." [laughter]

Q: (Joe) "Beam me up, Scottie" is already super high tech! Can't go any higher tech than that!

(L) So, in other words, it would be like an elevator that you would get into, and it would be high tech, and it would demolecularize you and remolecularize you, or something like that?

A:
Yes.

Q:
(Joe) Or not remolecularize you and just your soul, or whatever, goes to 5D. Because the reason we asked the question was because how can you go...? It's not a physical realm. You can't go in a physical elevator. You can't step into an elevator on 3D as a person and take an elevator to 5D. First of all, the elevator can't be in 5D because it's physical, you can't be either because you're physical. So how would that actually happen? But obviously it's super high tech. So, forget about it.

The C's mentioned the AotC is a trans-density device as is the TDARM (Jan. 21, 1995).

This is what I'm thinking: there are two devices that have similar hyperdimensional and trans-density capabilities but are of different alignments; the TDARM has been written out of history and the AotC is masking them; the ToK/L is an artistic interpretation of an EM node that is an access point to an infinite hyperdimensional network.

My other thought is that there was only one technological device, the TDARM, and the AotC is like the Philosophers Stone (the C's did refer to the AotC as the "Mother Stone", after all).

As a side note, remember the Toltec statues that appeared to be holding a "purse" where Puma proposed that those were guns of some sort?

Nov. 4, 1994
Q: (L) What kind of weapons do the Nephilim use to do their "enforcing?"

A:
Stun guns.

Q:
(L) Do they actually use some kind of material weapon?

A:
Yes.
 
In the Nov. 7, 1994 session above, the "power cell" was given to the Jews by the Lizzies so they could manipulate others, but then only certain people with a non-selfish energy field - "only those who would not try to use it for selfish reasons" - could use it; ie: the priests. Any other person would receive an energy overload and become liquified by reverse electromagnetism. So, this further suggests an STO oriented creation.

But then, how is it that 4D STS could use such a device? Even if they gave it to a proxy, those proxies would still be using it for selfish reasons through 4D STS. I had a thought that 4D STS maybe created their own version of the AotC known as the TDARM. Because they could be powered magnetically by the Pyramids, are used for abductions and replications, it suggests an STS origin. Could the Jews have been given a TDARM, masquerading as the AotC, instead?

Anyway, at some point, the AotC was in the possession of STS (I'm assuming in it's ornate box so people wouldn't be liquified) and was later reclaimed by an STO mission and subsequently hidden by a frequency fence that allows STS to only have a general idea of it's location. Hence the attempt by Vincent Bridges to try and locate it via Laura, apparently, which failed.

What you describe reminds me a lot of the movie and video game series Assassin's Creed.
In it, the bad guys, “The Templars,” and the good guys, “The Assassin Sect,” seek to recover “The Apple of Eden” (a technology from ancient civilizations that was used to manipulate the masses).
It's all too coincidental for my taste...




P.S.: I've never played video games, I only watched videos of the Assassin's Creed saga developed by players until 2020. Then I stopped because it became too WOKE 🤮for my taste.

Well, I'm just going to address the Sumerian stuff. Candace gives no details at all. Really, the only lead she provides is the name Project Looking Glass. So I watched a few videos and I found one that gives a fairly detailed story of where the Sumerian connection comes in.

It starts with a shady deal made in 1948 of two American "archaeologists" buying two specific metal Sumerian cylinder seals from the curator of the National Museum of Iraq for a suitcase full of $100's. My first question is, there are a lot of cylinder seals. Are they sure they were Sumerian? No. Apparently they were older then that and were given to the Sumerians by the Annunaki themselves! (ohhhh brother) Pictures of the Apkallu and others are shown.

What if what is said in this video or part of it is true? Is this how they are trying to find TDARM?
Or maybe they already found it...
Or are they desperately searching for the right person in this world to get this TDARM?
The latter reminds me of the last book I read recently, The Secret of Secrets Book by Dan Brown.


It's just my idea, but @Laura's life, plus these elements also seen in this book, seem a little disturbing to me...

TDARM - AotC - @Laura - Vincent Bridges - Prague
 
What if what is said in this video or part of it is true? Is this how they are trying to find TDARM?

As I understand, "they" already have TDARMs (there are several of them). And one for sure, albeit inaccessible, is at Oak Island but, unlike that one, TDARMs are meant to be portable. So if what was being described in the Looking Glass story was actually a TDARM, then it's possible it was at building S4, or wherever, at some point.

Also, if I understand it correctly, it's not the TDARM they want. It's the AotC that they want but they can't find it because its hidden by a frequency fence.
 
Last edited:
As I understand, "they" already have TDARMs (there are several of them). And one for sure, albeit inaccessible, is at Oak Island but, unlike that one, TDARMs are meant to be portable. So if what was being described in the Looking Glass story was actually a TDARM, then it's possible it was at building S4, or wherever, at some point.

Also, if I understand it correctly, it's not the TDARM they want. It's the AotC that they want but they can't find it because its hidden by a frequency fence.
I was reviewing a session where TDARM came up. Perhaps all the above is just a distraction from more cosmic processes at play:

November 16th, 1994

Q: (L) If the mother planet that the human race was seeded on originally, is burned up, or turned into a cinder, I would like to know how it burned up?

A: Star expanded.

Q: (L) Well, if the star expanded, it must have expanded recently, is that correct?

A: Time does not measure that way in that realm.

Q: (L) What realm is that?

A: Time/space warp.

Q:
(L) What do you mean by a time/space warp?

A: Too complicated but you already have some understanding of concept.

Q: (L) So, the star expanded and the mother planet was turned into a cinder. If this was the case, it means that it must have turned into a cinder very close to the point, using time loosely, when human beings were created?

A: You can't even use it loosely.

Q: (L) Would you help me out here. I'm trying to figure out why, if that planet was turned into a cinder, why were human beings seeded there... what was the point in being brought into being on a planet that was very shortly to become a cinder... a crispy critter...

A: Okay. Now: "Shocker" For you. It hasn't become a cinder yet.

