2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

Actually, I didn't interpret the comment you're referring to by Tucker as "selling out". I think he was just being cautious and strategic since he was broadcasting from Fox. If he would have just brutally fanfared "Election fraud! Trump won!", he would have just given more bullets to the enemy. Or, that's what I think.
But he didn't have to say that at all. He could just present the evidence. But what's needed is evidence indicative of the scale of the fraud. Too many of the anecdotes that Tucker and Hannity are presenting are rather small in scope. Some highly questionable practices by election workers, for example, could translate into many thousands of votes -- but it needs to be stated as such. Hannity never does that. The only person who really got to the larger numbers is Trump's press secretary, who spoke on Hannity. She's very good. As is Sydney Powell (Flynn's lawyer) -- she spoke to Lou Dobbs recently. She talks about Hammer and Scorecard among other issues, but the numbers she's conveying are massive in scale. It's that aspect that needs to be emphasized, or else it just sounds anecdotal, and the kind of voter fraud you might expect to see during any election. What needs to be made clear is that this is of a much larger scale and more complex and systemic. And it's not that there isn't evidence of that. So, it's a matter of what these "presenters" are going to emphasize. To me, by not emphasizing the scale of the operation they are colluding with the status quo at Fox.

I know they would never make this connection, but it's just occurred to me that one of the reasons the "planners" switched from 3 feet for social distancing to 6 feet could very well be in anticipation of this election, and their plan to keep observers so far away from the ballots being inspected as to be virtually useless. But, forget that. That would be too great a leap for Fox.
 

No, Vote-By-Mail is NOT an Elaborate “Sting” by Trump​

Deconstructing Pieczenik’s lie about Trump’s ballot “Sting” (all watermarked to entrap Democrat fraud) and the bigger Intel Community fraud to push electronic voting behind the lie

This is a video of the David Knight Show, published on Nov. 6. Good commentary by Knight IMO, although I'm unfamiliar with him and his work. It's on the Infowars channel, which is probably why. Ironically (or not?), Pieczenik also appeared on Infowars to promote his sting story. Anyhow, the video may be worth a look even if one is an Infowars avoider (like me). No AJ.

 
If the USA is a new Rome, Washington is a new "city on a hill" then maybe history will repeat itself again.

@Artem Yalovyi,

I have often wondered if that is not a good possibility. I liked your latin reference (Alea iacta est) to Caesar too.

City upon a Hill

I think the U.S.A. may have fallen short of it's great claim to American exceptionalism. Even Putin asked us at the U.N. to question if our claims to exceptionalism hold up under scrutiny. It may be that those programs instilled in us Americans almost from birth need to be questioned due to the corrupt reality we are now seeing in almost every aspect of our society. Those claims may really be 5D (dead) in reality.

One could look forward to the death of lies and a return to truth and reality.

I think that goes for both Republicans and Democrats.
 

Hope is alive in America​

Sarah Lee at Red State wrote, "The Trump administration’s legal challenge — and his legal team has shown amazing resolve in revealing only little bits here and there — is starting to take shape, and it could put as many as 94 electoral college votes in play by some estimates."

It is clear that stuffing the ballots with illegitimate mail-in votes was not enough to put Biden over the top. Democrats literally own the voting booths. Companies owned by Democrats ran the computer software to count the votes in 28 states.
Do not let the depth and breadth of the Democrat Fraud Machine depress you. This is the ammunition to take the case to the Supreme Court, where five conservative justices will frown on the violations of election law in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and the 4 AM ballot dumps in Michigan and elsewhere.

I wouldn't trust John McCain Roberts to walk a dog, but five other justices likely will not rubber stamp this fraud.
Enough fraud, enough invalidation. Team Trump must stop certifications in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. That will take federal court action on a scale never seen before.
All I want to hear is the rage, crying, and gnashing of teeth when the Supreme Court kicks the election to the U.S, House.
 

John Solomon says Mark Zuckerberg sent at least $350 million to election judges in mostly Dem areas​

The Just the News founder breaks three incredible developments from the Just the News election investigation


Short 2:44 video. It also includes interesting info on other election issues. Will it lead to anything?
 
I think the U.S.A. may have fallen short of it's great claim to American exceptionalism. Even Putin asked us at the U.N. to question if our claims to exceptionalism hold up under scrutiny. It may be that those programs instilled in us Americans almost from birth need to be questioned due to the corrupt reality we are now seeing in almost every aspect of our society. Those claims may really be 5D (dead) in reality.
The romantic fiction books are set in an historical era and culture where public values of marriage, family, and honor were very important, despite hypocrisy and corruption. Perhaps the US today stands in a similar role, where American values can be remembered after the empire has collapsed. What would those American values be? Freedom and hard work?
 
This won't keep me from watching Tucker, although I don't specifically follow him. However, the statement we're discussing was a notable reveal. Antennae up!

Actually, I didn't interpret the comment you're referring to by Tucker as "selling out". I think he was just being cautious and strategic since he was broadcasting from Fox. If he would have just brutally fanfared "Election fraud! Trump won!", he would have just given more bullets to the enemy. Or, that's what I think.

Just wanted to come to Tucker's rescue here too, I'm with aragorn, and I think his piece was excellent. He's such a smart, warm and decent guy. Of course he is not a saint and doesn't know everything, but I found his message spot-on: it's NOT about "bringing our guy in, no matter what", that's what Biden and the dems are doing. It's about UPHOLDING THE RULE OF LAW, so he says we should gather all facts and then come to a decision so that the whole system doesn't burn down. He brings lots of examples of election fraud (and I found it spot-on that he put all of this in context, especially regarding Big Tech, that's the elephant in the room!), and then just says basically that as far as he knows, the confirmed fraud cases (yet!) are not enough to swing the election. He's just being careful, and for good reasons given how much is thrown around on the net. And maybe he doesn't know all the facts, and maybe he's even ill-informed or whatever, but it bodes ill for the US if this half-sentence makes everyone go "Tucker is a traitor!!" after years of him brilliantly shining light on so many issues and, more importantly, constantly appealing to human decency and deeper values. It's the Putin thing to do IMO - don't root for an outcome, but for decency along the process and upholding principles.
 

So our dear French president also congratulated the not-quite-president-elect Joe Biden? This guy is such a disapointment, really can't find anything to redeem him. If Trump is declared victor in the end, I will just watch with glee how Macron is going to react...
 

No, Vote-By-Mail is NOT an Elaborate “Sting” by Trump​

Deconstructing Pieczenik’s lie about Trump’s ballot “Sting” (all watermarked to entrap Democrat fraud) and the bigger Intel Community fraud to push electronic voting behind the lie

This is a video of the David Knight Show, published on Nov. 6. Good commentary by Knight IMO, although I'm unfamiliar with him and his work. It's on the Infowars channel, which is probably why. Ironically (or not?), Pieczenik also appeared on Infowars to promote his sting story. Anyhow, the video may be worth a look even if one is an Infowars avoider (like me). No AJ.

I followed David for awhile on Infowars. I liked him and thought he was the best reporter there. I see he has the same opinion as I have about Pieczenik for the same reason. He may have dismissed the sting possibility because he thought it came from him which is understandable. Thats disappointing about CISA. I like what Thomas Wicktor said about it but maybe he doesn't have all the facts.

My source for the sting operation came from Tore who I think is very credible in the information she shares. She worked in the government for 15 yrs. (?) in cyber intelligence, a hacker/programer and has experience in many forms of surveillance. The only thing I've heard her say about CISA is, a woman in the zoom chat involved with the coup worked at CISA. I think it was Tore who infiltrated that group and all the information was sent to the feds. This was the group that was working on the shut down of Washington DC. She says all those people have been arrested or are in hot boxes, whatever that means. And I've noticed, nothing much has happened in DC like was planned. In case you missed it, another woman on that chat was Maria Stephan who works at the Pentagon and was an associate of Esper. She also worked at NATO headquarters at one time. Tore said the group made a serious error of letting Stephan on the chat because it allowed access to all her communications. So Tore says this sting operation has been going on for some time now and Trump has EVERYTHING on these people.

Looking at the extent of the voter fraud and how many people are involved, its pretty clear they've been setting this up for awhile. One of the zoom chats has people going over the time line for their part in the coup. This came out in September and they where saying all the states whose votes would be contested are the ones we see now. So it was all planned and the authorities where sent the information. I was looking at that timeline tonight and it doesn't look like things are going to plan. A big flop perhaps.

Another thing about David and many others as well, he seems to think he knows better of what Trump should have done in this or that situation. And he's kind of pessimistic about a lot which is a bit of a downer. Thats why I don't follow him anymore but he does offer value at times I'm sure.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom