What if everything you don't like is deepfake? I know that sounds a bit facetious, but there's no reason to think it's a deepfake.
Last edited:
2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!
- Thread starter Ruth
- Start date
What if everything you don't like is deepfake? I know that sounds a bit facetious, but there's no reason to think it's a deepfake.
It's pretty clear that, from the beginning, neither Trump nor anyone who supported him had the necessary knowledge or general perspicacity about their enemy to have even a small chance of prevailing. Then again, few people have.
Last edited:
SOTTREADER
The Living Force
Nobody cared to ask any deep or meaningful questions. Asking these questions resulted in you being branded one with no faith.
Everything turned to a Hollywood script. They all thought Trump will prevail because well, he's the hero. You ask how will he prevail, show me the details, show me a semblance of a plan? They all say the plan is deified and can only be revealed at the absolute last moment, like a twist in a movie.
From the very beginning... What was the plan?
The only plan I saw was what played out. Get people into Washington DC and have them worked up to the point they storm an inanimate building.
But alas, they get into the building... Their objective, as if in a video game. What happens next?
They seat there, take selfies, congratulate themselves and then I guess it's time to go home.
What a plan!
If there were any other plans, I failed to see them!
It's hard to believe Trump failed to think this through. I just find it unfathomable. Like, what was he expecting? Where were his 4D chess moves! Like he thought he could just stand there as if in some boardroom negotiation, dangle protestors in front of the PTB and expect that will be enough!
I'm not sure what to think.
That was another line of BS easily sold to the acolytes. When talking about the die hard Trump supporters, it all goes back to "Q", which was an obvious psyop from the get-go.
Atomas
Jedi
@Joe I found him just a few days ago as potential internet source of information and by looking at his bio at Wikipedia, work experience at his website site, some of his tweets on politics where he supported Trump and backed claims on election fraud, also the fact that his account at twitter was permanently banned, I thought this guy may have some credible contacts and links he get information from to share with others. What have I, and maybe others, hugely missed? I guess I (some of others) may have missed something big as you call him a fool and not credible. Maybe the reason is due to some past events, his way of self-expression, too much play on visibility, etc.? I'm not defending him at all, it's more about potential gaps in my filtering rules for trusted info sources o the internet
SOTTREADER
The Living Force
Taking a step back from this whole situation and in general our ability to assess it in real time, the lessons I've learnt are
I think ultimately this is a good example of why the Cs don't always hand out answers on a platter and push for people to use their brains.
Anyways that's my read. I just hope people aren't here based on nothing but predictions and a promise of a better future if they maintain faith in the predictions. Like, this is meant to be a place led by critical thinking and analysis with small doses of faith and superluminal inspiration from the C's.
Anyways that's how I've always taken it and that's how I approach it.
- It's definitely worth assessing how much one believes something based on analytical thinking Vs faith
- We may not have behind the scenes knowledge but to use an example, the way Laura and co have gone about revealing the unseen reality is such that without even seeing it, it becomes almost self apparent it's there. Yes part of it requires faith but I feel that everything is rooted in analytical thinking and assessment.
- With Trump my view was a lot were relying more on faith and dismissing analysis. It was quite disheartening when the only argument some fell on was their interpretation of the prediction from the C's. I can go back copy / paste some responses but think that'd be OTT
I think ultimately this is a good example of why the Cs don't always hand out answers on a platter and push for people to use their brains.
Anyways that's my read. I just hope people aren't here based on nothing but predictions and a promise of a better future if they maintain faith in the predictions. Like, this is meant to be a place led by critical thinking and analysis with small doses of faith and superluminal inspiration from the C's.
Anyways that's how I've always taken it and that's how I approach it.
Given the kind of hysterical stuff he was posting to his "followers", he was never a serious person, but rather a clear liability for the allegations of fraud to be taken seriously. Same goes for Sidney Powell and her "kraken" nonsense. Neither of these people actually cared about the task at hand (exposing fraud), they only cared about the sounds of their own voices. They should never have been allowed to represent anything relating to vote fraud.
Gorbachev, 'once America's best friend in Moscow' dissolved the Soviet Union not least in the interest of the deep state...
Really? Killing a dead bird is victory? One can't tell this even to a 3-year-old. He/She will say 'Dad! This is Stupid!'.
It seems, some common sense still there. Democrats Eye Vote On Impeachment As Early As Next Week | ZeroHedge
Other possibilities are they are in delusional euphoria or they are still shivering in their pants in an out-of-control fashion OR something else going on behind the scenes which we are not aware - emergency or some X factor.
There's more than a good bit floating around about it possibly being a deepfake - maybe we are seeing what we want to see and this is wishful thinking - but there's enough about some of these that are a bit uncanny...
Look at this: AI Can See Clearly Now: GANs Take the Jitters Out of Video Calls
The Trump videos have the same sort of visual effects that the above GAN outputs do. It does not even have to be fully synthetic - say, somebody did a mish mash of copied words and him saying it, then fed it through to smooth over copy/paste artifacts.
Pearce
Jedi Master
Last night I had two dreams, one picked up where the other left off. The major themes were: music, dancing, spirit, family, home, and most of all, the prominent display of the word halcyon.
hal·cy·on
/ˈhalsēən/
Adjective.
denoting a period of time in the past that was idyllically happy and peaceful.
Noun.
a mythical bird said by ancient writers to breed in a nest floating at sea at the winter solstice, charming the wind and waves into calm.
Perhaps a good omen, at least, one can hope so.
hal·cy·on
/ˈhalsēən/
Adjective.
denoting a period of time in the past that was idyllically happy and peaceful.
Noun.
a mythical bird said by ancient writers to breed in a nest floating at sea at the winter solstice, charming the wind and waves into calm.
Perhaps a good omen, at least, one can hope so.
From what I've seen, he just cannot back up his claims with solid evidence. Just talking. For example, "Pence e-emails" that he revealed recently: he provided some PDF file with some mail-like content, that cannot be verified (it is possible to verify if e-mail was sent by domain via DKIM signature, but raw messages are needed). Recent Hunter Biden's laptop screenshots? It could be anyone's computer with some random porn photos... And he keeps people preoccupied with hacking some bogus websites
Lumiere_du_Code
Jedi Council Member
May be. I just suggested, not making a statement.
Why did you decide that I don't like it? I noticed in the video a black "neckline / cutout" right where Trump's neck adjoins to the collar and tie at one of video moments. Maybe it's just an artifact due to processing / compression.
Last edited by a moderator:
There was nothing wrong with keeping the Cs prediction in mind, but it HAD to be tempered by our understanding of those kind of predictions (they can change) and, most importantly, evidence that the prediction was likely changing as events unfolded AND, even more importantly, our understanding of the extent of the grip that the PTB have on shaping the narrative and the extent of their control over the political establishment and the ways and means they have for imposing that control (massive blackmail, up to and including REAL threats of death that most politicians KNOW they can and will act on if necessary).
Put all that together and it was pretty clear that the task of exposing election fraud and having it accepted was a VERY difficult one, that would be resisted with all of the power and control that the 'deep state' has.
So I don't fault anyone for hoping that Trump would prevail, he has, after all, represented the only significant resistance to the orwellian plans of the deep state. Giving up that temporary, fleeting hope is difficult, but we have to keep the bigger picture in mind and realize that this is a process of global (or even cosmic) proportions and it has only really just begun. There will be more, and more difficult, trials for us to go through, and I expect most of those trials will be in the form of simply watching the STS mindset manifest itself fully across the world, and in particular the Western world.
That process will be painful and depressing at times, but we need to remember that what we are watching is the collapse of a corrupt global system. As it collapses, a new world will progressively take its place, or so the theory goes.
So it really IS time to "watch the show" and realize that the WAY we watch, i.e. how we interpret it, is all important - remember the observer function creating order through the process of observation. So remember this 'big picture' during the difficult times and that, in the end, we were all made for these times, primarily to support each other and 'anchor a frequency' of truth and love. Regardless of whether or not that has some effect on a 'new world' (as suggested) I think it is probably THE best approach to take as the world OBJECTIVELY descends into chaos and generalized madness. After all, we don't want to be caught up in or 'pulled under' by that kind of nutty, chaotic energy.
So let's keep perspective, keep our senses and keep the faith that our while our 'cosmic' perspective on this entire situation is still theoretical, the practical manifestation of that perspective makes it probably the best one to have. So let's support each other in that and seeing things as they are or as "the universe" sees them, rather than how we would like them to be. At the end of the day, during macro-cosmic collapses or changes like this, we really have not other option than to believe that "the universe" (or some kind of intelligence) knows what it is doing.
Last edited: