2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

[sbeaudry]

Less than 14,000 votes separate B and T in AZ out of about 3.3 million votes. If Dominion is an issue plus manual counts of Sharpie ballots, this may flip. My ballot clearly stated NOT to use anything other than a blue or black ballpoint pen.

Arizona​

98% Est. Vote Counted
Electoral votes at stake: 11

Candidate	Total Votes	% Votes	Electoral Votes

�

Biden (D)	1,652,716	49.5%	11
Trump (R) *	1,638,952	49.0%	-
Jorgensen (LB)	50,522	1.5%	-

 

[SummerLite]

Ha! Wish we could know more.

I checked this out a little further. He says his phone malfunctioned.

 

[Nucifera]

Following these twitter threads and replies is painful. My settings or browser doesn't allow snippets in the forum so I have to click over and I think I'm pretty much done clicking over. There is a reason I don't Twit or Fakebook. Up to y'all but if you would please include a snapshot or description of what you think is important in these tweets I'd appreciate it.
Edit: I click over for a tweet and then it's usually pages of hateful comments. I'm not sure what benefit this is, other than to see the general idiocy and hate among the twitter trolls.

I was in the same position for a while, not knowing that a security add-on was causing it. It just started happening one day, so I didn't suspect a change — not made by me — in my browser security was causing it.

For a while I added screenshots and such. That was significant extra work. Later I found that it also caused cluttered or doubled-looking posts for others. When I figured out that the browser add-on was responsible, I reconfigured it not to do that.

 

[herondancer]

Let's try some critical analysis. Here is a small example of the the type of rhetoric I'm talking about, from a prominent CNN anchor.

May I snip your analysis to use on Twitter? Twatter needs more of this sort of thing.

It would look like this:




(Anonymous) credit to you of course :)

 

[sbeaudry]

I was in the same position for a while, not knowing that a security add-on was causing it. It just started happening one day, so I didn't suspect a change — not made by me — in my browser security was causing it.

For a while I added screenshots and such. That was significant extra work. Later I found that it also caused cluttered or doubled-looking posts for others. When I figured out that the browser add-on was responsible, I reconfigured it not to do that.

I get that and am not trying to be rude, but why should I change my browser/security settings for these twitter feeds? How are screenshots significant extra work? And will these twitter feeds survive a purge or just be dead links? Maybe I just don't get it. Let me know if that's the case.

 

[sbeaudry]

Now less than 13k and .3% margin in Az at 7pmMST

Arizona​

99% Est. Vote Counted
Electoral votes at stake: 11

Candidate	Total Votes	% Votes	Electoral Votes

Biden (D)	1,655,192	49.4%	11
Trump (R) *	1,642,379	49.1%	-
Jorgensen (LB)	50,636	1.5%

 

[Nucifera]

I get that and am not trying to be rude, but why should I change my browser/security settings for these twitter feeds? How are screenshots significant extra work? And will these twitter feeds survive a purge or just be dead links? Maybe I just don't get it. Let me know if that's the case.

Why should everyone do extra work because of your browser settings? How much extra work is it for you to click on the Twitter links if you don't want to change your settings? I don't mean this as rude either, but there are choices within your control.

Have you tried linking Twitter posts with screenshots and embedded links? It's not rocket surgery, but does take at least a couple more minutes than a simple copy/paste — if one is proficient. How many here might feel that the extra effort is justified?

Agreed that tweets could disappear, and that's a good point. This thread or forum could disappear also.

 

[Ursus Minor]

Maggie Magoo (3 year old dog) successfully voted in Santa Cruz County, AZ

UGETube, 10 November 2020

 

[sbeaudry]

Why should everyone do extra work because of your browser settings? How much extra work is it for you to click on the Twitter links if you don't want to change your settings? I don't mean this as rude either, but there are choices within your control.

Have you tried linking Twitter posts with screenshots and embedded links? It's not rocket surgery, but does take at least a couple more minutes than a simple copy/paste — if one is proficient. How many here might feel that the extra effort is justified?

Agreed that tweets could disappear, and that's a good point. This thread or forum could disappear also.

Hypertext copying is easy but doesn't add much. We could post links for days. Screenshots aren't tough, or a short description, but, again, if twitter links are the new thing I'll pass. This has been brought up before. My settings work for me across sites, not just here, and maybe the twitter isn't worth it for me. So, I will take a pass and not bring it up again. Chalk it up for what it's worth.

 

[Nucifera]

Hypertext copying is easy but doesn't add much. We could post links for days. Screenshots aren't tough, or a short description, but, again, if twitter links are the new thing I'll pass. This has been brought up before. My settings work for me across sites, not just here, and maybe the twitter isn't worth it for me. So, I will take a pass and not bring it up again. Chalk it up for what it's worth.

I'm most of the way there with you. Twitter links are common here, and also on numerous other sites I visit. The use is pervasive. Ultimately I decided I was missing too much content and unblocked them. Like you, I appreciate a short description, comment, or some other sort of added value. Where we may differ a little is on screenshots. Due to a browser security issue, I recently spent about three weeks doing screenshots for Twitter postings here, along with having to click the links in others' posts to see anything. Having experienced that, I'm glad it's over.

 

[Heather]

I checked this out a little further. He says his phone malfunctioned.

Gee, I thought he was being threatened with life threatening reprisal should he leak delicate intel, or something. But, no. It's just his phone.

 

[PopHistorian]

May I snip your analysis to use on Twitter? Twatter needs more of this sort of thing.

Yes, of course!

 

[Joan]

well well well

https://twitter.com/x/status/1326304091035881472

Here is the Sean Hannity for this evening 11/10/22 discussing voter iregularties, big time in the opening sequence, Marco Rubio is scheduled to appear.

 

[pluto123]

So with all this info and what the C’s said trump has a good chance of re election, does that mean he will win Reelection?
and did Biden and his cahoots really 100% cheat?
this is really distressing for me...

 

[aragorn]

Yeah, it's sort of like the moment that Caesar realizes Brutus is among those sticking the knife in. In this particular situation, you're looking for Tucker to be the mainstream purveyor of "reality" concerning this mounting, legitimate evidence of massive voter fraud. And, as we all know, just so much is at stake considering the insidious agenda the Democrats have in store for us. So, when he made that comment in his opening remarks, that was it for me. I couldn't listen anymore. It was all just blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. I even wrote him a tweet -- right then and there -- expressing my disappointment. I figure I must represent others who feel similarly let down, and he ought to know our reaction to what he did.

Actually, I didn't interpret the comment you're referring to by Tucker as "selling out". I think he was just being cautious and strategic since he was broadcasting from Fox. If he would have just brutally fanfared "Election fraud! Trump won!", he would have just given more bullets to the enemy. Or, that's what I think.