No WWIII. It's in the transcript, I'll digg and copy past it here when found :)loreta said:4th of August England, in 1914, enter in the WWI. Maybe the WWIII will start one 4th of August?
dugdeep said:Bobo said:Perceval said:How do they figure that the year is 2012?
Perceval you mean about the time of the calculation or 18 months from the year 2011?
I think Percival is pointing out, and he can of course correct me if I'm wrong, that there is nothing in this interpretation of the crop circle to indicate the year. Those who are interpreting the cc as communicating a date and time are assuming it means this year. But really that date could apply to any year where August 4th falls on a Saturday, past or future.
what a logic ! because it appeared this year means it depicts this year !Fig. 3 shows that the formation tells the following time and date: 19:45:53 on Saturday, 4th August. And as the formation occurred this year, we assume that this is the year meant by the creators of the formation.
Pashalis said:dugdeep said:Bobo said:Perceval said:How do they figure that the year is 2012?
Perceval you mean about the time of the calculation or 18 months from the year 2011?
I think Percival is pointing out, and he can of course correct me if I'm wrong, that there is nothing in this interpretation of the crop circle to indicate the year. Those who are interpreting the cc as communicating a date and time are assuming it means this year. But really that date could apply to any year where August 4th falls on a Saturday, past or future.
yep. I'm still unable to follow how exactly they came to the conclusion of the year 2012 ?
ahh wait I see:
what a logic ! because it appeared this year means it depicts this year !Fig. 3 shows that the formation tells the following time and date: 19:45:53 on Saturday, 4th August. And as the formation occurred this year, we assume that this is the year meant by the creators of the formation.
wishful thinking or what ?
how am I supposed to take anything they assume about CC even remotely serious when they work like this ?
on the other side isn't it a pure assumption that this has anything at all to do with dates and time?
I don't think it is wise to be certain of any interpretation in regards to Crop Circles especially if a Circle might come
from a hypothetical 6 density STO.
Edit: more
no STO. and I was talking in general and not about this specific Crop Circle.Bobo said:Pashalis said:dugdeep said:Bobo said:Perceval said:How do they figure that the year is 2012?
Perceval you mean about the time of the calculation or 18 months from the year 2011?
I think Percival is pointing out, and he can of course correct me if I'm wrong, that there is nothing in this interpretation of the crop circle to indicate the year. Those who are interpreting the cc as communicating a date and time are assuming it means this year. But really that date could apply to any year where August 4th falls on a Saturday, past or future.
yep. I'm still unable to follow how exactly they came to the conclusion of the year 2012 ?
ahh wait I see:
what a logic ! because it appeared this year means it depicts this year !Fig. 3 shows that the formation tells the following time and date: 19:45:53 on Saturday, 4th August. And as the formation occurred this year, we assume that this is the year meant by the creators of the formation.
wishful thinking or what ?
how am I supposed to take anything they assume about CC even remotely serious when they work like this ?
on the other side isn't it a pure assumption that this has anything at all to do with dates and time?
I don't think it is wise to be certain of any interpretation in regards to Crop Circles especially if a Circle might come
from a hypothetical 6 density STO.
Edit: more
You mean 6 density STS ?
loreta said:It is very strange with the coincidence: the 4th August 1914 was a Saturday....
Sorry, I made a mistake. It was a Tuesday. The 1 August was Saturday...
For me Crop Circles are a mystery and I never try to interpret them: they are what they are, a creation, a picture, a symbol, like a dream. Some tell me a lot, others tell me nothing. It is impossible to interpret a crop circle. It is there, I think so, just for the beauty of it.
"Just remember: All prophecies attached to calendar dates are useless unless you wish to be sucked up by the fourth density STS forces!"
July 14, 1996
lux said:I want to add something.
One time C's interjected the caution...
"Just remember: All prophecies attached to calendar dates are useless unless you wish to be sucked up by the fourth density STS forces!"
July 14, 1996
JayMark said:lux said:I want to add something.
One time C's interjected the caution...
"Just remember: All prophecies attached to calendar dates are useless unless you wish to be sucked up by the fourth density STS forces!"
July 14, 1996
I guess it can't be any clearer.
Pashalis said:no STO. and I was talking in general and not about this specific Crop Circle.Bobo said:Pashalis said:dugdeep said:Bobo said:Perceval said:How do they figure that the year is 2012?
Perceval you mean about the time of the calculation or 18 months from the year 2011?
I think Percival is pointing out, and he can of course correct me if I'm wrong, that there is nothing in this interpretation of the crop circle to indicate the year. Those who are interpreting the cc as communicating a date and time are assuming it means this year. But really that date could apply to any year where August 4th falls on a Saturday, past or future.
yep. I'm still unable to follow how exactly they came to the conclusion of the year 2012 ?
ahh wait I see:
what a logic ! because it appeared this year means it depicts this year !Fig. 3 shows that the formation tells the following time and date: 19:45:53 on Saturday, 4th August. And as the formation occurred this year, we assume that this is the year meant by the creators of the formation.
wishful thinking or what ?
how am I supposed to take anything they assume about CC even remotely serious when they work like this ?
on the other side isn't it a pure assumption that this has anything at all to do with dates and time?
I don't think it is wise to be certain of any interpretation in regards to Crop Circles especially if a Circle might come
from a hypothetical 6 density STO.
Edit: more
You mean 6 density STS ?
loreta said:For me Crop Circles are a mystery and I never try to interpret them: they are what they are, a creation, a picture, a symbol, like a dream. Some tell me a lot, others tell me nothing. It is impossible to interpret a crop circle. It is there, I think so, just for the beauty of it.
JayMark said:loreta said:It is very strange with the coincidence: the 4th August 1914 was a Saturday....
Sorry, I made a mistake. It was a Tuesday. The 1 August was Saturday...
For me Crop Circles are a mystery and I never try to interpret them: they are what they are, a creation, a picture, a symbol, like a dream. Some tell me a lot, others tell me nothing. It is impossible to interpret a crop circle. It is there, I think so, just for the beauty of it.
What makes you think that a crop circle that you identified yourself as being 'symbolic' is impossible to interpret?
If it's a creation, who is the creator?
How would you compare it to a dream? In what way do they resemble?
I'm just curious. This is interesting matter.
Peace.
loreta said:Usually it is very difficult to interpret a dream and I think it is not good to interpreted it because when you interpret something you are loosing maybe the message or the real sense of the dream. Instead of interpreting I think (this is a very personal idea) is better to feel the dream, to listen what really the dream is telling to you. Dreams are made of symbols, mythological characters, symbolic situations, etc. When I see a crop circle I try to do the same as in front of a dream: what this crop is telling me? How I feel in front of him? What situations or symbols are coming to my mind?
Crop Circles are so mysterious, for me. As mysterious as a dream. It is just that. But I remind you that I am very new in this and I am an ignorant, total, about Crop Circles.