Q:
(L) Okay. What is it. You told us it was a cinder... burned up... what is the real story here?

A: It will be at the same "time" that you go to 4th density. The human race is currently being formed on D'Ahnkiar.

Q:
(L) What do you mean that the human race is currently being formed on that planet? Is that because that planet is this planet?

A: No. That closes realm grand cycle.

Q: (L) Are you saying that there are human beings being created on that planet at this current time...

A: Yes, you are. Your race is forming there.

Q:
(L) How?

A: Realm crossing understand?

Q: (L) Are you saying that there are 4th density bodies being formed there...

A: No. 3rd.

Q: (L) There are 3rd density bodies... are we going to leave the bodies we are in and go into other bodies?

A: You are drifting... Think carefully. Realm is derivative of reality. Cycle.

Q: (L) So the human race is being formed on this other planet at the present time...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And at the time of the realm border crossing, this other planet will then become cindered... burned up...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Where will the human beings go that are being formed on that planet at the time of the realm border crossing?

A: Ancient earth.

Q:
(L) They will go to ancient earth?

A: There is no time as you know it; its all just lessons for the collective consciousness.

Q: (L) So at the closing of this grand cycle everything will just start all over again?

A: Not exactly; you see, there is no start.

Q: (L) Are a lot of souls on the earth going to recycle into these new bodies coming onto the earth?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) As ancient mankind?

A:
Yes.

Q: (L) And do the whole thing all over again?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) So, in other words, a lot of people are going back to square one?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Is this punishment.

A: No. Nature.

Q: (L) Are some of the souls, at that point, going to move into a higher density level?

A: Yes.

Q:
(L) Could you give us a percentage on this?

A: No. Open at this point.

Q: (L) Now, getting back to the planet, if at some point in the cycle, bodies were generated on this planet and brought to earth, who brought them?

A: Realm crossing.

Q:
(L) It was not a who, it was a what, is that correct?

A: All is who and what.

Q: (L) Well, the other night you mentioned something about the Transient Passengers hauling these bodies off that planet and bringing them to earth, is that correct?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Well, are these Transient Passengers Realms?

A: Yes. So are you.

Q:
(L) Do you guys know what you are doing to the linear mind here?

A: Can of worms.

Q: (L) You said something the other night when we lost the tape about the expansion of the star being conducive to creation. Could you give us a little bit on that aspect?

A: Transdimensional Atomic remolecularization.

Q:
(L) What is Remolecularization.

A: Being reassembled.

Q: (L) Reassembled from what to what?

A: Complex. Density collision.

Q:
(L) Collision of one density with another. Which?

A: Learn 4 level assembly.

Q:
(L) How?

A: Study.

Q: (L) Does this mean that this was a point in space time when pure energy could form around a framework of a thought pattern and thus become solid matter?

A: Close.

Q:
(L) Is this transitioning of energy from higher densities into third density or solid matter kind of a traumatic event for universal energy?

A: Subjective.

Q: (L) Is it a form of death?

A: Death and birth are the same.

Q: (L) Was it a requirement to be on a planet with a dying star for this remolecularization to take place?

A: If 3rd density remolecularization.

Q:
(L) So, for energy to go into 3rd density physical level... is energy moving down when it comes into 3rd level?

A: No. Upward.

Q: (L) What moves upward?

A: Molecules, atomic matter. Light is first density and unifies all densities.

Q:
(L) Does that mean that by us moving from 3rd density into 4th density that we are getting farther away from unification with the source?

A: No. Light and darkness unify all densities.

Q: (L) How many levels of density are there?

A: 7

Q: (L) When you reach the seventh level, how would you describe that if 1st level is light?

A: 7th is core of existence.

Q: (L) Well, if seventh density is the core of existence, would that mean that 1st density is the outer edge of existence?

A: Base.

Q: (L) When one has reached 7th density, then what does one do?

A: When one reaches 7th all do.

Q: (L) Are there any beings on 7th level?

A: Time does not exist.

Q: (L) When light is transferred to electrical energy, does it actually change density?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Is it from 1st to 3rd when it becomes electricity?

A: Yes.

Q:
(L) Once again, are there any beings on 7th level?

A: Big bang.

Q: (L) Big bang is at 7th level?

A: Close enough.

Q: (L) So, when we all reach 7th level we will all blow up? We will all become one and it will all start all over again?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Well, that's not a pleasant thought!

A: Why? There is no time, you dwell there eternally. 7th is the light you see at death of the body.

Q: (L) So, when you die and leave the body, do you go to seventh level?

A: See it.
 
Another confirmation is that the Spoerer Minimum (1420-1570) and Dalton Minimum (1790-1820), which came before and after the Maunder Minimum (1645-1715), can be explained with the entry and exit of the brown dwarf into and out of the heliosphere of the Sun:

I was thinking if it would be interesting to apply this idea to the 3600 year cometary cycle. It would amount to consider the "approaching factor", in terms of events: something potentially visible, precursor events. Then, when it's the closest to earth, and, finally, when it's "leaving".

I don't know if the mass of the cometary swarm is something comparable to the brown dwarf so that it would still be interesting to study the effects in the same way. Just an idea!

In addition, I don't know if the "timing" differ, for instance, we may learn that the cometary swarm takes 10 years (fictive example) for the "approach phase"... Technically, a 3600 year cycle could be split in 1200 year chunks. I always remain cautious with such cookie-cutter ways, but, why not.
 
I was reviewing a session where TDARM came up. Perhaps all the above is just a distraction from more cosmic processes at play:

November 16th, 1994

I'm familiar with that session and I absolutely agree. Perhaps what I'm suggesting is that these cosmic processes can be accessed within a localised jurisdiction?

Oct. 21, 1995
Q: (L) OK, now of the 21 that were in the craft that was captured, so to speak, there were four outside the craft when it was approached, is that correct?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Then that would mean that there were 17 inside... Of these 21 beings, how many were greys, the standard grey lizzie-probe type being?

A: Most.

Q: (L) Were there other kinds of beings in there?

A: Human.

Q: (L) There was one human in there also?

A: 5.

Q: (L) There were 5 humans inside? So we have... (LM) Why? (L) Why were those humans in the craft?

A: Retrieval and study specimens, two big foot types.

Q: (L) Does that mean that the humans that they had in there were retrieval and study specimens, or otherwise known as abductees?

A: Deceased.

Q: (L) Oh, they were dead humans. Wonderful. Did they abduct them dead? Or did they abduct them alive?

A: No.

Q: (L) Did they abduct them alive and then kill them?

A: No.

Q: (L) Were they dead as a result of the crash?

A: No.

Q: (L) Well, then, what's the story here, I mean, what other choices do I have?

A: Retrieved.

Q: (L) Ohh, these were beings that had been retrieved at death and remolecularized? Is that what you are referring to, what we discussed before?

A: 3rd density.

Q: (L) Were they remolecularized in third density? Is that what you are saying?

A: Retrieved in 3rd density.

Q: (L) OK, tell me once again what it means for a being, a human to be retrieved.

A: Picked up after expiration.

Q: (L) OK, so they picked up dead bodies, is that it?

A: Yes.

Q: (LM) Why? (L) To study them. OK, did they plan to reanimate these corpses?

A: Open.

Q: (L) Do they ever pick up dead bodies, you know, right after, and reanimate them?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) When they pick them up and reanimate them, do they reanimate them with the souls that left them? Do they like, catch the soul and put it back in?

A: No.

Q: (L) When they reanimate them, do they reanimate them with an alien soul?

A: Multiple possibilities.

Q: (L) If they reanimate them, is it possible to reanimate them with no soul?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) OK, when they reanimate them with no soul, do they have kind of like a zombie-like situation?

A: No.

Q: (L) Well, could you give us a little more information on this particular aspect? If they reanimate them with no soul, what is the animating force or energy?

A: Indistinguishable from other humans.

Q: (L) They're indistinguishable from other humans. (LM) How is that possible?

A: Technology makes all things possible!!!

Q:
(L) Of course, you are talking about 4th density technology?

A:
Yes.
 
Last edited:
I had been working on this post in December but then Christmas stuff hit and I didn't return to it in time and it got deleted. This is a reconstruction.

I had the idea of comparing the Ark of the Covenant and the Transdimentional Atomic Remolecularizer. Here are several sections pertaining to the AotC.

Nov. 7, 1994


Apr. 11, 1998


So, the AotC gets connected to the TDARM at Oak Island in this session but that doesn't mean they are the same thing.

This next session is very interesting which is known as the Mirror Session where Laura uses "the mirror" under hypnosis. Vincent Bridges was very interested in the AotC (and the Grail) and its current location, which is not revealed.

July 5, 2001


Here, the Kabbalah Tree and the AotC get associated together but not as a 1:1 comparison. The AotC/time machine is described as being the size of a very large bread box and sounds like it "goes inside the field". I find Laura's description of "the field it produces is the important thing", very interesting when looking at the Tree of Life/Knowledge with the Apkallu standing next to it. My interpretation would be that the AotC "power cell" generates an EM field and that's what the Apkallu are interacting with. Is it possible that this 'field' is invisible?

And then the description of the Kabbalah Tree itself is very interesting too: a very fluid place; ropes, strings, structures; living light; vast network; infinite... . What is this network of connecting fluid ropes of living light? It sounds like this network is the actual 'tree' with branches made out of plasma (?). Does this 'tree' act as a hyperdimensional multipurpose node for accessing information, communication, travel (time travel?), power generation, charging 'purses', healing, body duplication? Is this network being artistically depicted as the Tree of Knowledge/Life where every 'flower' is another node, all accessed by thoughts?

View attachment 115091

This next part is just an idea and I don't really know where I'm going with it. Laura's other description that the visual representation of the core of every 4D being as being almost that of a tubular stick got me thinking about the centre of the 'tree' where there is a six-piece 'trunk' of sorts - three-ring base, trunk, three-ring middle, trunk, three-ring top, flower head - which could be 'tubular stick' in shape. Sort of makes me think of the magnetic field created by two bar magnets.

View attachment 115092

I mean, 4D birds on 3D Earth are called Rods, they look kinda tubular, just with wings. Like I said, I'm not sure where I'm going with this bit.

Lastly, Laura's date of the origination of the AotC being 10,000 BC would put it right around the same time as the Pyramids and Stonehenge. Well, I think it's older then that, imo.

Aug. 23, 2001


What I find interesting about this section is the mention of Sumeria and I can't help but think of the Apkallu panels.

Feb. 26, 2002


Dec. 9, 2017


Reading these sections, if I understand it correctly, I get the impression that the AotC, the "Gift of God" and "Mother Stone", was originally a 4D STO device because it's frequency was consciously tuned for a range of multiple possibility vectors with such precision that the narrowness of STS gifts were not capable of building one, but it appears that they could still use it. Or could they?

In the Nov. 7, 1994 session above, the "power cell" was given to the Jews by the Lizzies so they could manipulate others, but then only certain people with a non-selfish energy field - "only those who would not try to use it for selfish reasons" - could use it; ie: the priests. Any other person would receive an energy overload and become liquified by reverse electromagnetism. So, this further suggests an STO oriented creation.

But then, how is it that 4D STS could use such a device? Even if they gave it to a proxy, those proxies would still be using it for selfish reasons through 4D STS. I had a thought that 4D STS maybe created their own version of the AotC known as the TDARM. Because they could be powered magnetically by the Pyramids, are used for abductions and replications, it suggests an STS origin. Could the Jews have been given a TDARM, masquerading as the AotC, instead?

Anyway, at some point, the AotC was in the possession of STS (I'm assuming in it's ornate box so people wouldn't be liquified) and was later reclaimed by an STO mission and subsequently hidden by a frequency fence that allows STS to only have a general idea of it's location. Hence the attempt by Vincent Bridges to try and locate it via Laura, apparently, which failed.

This device first existed on Kantek and was used to transport some Kantekkians off the planet to Earth. I'm assuming it was in 4D STS possession when the planet exploded because it was given to Akhenaten by them... and then stolen by Sara and given to Abraham.

STS wants the AofC because it's a trans-density device.

Feb. 2, 2003


Lastly, there's this thing about 'elevators' that popped into my mind.

Mar. 18, 1995


Nov. 4, 1995


Jan. 25, 2025


The C's mentioned the AotC is a trans-density device as is the TDARM (Jan. 21, 1995).

This is what I'm thinking: there are two devices that have similar hyperdimensional and trans-density capabilities but are of different alignments; the TDARM has been written out of history and the AotC is masking them; the ToK/L is an artistic interpretation of an EM node that is an access point to an infinite hyperdimensional network.

My other thought is that there was only one technological device, the TDARM, and the AotC is like the Philosophers Stone (the C's did refer to the AotC as the "Mother Stone", after all).

As a side note, remember the Toltec statues that appeared to be holding a "purse" where Puma proposed that those were guns of some sort?

Nov. 4, 1994

You have produced a very thought provoking analysis here. My one major query though is whether we are confusing two different things here, i.e. the Ark (the power cell) and the Grail, which were objects that formed the focus of attention of two separate factions according to the C's:
Q: (L) So, we have a whole different set of clues to look at here. Alrighty then! Was what we are calling the Ark of the Covenant at Baalbek?

A: No. But there were certainly those who had advanced knowledge.

Q: (L) I hate it when they do that: blow my theory to bits. Was there a "grail faction" and an "ark faction?"

A: Pretty much.

Q: (L) Was Baalbek built by the Ark Faction or the Grail Faction?

A: It was Ark Faction.

Q: (Galahad) Well, we got that part right
. (L) Once before we discussed Nefertiti and Sarah being one and the same person. We have now been discussing the idea, based on some significant clues in ancient documents, that this individual was also Helen of Troy. Is this, in fact, a useful idea to follow? Is it a correct assessment of the clues?

A: Indeed!

More on Nefertiti, Sarah and Helen later.

The Ark of the Covenant, as described in the Bible, is merely an ornate box made of gold and wood that seems to have belonged to Pharaoh Akhenaten until it was stolen by his wife Queen Nefertiti (in her guise as the biblical Rachel) and given to her lover Abraham/Moses to whom she became a wife in the guise of the biblical Sarah. Indeed, the British archaeologist Howard Carter discovered a very similar Ark box in the tomb of Tutankhamun who was Pharaoh Akhenaten and Nefertiti's son.

The Ark was therefore just an ornate box for carrying things, including the Ten Commandments, Aaron's Rod (was this just a code for the 4D power cell perhaps?) and maybe a store of monoatomic gold, the white shew bread of the Pharaohs, a substance (the Philosopher's Stone) that would be the focus of alchemists for centuries afterwards - consider here that Moses was a prince of Egypt and would have been trained and educated by the High Priests of Egypt, a training which would have included the alchemical secrets that he seemed to put to good use when he forced the rebellious children of Israel to ingest the powdered-down gold of the Golden Calf.

The Ark of the Covenant also seems to have acted as a receiving device, perhaps radio signals or crude TV signals from the Lizzies posing as Yahweh, which apparently emerged from between the two gold cherubs mounted on the 'Mercy Seat' or lid of the Ark. The C's hinted at this function here:
Q: Another thing: I researched the word Emerald, and that it is derived from the word orient, which is Orion, and that they go back to words from which we also derive Aurora and gold. Is there something about the element gold, such as the atomic number, or anything, that is a specific frequency of light that is important?

A: Gold, when heated to its liquidation temperature, gives off energy waves which, when properly channelled, open the door to higher density experience. Clue to this is in the way that gold can be an effective transceiver of radio waves and transdimensional communications.

However, I would suggest that Abraham/Moses also possessed the Grail, which the C's have never actually described to us.

I personally think the Grail is in fact the pure crystal skull that the Knights Templar possessed and called Baphomet (the Baptism of Wisdom), which to this day has never been found. I believe it is what lies behind the Celtic legend of the magical, talking Head of Bran ([A]bram) that was supposed to have been buried under what is now Tower Hill in London (the new Troy) and the singing, decapitated head of Orpheus. It may also underly the legend of the head of the Gorgon Medusa (all those writhing snakes being symbolic of knowledge) that the Greek hero Perseus recovered in what is basically an early form of Grail quest - Perseus being the mythical founder of the Perseid family, whose descendants evidently included Pharaoh Akhenaten, who possessed the Ark and the Grail, and his surviving daughter Princess Meritaten, who I think is the biblical Hagar the Egyptian maid servant who became a concubine to Abraham and, until she bore him a son Ishmael, was the last living member of the Perseid family as well as being the Kore mentioned by the C's.

I would not even rule out that Meritaten was a guardian of the Grail (as she was described as a "seer" - see more below on this - and took part in religious rituals overseen by her father) and may have even taken it with her when she was forced out of the Israelite camp and abandoned in the desert of Paran or wilderness after falling out with her mother Nefertiti/Sarah, as depicted in the biblical story of the maid servant Hagar.

Indeed, I think that Meritaten was also the Greek mythical figure of Helle, who with her twin brother Phrixus (Ishmael?) rode on a Golden Ram to Colchis (Britain) to escape the murderous plans of their stepmother, although she then fell off into the sea and supposedly drowned in what is today called the Hellespont that is named after her. However, the C's questioned this narrative and queried whether she did in fact drown:
Q: (Galahad) Is the importance of Argos related to the myth of Jason and the Argonauts?

A: Yup.


Q: (Galahad) Does it have something to do with the individuals who flew away on the Ram?

A: Mmmmm .... And did she really drown?

Q: (Galahad) Is it a significant fact that this girl's name was similar to Helen of Troy?

A: Could be a clue. All those stories of escape from confinement and flying and cataclysm...? Who was imprisoned? Why? Good night. [MJF: Perhaps it was the Grail confined within the Ark?]

