UOs in the sun's corona

Joe

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Some Unidentified Objects (not sure if they're flying or not) for y'all to ponder.

http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/01/18/behind/euvi/195/1024/20100118_053530_n7euB_195.jpg

http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/01/21/behind/euvi/195/1024/20100121_025530_n7euB_195.jpg

http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/01/21/behind/euvi/195/1024/20100121_012530_n7euB_195.jpg

http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/01/21/ahead/euvi/195/1024/20100121_004530_n7euA_195.jpg

They're unidentified because Nasa has yet to make any comment on them.

Can someone grab them and post them here?

So far my best guess is that it's venus, because venus is always playing tricks on us!
 
Can't open pages (showing error) but I guess you mean on this one (pics attached) and some original film clips with same thematic can be found on page:

http://www.realufos.net/2010/01/ufos-near-sun-nasa-soho-images.html

It seems that area in sun's vicinity is getting more and more interesting starting with first photos of anomalous objects from beginning of 2000 of (as Cs describe it) one of two control centres of 4D STS for solar system (unfortunately the other one on the outskirts of our solar system we still did not trace it, although Cs said and pics prove it that many bases are scattered all over our small solar system including moon....), now if we know that main comand and monitoring centre is pretty near to the sun, could it be that some part of Wave STS contingent is allready in our neighbourhood waiting for the rest of the gang close to "the comand post"??
 

Attachments

  • april 2000 large object in sun corona.jpg
    april 2000 large object in sun corona.jpg
    8.4 KB · Views: 14
  • ufo in sun corona january 2010.jpg
    ufo in sun corona january 2010.jpg
    27.2 KB · Views: 30
Can't open pages (showing error).

It would be nice if the Chinese government release the picture taken during the eclipse that show the anomalies. So far nothing as leaked out but who know, they may be tempted to follow NASA is lead or leak.
 
jubazo said:
starting with first photos of anomalous objects from beginning of 2000 of (as Cs describe it) ... although Cs said and pics prove it that many bases are scattered all over our small solar system including moon....)

jubazo, could you quote where the C's said the pics prove this? I do not recall it. Thanks!
 
Perceval said:
Some Unidentified Objects (not sure if they're flying or not) for y'all to ponder.
Ironic that when you click on the links you get "Object not found!" error. Coincidence? :)
 
anart said:
jubazo said:
starting with first photos of anomalous objects from beginning of 2000 of (as Cs describe it) ... although Cs said and pics prove it that many bases are scattered all over our small solar system including moon....)

jubazo, could you quote where the C's said the pics prove this? I do not recall it. Thanks!

Just to clarify, what jubazo actually said was that 'Cs said and pics prove [the existence of bases in our solar system]', so I don't think she is saying that the C's mentioned any pics, just that the C's had mentioned bases and these pics happen to reinforce that. Not that it wouldn't be nice to see a collection of the transcript excerpts about bases, though...

Edit: corrected jubazo's gender -- sorry jubazo!
 
Shijing said:
Just to clarify, what jubazo actually said was that 'Cs said and pics prove [the existence of bases in our solar system]', so I don't think he is saying that the C's mentioned any pics, just that the C's had mentioned bases and these pics happen to reinforce that. Not that it wouldn't be nice to see a collection of the transcript excerpts about bases, though...

You're right, thanks for the clarification!
 
Laurentien said:
Can't open pages (showing error).

Very interesting. They must have removed the images. I think I have copies. I'll post them
 
Perceval said:
Laurentien said:
Can't open pages (showing error).

Very interesting. They must have removed the images. I think I have copies. I'll post them
Yeah, very weird. I'm not sure what their naming convention is for these pics, but if you replace the "n7eu" text in the URL's from the first post with "n4eu" pictures do come up.

The "behind" pictures for Jan 21st appear to be at this link:

_http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/01/21/behind/euvi/195/1024/

but they all have that "n4eu" in them. I don't know if they renamed them or replaced them. I pulled up one of the pics using the text replacement but I didn't see anything funny just on quick perusal.
 
anart said:
jubazo said:
starting with first photos of anomalous objects from beginning of 2000 of (as Cs describe it) ... although Cs said and pics prove it that many bases are scattered all over our small solar system including moon....)

jubazo, could you quote where the C's said the pics prove this? I do not recall it. Thanks!

