UOs in the sun's corona

[sophiesworld]

Re: Huge cube caught by SOHO

Interesting, at first look more like some error in the picture, nut than if you look more carefully, object even has a shadow. Thanks for posting sophiesworld, intriguing video.


Here are some old pics from soho, still puzzling my mind:

And here's another strange animation showing a black square appearing quickly. Looks like it was intended to cover the strange cube, who knows?

Edit=Quote

 

[mkrnhr]

The appearence of the black square in the same place where appears the other square looks like it shows there is a reccurent problem with the camera or the acquisition system.

 

[whovian]

Re: Huge cube caught by SOHO

I don't know if this has already been post, but I didn't find any reference, so I'm posting it here:

The video below shows a strange cubic structure next to the sun, caught on SOHO. I would appreciate to hear what you think about it.

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/63316/another_huge_cube_on_soho_27_dec_2010/

Interesting, at first look more like some error in the picture, nut than if you look more carefully, object even has a shadow. Thanks for posting sophiesworld, intriguing video.


Here are some old pics from soho, still puzzling my mind:

Look familiar???!!!

Shot at 2011-01-14

Crop circle from 8-16-2010

 

[Joe]

Re: Huge cube caught by SOHO

Look familiar???!!!

Shot at 2011-01-14

Crop circle from 8-16-2010

Good catch, and very interesting!

 

[Joe]

SOHO (or rather members of the public poring over SOHO images) recently spotted their 2000th comet. Something else of interest they note:

http://soho.esac.esa.int/hotshots/2010_12_28/

It took SOHO ten years to spot its first thousand comets, but only five more to find the next thousand. That's due partly to increased participation from comet hunters and work done to optimize the images for comet-sighting, but also due to an unexplained systematic increase in the number of comets around the sun. Indeed, December alone has seen an unprecedented 37 new comets spotted so far, a number high enough to qualify as a "comet storm."

 

[Joe]

Apparently we're also experiencing a "sun-diving comet storm"!

Jan. 12, 2011: The sun has just experienced a storm—not of explosive flares and hot plasma, but of icy comets.

"The storm began on Dec 13th and ended on the 22nd," says Karl Battams of the Naval Research Lab in Washington, DC. "During that time, the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) detected 25 comets diving into the sun. It was crazy!"

Sundiving comets—a.k.a. "sungrazers"—are nothing new. SOHO typically sees one every few days, plunging inward and disintegrating as solar heat sublimes its volatile ices. "But 25 comets in just ten days, that's unprecedented," says Battams.

"The comets were 10-meter class objects, about the size of a room or a house," notes Matthew Knight of the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona. "As comets go, these are considered small."

According to James McCanney the reference to "icy comets" is nonsense and Nasa knows it. Comets are "dry hot rocks"

Here's a gif of one of the comets "diving" into the sun. Looks to me like caused that big CME! (Coronal Mass Ejection)

Since sun spots are said to lead to CMEs, and sun spots happen in cycles of 11 years, I wonder if they're caused by cycles of comet clusters, or maybe a cycle of the sun's own internal activity "attracts" the comets.

 

[Woodsman]

Re: Huge cube caught by SOHO

Look familiar???!!!

Shot at 2011-01-14

Crop circle from 8-16-2010

There may be some deliberate familiarity here on the part of the crop glyph makers, but I want to point out that this particular design is quite out of character with glyphs which I associate with 4D STO.

The C's push boundaries and leave riddles which are designed to lead away from linear 3D thinking. This obvious design of a flying saucer, by contrast, is like a child's picture book representation meant for easy consumption. Much like the 'Gray Alien Head' glyph.

Seems like hyperdimensional STS dis-info, (or even 3D military disinfo) to me, perhaps expressly made to link with the SOHO image.

I don't put much stock in that kind of thing.

 

[shijing]

Since sun spots are said to lead to CMEs, and sun spots happen in cycles of 11 years, I wonder if they're caused by cycles of comet clusters [...]

That's something that I had wondered also.

 

[Z...]

This obvious design of a flying saucer, by contrast, is like a child's picture book representation meant for easy consumption. Much like the 'Gray Alien Head' glyph.

Seems like hyperdimensional STS dis-info, (or even 3D military disinfo) to me, perhaps expressly made to link with the SOHO image.

I don't put much stock in that kind of thing.

FWIW to me this doesn't at all look like obvious design of a flying saucer.
Rather two aligned planetary bodies, one smaller then the other and something between them.
It also made me think of the head of Caduceus.

 

[Mikey]

The video below shows a strange cubic structure next to the sun, caught on SOHO. I would appreciate to hear what you think about it.

This and similar "cubic phenomena" (actually they are square) seem to be errors in the encoding of the images, probably caused by faulty transmissions from the satellite. They can be seen rather frequent in the SOHO imagery.

Here are some old pics from soho, still puzzling my mind:

Those are streaks from overexposing the CCD image chip. See very last image on the Wikipedia site. Another example.

Look familiar???!!!

Definitely, but maybe not related. See previous links and image.

 

[mkrnhr]

The image from "Shot at 2011-01-14" is clearly saturated. It may be a brillant comet who knows. There is a real object as we can see from the non saturated parts. When a CCD camera pixel is saturated it affects the adjacent pixels. For example, when you take an image of a star or any point-like source, you are supposed to have a point. But if the source is too brillant and the pixel is saturated, the adjacent pixels will react (charge transfer) and instead of a point you will have a line (a few pixels in the same direction).

In the above mentioned image, you have six lines of saturated pixels, the lower pixels, with more saturation in the higher pixels than in the lowest, thus the inverse triangle shape.

When we look at an electronic image like in this case, the first thing to check is the levels of intensity. Of course the object signal have to be higher than the noise signal, but also, it has to be smaller than the maximum range of the camera. If the maximum level is reached (saturation) than nothing can be said. One can experiment with a webcam by pointing a lamp or a laser pointer into it an see the result.

 

[whovian]

The video below shows a strange cubic structure next to the sun, caught on SOHO. I would appreciate to hear what you think about it.

This and similar "cubic phenomena" (actually they are square) seem to be errors in the encoding of the images, probably caused by faulty transmissions from the satellite. They can be seen rather frequent in the SOHO imagery.

Here are some old pics from soho, still puzzling my mind:

Those are streaks from overexposing the CCD image chip. See very last image on the Wikipedia site. Another example.

Look familiar???!!!

Definitely, but maybe not related. See previous links and image.

I think that some of you are missing the point here. I understand that the image may not represent the actual object in the picture, but regardless that is how it appears to our eyes! And in 3D, that is all that matters. This is all an illusion. I don't feel that the object is that important, because in the 'here and now', it really has no meaning for us. However, the fact that I was able to recall the crop circle from memory and instantly associate it with an object in a completely different photo is the key. It means that whomever is creating the crop circles, and for whatever reason (positive or negative), they are having an impact in implanting information in our subconscious. IMO, that is the entire purpose of the crop circles. To arm us with the information for difficult times ahead by subtly reprogramming our consciousness. In 3D, this is accomplished through the subconscious mind.

 

[Joe]

I think that some of you are missing the point here. I understand that the image may not represent the actual object in the picture, but regardless that is how it appears to our eyes! And in 3D, that is all that matters. This is all an illusion. I don't feel that the object is that important, because in the 'here and now', it really has no meaning for us. However, the fact that I was able to recall the crop circle from memory and instantly associate it with an object in a completely different photo is the key. It means that whomever is creating the crop circles, and for whatever reason (positive or negative), they are having an impact in implanting information in our subconscious. IMO, that is the entire purpose of the crop circles. To arm us with the information for difficult times ahead by subtly reprogramming our consciousness. In 3D, this is accomplished through the subconscious mind.

You could also just have remembered it in the normal way.

 

[Dez]

Re: Huge cube caught by SOHO

I don't know if this has already been post, but I didn't find any reference, so I'm posting it here:

The video below shows a strange cubic structure next to the sun, caught on SOHO. I would appreciate to hear what you think about it.

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/63316/another_huge_cube_on_soho_27_dec_2010/

Interesting, at first look more like some error in the picture, nut than if you look more carefully, object even has a shadow. Thanks for posting sophiesworld, intriguing video.


Here are some old pics from soho, still puzzling my mind:

Look familiar???!!!

Shot at 2011-01-14

Crop circle from 8-16-2010

I think you'd be shocked at just what this image represents if.....you turned it upside down...

(can you say, MotherShip approaching a small, yet familiar planet you may have heard of?)

 

[Woodsman]

Okay. Let's examine this glyph with a little more depth. . .

So here's the image in question. (Above)

It may not be a spaceship, but it looks like a deliberate shape designed to trigger viewer recognition within the "image stocks" of human culture. It could be a set of flight wings on a pilot's uniform, or inverted, a "pyramid of the sun" kind of deal. By contrast, genuine crop circles from 4D typically embody a very different type of design ethic. When they first showed up, they were really new and quite unlike anything we were familiar with in our everyday world. They were never direct representations of objects we might recognize. Instead, they give us puzzles. Some of the objects have been speculated to be slices of three dimensional objects passing through a two-dimensional plane. Often they contain geometric shapes which carry mathematical puzzles. They are rarely cartoons designed to look like known Earthly objects or symbols.

