2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

Session 22 September 2018;
... A: An "insider" of psyops. ...

So it seems that it is normal to have some truth mixed with lies if it is psyops. It does cause confusion but if you can separate the truth from the lies the confusion could be ended.
Now that I re-read the response of the C's ... I do not understand how to conclude that it's disinformation ?
What is psyops ? Are psyops only used by STS ? For me I would ponder the response that the C's gave here. psyops can also be managed by STO (3D) forces, and when we see how Trump succeeded in many sub-topoics/domains, it's evident that Trump's people also heavily use psyops-type methods.
Better question to ask to C's is : Is "Q" under SDA or STS influence ?
 
Now that I re-read the response of the C's ... I do not understand how to conclude that it's disinformation ?
What is psyops ? Are psyops only used by STS ? For me I would ponder the response that the C's gave here. psyops can also be managed by STO (3D) forces, and when we see how Trump succeeded in many sub-topoics/domains, it's evident that Trump's people also heavily use psyops-type methods.
Better question to ask to C's is : Is "Q" under SDA or STS influence ?
@dredger,

By "SDA" I suppose you mean STO.

Unfortunatly, I think that for defense purposes we sometimes may need to use similar tactics of the enemy to survive.

Session 30 May 2009:
Q: (L) So in other words, some of the thoughts and discussions that we've had over the past week or two {about the global situation} are pretty much on the money?

A: Yes. More or less. There has also been some nudging from this side. Time is getting "short" even though there really is no time. Remember what we said about being wise as serpents and gentle as doves.

Even for economic survival we need to use common sense 3D skills. Small businesses are dieing from all the 3D STS BS.

Session 22 June 2002:
Q: So, promotional activity can be considered a service to a larger community. Obviously, promotional activity has to support itself and promotional activity, enlarging the scope of what we are doing, necessitates a much greater commitment of time and energy and skill on not only our part, but the skill, time and effort of other people, which means that it must support that also. Nevertheless, the perception {among New Agers} seems to be that anything that involves promotion or involvement of any kind of monetary exchange is an STS thing. However, is there a way around this can be functional Service to Others?

A: It should be noted that the STS system can only be penetrated by becoming "wise as serpents and gentle as doves." There is nothing negative about networking. Details of a network include the necessity for those who are involved to invest "energy" in the exchange. If the individual comes upon the life work of another and expects to benefit and gain by that work, they will naturally wish to have their own position balanced by putting forth a commensurate amount of energy. Otherwise there will be an imbalance of energy. This then leads to an STS pyramid. An example of this principle in reverse is a teacher who demands payment for no real work on their own part.

The fact that both of you have devoted yourselves to this work for not just a short time, but literally your entire lives, and have not asked for the support that this intensive labor earns has, in effect, created an imbalance for those who are benefiting. Many of those who are experiencing blocks in their own lives would find those blockages dissolved by the action of opening the flow of energy in the exchange. In your world, money equals energy!!!

{Exclamations of amazement at the speed and intensity of delivery. (BT) I've got writer's cramp!}
 
Last edited:
Now that I re-read the response of the C's ... I do not understand how to conclude that it's disinformation ?
What is psyops ? Are psyops only used by STS ? For me I would ponder the response that the C's gave here. psyops can also be managed by STO (3D) forces, and when we see how Trump succeeded in many sub-topoics/domains, it's evident that Trump's people also heavily use psyops-type methods.
Better question to ask to C's is : Is "Q" under SDA or STS influence ?

psyops is negative. Psychological operations designed to manipulate public opinion. There was no doubt in the response and there is no doubt from the kind of nonsense that "Q" has put out.
 
By "SDA" I suppose you mean STO.
Yes sorry SDA is the french counterpart to english STO, i often miss, sorry.

psyops is negative. Psychological operations designed to manipulate public opinion. There was no doubt in the response and there is no doubt from the kind of nonsense that "Q" has put out.
Well, i still do not agree (glups). It's like an hammer, you can build or destroy with it. Also, psyop ...ok, let's follow what they did : they created a character named "Q" to distill information in a way that a lot of people will follow this, put many efforts to try to decypher the messages, connect the dots, verify, and so on. In other words : send to the world a kind of puzzle and ask people to solve it. Create an army of puzzle solvers, what they call the digital soldiers.
And that's all, this can be named a psyop, no ?
I would answer yes, and then, if all agree this can be named a psyop, then is it really a negative action, plan, to counter PTB ?
Ok, they probably gave false information, nonsenses as you said, but ... Q can be read by all, meaning the PTB too, they can also give false information to fool the PTB. Trump regularly played such tricks during these last months, suggesting/showing a weak spot to better trap his opponents.

