Laura said:
Yeah, it's like the astrophysicist guy mentioned by Psyche and Megan above: it didn't work for him. My guess is that there was something really flawed in the way he went about it. Though I am impressed by Megan's little experiment with adding back a few carbs in the way of sauerkraut and having such good results. Maybe our bodies are just so messed up that eating properly isn't going to work if we don't get some other things sorted along with it.
I've had the experience of having a few more carbs and then when I went back to near-zero carbs, everything worked better. In fact, we've got some home fermented sauerkraut making as we speak. Should be ready in a couple of weeks and then we'll be following Megan's example and having a spoonful with our meals to test it out. Since it is home-made, we know what's in there and that the fermentation is natural. Besides, I just love sauerkraut with pork...
There are so many facets to gut health that I feel overwhelmed at times, but then I start trying to think in common sense terms. Taking things apart scientifically can be fascinating, but when you try to put everything back together so you can use it, the parts may not fit and you may be missing a lot of parts you never knew were there because you never knew to look for them. I think that is a problem with Jaminet's work, although I do find some of his insights to be very useful.
So looking at it from common sense, we have this "small" intestine that's very long and this "large" intestine that is quite short. Both add weight and take up space and need energy to operate, even if most of the work being performed within is accomplished by microorganisms. If you don't eat any plant materials then the large intestine doesn't have much to do, which starts to make it look like a waste of resources, something that evolution should eventually reduce to an organ more like what carnivores have.
My sense, though, is that because we do still have the colon, it
is very useful (and gives us advantages over carnivores) and we just don't know what all it's used for. So, after cutting out plant foods for a while to try to control pathogenic microbe activity, I have been trying to feed my colon, but selectively and not too much.
In spite of its name, it isn't all that large, especially if you don't cram it full of waste plant material and stretch it. It's physical configuration seems to be a fermenter, so I feed it indigestible fermentables -- "prebiotics" or foods that pass through the small intestine undigested and then fuel fermentation in the colon. I also have been including a probiotic -- sauerkraut -- to hopefully keep the pathogenic bacteria at bay while the whole thing starts to do some much needed maintenance.
The carb intake from the prebiotics and probiotics is negligible, so this should not affect gluconeogenesis. If Jaminet is correct, the carb content of the low-carb veggies amounts to less than the energy consumed by the (glucose hungry) immune system to keep the bacteria in check.
Properly "tuned," the colon would seem to have the potential to produce a wide array of nutrients and other substances that the human body itself is unable to make. For all I know (and I don't know much at this stage), with the right substrates going in the colon could be able to make vitamin C or something better, and
that is why we don't make it ourselves any more. I can also imagine how, by outsourcing some processes to microorganisms, people can adapt to different foods and regions and health threats by changing what's in their guts (and not just in the colon). After all, microbial evolution can take place much faster than human evolution. There is so much we don't know.
As I have suggested before, the gut with its various components is our energy converter, that "understands" the outside world and "digests" food information to provide the metabolic substrates that we require, while blocking harmful information, and yet providing for adapting over time to changes in what is available from outside. It is not a fixed, blind process.
To me there seems to be an analogy with our minds, and how we go about taking in non-food information effectively, and I think it could be more than just an analogy. What particularly strikes me is the way the gut is described in
The Polyvagal Theory as a sense organ. It seems to be involved in more than just taking in food. I do wonder (and this is purely speculative) if all those microorganisms are somehow involved in a networked way with this sensing function as well. They are said to outnumber our own cells 10 to 1!
That said, I think I am going to try some pork with my sauerkraut, and see if the pork doesn't taste better.