Well, nothing about pictures, but I believe the reference is to the following:

December 4, 1999
[quote author=Transcripts]
Q: Now, according to some information posted on the Millennium Group site, there are some photographs that seem to indicate that there IS something anomalous in orbit around the Sun... maybe a new "planet, " or something. Is there a new object in our solar system in a close orbit around the sun?
A: Maybe.
Q: There is conjecture that this object appeared around the time of the passage of the Hale Bopp coment. Is that the case?
A: No.
Q: Is this object that is possibly in orbit around the sun, is it a natural or artificial construction?
A: Latter.
Q Who constructed it?
A: Orion STS.
Q: What is it?
A: HQ.
Q: The Orion Headquarters?
A: For your star system.
Q: Okay, you said "maybe" to this being a "new object." When did it arrive, or when was it placed there?
A: You measure "time" linearly.
Q: Can we give it a "linear" definition, or does it come and go through some sort of portal in terms of time, in a cyclical way, or a variable and selective way?
A: Yes, but it arrived at that coordinate 26,730 years ago, sort of.
Q: What is its orbit, or distance from the Sun?
A: 31,230,000 miles.
Q: How large is this object?
A: 1005.6 kilometers diameter.
Q: What is the general configuration or shape of it? (A) A sphere, a ball, a disc, a cylinder?
A: Partial sphere, hexagonal.
Q: (A) Is it in a circular orbit or an elliptical orbit?
A: Circular. Rotation is altered by guidance system, gravitationally powered.
Q: What is its angle to the plane of the ecliptic?
A: 21 degrees.
Q: Okay, you said that it is "headquarters," so that answers what it does. And, it did not arrive with Hale Bopp. Just off to the side, was there REALLY a Hale Bopp companion - this rumor just won't die!?
A: No.
Q: Now, what do these Orions DO in this object? I mean, isn't it a little warm so close to the sun? I know. That's a stupid question. Space is cold.
A: Yes, and study magnetism for answers.
Q: Do Orions LIVE in this object?
A: Close.
Q: Do they use it as a transfer portal?
A: Yes.
Q: So, it is a doorway, so to speak?
A: Doorway as are many.
Q: How many of these objects are in our solar system?
A: Two.
Q: Where is the other one?
A: Outside, on the fringe of the solar system.
Q: Is the government, or some faction or department, aware of this object?
A: Yes.
Q: Anything else you can tell us about this object?
A: No need. [Break to look at photographs.]
Q: Now, in terms of the photographs of this object, it looks sort of like two cylindrical objects with a dome or energy flow arc at the top. Could you tell us what we were seeing.
A: The object.
Q: Was it in two parts connected by some sort of energy arc?
A: No.
Q: What was this arc looking part? Part of the spherical part?
A: Your visual perspective.
Q: Are the two cylindrical parts aspects of the hexagonal shape extending down from a spherical cap?
A: Close.
[/quote]
Now as a digression, the first time I read this (and ever since then) I was and remain troubled with the reported size of 1,000 km. This is ginormous. Its hard to believe that something of this size that is so close would not have been seen. Now one could argue that TPTB have seen it but are hiding the pictures, but there are literally millions of amateur astronomers, some that have serious equipment, that would be quite capable of identifying an object of this size. Although, being a 4D "object", it perhaps has properties we do not understand that have the effect of making it essentially invisible.

Maybe the Orion confederation bought the cloaking device from the Klingons... ;D
 
Thanks rs & shijing, I had in mind that particular session sorry for not having quotation, I have only Croatian translation of the same.
 
That description of the object sounds so much like a Death Star, though not round but hexogonal. All hail Darth Vader:)
I suspect being so much close to sun, its very hard to capture it by amatuer astronomers. A size of 1000 Kms appears huge but compare that to the distance between Sun and Earth and the obvious glare from Sun rays which can provide all kinds of visual distortions.

-Sid
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom