Hi Team,
I've been deliberating where to post this but figure as 353 was the catalyst, here's as good a place as any.....
Anyhoo, without all the backstory an interesting experience occurred the other day upon switching on the laptop (the main PC that I use). As I was fluffing around waiting for it to boot up I happened to notice that the clock was reading 3:53, which I thought was rather odd seeing as it was mid-morning?
While I was wondering to myself how the internal clocks timezone setting may have changed overnight, I also realised that this wouldn't explain the error as the deviation wasn't in a multiple of 30 or 60 minutes?
It was then that I had the
'Oh, 3535 was a code mentioned by the C's' dim light bulb moment, stared at the clock for another 5 seconds and decided I better go grab my watch and a coffee.
As you can imagine , upon returning the computer is proudly displaying the correct time of 10:16....Hmm that's a new one I think to myself
So, without expounding on all the myriad patterns in the 353535 sequence, I will say that I agree with Laura's assumption below with the exception that perhaps in becoming a 'star' we first need to become 8 (3 + 5) as opposed to 5?
Cyndi said:
Here is Laura's take, as far as I can tell:
Laura:
So far, my take on the 3/5 code, when taken in the context of the discussion where it was bruited, is that we have 3 centers until we work, at which point we can acquire access to two higher centers and become 5, or a "star."
Which is based in part and rather well elucidated in Gurdjieff's law of octaves and stems from the most obvious derivation of 3+5 = 8 and therefore 353535 can be seen as 888.
And from this an underlying order of 2 & 4. Which can be seen via contemplating the sequence 3 to 5 = up 2, 5 to 3 = down 2
Or 3-5 = -2 and 5-3 = +2 (intervals of 4).
Or 3+5+3 = 11 = 2 and 5+3+5 = 13 = 4
And 112 = 22 = 4
And 134 = 28561 = 22 = 4
Or 353535= 888 = 24*
And so on.
*
Note: Regarding the below-
Graalsword said:
ark said:
If you read
Answer to The Ultimate Question Of Life, the Universe, and Everything the answer should be 42. But this may well be a code. 4+1=5 and 2+1=3, so we get 53. Which reversed is 35.
On the other hand, going deeper into
The Code Problem we can find that:
Also, if you do: 3+5+3+5+3+5=24 .. which reversed is 42
As much as I would like to bring 2442 into the discussion I fear it would soon become unwieldy. :/
Soooo, (if anyone is still with me) back to the odd computer clock 353 experience.
A few days afterwards (and just into the New Year) I stumbled across the SOTT article below-
https://www.sott.net/article/338017-Beautiful-crop-circle-makes-an-appearance-in-Antsy-UK
And being a Triskele kind of guy am suitably impressed with the beauty of the symbol and the multi-layered significance of the 'Mothership' symbology.
Now being a hopeless sucker for patterns and glyphs (and crop circles) I had a bit of poke around looking for the best resolution images I could find and soon noted the fallacy in the mirrored 'MOTHERSHIP' (spelled) interpretation of the symbols, because as anyone can see, there are
more than 10 distinct characters around the periphery (of the flower of life).
There's actually 14.
- 10 that appear only once
- 3 that are twinned
and
1 that occurs 4 times**
And then while looking at the positions of the symbol that appears 4 times, it became apparent that it happened to be separated (from itself) by intervals of 3, 5, 3 and 5.
Hmmm,
- 3 leaves
- 14 characters (1 + 4 = 5),
- 3 circles (2 distinct and the 3rd segmented into 33).
- And 33 + 2 = 35
This is interesting...
Now, upon trying to find a suitably oriented plan view of the circle, you'll discover that the best images appeared to be subtly skewed or out of alignment and all seemed to have arbitrarily selected orientations, that I personally couldn't rationalise?
This being the case, please excuse the image below but it has been rotated to better look at the positional relationships.
The orange line displaying the usual vertical axis upon which the image is presented.
The red arrows obviously identify the glyph that appears 4 times and using this as a marker, the image was then oriented to highlight the only complimentary alignment with the leaf axis. This configuration being the most intuitive (to me anyway).
Now moving on to the next image (which is the best I could find @ defining the glyphs).
We need to reorient ourselves so that the previous 12 o'clock is now at approx 4 o'clock- as the starting position to consider the symbol relationships.
Image courtesy-
http://www.cropcirclecenter.com/date/2016/201608.html
Ok, so in the next image we can see the relationships between all the pairs and the rather interesting pattern that appears if we view it in light of G's law of octaves.
ie. At the points where 'Shocks' are required- between Mi - Fa and Ti - Do' (Do' = start of next octave) Or for those of us that think along the lines of the C major scale- between E and F and B and C' (C' = next octave).
So, starting with the 3 / 5 relationship of the 8 tones of the diatonic sequence (whole tone, whole tone, half tone, whole tone, whole tone, whole tone, half tone, octave) We can then identify the 'Shocks' being required where there is an 'absence' of a semi-tone (within the domain of the 12 possible notes).
And if we begin our count @ the identified glyph/leaf correlation (@ the 4 o'clock position) and proceed in a clockwise rotation (in accordance with the glyphs 3535 spacing) around the symbols from C, C#, D, D# to E we find ourselves at the second of the four glyphs- requiring a shock.
If this shock is absent, we find a 'lull' of 5 symbols before coming across the 3rd of the 4 glyphs. At which point we can begin again at note C proceeding to E, where a shock is again required and if not received, we again have a lull of 5 symbols before arriving back where we started.
Now in contrast, if we progress again to the second symbol (of four) and this time imagine the required shock
is input, we then find ourselves
at the first of the 3 other pairs (which I have arbitrarily identified as '4th').
Then continuing the sequence F, F#, G, G#, A, A# to B (next shock req'd - or 12th tone) and imagine this 2nd shock is also input, we find ourselves @ C' (completion of the diatonic scale or 8th whole note) and also
the 2nd of the 3 pairs (which also looks a little like a dancing angel
).
Which is then followed by the 3rd (rather womb-like) symbol and last of the 3 pairs, 5th axial relationship, and coincidentally only other alignment with an axis through the leaves of the 'Mother'.
Which may be note 9?
And the 9th rune is HAGALAZ (the 'Mother' rune), 3x3 (like the leaves).
The first rune of the second Aett (journey).
The 'Hail Stone' or Cosmic egg.
**And symbolised by 'H', the 8th (3 + 5) letter of the english alphabet (as highlighted in motHersHip).
http://www.maginrose.com/runes/exploring-the-runes/hagalaz/
And on that note.
I better go and do some washing
Cheers