Also, true STO do not manipulate opinion ok, but the C's said many times that we are STO candidates but still all STS. Thus, as it concerns 3D human "moves" on a STS planet, why then STO candidates who are still STS would not use psyops operation for ... maybe not 100% good purposes, but at least better purposes than what Biden's team (PTB) has for all of us ?

Another tought that came to my mind while typing, if i well remember from Castaneda, the act of "cunning" (in french : faire preuve de ruse), isn't it one of the "methods" to face and succeed toward a petit tyran ? Looking at "Q", could it be compared to such a move but at a country (world) level, the tyran being the PTB ? Is it then really as bad as you seem to conclude ?

Another interpretation of the answser of the C's could also be like the following :
An insider (read this like a whistleblower) among the psyop (bad/STS) guys is leaking information.
But i do not think so ...

I also would agree that it may be here STS vs STS,. Q is clearly acting against the PTB, so, could it be an higher STS circle who is actively getting down the PTB which is positionned at a lower STS circle, like it's common in STS hierarchy where the bottom minions or oftenlty sacrified ? Then this would give sense to your opinion ...

Please Joe, understand, at no cost I want to be right or whatever, not being ok with you is something i do not much like, but it's notthing regarding you of course, just that here i'm even a bit afraid to post my answer, you are not anybody here, you are intimidating and often aiming right. I just try to give/explain what I think is an other valid way to see this 😓
 
My take after listening, president Trump needs to sign that paper they referenced which would assign the special counsel status to Sidney Powell. That would seem to give the KRACKEN code word they been using the teeth needed to allow Sidney to do what she's been asking to do all along. Without her unleashing the bureaucrats in place will continue to stall and run the clock out.

Thank you, Ocean and bravo for posting!

Sidney powell, appointed to special counsel might be getting closer.

Donald J Trump@realdonaldtrump

30m·

After seeing the massive Voter Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election, I disagree with anyone that thinks a strong, fast, and fair Special Counsel is not needed, IMMEDIATELY. This was the most corrupt election in the history of our Country, and it must be closely examined!
 
Anybody checked out Ann Vandersteel's interviews? She's moving to the forefront of the new media and has a finger on a certain pulse within DC that is very interesting.

Her 2hr interview with Patrick Byrne last night? Wow. Just. Wow. If Byrne is legit... Just wow.


YouTube tip: Use the playback speed function. Most interviews you can get used to 2x speed,
 

Why?

In light of the recent pardonings by Trump, I watched this video from Head to Head with an interview with Erik Prince, the former CEO of Blackwater that oversaw the sensationalized 2007 Nisour Square Massacre for which the aforementioned contractors were put on trial. Around the time of the incident and much later, this became one of the stories being pushed by the MSM that paints the Blackwater people as scum of the Earth. Even if true, they focus and hammer in the point of civilians and children being killed in combat that were "unprovoked" in nature. The Blackwater folk and others say otherwise, saying that they were under threat of battle.

The thing is, the war in Iraq is similar to that of the Vietnam war where soldiers don't know who and where they will be ambushed. Militant Iraqis, if smart, will garb themselves in civilian clothing to confuse soldiers, who by their nature, are highly vulnerable and can be singled out due to their uniforms. I'd imagine as a soldier in an urban area in a hot zone in the Middle East where any "civilian" can just whip out a gun and blast you, the tensions would be extraordinarily high. Being a contractor company, they may not have adequate training institutions in place to handle the emotion and stress of the matter. Of course, that doesn't absolve them of any civilian casualties, but when the MSM shine light on only one aspect of the story, what's the whole truth? And does that whole truth change things?


