2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

While meditating and praying this morning, a thought came to me. Regardless of how things ultimately play out, a good part of the emotional reaction to the events of the past couple of days - Trump's apparent concession announcement in particular - is down to anticipation.

We wanted to believe, so badly, that he had a Plan, that the White Hats would ride in at the last minute and save the day. We became emotionally invested in this outcome, despite ourselves - our rational brains telling us this didn't look likely, but being overridden by our emotional centers. The possibility that the cabal would consolidate their rule and bring down the totalitarian boot is simply too horrible to contemplate. This emotional investment in a particular outcome then led directly to wishful thinking, where rather than use our rational faculties to perceive reality as accurately as possible, we used them to look for reasons why reality is as we want it to be. That anticipation therefore led to a kind of passivity.

The opposite of this is intention - thinking torwards something, without anticipating it. How might things have played out differently if, instead of anticipating a last minute Trump victory, we (not just here on the forum, obviously) turned our thoughts towards the intention of defeating TPTB be by strengthening the movement towards a better timeline? Without anticipating what, exactly, that would necessarily look like?

For one thing, there would have been less passivity, since instead of waiting for the cavalry to come, we would be working each moment towards a better future. For another, the emotionally driven thought loop between anticipation and wishful thinking would have been disrupted, enabling us to more accurately perceive reality in any given instance. And finally, there would be less of an emotional reaction to any given setback - the events of the day would be accepted with greater serenity, in turn helping to maintain a rational hold on things.
 
There's more than a good bit floating around about it possibly being a deepfake - maybe we are seeing what we want to see and this is wishful thinking - but there's enough about some of these that are a bit uncanny...

Except that Trump posted it on his twitter feed today. But maybe his twitter account was taken over after it was taken down for 12 hours, and maybe Trump himself was assassinated and all future appearances of him will be a body double. I could go on, but you get the point I hope.
 
Something else that exposed Wood as a shill. And his shilling worked, it seems.

The Daily Beast!
That's a far left rag.

 
Really? Killing a dead bird is victory? One can't tell this even to a 3-year-old. He/She will say 'Dad! This is Stupid!'. :lol:

It seems, some common sense still there. Democrats Eye Vote On Impeachment As Early As Next Week | ZeroHedge


Other possibilities are they are in delusional euphoria or they are still shivering in their pants in an out-of-control fashion OR something else going on behind the scenes which we are not aware - emergency or some X factor.
FWIW someone told me that if he's impeached twice he won't be able to hold public office again, but as far as I can tell that's not the case automatically. From what I can gather the senate could vote to bar him from holding public office again as part of the impeachment process, so maybe they're thinking they can get enough republicans to vote with them to do that with the current "crisis".

Added: a second impeachment would also be a way to "twist the knife" since he would be further "disgraced" if he was thrown out of office days before the end of his term.
 
Last edited:
It's pretty sad to see from the outside that the election was rigged from the beginning till the very end. And even the German media keeps on spinning on as crazy and misquoting Trump as usual. I can perfectly understand Trump when he didn't call for martial law and steps back. Heck, I cannot even imagine what he was going through the last 4 years, getting misquoted, betrayed and attacked from all sites. Imo he did his best uncovering the rigged election, but the deep state was too strong and many other people were too weak to withstand and to step up for the truth and to protect him.

Even when he finally resigns he still gets hunted and well, I cannot put it in words how deeply flawed the media and system got. But it comes as no surprise considering the last 20 to 60 years.
 
I think ultimately this is a good example of why the Cs don't always hand out answers on a platter and push for people to use their brains.

Anyways that's my read. I just hope people aren't here based on nothing but predictions and a promise of a better future if they maintain faith in the predictions. Like, this is meant to be a place led by critical thinking and analysis with small doses of faith and superluminal inspiration from the C's.
This is a good point, and I caught myself becoming lazy in this regard. When they revised the prediction to 50/50, the momentum was already there and I had convinced myself that he would make it; if I prayed enough and sent him my energy it would push him over the line. Nope.

As far as my dreams are concerned, I've become interested in the fact that they seem to foreshadow certain events or emotional states that I will encounter in real life. This has given me pause to consider many of the dystopian dreams I've had over the last couple of years, and yes most of them have some sort of esoteric element. The purpose of sharing the "mantis" dream was to give a certain insight into my mental landscape. It was a way of connecting emotionally with certain readers who have experienced similar dreams or read paranormal accounts and stories and understand the context of my emotional state. Dreams are metaphorical and use a lot of symbolism; whether or not I was being "beamed" by an actual mantis is kind of tangential, it's the essence of the energy exchange which interests me. And my perception is that the same essential energy which was behind my conception of the "mantis" is behind the takedown of Trump. And as far as I can tell the level of "mantis beings" and "lizard beings" is the ultimate reality which infuses and is behind all of this, whether I can personally interact with them or not. Strictly speaking though, this was a personal sidebar which really has no place in a thread dedicated to a topic as mundane as the US election, and I probably should've kept my mouth shut.

As far as bridging the two worlds, I previously described it as being an outcast of both and not fully belonging to either; caught in between. The world in which I am writing this is the lower world of materialists, where things proceed largely according to mechanical laws, and from which spirit has largely been stolen. It has its purpose, but my sense is that it has passed its sell-by date, and is either going to blow up or become completely insufferable at some point. To me it is a dead world. The higher world is full of mirage and trickery, but is also brimming with potential and represents the hope of the future. IF I were a shaman in this time, I would perceive my role to open the door to the higher world so that people can escape from the closing of cyclical destruction. But Laura is the shaman, I'm just here for additional entertainment:lol:

Shamanic meanderings aside, in conclusion I believe that the universe helps those who help themselves. "Changes after turmoil" are not going to whisk anyone away, but may meet you halfway. That's going to involve some combination of physical, legal, emotional, etc conflict and lots of it.
 
Last edited:
Gorbachev, 'once America's best friend in Moscow' dissolved the Soviet Union not least in the interest of the deep state...
Really now, can these old age politicians not play chess or go fishing rather than pollute the digital space with foul byproducts of slow mental digestion? Maybe the elite world is becoming too small and it is starting to suffer from the village syndrome.
 
Given the kind of hysterical stuff he was posting to his "followers", he was never a serious person, but rather a clear liability for the allegations of fraud to be taken seriously. Same goes for Sidney Powell and her "kraken" nonsense. Neither of these people actually cared about the task at hand (exposing fraud), they only cared about the sounds of their own voices. They should never have been allowed to represent anything relating to vote fraud.
Thank you, I guess I understand what you mean by that. They are personalities which prefer talking about something rather than actually doing something about that, right? However, by imagining of being in their shoes, I don't rule out possibility that they may consider their talking an important "mission" as they share their "inside" knowledge, rumors, latest hearsay with their followers/public who are interested in this subject and may not follow MSM. They pretend to be alternative source of information with another angle of view (i.e. as far as it relate to the US Elections). It's kind of one of the mouthpieces, among the others, for a wider audience to share what they may know, believe or even are paid for. The question probably would be more about how much truth comes out of these sources and how much they can be trusted by those who are looking for answers. I completely agree with you on this that talking and doing are two different things, no doubt about this. But if they were just speaking truth, wouldn't that be important for the goodness and objectiveness in general?
The thing that they cannot be trusted to do something real or perform investigation in parallel to talking, might be another issue. Not everyone is capable of digging deep, but the persons in question may have connections to those who can. That's why important question is whether information from those individuals can be trusted in general, or not. Have you personally spotted something coming out of them which would convince you that they are unreliable, just from an information source perspective?
 
Okay, I've just listened to the beginning of this interview so far, but here's a conversation about what Trump still might do.

Alex Newman is again being interviewed by Greg Hunter -- I posted another such Hunter interview with Newman concerning Newman's book about the considerable role of the Council on Foreign Relations dating back to Mao and Chiang Kai-shek.

Anyway, let's hear what these two have to offer us here, what their conjectures are:

 
From what I've seen, he just cannot back up his claims with solid evidence. Just talking. For example, "Pence e-emails" that he revealed recently: he provided some PDF file with some mail-like content, that cannot be verified (it is possible to verify if e-mail was sent by domain via DKIM signature, but raw messages are needed). Recent Hunter Biden's laptop screenshots? It could be anyone's computer with some random porn photos... And he keeps people preoccupied with hacking some bogus websites :mad:
Thank you, got it. I saw the so supposed HB screens in his account without convincing evidence that this information really belong to HB. It looked quite strange to me and it appears that's his usual style. It's much clearer now.
 
I hope this doesn't come across as criticism, because I am extremely grateful to those who find and post links to videos and interviews, but at the same time, a lot of these are 1H+ long and honestly, after attempting to listen to some of them, it amounts to nothing more than two people engaging in a crap ton of wishful thinking, with nothing of real substance, which in turn translates into wasted time and energy for those of us who do not have the time to devote 16 hours a day to listening.

It would be externally considerate, before posting such an interview or lengthy video, that one could watch the thing in it's entirety, and then decide if it's worth posting, along with perhaps a dissection of the points being presented.
 
Back
Top Bottom