Do you have a link to that article ?A little off topic but I've just read an article on THE SAKER about the rape of Russia in the '90's. and the basket case it was reduced to.
I scrolled down the comments section and found one very interesting chap.
A few days after Crimea rejoined Russia, Jacob Rothschild stated”Vladimir Putin has betrayed the New World Order”. An interesting choice of words
How true this is remains to be seen, but I remember the C's mentioning that the Rothschilds' would feel the pressure of the Wave. Any pressure is good and if Trump is causing a little pressure as well we can pray this will cause a ripple effect through the U.S. population. I'm not heavily backing one side against the other but looking for the best possible outcome whatever it may be for humanity.
For two years I've been referring to this incredible NYTimes map of the 2016 (official) election results, which goes down to the district level and the % of (official) votes for each candidate. It's an amazing piece of tech work, 11 zoom levels. What I noticed is that all cities are blue, even in the reddest states. Made me wonder how they do it, and certainly raises questions about results when you see 90% Clinton districts side by side with 90% Trump districts, etc. How is it done? Strategic focus? Natural groupthink? Mind-control radio towers? Something in the water? Magic? How?Wow! This is Super interesting.
That's a great question. It seems to be once an area reaches a critical mass of people that's where it happens. I live right above a smaller city that's turned blue in the last 10 years. Ugh.For two years I've been referring to this incredible NYTimes map of the 2016 (official) election results, which goes down to the district level and the % of (official) votes for each candidate. It's an amazing piece of tech work, 11 zoom levels. What I noticed is that all cities are blue, even in the reddest states. Made me wonder how they do it, and certainly raises questions about results when you see 90% Clinton districts side by side with 90% Trump districts, etc. How is it done? Strategic focus? Natural groupthink? Mind-control radio towers? Something in the water? Magic? How?
An Extremely Detailed Map of the 2016 Presidential Election (Published 2021)
An interactive map lets readers explore the 2016 election in new detail.www.nytimes.com
Oh, something is up...
View attachment 40325
Rudy Giuliani speaks to the press about various lawsuits related to the 2020 election. Picture: AFP
We can logically conclude that it's quite easier to rig an election in a city when you have so many people around - more people in overall means greater "groups" of bad (SDS Oriented) people who can then better organise. And as commonly agreed, it's also in cities that you have a concentration of sheeps/brainstormed/hypnothised people. I would be interrested, as many, to know the 3 following numbers, for each big cities : official (rigged) numbers, more realistic numbers after Trump's team spot the fraud, and 3rd, real number of people who (really) voted from Trump & Biden (for this one, only C's can help)That's a great question. It seems to be once an area reaches a critical mass of people that's where it happens. I live right above a smaller city that's turned blue in the last 10 years. Ugh.
Yes there is a one world Gov but there are shades of gray in everything and I believe the President and the Party the represent are those shades. It does matter albiet not as much as the majority of people think you are right about that... This process is something to examine and learn like an experiment I believe one does oneself a diservice to say theres a one world government and not pay attent to the happenings (not saying you are doing this but I know of people that do) its always important to know that how you make decisions based on your knowing.To Divide the people and Suck they delicious energy IMHO.
There is already One Government. So whatever is happening it’s their Agenda.
Does not matter who will win. Until people will realize that they are being manipulated about everything - nothing particular will change.
IMHO - Biden or Trump - It’s just the „surface” change to let people think that they can change anything. However they can’t at this point.
This is only my subjective opinion based on what I see. People are loosing their energy on disputing who won election. We know that someone else is pulling the strings.
This guys we need to dethrone.
They are starving like flys to....Oh, hell - why didn't they just run up and make citizen arrests!!
For two years I've been referring to this incredible NYTimes map of the 2016 (official) election results, which goes down to the district level and the % of (official) votes for each candidate. It's an amazing piece of tech work, 11 zoom levels. What I noticed is that all cities are blue, even in the reddest states. Made me wonder how they do it, and certainly raises questions about results when you see 90% Clinton districts side by side with 90% Trump districts, etc. How is it done? Strategic focus? Natural groupthink? Mind-control radio towers? Something in the water? Magic? How?
An Extremely Detailed Map of the 2016 Presidential Election (Published 2021)
An interactive map lets readers explore the 2016 election in new detail.www.nytimes.com
In my estimation, Tucker Carlson in his "voter fraud light" approach is no where NEAR as "investigative," no where near his and his team's obvious ability to "connect the dots," interview multiple sources, etc., as he's been on a subject like Big Tech. When it comes to voter fraud 2020, he folds his arms, waiting for the evidence to fall in his lap. Why in this instance, for example, doesn't he interview the witness Powell is offering him, who is far more versed in "numbers" than she claims to be? There would seem to be no reason for not doing so.He said, She said: on Tucker Carlson and Sidney Powell.
First, Tucker:
This had to have happened last night -- a show I haven't watched yet.
Sidney Powell's response:
View attachment 40327
View attachment 40328
But in the end, i expected a win, solely because Trump is allied with the part of the Deep State that is on good terms with Mossad. He would win because not only so many people vote for him, but because Mossad would make sure that everyone knows that so many people voted for him.
Because, if anyone can pull that off, it's Mossad.
Then Biden wins, and it gets me confused. Was i wrong? Did i miscalculate how much trust Mossad put into Trump? Were they not that invested in him after all? Did they abandon him in the end?
To me, it actually brought a spark of hope. So he was a loud and rabid dog on their leash, but still too rabid and too unpredictable to be trusted. They had him, yet they still couldn't control him. He agreed to do their bidding and yet he still didn't do what they wanted, and for that, they abandoned him. Finally someone stood up to them. Finally, even if it means he won't be president a second term. Finally, someone with an actual spark of goodness in them.
Because the problem is... it's not over yet.... Biden still didn't win.
And that is what worries me the most.
I am worried that somewhere, in a dark room, Trump will have a conversation, and they will give him an offer he cannot possibly refuse. They will get him the win. They will give him the proof of an election fraud, proof for what they themselves very likely helped to orchestrate. They will give him support and legal backup to push it. They will make him the president for the second term.
And most importantly, they will make absolutely sure that every mainstream media outlet will be talking about it day and night, just to make people go even more insane.
Because, if anyone can pull that off, it's Mossad.
For that to happen, Trump would have to make promises and concessions. He would have to submit to the actual Deep State. And this time, for real.
I fear that he might make, or already has made, a literal deal with the devil, and this second term of Trump would be nothing like the last 4 years. I fear his "spine" might get broken, and with that, the entire country will follow.
I fear that this would be the "death of hope". With the left rioting in the streets destroying everything, and the right hopelessly abandoned and passively succumbing to darkness.
For two years I've been referring to this incredible NYTimes map of the 2016 (official) election results, which goes down to the district level and the % of (official) votes for each candidate. It's an amazing piece of tech work, 11 zoom levels. What I noticed is that all cities are blue, even in the reddest states. Made me wonder how they do it, and certainly raises questions about results when you see 90% Clinton districts side by side with 90% Trump districts, etc. How is it done? Strategic focus? Natural groupthink? Mind-control radio towers? Something in the water? Magic? How?
An Extremely Detailed Map of the 2016 Presidential Election (Published 2021)
An interactive map lets readers explore the 2016 election in new detail.www.nytimes.com