The Golden Ram was later smelted down and turned into the Golden Fleece that was subsequently sought by the hero Jason and his Argonaut crew, which, of course, is yet another Grail quest story. However, I believe that Meritaten/Hagar/Helle is also to be discovered in the legendary figure of Princess Scota, who in the Scotichronicon, a chronicle written by a Scottish Abbott. Walter Bower in 1444, is described as being the daughter of an Egyptian Pharoah who drowned in the Nile, which evidently would seem to be Akhenaten:
Q: (L) Did Akhenaten go mad as I have surmised?

A: Pretty much.

Q: (L) Did he fall in the Nile and get eaten by a crocodile as the story about one pharaoh suggests?

A: No Crocodile.

Q: So, he just fell in and drowned?

A: More like he was "helped."

Meritaten supposedly lived in the 14th century BC, although the C's seem to push this back to the 17th century BC due to modern errors in dating. If she did come to the British Isles as legend describes, is there any evidence to support an Egyptian presence here in the mid-14th century BC. The discovery in the late 1930's of the well preserved remains of Egyptian sailing vessels carbon dated to the mid-14th century BC at North Ferriby in Yorkshire on the Humber Estuary into which the River Trent flows, as well as the discovery of a blue faience neckless of the type worn by her brother Tutankhamen on the body of a teenage boy discovered in an ancient grave located in the hills of Tara in Ireland in the early 1950's, seems to back up the theory of Egyptian contact in that period. The fact that five Egyptian boats were discovered on an estuary into which the River Trent flows also makes me think of what the C's said here about Baphomet:
Q: What is the definition of the god 'Baphomet,' if they did, indeed, worship such?

A: The holder of the Trent.

Q: What is THAT?

A: Seek.

But "Trent" can also mean "three", which may connect us with the "Troad", which links us back to Troy ("three" or trois in French) and the Anatolian peninsula where Troy was meant to have been located according to Heinrich Schliemann:
Q: (L) Arcadia was a Greek province. You have made many references to Troy, which was located in what is now Turkey. A lot of funny stuff tracks back there. And, Troy means 'three.' Interesting.​

And:
Q: Then, you also said: 'quite simply we would say, where is Arcadia?' Arcadia ...

A: You need to work on that one. The answers to these mysteries are not easily solved, but well worth it!

Q: The chief thing I noticed about Arcadia was, the Arcadians were the enemies of the Trojans, they were the creators of the Trojan Horse - a huge deception... and the Celts are supposed to be the descendants of the refugees from Troy. And, when Hitler came along, one of his ideals was to resurrect Arcadia, and that Germany was going to be the new Arcadia and destroy the 'old corrupt civilization,' which was Troy. Troy is 'three' and is connected to 'Ilium,' and I guess what my question is here is: just who's on first?

A: Who is on second?

Moreover, there is a theory that the skull which the Templars possessed (Baphomet) was triple faceted, a bit like the Roman god Janus who looked both ways to the past and the future. Indeed, there were three Gorgon sisters but Perseus could only kill Medusa. Was this because she represented the present whilst her two sisters represented the past and future, which are unobtainable to 3D mortals?

However, the C's confirmed that Troy was in fact located in England in what is today the city of Cambridge, a city I know well since my five children were all born there in what was the Plain of Illum at a place called Cherry Hinton.
Q: (Altair) Did Troy ever exist as a town?

A: Yes

Q: (Altair) And if so, where was it located?

A: England.

Q: (Joe) "Where Troy Once Stood"

(Chu) Yeah, we knew that one.

It was here that the legendary siege of Troy took place, a siege precipitated supposedly by the kidnapping of Queen Helen of Greece but could it really have been more about the recovery of the Grail that Helle/Kore/Meritaten/Hagar had brought with her to Britain from the Middle East?

I say this because there is a reference in mythology to a prior event that was supposed to have triggered the Trojan War and that is the tale of the 'Apple of Discord'. Quoting from Wikipedia:
In Greek mythology, the Apple of Discord was a golden apple thrown by Eris, the goddess of strife, at the wedding of Peleus and Thetis. She was not invited to the wedding and threw it out of anger to ruin the gathering (after showing up uninvited). It sparked a vanity-fueled dispute among Hera, Athena, and Aphrodite that led to the Judgement of Paris and ultimately the Trojan War. In common parlance, the "apple of discord" is the core, kernel, or crux of an argument, or a small matter that could lead to a bigger dispute​
Strange that the quote above makes reference to the "apple of discord" as being the core, kernel, or crux of an argument given that the C's referred to Kore/Hagar (the last living member of the Perseid family) as being linked to "blue apples" and the "trampled leaves of wrath":

Q: (L) So, he returned the ark to the so-called angel. And then, he gave something to someone else. Previously, when I asked about this, you said that what he gave to Esau was "trampled leaves of wrath, the blue apples incarnate," and remarked that I should inquire into the "core meaning."

A: And who was "Kore?"

Q: (L) Was this Abraham's daughter?

A: It was the last living member of the Perseid family.

Q: (L) Was it a male or female?

A: Female.

Perhaps the 'Apple of Discord' also provides us with an echo or link to Sindy S-R's post above where she mentioned the 'Apple of Eden' sought by the Templars and the Assassin sect in the video game series Assassin's Creed, which my sons were great fans of by the way:​

What you describe reminds me a lot of the movie and video game series Assassin's Creed.
In it, the bad guys, “The Templars,” and the good guys, “The Assassin Sect,” seek to recover “The Apple of Eden” (a technology from ancient civilizations that was used to manipulate the masses).
It's all too coincidental for my taste...

Could the Apple of Eden really be a cover for the Apple of Discord and by extension the Grail? Was the discord referred to in the tale of the Apple of Discord not have between three Greek goddesses but between Nefertiti and her daughter Meritaten instead:

Q: (L) Going back to this person - the last living member of the Perseid family - who was handed over by Abraham in his Jacob persona to someone else, who was this person handed over to and why?

A: For protection from the fury of "Helen." [Nefertiti)

Q: (L) So, there is a reflection of that in the story of Hagar the Egyptian. Who was she handed over to?

A: The "Dragon Slayers." [MJF: who may have been the Tuatha de Danann of Irish folklore]

For a long time I wondered whether the dating of the Siege of Troy could tie in with the timeframe of Meritaten since I thought that the Trojan War had occurred long before her time. However, the C's have since confirmed that Troy was in existence up until 1100 BC, thus long after Meritaten's death:​

(The Mexicans) Was Troy the dominating force in the region before its fall?

A: Yes

Q: (The Mexicans) Did it get destroyed during the events of 1627/8 BC? [MJF: The eruption of Thera that eventually brought around Akhenaten's downfall.]

A: No. 1100 BCE.

So, if she had come to the British Isles as legend holds, the numerous members of her large Egyptian/Canaanite retinue would have had plenty of time to establish a dominant and advanced civilisation here. The $64,000 question is though, could she have brought the Grail with here and, if so, with the fall of Troy did it subsequently find its way back to Israel?

As you correctly point out, the C's referred to this object, the Grail, as the Mother stone or Merkhaba. It was this object or device, which transported (functioning as a TDARM) a group of Kentakkians to Earth over 80,000 years ago. However, the device on Oak Island was supposedly buried there originally 10,000 years ago by the Lizzies and, as you pointed out, the hypnosis session with Vincent Bridges spoke of the Ark dating back to 10,000 BC, which is long after the destruction of Kantek, so in my view it could not have been the Ark that saved the group of Kantekkian refugees:
VB: Is this the Ark?

Laura: Yeah... it...

VB: Ark. Noah's Ark. The Ark of the covenant... the Ark of Time...

Laura: The object of which you speak, goes inside... it's the field...

VB: Now, keep looking, and stay outside the mirror; could you show Laura, so she can describe it for us, where, in time, this machine originates?

Laura: Ah! That's odd. The answer comes as 10,000 BC.

This object or device (if it is appropriate to call it that) was clearly an STO creation (the 'Gift of God'), whereas the C's informed us that the Ark (a power cell that seems to have had an inbuilt AI capability) was an STS created device:
A: It was finally understood by "Moses" that the danger of the object was greater than the ability of descendants to resist corruption. He handed it over to those who had created it.

Q: (Galahad) Was it STS or STO forces that created it?

A: STS.

Q: (Galahad) So, the Ark was an object created by STS. Did this amount to some sort of realization on Moses' part? Did he start to wake up?

A: Yes. The story of the "contending with the angel" was the significant turning point as well as the moment of return.

In my view, the Knights Templar discovered both the Grail and the Ark, whilst they were in the Holy Land, as perhaps indicated by their role in the building of the Cathedral of Notre Dame de Chartres and the sculptures found inside that church:
Q: It seems that the Templars were in charge of building the Cathedral at Chartres, and there is a tableaux on one of the porches of Melchizedek and the Queen of Sheba. Equidistant between them is the Ark of the Covenant in a cart. Melchizedek is holding a cup that is supposed to be the Holy Grail. Inside this cup is a cylindrical object of stone. What is this?

A: Greater sight.

Q: What?! (A) Is it a symbol or a device?

A: Why cannot it be both?

Q: (A) It can be both, but is it both?

A: Yes.

Q: (A) So, it is a device for greater sight like a crystal ball, yes?

A: Only when utilized exactly precisely.

Q: How do you execute something with this device?

A: Why should one wish to "execute" someone with this device?

Q: We don't understand...

A: Laura did say "execute."

Well the Israelites did use the Ark to execute people (their enemies) as the Bible tells us, so this suggests to me that the device the C's have in mind here is the Grail and a skull made of pure crystal is after all a stone as well as being a symbol too (think here of the pirates 'skull and crossbones' flag and skulls being used by philosophers as memento mori). The C's said the device could be used for obtaining greater sight like a crystal ball when utilized exactly precisely, which suggests to me something akin to lensing or focusing:
Q: (L) We were making some theories about this object that Vincent Bridges was looking for - the Ark of the Covenant, or the Holy Grail. I believe that we understand that this is an object that is of great usefulness, some kind of lensing device. Is that correct?

A: Yes.

This makes me wonder whether communication with the Lizzies posing as Yahweh via the Ark in the Tent of the Tabernacle was achieved by using the gold elements of the Ark along with the power cell retained inside it and the Grail deployed as a fine tuning device - think of the old crystal radio set and consider this in line with the C's quote I gave above.

But could a crystal skull like Baphomet be used as a focusing device rather as one might use crystal ball. Judging from what the C's said here, the answer is probably yes:
Q: (L) Who carved the crystal skull found in Central America? [MJF: This is a reference to the famous Mitchell-Hedges crystal skull]

A: Mayans.

Q: (L) What was the purpose of that skull?

A: Study brain. Long message follows pause: Now: skull was to learn about soul; reflective remolecularization imaging. Grays do this with abductees.

Q: (L) Through what kind of instrument.

A: Energy focusing.

And as the C's said about the Grail, it was tuned by consciousness:
A: It is a trans-density device.

Q: (L) Well if 4th density STS are so technically advanced how come they can't just make another one?

A: This item is tuned by consciousness. It is of such a frequency that STS gifts are not capable of such precision. The range includes multiple possibility vectors. STS operates within a narrow range.

The Mitchell-Hedges Skull is no doubt much younger than Baphomet if the latter is the Mother Stone from Kantek and probably far less sophisticated, but when it was examined by Hewlett Packard in the 1970's, it was observed to have been fashioned not only from a single crystal of quartz but also from piezo-electric silicon dioxide, precisely the type of naturally occurring quartz that is so widely used in modern electronics. It means that the skull has a positive and negative polarity, like a battery, and is capable of generating electricity.

The experts also identified other extraordinary properties of the skull with regard to its interaction with electricity and light. The authors report:​

The Hewlett-Packard team also examined the skull's unusual optical properties, such as its ability to channel light from below, so that it is focused out through the eye sockets. Apparently, this is only possible on account of the orientation of the skull's optical axis...

What this means is that light actually travels quicker through the skull in one direction than another. Jack explained that not only was the skull able to perform these incredible tricks with normal multi-directional light, but also that if you shine directional or polarized light at the skull, not only does the light pass along its optical axis quicker than in any other direction, but the skull also actually rotates that light as it travels along its axis.

So, the C's say the Mitchell-Hedges Skull made by the Mayans was used for reflective remolecularization imaging by energy focusing. This seems to take us back again to the subject of TDARMs. Could the skull have therefore been used for materialisations, for example, just as the Merkabah or Matriarch Stone was in its guise as the 'Gift of God':
A: Multiple. In ancient times this object was called the Gift of God. It was used to aid in the manifestation of all things needful for existence.

Q: (A) Manifestation? (R) That sounds like Merkabah. The Matriarch Stone. The Mother Stone. (A) So it can do all kinds of things ... (R) Is this the Merkabah?

A: Mother Stone, yes.

Q: (R) So that's it! This is the real meaning of the Merkabah. Pretty neat. And there is only one of these available. This puts a very strange aspect on all this. (L) Where was it created?

A: Kantek.

Q: Was this what was used to help transport the Kantekkians to Earth at the time of the destruction of their planet?

A: Some of them. Others transported by Lizards.

If there were other such stones (crystal skulls) like that of the Mayan Mitchell-Hedges Skull (whose ancestors were Atlanteans remember and masters of crystal technology) could they have been made in imitation of the Grail, which is why perhaps it became known as the Matriarch Stone? Could the Grail have even been the centre of a network of such skulls acting as a kind of mother board? If so, it may explain the Mayan legend of the 13 Crystal Skulls where at a pivotal time in humanity's history, the 13 crystal skulls will be reunited to awaken a new era - transforming from an old paradigm into a new world - see: 13 CRYSTAL SKULLS

Is the Grail the 13th Skull perhaps? Curious that Native American Cherokee Medicine Man, Harley Swift-Deer Reagan is quoted as saying: "The skulls were kept inside a pyramid in a formation of tremendous power known as the Ark."

As to crystal skulls being used as a means of communication from higher realms, I would not rule this out based on what the C's said here​

Q: (L) Well, just to get the question on the record, it was are all these people making all this stuff up about what the Merkabah is?

A: But then again, what is made up and why? It is not so simple!

Q: (L) In ancient literature, something called a Merkabah is talked about, but the definition of this extremely mysterious thing has been lost down through the centuries. There have been many "explanations" from such sources as the Midrash - Jewish commentaries - but there is even argument there. It seems that, even then, nobody knew what it was. But now, we have all these New Age folks coming along who have decided that they know what it is, and it is variously described as rotating double tetrahedrons...

A: If no one knows what it is, that is as good as any other explanation.

Q: (L) I want to know what the ancients who wrote about it meant? What is the definition of the word as the ancient writers used it?

A: The original definition predates this.

Q: (L) What is the original definition that predated the ancient writings that we have access to?

A: What do you think?

Q: (L) What? Well, it's a curious word because it is composed of two words or even three: mer kaba or mer ka ba. If we think of it as three-part word, we have the Egyptian Ka, which is like the astral body, and the Ba which is similar to the Ka. I guess you could think of them as the astral body and the genetic body. Then there is the Ab which is the sort of principle element of the life in man - like the part that is of God or the soul. The Ab was represented as a red stone. It was the part of the man that expressed desire, lust, courage, wisdom, feeling, sense and intelligence. So, all of them together sort of expresses an abstract creative principle. Kaaba is Arabic for cube, and it is the square stone building in which the Black Stone is housed in Mecca. It was supposed to have been built by Ishmael and Abraham. So, with Mer, Ka, Ab, and Ba, we have a cube made up of the principal parts of the etheric self, and housing a stone. Soul stone? Mother stone?

A: By god, she's got it!

Q: (L) Okay, we've got the soul or mother stone. Or the mother of all stones. Now that we have a definition, what was it?

A: The Matriarch Stone.

Q: (L) Is the Matriarch Stone the one in Mecca?

A: Symbolism reigns supreme here.

Q: (T) Is this also the Philosopher's Stone?

A: "Stone" to those you perceive as ancients symbolized communication from "a higher source."

Q: (L) What is it about a stone that made the ancients associate it with communication?

A: Radio waves.

Q: (L) How did radio waves interact with the stone? Were they recorded by the stone; transmitted by the stone?

A: Transmission.

Q: (T) Crystals are stones. Crystals are used for radio transmissions.

A: Yes.

Before anyone mentions it, I appreciate that this applies equally to quartz rocks or stones like those used at Stonehenge in England.

If the Knights Templar possessed the Grail (Baphomet) as the C's claim, is there any legend connected to its finding in the Middle East? Well there is I believe in the curious Templar tale of The Skull of Sidon and the Lady Maraclea.

The documentation of the story dates back to the 12th century, but the version that is most known is the version written by Walter Map(p), a medieval writer who was a courtier of King Henry II of England, and the eventual Archdeacon of Oxford. Map(p)'s version of the tale is as follows;​

“A great lady of Maraclea was loved by a Templar, a Lord of Sidon; but she died in her youth, and on the night of her burial, this wicked lover crept to the grave, dug up her body and violated it. Then a voice from the void bade him return in nine months time for he would find a son. He obeyed the injunction and at the appointed time he opened the grave again and found a head on the leg bones of the skeleton (skull and crossbones). The same voice bade him guard it well, for it would be the giver of all good things, and so he carried it away with him. It became his protecting genius, and he was able to defeat his enemies by merely showing them the magic head. In due course, it passed into the possession of the Order.”

Hmmm... the head would be "the giver of all good things". Sounds a lot to me like the Matriarch Stone or the Gift of God which the C's said could be "used to aid in the manifestation of all things needful for existence."

This tale was retold during the trials of the Knights Templar by an apostolic notary named Antonio Sicci, as 'evidence' of the accusations levied against the Templar Order - accusations of heresy, blasphemy and witchcraft, and the worship of some head-like artefact.