A few parts that caught my eye was @36:30 where the interviewer spoke about Trump et al saying that Mexico was going to fund the wall and he flat out denies any possibility of Mexico paying for any wall. Erik goes on to conclude that the jury is still out on that, not anticipating any outcome. It is a sort of STS and STO dynamic, albeit very subtle.

@42:50, a man in the audience asks Erik what are Trump's greatest foreign achievements and what steps he should focus on for reelection. Erik's answer surprised me when he said that he said that Trump is trying to reduce America's presence in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. He also brings up that a peaceful negotiation with the tensions between North and South Korea that Trump is trying to do and Erik thinks that if he pulls it off, it may be a good sign for the US to remove their military presence in Korea. And to top if all off, he mentions the MIC, and as the Cs said, when you mention the MIC you've said a whole lot! He appears to be in Trump's camp and we all know by now that anyone that is for Trump will be attacked by the MSM. Erik was a good sport in that interview, parrying much of the psychological attack that the interviewer shot at him (along with the audience).

The aftermath of the entire spiel is that Erik left Blackwater in 2009 where the company changed its name to Xe Services and is now known as Academi from 2011 on. The recent pardonings by Trump are reopening old wounds from back then and it will be interesting to see how it will play out from here.
 
Last edited:
Anybody checked out Ann Vandersteel's interviews? She's moving to the forefront of the new media and has a finger on a certain pulse within DC that is very interesting.

Her 2hr interview with Patrick Byrne last night? Wow. Just. Wow. If Byrne is legit... Just wow.
@ge0m0,

Thanks for an interesting video interview. I had a long nap before watching/listening to the show. I think that many questions about Patrick Byrne were made more clear by his details. It is one of those informational finds that maybe bringing a big hammer with you while thinking might be useful. There certainly were some wow moments in there for me.

P.S.
Could not help noticing you are from Fairfax, VA (I graduated from Annandale H.S and my aunt and uncle lived in Fairfax) so I know you are probably more sensitive to what is happening in D.C. than many. It is sometimes a small world.
 
The China connection is I think a huge thing in the mix now and SOTT is right on it.

Who is Creating a New Chinese Boogey Man? (An Examination of Modern Psychological Warfare)

Excellent article to read.

Anybody who is on to George Soros deserves kudos if you ask me (of course there is no need for that).

George Soros and the Attack on the Asian Markets

From May 1997, George Soros' targeting of the Southeast Asian "Tigers economies" of Myanmar, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Laos, and Malaysia with speculative short sales of their local currencies resulted in months of vast anarchy across all of Asia and the world more broadly. Currencies collapsed from 10-80% over the next 8 months and took many years to begin to recover.

Malaysia's Mahathir Mohammed was brave enough to call out Soros' economic warfare and did much to help his nation weather the storm by imposing capital controls to maintain some semblance of stability calling out the speculator saying: "as much as people who produce and distribute drugs are criminals, because they destroy nations, the people who undermine the economies of poor nations are too."Chinese President Jiang Zemin followed suit calling Soros "a financial sniper" and stated he would not let the speculator enter Chinese markets.

It makes this a lot more clear as to how we got here.
 
Anybody checked out Ann Vandersteel's interviews? She's moving to the forefront of the new media and has a finger on a certain pulse within DC that is very interesting.

Her 2hr interview with Patrick Byrne last night? Wow. Just. Wow. If Byrne is legit... Just wow.


YouTube tip: Use the playback speed function. Most interviews you can get used to 2x speed,

Anyone interested in the election fraud should listen to this interview.
Dominion voting machines in swing states have been traced by their IP, to a corporation in China, whose person's name has already come up in that swing state of some dirty dealings.
There is so much more in this interview.
 
Please Joe, understand, at no cost I want to be right or whatever, not being ok with you is something i do not much like, but it's notthing regarding you of course, just that here i'm even a bit afraid to post my answer, you are not anybody here, you are intimidating and often aiming right. I just try to give/explain what I think is an other valid way to see this

No need to worry about posting your opinion. I just don't agree based on all the "Q" has "said". It has been, IMO, mostly nonsense designed to wind people up. Nothing of any consequence has been forthcoming from that source. If it has, I'd like to see it.
 
Back
Top Bottom