Hi @seek10 and all.
This is the continuation of our tangent discussion on the Romantic Novels thread here.
Seek10 you asked this question:
The C's never said this and when I asked you to please point to the the session where you were quoting so I could read the context of it, you quoted the following:
The above quote or exact excerpt from the sessions above that you replied with, is not what you originally said in the manner of quoting the C's, and this is why when I tried to find "You don't need anybody to evolve by yourselves" in the sessions, I was not able to find it because it doesn't exist. That is the main problem: saying you are quoting the C's when that is not the case.
As for the interpretation of the answer that the C's gave to Laura within the context of the session you quoted above, which is apparentely based on your reply what evoked you to write the aforementioned misquote, it is of my opinion that this not what they meant by that answer as you interpreted and not what they mean in general over the whole volume of the transcripts either. No one can do it alone, and even as a groups all over the world, just by ourselves only; this is because we do need some help evolving, but the catch here is that this sort of help seems to be given by DCM/Prime Creator when sincerely asked with the "unweighted choice" of Working on ourselves and changing our assumptions of inner and outer worlds realities--the "catch 22" to experience the Wave in a positive way in relation to what I quoted before about with "whereas when one has complete faith and multi-density understanding, their activities are indeed truth and useful as prescribed and this is the correct way to pursue them." This creation of a conduit with the help of ourselves in the "future" through by our own efforts and network group efforts to meet the conditions "simple and karmic understandings" to be halfway on the process of the creation of his "hatch"/conduit due to having received the necessary "antenna's" to tune to this "help", is I think further explained by reading this quote:
FWIW, I hope this reply assists in clarifying my thinking for you and others.
This is the continuation of our tangent discussion on the Romantic Novels thread here.
Seek10 you asked this question:
I mean that you said that "the C's said" this and then used quotation marks with the following on page 35 of the Romance Novels thread:I am trying to understand what is you are trying to say. I am sorry for that. Do you mean to say I took C's quote out of the context when they answered a specific question( in your opinion)?
In this sense, I find it interesting C's saying "You don't need anybody to evolve by yourselves" and it is all there in the architecture of the Human species makeup and triggers.
The C's never said this and when I asked you to please point to the the session where you were quoting so I could read the context of it, you quoted the following:
Q: (L) Well, I don't exactly get what you mean. The whole point of this article is to say that ET's who abduct people are here to help us evolve and that it is only us, if we have dark and dirty unconscious minds, who perceive them as negative.
A: Wrong, you do not need "help" evolving, nor does anything else.
The above quote or exact excerpt from the sessions above that you replied with, is not what you originally said in the manner of quoting the C's, and this is why when I tried to find "You don't need anybody to evolve by yourselves" in the sessions, I was not able to find it because it doesn't exist. That is the main problem: saying you are quoting the C's when that is not the case.
As for the interpretation of the answer that the C's gave to Laura within the context of the session you quoted above, which is apparentely based on your reply what evoked you to write the aforementioned misquote, it is of my opinion that this not what they meant by that answer as you interpreted and not what they mean in general over the whole volume of the transcripts either. No one can do it alone, and even as a groups all over the world, just by ourselves only; this is because we do need some help evolving, but the catch here is that this sort of help seems to be given by DCM/Prime Creator when sincerely asked with the "unweighted choice" of Working on ourselves and changing our assumptions of inner and outer worlds realities--the "catch 22" to experience the Wave in a positive way in relation to what I quoted before about with "whereas when one has complete faith and multi-density understanding, their activities are indeed truth and useful as prescribed and this is the correct way to pursue them." This creation of a conduit with the help of ourselves in the "future" through by our own efforts and network group efforts to meet the conditions "simple and karmic understandings" to be halfway on the process of the creation of his "hatch"/conduit due to having received the necessary "antenna's" to tune to this "help", is I think further explained by reading this quote:
June 9, 1996
Frank, Laura
[...]
Q: (L) Okay. Let's toss that. My question is: is the information we are receiving similar to what Al-Arabi calls an 'opening?'
A: Yes.
Q: (L) You say that you are unified thought forms in the realm of knowledge.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Al-Arabi describes unified thought forms as being the 'names of God.' His explication seems to be so identical to things you tell us that I wonder...
A: We are all the names of God. Remember, this is a conduit. This means that both termination/origination points are of equal value, importance.
Q: (L) So, it is a blending of the aspects of God?
A: No.
Q: (L) What do you mean? Does this mean that we are a part of this?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, it has to do with...
A: Don't deify us. And, be sure all others with which you communicate understand this too!
Q: (L) What quality in us, what thing, enabled us to make contact. Because, obviously a lot of people try and get garbage.
A: You asked.
Q: (L) A lot of people ask!
A: No they don't, they command.
Q: (L) Well, a lot of people do ask or beg or plead, but they get all discombobulated with the answers.
A: No, they command. Think about it. You did not beg or plead... that is commanding. After J.W. left, purification began.
Q: (L) This recent 'awakening' or period of seeing things with such clarity, as they really were, and the whole picture of the interactions between people and how truly ugly it can be. I plunged into a terrible depression. I needed to get my balance from seeing so much all at once. Can you explain to me what was going on?
A: Growth.
Q: (L) I tried to share this perception with other people, and almost without exception, when I said to people that I was finally seeing things in their true state and it was NOT a pretty picture, they all said "well, you are obviously seeing this through the eyes of some major spirit possession!" Why would they say this?
A: First of all, it is not correct to perceive "everything in such darkness and gloom, etc." That is merely the result of a cocoon of falsehood being removed. Celebrate the balance. Don't mourn the death of an illusion of an imbalance.
Q: (L) Where do I go from here? Where do we all go?
A: Everywhere.
FWIW, I hope this reply assists in clarifying my thinking for you and others.