In The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail (Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln, 1982), it is suggested that the inquisitors of the time would have realised that the woman, the young Lady of Maraclea, may have likely been of Armenian heritage, which could link back to the Armenian Church and it's Paulician sects, who practised Catharism. The church believed that those who practised Catharism also practised black magic and necromancy, which is why the church had made such an effort to wipe Catharism from history, and which is why the story was deemed probable, and guilty. Some who have read and studied this story have deemed it a possible origin of the 'skull and crossbones' insignia, which has it's own defined roots in the history of the Knights Templar. Others who have studied this story may notice similarities with other stories in myth and legend - such as the story of Medusa, who's severed head was used as a weapon by Perseus, and then the goddess Athena

As to the real secret of Rennes-le-Chateau, a village located deep within Cathar territory in a region once heavily associated with the Knights Templar, was it encoded by clever pentagonal projection by Rosicrucian artist Nicholas Poussin in his celebrated painting of The Shepherds of Arcadia?

1768794690173.png


Look closely and you will see that the mirror image view of the painting, as proposed by the C's, displays a skull. Did Poussin, the 'Keeper of Secrets' know something about the Grail, which he hid within his painting?

So, where is the Grail or Baphomet. My educated guess is that it is somewhere within a cave in the French Pyrenees and not far perhaps from the location of the enclave of alchemists (Perillos?) who for all their higher density abilities cannot find it due to its occlusion:​

Q: What was the head worshipped by the Templars that was supposed to have been called "Baphomet?"

A: Seer of the passage.

Q: What does that mean?

A: Remember, secrets of Knights Templar were kept in caves guided by eternally burning lamps.

Which finally reminds me of a brief mention in the transcripts of a cave in the Pyrenees wherein a great treasure may be found:
Session 24 October 2009:
Q: (A***) Phew! (laughter) (Joe) Bananas are evil for everybody! (L) NO! (Joe) They're from South America and were developed by Quetzalcoatl, who dropped down out of his spaceship and said, "Eat these!" (laughter) (Scottie) Bananas were invented by the Atlanteans! (Joe) Look at them! They're yellow and bendy! (P*****) I would like to ask a question about this dream Laura had about this treasure in a cave in the Pyrenees.

A: Wait for more on that. Not time yet.

Are we fast approaching the time when Laura should revisit that dream I wonder?
 
Look closely and you will see that the mirror image view of the painting, as proposed by the C's, displays a skull. Did Poussin, the 'Keeper of Secrets' know something about the Grail, which he hid within his painting?
I'm seeing a dark shadow of a pelvis, the center of which is where the man kneeling hands join. It looks like there is a lighter shadow of a devil on top. The men, of course, are looking downwards (towards the Earth) instead of upwards - where they might see "the Devil" if did.

.....Alternatively, the lighter shadow on top of the pelvis looks like the face of a chipmunk facing forward (with a crown) :lol: It's 'crown' would be the 'face' of the Devil. I'm not seeing the skull. I must have missed something.
 
I'm seeing a dark shadow of a pelvis, the center of which is where the man kneeling hands join. It looks like there is a lighter shadow of a devil on top. The men, of course, are looking downwards (towards the Earth) instead of upwards - where they might see "the Devil" if did.

.....Alternatively, the lighter shadow on top of the pelvis looks like the face of a chipmunk facing forward (with a crown) :lol: It's 'crown' would be the 'face' of the Devil. I'm not seeing the skull. I must have missed something.
sacred sacrum !


inviting inquiry into hidden patterns, sacred geography, and the convergence of divine feminine energy at liminal places


The term ilium has two primary meanings, one anatomical and one historical/mythological, which occasionally intersect in esoteric or symbolic interpretations.

In anatomy, the ilium is the large, fan-shaped part of the hip bone, forming the upper portion of the pelvis. It plays a key role in supporting the spine and enabling movement, and is associated with grounding, stability, and the foundation of the body. In some holistic or energy-based practices, the pelvis and hip bones are symbolically linked to creativity, sexuality, and ancestral memory, though the ilium itself is not a central symbol in traditional esoteric systems.

Historically, Ilium is the Latin name for the ancient city of Troy, derived from Ilus, the mythical founder of the city. In classical literature, especially in Virgil’s Aeneid, Ilium represents the ancestral origin of the Romans through Aeneas, giving it a symbolic weight as a cradle of civilization and a site of destruction and rebirth. This mythic resonance has led to metaphorical uses in literature and modern esoteric thought, where Ilium can symbolize the fall of empires, hidden knowledge, or the cyclical nature of history.

Trisentona was the name of a prehistoric river goddess venerated at the confluence of three rivers—the Trent, Tame, and Mease—in what is now England. The name is believed to mean "thrice-beloved" or "greatly beloved," with the "tri-" prefix reflecting both the sacred number three and the merging of three rivers. This triple confluence was seen as a spiritually significant site, where the goddess embodied the life-giving and unifying power of water. Over time, the name Trisentona evolved into "Trent," the modern name of the river. The goddess represents an early form of the triple goddess archetype found in many ancient European traditions, symbolizing fertility, unity, and the divine feminine.
 
Look closely and you will see that the mirror image view of the painting, as proposed by the C's

You need to be less literal. Those were only symbolical clues from the Cs!! Here's the painting. Now, spot the similarity between the Last Supper by Leonardo Da Vinci and Poussin's The Shepherds of Arcadia.

The-Shepherds-of-Arcadia-Poussin-Nicolas-1638-3.jpg


I think you all need to be less chasing the red hering and getting more grounded on reality. If there is ever a 4Dtechnology like that "available", it is useless if you can't see reality as it sees itself. Or as the Cs said:

Life is religion. Life experiences reflect how one interacts with God. Those who are asleep are those of little faith in terms of their interaction with the creation. Some people think that the world exists for them to overcome or ignore or shut out. For those individuals, the worlds will cease. They will become exactly what they give to life. They will become merely a dream in the "past." People who pay strict attention to objective reality right and left, become the reality of the "Future."
 
Back
Top Bottom