Secondly, this glyph looks to have rendering errors. . .

I know that many glyphs considered genuine contain aspects of non-symmetrical design, but those aspects, to me, seem to carry a different look and feel. They appear deliberate. This design, by contrast, just seems to me like somebody tried to make shapes out of keyboard characters and got confused. I don't know how else to quantify it; a tech geek's attempt to be mysterious using a computer-assisted crop circle making machine. If it comes from STS through technology, then pixels, deliberately controlled on/off logic, seems to be very much in character, (if our own public arena technology and controlled industry provides a mirror of STS thinking and higher technology, that is). So to me, this image looks like a digital creation, envisioned on a monitor using rows of pixels than it does an analog thought pattern. (The C's describe crop circles as thought patterns.)

Take the following example. . .

And here's what the C's had to say on this spectacular cartoon of an alien head. . .

Session Sept. 14, 2002

[...]
Q: (L) Okay. I think that answers the question. Now I want to ask about this crop circle supposedly that was created here on or around Aug. 15, 2002 and I guess the first thing I'd like to ask is "whodunnit"?
A: It was produced via 4th density technology.
Q: (V) STS or STO 4th density technology?
A: STS.
Q: (L) Okay. You said via 4th density technology. However you did not say via 4th density beings...
A: Correct. There has been much advancement in 3D realm tech due to 4D interaction.
Q: (V) Between whom and 3rd density?
A: Consortium.
Q: (L) Well, I noticed that last year, on or about the same date, the crop circle appeared with the woman's face - the Chilbolton Crop glyph - and the so called signal thing. Was that also the production of 4th density?
A: No.
Q: (L) I noticed also that Aug. 15 is, in fact, an ancient feast day of the Mother Goddess and therefore the appearance of the face last year was somewhat appropriate. In fact, I had a dream to go with that one. This new one, produced on almost - if not exactly - the same date, seems almost like it is a response to the face image last year. The message deciphered from this new crop circle is - and Ark has checked it and confirmed the deciphering - "Beware the bearers of false gifts and their broken promises. Much pain but still time - and then an unknown word - there is good out there. We OPpose deception. Conduit closing. (bell sound)." What is the meaning of this message?
A: The first thing that was intended was to demonize the crop circle phenomenon. The second thing was to give those who are susceptible the impression that their favorite gray aliens might be "good guys." The third thing intended was to send a message of doubt directly to this room.
Q: (J) 'The conduit is closing.' Since the C's have talked about creating a conduit from the beginning, they are trying to convince us that the conduit is closing. What was the garbled word, was it "believe"?
A: It was believe. However the glitch was due to the application of the technology. This provides the clue to the STS source.
Q: (J) Okay so their amateur fumbling caused the glitch. (A) The human element is probably the glitch in the software. There was a noise...
A: Wishful thinking will get ya every time.
Q: (L) So they were wishfully thinking that they had everything perfect and they didn't. (A) Still I want to know if physical characteristics of this circle were matched with the physical characteristics of what would be considered an authentic crop circle?
A: They can get close. But again, there are differences. These can be detected if one is aware and looking.
Q: (J) Is there any criteria you can give us to measure against, is there anything in particular to look for? Or would it pop out as something strange that doesn't make sense in a crop circle if you examine it? Or is there actual...
A: One thing to look for would be growth disruptions to the area. Real circles do not disrupt the creative principle.
Q: (J) Now would this lack of disruption of the creative principle apply to crop circles created by STS, STO, or both?
A: STO.
Q: (J) So STO doesn't disrupt the life cycle but, if it were STS then it would change it. That would make sense. Well, there again the reported effects of contact with STS: the coldness, the burning, the whole negativity of it. That would logically disrupt the life cycle. As for the way that they do this: you say that it was directed from 4th density. Do they actually come in and have any kind of physical apparatus in the vicinity to do this?
A: It was not done from 4D.
Q: (J) I'm not talking about the one that we're talking about this time, I'm talking about when STO creates a crop circle do they have a physical...
A: Real crop circles represent thoughts from 6th density unified thought realm.
Q: (J) Okay. So that's why they don't disrupt the growth; because they're using thought forms as opposed to STS technology, either the 3D or 4D or what not. Have any crop circles been made by 4th density STS directly?
A: Very few and quite ineptly up to this point.
Q: (V) Can you tell us an example of another one, if there is only a few?
A: One comes up as a series of "symbols" similar to occult cipher. Check the data.
[...]

I'm not saying that I'm 100% sure I'm right. Maybe I'm totally off on this, but based on my instincts and the patterns we know about, I'm willing to file this image under STS "fun and games".