Because the commenter is clearly not making an effort to understand, or is intentionally trying to obfuscate.
There is no "issue". The PCR test has been around since the early 80's. The reason it was so quickly prepared was due to it being a tried and tested process for detecting viral DNA. As Ian pointed out, technology has advanced to the point now where viruses can have their DNA completely sequenced before a PCR test is formulated for mass usage.
As stated so well by the C's, sometimes sitting on the fence makes you the perfect target for snipers.
No, we don't need to "be careful" with it at all. It's obvious BS for those with eyes to see, and there's enough information to review as is without undiscerning fruitloops with a solipsism fetish pushing that nonsense. Every time I check this thread I'm amazed by the amount of garbage that's given air. I think it's about time we locked it and require any extra posts to have moderator approval before being added. Some people here need a reality check by the looks of things.
Congratulations on being successfully vectored into throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
Hi Ryan
Whilst I understand you feel frustrated, this forum is a place of open debate and sharing. So please do try and remember that when you post.
Every time I check this thread I'm amazed by the amount of garbage that's given air. I think it's about time we locked it and require any extra posts to have moderator approval before being added. Some people here need a reality check by the looks of things.
Any suggestion that such an important and popular thread as this should be in some way censored isn't constructive or appropriate. Yes we could all do well to remember that in a time of fast moving day-to-day developments we need to remain as objective and removed from the eye of the storm as possible, and indeed exercise extra due diligence before racing to post every new issue we come across as if were gospel. But we also need to remember everyone without exception is under great stress and strain and doing what they can to stay sane and orderly and it is our duty of care for each other not to lash out, whatever is going on in our own lives at the time.
No, we don't need to "be careful" with it at all. It's obvious BS for those with eyes to see, and there's enough information to review as is without undiscerning fruitloops with a solipsism fetish pushing that nonsense.
Yes we do need to be careful. Its called external consideration. Making an argument is different from getting into an argument and whatever the strength of ones case one never succeeds in bringing truth to the surface by resorting to insults.
I do acknowledged you have grounds to be frustrated (and the horror show that's going on in Australia would be enough to sorely test the patience of a saint!) So for those members who haven't read it before, it might be worth revisiting t
his post from Niall back in March on the dangers of getting suckered into fixating on the counterproductive dead end of there being no virus.
I would suggest that much of this false debate has emerged from the information vacuum and deliberate misinformation that existed for far too long, most likely a result of the system's attempts to limit access to the full virus sequence because those who did see it too often openly stated it showed significant signs of human manipulation - and that indeed it was not 'novel' in the strict meaning of the natural term. As a result many authorities attempted to block access or obfuscate and this has in many ways helped fuel the theory that actually there is no virus to begin with. FWIW.
There is no "issue". The PCR test has been around since the early 80's. The reason it was so quickly prepared was due to it being a tried and tested process for detecting viral DNA. As Ian pointed out, technology has advanced to the point now where viruses can have their DNA completely sequenced before a PCR test is formulated for mass usage.
You might want to rethink this paragraph. There are indeed issues such as:
1. Process inventor Kary Mullis stating on numerous occasions that PCR is not a diagnostic tool and if used as such will provide false data.
2. The entire pandemic was fundamentally built on the back of Drosten PCR test which was thoroughly debunked back in November 2020 by some of the worlds leading experts in an
independent peer review in which they outlined no fewer than 10 major scientific flaws. This test has been used worldwide to justify the need for further lockdowns etc.
3. The protocol setting of PCR levels at 40+ cycles by bodies such as the CDC and WHO guaranteed a test-demic because all literature associated with the product as well as multiple studies reveal this leads inexorably to a tidal wave of false positives.
No its not PCR's fault. Yes there is a problem with PCR used this way. I'm sure that's what you meant but perhaps it would have been better to focus on this instead of claiming what you did, don't you think?
