
THE DICTATOR #BUKELE IS AMUSED BY THE SERIOUS ACCUSATIONS AGAINST HIM!
When mockery replaces a response...
By Reyzope
03/12/2026
While an international group of experts presented a report to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights @CIDH detailing arbitrary detentions, torture, forced disappearances, and deaths in custody under the Bukele government, the dictator's reaction was not an explanation, a detailed refutation, or a gesture of institutional concern. It was mockery.
"It's funny," he wrote on social media, referring to the NGOs, journalists, think tanks, and media outlets that have covered the allegations. According to Bukele, they are all acting "in unison" and in a "coordinated" manner, insinuating the old conspiracy narrative about George Soros' financing.
But we are not talking here about minor criticism or just another media controversy. The report presented to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights argues that the state of emergency has led to systematic human rights violations that would fall under Article 7 of the Rome Statute, that is, in the category of crimes against humanity.
This is an extremely serious accusation.
Faced with something like this, any democratic government would respond with data, investigations,
transparency, or at least with language of institutional responsibility. Bukele chose another path: sarcasm and mockery.
He does not dispute the facts. He does not respond to the figures. He does not explain the deaths in custody or the allegations of torture. Instead,
he turns the debate into a conspiracy theory in which all critics are part of the same "Sorosian plot."
The strategy is well known: discredit the messenger to avoid responding to the message.
But there is something deeply disturbing about the tone chosen. Because when a president declares himself "amused" by accusations of torture, disappearances, and deaths in custody under his government, the problem ceases to be merely political.
It becomes moral.
The allegations may be investigated and confirmed over time. That is what international bodies are for. But the attitude toward these allegations reveals something immediate: the way a dictator relates to the gravity of what is at stake.
And when the most serious accusations a state can face provoke laughter in those who govern it, the signal to the country and the world is not one of strength.
It is one of contempt for the seriousness of the allegations.