2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!
- Thread starter Ruth
- Start date
Why do these people insist on talking about China hacking the election???
Ocean
The Living Force
Just like USA, UK, and other actors, China probably has it's own deep state. I've met many Chinese people and all of them have been kind, gentle, understanding AND animal lovers. There are thousands of videos out there showing Chinese rescuing and saving dogs, cats and all creatures. I know many British families who have moved to live in China - by desire.
The Chinese Deep State is another thing entirely.
I would not like to see the Chinese people themselves be victims of a 'lynch mob'
SOTTREADER
The Living Force
SOTTREADER
The Living Force
I think this is projection. You're taking what you know about how western governments operate and essentially saying this is how non western governments operate as well. I'm not saying it's necessarily incorrect but I'd ask for some semblance of evidence.
What do you know about the inner machinations of China?
dmnlksm
Jedi
I explained my opinions on this subject. Trump certainly wants to make a move before leaving the seat. But Iran has the possibility to get away with it.
Iran made harsh statements after the Ankara-Baku rapprochement. Now Turkey will support Iran's cornered.
There is a meeting between Ankara and Washington on this issue.
Ocean
The Living Force
I know because I have first hand knowledge. I am currently in negotiations with a huge corporation in China to invest in the country where I live to finance and build a new oil refinery. One of my contacts is called 'George' as he likes to be called. He is my source.
Ocean
The Living Force
Heather
Dagobah Resident
Okay, but now Fitts tweets this article:
... suggesting a block to the president's ability to use the Insurrection Act was sneaked into the defense bill that was being written over the summer -- oh, with the idea that Trump probably would win the election, and so they wanted to foreclose on this option. But WHO wants to foreclose on this option if, as Fitts insisted previously, the Deep State only benefits from the president's invoking the Insurrection Act, or declaring Martial Law? Trump is attempting to veto this defense bill for other reasons, including its not including the repeal of Section 230, which protects Big Tech from the type of liability most media are subject to. [This is another area to examine as some are saying repealing Section 230 will actually cause Big Tech to clamp down on free speech even more than they are presently doing.]
Anyway, point is, Fitts saw fit to tweet this article, especially in light of what her previous assumptions have been. But again, does this mean the Deep State doesn't want the president to have such powers after all? Or does this suggest another faction [of the Deep State?] is moving to foreclose on what Fitts had been predicting IF Trump were to invoke this act, or declare Martial Law?
Insurrection Act nullified in latest coronavirus bill? Wrong, it was sneaked into legislation back in summer, Twitter discovers
Congress’ Covid relief bill is packed full of under-the-table provisions, but does it really include a line restricting President Trump’s ability to deploy the military? No, but lawmakers managed to sneak that one in elsewhere.
Heather
Dagobah Resident
Remember this?
When I think back on how confident Pompeo was that we would be seeing a smooth transition to the second Trump administration, and then I see these moves on Iran, I find it hard not to connect the two. Pompeo has been called a NeoCon, and so is very much tied to Israel/Israeli Intelligence. With the "peace agreements" just signed between Israel, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia -- good relations already established with Qatar -- we have these "allies" set up against Iran. Could "the deal" be: yes, Trump, you can maintain power so long as you deal with Iran -- militarily, if need be, with the goal being regime change, one might well assume.
As Laurent Guyenot states in "From Yahweh to Zion," every single president since WWII who won a second term did so at the Zionists' behest, as it were -- one exception being Lyndon B. Johnson, given the extreme public opposition to the Vietnam War.
Trump, however, promised an end to these "endless wars." He remains very critical of the extremely hawkish John Bolton, his National Security Advisor from 2018-19. Bolton is no doubt a NeoCon, and was calling for regime change in Iran during his tenure.
So, is Trump facing "reality" and caving into the demands of Zionist factions of the Deep State? As Guyenot has indicated, this would be in keeping with recent past history for maintaining presidential power.
Hope the link was not confusing.
The previous link I posted goes directly to the Mattew Ehret article instead of the whole SOTT article. It should be
Who is Creating a New Chinese Boogey Man? (an Examination of Modern Psychological Warfare)
@Heather,
I think Fitts sees a big picture and she does not give much hope for a cure but she does see that the PTB have a fear of the "population". Sadly, it seems that in the U.S. and those affected by our role in the "big" picture (our "central role" as the "enforcers" of military control) puts almost the whole planet at a crossroads.
The bill being claimed "Nullifies the President's use of the Insurrection Act." is H.R. 6395 July 7, 2020. Maybe some scholarly lawyers here can give us a better idea if that is true.
Catherine Austin Fitts seems to have little hope and I can understand that. She does not know that in the cosmic picture this take-over wishful thinking will fail.
