2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

Anyone remember the following incredible freudian slip from Biden just before the election, basically detailing what they will do? It closely resembles what has happned IMO. Take a look:


Biden said on October 24, 2020, quote:
Dan Pfeiffer: One final question for you, Mr. Vice President. This interview is going to come out tomorrow, which is early vote day. And so I'm going to ask you a two part question, which is what I think President Obama used to call pulling a Chuck Todd. So part part one: what's your message to the folks who have not yet voted or do not yet have a plan to vote? And, part two, for the folks who have already voted, the 50 million Americans who've already voted, what can they do over the last 10 days to help make sure that you're the next United States?

Joe Biden: Well, first of all, you know, what really rankles my opponent is I say that the thing that bothers them most is he's not a patch on Barack's jeans. I mean, Barack is one hell of a president. And I tell you what, man, what an honor it was, I think you guys believe it, too, to serve with him. An incredible honor. And I'm not being solicitous. I really mean that. He had more integrity in his little finger, than most people have in their whole body. And he had a backbone, like a ramrod, has one. But one of the things that I think is most important is those who haven't voted yet. First of all, go to iwillvote.com to make a plan. Exactly how you're going to vote, where you're going to vote, when you're going to vote. Because it can get complicated. Because the Republicans are doing everything they can to make it harder for people to vote. Particularly people of color to vote. So go to iwillvote.com. Secondly, we're in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administr... [Biden correcting himself] the President Obama's administration before this; we have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics. What the president is trying to do is discourage people from voting by implying that their vote won't be counted. It can't be counted. We're going to challenge it and all these things. If enough people vote, it's going to overwhelm the system. You see what's happening now. [...]

I guess Biden's senility has some good sides after all. :lol: He talks out stuff he should keep secret.:rotfl::lol2:
 
@RevChristoph , Nope, they are simply programmed. It is super hard to break out of such programming after so many years. TV is a very powerful tool in the wrong hands. A friend of mine did some math and it turned out that his father who is in his mid-60s and he spent around 4-5 hours a day on TV. This makes around 8-12 years of TV on average during lifetime .... That is a lot of crap being pumped in ....
 
Fox is a globalist company, so it was well expected. The prime-time opinion shows, as you point out, are not immune. They don't go too far, pretend that they don't know what's really behind anything, and they defend the network.
But a lot of people put their trust in Tucker Carlson especially. They make him the exception. In some ways, I do too. He's good at a type of hard hitting analysis that very often hits the nail on the head. But that's also why I wanted to try to carefully explain my dissatisfaction with what he did last night, of all nights (after Fox's egregious call for Biden). Because a lot of people get caught up in his concise, emphatic style, and may have missed how he was inserting the "just give up, it's over" message into his often indignant sounding arguments. Even Dan Bongino was giving Tucker a pat on the back today on Twitter re: Tucker's Big Tech analysis (also from last night, as I stated). And I agree: as a separate segment it's good information. But in the context of the stakes here, and the need for people to realize that the fraud we're confronting NOW, AS WE SPEAK is massive and systemic, Tucker's focusing on what happened with Big Tech in the run-up to the election really is a distraction. Look at this thread. Look at all the segments that might be produced out of this material so as to have the general public understand the enormity, and complexity of the immediate problem, as well as what precisely Trump and his team need to accomplish in contesting these fraudulent results.

Instead, Tucker has some anecdotal information that in no way suggests the reality of the massive fraud. How masterfully he inserts the "oh, we just don't have enough confirmed evidence to help Trump out, I'm afraid. But, hey, we're still angry about all this other stuff, so let's just focus on that. Don't worry about the fraud. It's all over, anyway."

YUCK!
 
@RevChristoph , Nope, they are simply programmed. It is super hard to break out of such programming after so many years. TV is a very powerful tool in the wrong hands. A friend of mine did some math and it turned out that his father who is in his mid-60s and he spent around 4-5 hours a day on TV. This makes around 8-12 years of TV on average during lifetime .... That is a lot of crap being pumped in ....
I agree. A lot of what the media pumps in us is self-depricating nonsense. But there are some who voted for the democrats who are not idiots. These are the people I'm speaking about.
 
Anyone remember the following incredible freudian slip from Biden just before the election, basically detailing what they will do? It closely resembles what has happned IMO. Take a look:


Biden said on October 24, 2020, quote:


I guess Biden's senility has some good sides after all. :lol: He talks out stuff he should keep secret.:rotfl::lol2:

Here is just the short snipped:

 
But a lot of people put their trust in Tucker Carlson especially. They make him the exception. In some ways, I do too. He's good at a type of hard hitting analysis that very often hits the nail on the head. But that's also why I wanted to try to carefully explain my dissatisfaction with what he did last night, of all nights (after Fox's egregious call for Biden). Because a lot of people get caught up in his concise, emphatic style, and may have missed how he was inserting the "just give up, it's over" message into his often indignant sounding arguments. Even Dan Bongino was giving Tucker a pat on the back today on Twitter re: Tucker's Big Tech analysis (also from last night, as I stated). And I agree: as a separate segment it's good information. But in the context of the stakes here, and the need for people to realize that the fraud we're confronting NOW, AS WE SPEAK is massive and systemic, Tucker's focusing on what happened with Big Tech in the run-up to the election really is a distraction. Look at this thread. Look at all the segments that might be produced out of this material so as to have the general public understand the enormity, and complexity of the immediate problem.

Instead, Tucker has some anecdotal information that in no way suggests the reality of the massive fraud. How masterfully he inserts the "oh, we just don't have enough confirmed evidence to help Trump out, I'm afraid. But, hey, we're still angry about all this other stuff, so let's just focus on that. Don't worry about the fraud. It's all over, anyway."

YUCK!
EXACTLY! Stay mad! You were wronged, but there's nothing you can do about it.
 
Trying to edit to show that is the intent shown, not my belief or intent however.
 
Pepe's pretty clueless in this one.
Interesting. I see that SOTT also posted it, without comment.

 
I feel sorry for Tucker but he will probably sink with the boat soon.

Thanks Heather for your analysis, like you that phrase almost at the biggining: at this stage the fraud that we can confirm does not seem to be enough to alter the election results." said it all.
Yeah, it's sort of like the moment that Caesar realizes Brutus is among those sticking the knife in. In this particular situation, you're looking for Tucker to be the mainstream purveyor of "reality" concerning this mounting, legitimate evidence of massive voter fraud. And, as we all know, just so much is at stake considering the insidious agenda the Democrats have in store for us. So, when he made that comment in his opening remarks, that was it for me. I couldn't listen anymore. It was all just blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. I even wrote him a tweet -- right then and there -- expressing my disappointment. I figure I must represent others who feel similarly let down, and he ought to know our reaction to what he did.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom