2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

Beijing ‘Substantially Involved’ in US 2020 Election, China Analyst Says​



Beijing was “substantially involved” in the U.S. 2020 elections on multiple levels, according to China analyst Gordon Chang, who has described the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) infiltration of American “elite” circles as an “espionage emergency.”

“I think China clearly interfered,” Chang, the author of “The Coming Collapse of China,” told NTD’s Focus Focus.

Chang, who has spent decades studying China and writing about the threat of the CCP, explained how leading up to the Nov. 3 presidential election, the trend of Chinese propaganda was that former Vice President Joe Biden should receive the Democratic Party nomination over Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). State propaganda later favored Biden over President Donald Trump, Chang said.

“We also know that China tried to cause chaos. Large Chinese networks like ‘Spamouflage Dragon’ relentlessly attacked the president on YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter,” Chang said, referring to a pro-Beijing spam network that targeted Trump in the run-up to the election.

“We know that the social media platforms have taken down a massive number of fake Chinese accounts,” Chang said. “Twitter in June alone took down 174,000 fake accounts, so we know that they were actively involved, and we have a number of indications that it was not to help the president.”

Responding to Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s (ODNI) recent announcement that the intelligence community couldn’t meet the Dec. 18 deadline set by an executive order to report on foreign threats during the November election, Chang suggested that there could be a disagreement within the intelligence committee about the extensive nature of CCP involvement.

According to Trump’s executive order in 2018, the DNI was expected to deliver a report determining “to the maximum extent ascertainable” whether any interference attempts took place, and the nature of such interference, methods used, and who was involved and authorized such efforts.

The order also directs the U.S. government to impose automatic sanctions on foreign nations, individuals, and entities found to be involved in trying to interfere in U.S. elections.

Amanda Schoch, a DNI spokeswoman, said in a statement last week that “agencies have not finished coordinating on the product.”

“I think there might be some honest disagreements, but the overall trend is that China was substantially involved in our elections,” Chang said of the delay. “They did this with these malicious disinformation campaigns on the surface, with these troll and bot farm operations below the surface.

“They were involved, and they’ve been involved for a very long time.”

The author also highlighted the danger of CCP infiltration within the U.S. elite circle, suggesting that all institutions nationwide are being targeted by Beijing.

“It’s not just colleges and universities, it’s also prep schools, secondary schools, the foundations, NGOs. If there’s an institution in the U.S., China is targeting it,” Chang said. “China’s influence here is vast, which means that we’ve got a lot of work to do to remove the CCP from our society, because they are certainly up to no good.

“The danger is clear and present, and we’ve got to act immediately, because we don’t have much time to lose. Xi Jinping doesn’t talk about competing with us in the international system. He is floating these ideas that China has the mandate of heaven over all under heaven, and China actually acts like emperors of old, who believe that they’re the only sovereigns in the world, which means essentially that Americans are just subservient—we don’t have a country, we don’t have sovereignty,” he said.

“I know that sounds ludicrous, but we’ve got to listen to what Chinese leaders are actually saying. They are dropping hints that they should be considered the world’s only sovereigns. They’ve made it very clear, and we’ve just not been listening.

“If we don’t change course, we’re going to lose our country, because China imposes an existential risk to us. If we don’t understand the fundamental nature of the challenge, we’re going to lose, and we’re going to lose our country,” he added.

Rep. John Ratcliffe
Then-Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) questions Intelligence Committee Minority Counsel Stephen Castor and Intelligence Committee Majority Counsel Daniel Goldman during the House impeachment inquiry hearings in Washington on Dec. 9, 2019. (Doug Mills/The New York Times via AP)

Earlier this year, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said that the biggest threat to election security in the United States is the CCP.

“China poses a greater national security threat to the U.S. than any other nation—economically, militarily, and technologically. That includes threats of election influence and interference,” Ratcliffe said.

He said Beijing was concerned that Trump would win reelection, adding that the intelligence community has briefed “hundreds of members of Congress” to raise their concerns about China “and its increased efforts to impact the U.S. policy climate in its favor.”

Ratcliffe told CBS earlier this month that there was foreign election interference by China, Iran, and Russia in the 2020 election.

“China is an economic threat and a technological threat. And that’s something that the United States hasn’t had to deal with before,” he said.

Mimi Nguyen Ly contributed to this report.
 

Patrick Byrne Recounts Explosive Oval Office Meeting. Calls Out Cipollone



Radio interview with Patrick Byrne (former CEO of Overstock)

Patrick Byrne joins us today for a passionate conversation about his meeting with the President of the United States. There isn’t a need for many show notes.

If there was ever an episode of the show you need to share with your friends and family, this is it.

My take after listening, president Trump needs to sign that paper they referenced which would assign the special counsel status to Sidney Powell. That would seem to give the KRACKEN code word they been using the teeth needed to allow Sidney to do what she's been asking to do all along. Without her unleashing the bureaucrats in place will continue to stall and run the clock out.

Thank you, Ocean and bravo for posting!
 
He really did say it - it's not a deep fake. And I've seen Trump supporters post it a lot over the past few months. But given Joe's dementia, I think it's just too easy to write off as a slip of the tongue. I.e. plausible deniability. I think it was actually a Freudian slip.
One would have to see more of that video quote. e.g. what were the prior five sentences and following sentences? The Freudian slip was what instantly came to my mind when I played the clip. As an aside, I doubt Biden was given much detailed data on the plan.
 
My take after listening, president Trump needs to sign that paper they referenced which would assign the special counsel status to Sidney Powell. That would seem to give the KRACKEN code word they been using the teeth needed to allow Sidney to do what she's been asking to do all along. Without her unleashing the bureaucrats in place will continue to stall and run the clock out.

Thank you, Ocean and bravo for posting!

I completely agree about Sidney Powell. I believe Trump does also, she is the right person for the job.

Welcome michaelrc, thanks for that.
 
He really did say it - it's not a deep fake. And I've seen Trump supporters post it a lot over the past few months. But given Joe's dementia, I think it's just too easy to write off as a slip of the tongue. I.e. plausible deniability. I think it was actually a Freudian slip.

He seemed to 'take stock' of himself right before he spoke. With a knowing that he needed to get this right and the words came out flawlessly.
I've never seen him be so articulate.
 
Last edited:

Patrick Byrne said he did not vote for Trump but now his assement of Trump has been elevated and reassessed. That he now is trying to support Trump seems to be a bit late. I am not even sure I believe him. If all Trump's Whitehouse lawyers are wanting him to acquiess and spreading that around now, and Trump does not want to declare martial law then Biden will be the one to declare martial law.

Byrne described Trump as being too nice and tired but can we believe him. I don't know.

The Cs did not say who would declare martial law.

Session 10 October 2020:


If Trump does not change his mind I see no other way martial law will be declared other than after Biden is in office.

Don't fret Goyacobol. The President knows what he's doing. He likes to play the fool sometimes, which disarms his enemies.

Last Thurs. 17 Dec. Trump told his staff to get out of DC. It was estimated that 70% of our government politicians would be arrested and prosecuted for being [D]eep State and Chinese CCP puppets.


For you to fully understand who exactly Donald Trump is and the traitors who are swimming around him like sharks, like snakes up to his waist, this shows you what he is up against and why this simple fix is taking so long to rid the nation of Joe Biden and the Deep State.
A most volatile meeting like this in the Oval office has probably never happened in over 200 years.
 
Last edited:
I completely agree about Sidney Powell. I believe Trump does also, she is the right person for the job.
It seems Sidney Powell would certainly be better than the lawyers who would have him to concede.

Don't fret Goyacobol. The President knows what he's doing. He likes to play the fool sometimes, which disarms his enemies.
I think it is possible that Trump is playing the fool. I am not fretting but not looking forward to Biden being sworn in as president either.

Don't fret Goyacobol. The President knows what he's doing. He likes to play the fool sometimes, which disarms his enemies.

Last Thurs. 17 Dec. Trump told his staff to get out of DC. It was estimated that 70% of our government politicians would be arrested and prosecuted for being [D]eep State and Chinese CCP puppets.

That site is very Q-oriented and makes a lot of claims but we should know more very soon I think. Seeing arrests would be nice but I will "wait and see". Sometimes I like to be wrong.
 
I have been pondering on the issue of the stolen election from Trump, which I believe to be true, there is enough evidence mounting on a daily basis to recognize this as a reality, for those with eyes and ears to see.

Sometimes I watch the live stream from the Duran. Alexander Mercouris made a very interesting comment on one of these live streams, can't remember which one (I think it may have been after Russia officially acknowledged Biden) that has stuck with me. I am loosely paraphrasing, he said that "Russia would prefer a Biden Presidency because, it would be predictable". Think about it, the Russian Federation has been dealing with the US deep state for the past 2 decades, and yes it is predictable. They (Russia) have demonstrated masterful countermeasures.

If Trump did win a second term, by acknowledging voter fraud. it would throw the whole predictably into chaos. Not only cause chaos in the US population, but in the whole of the West, socially and politically, and also the Chinese Deep State (and yes I believe there is such a thing).

I really don't think Trump has the team in place to make good on his promise to "Drain the Swamp". This is something that has been in place for decades, if not millennia, it is so firmly entrentched in the body politic of the West and beyond. One positive outcome from this psychodrama is the revelation of the men and women behind the curtain (memories of The Wizard of OZ) has been revealed for those with eyes and ears to see.

I guess, as the C's say wait and see. What will happen on January 6th and more importantly, on January 21st.

Ah! The agony, like a good suspense novel, the cliffhanger. Just sharing my thoughts, we are living in interesting times, get the popcorn ready for the main event.
 
My take after listening, president Trump needs to sign that paper they referenced which would assign the special counsel status to Sidney Powell. That would seem to give the KRACKEN code word they been using the teeth needed to allow Sidney to do what she's been asking to do all along. Without her unleashing the bureaucrats in place will continue to stall and run the clock out.

Thank you, Ocean and bravo for posting!
Amen
 
I really don't think Trump has the team in place to make good on his promise to "Drain the Swamp". This is something that has been in place for decades, if not millennia, it is so firmly entrentched in the body politic of the West and beyond. One positive outcome from this psychodrama is the revelation of the men and women behind the curtain (memories of The Wizard of OZ) has been revealed for those with eyes and ears to see.

I guess, as the C's say wait and see. What will happen on January 6th and more importantly, on January 21st.

Ah! The agony, like a good suspense novel, the cliffhanger. Just sharing my thoughts, we are living in interesting times, get the popcorn ready for the main event.

@Joan ,

I think as you said revealing "the man behind the curtain" is maybe the best and most positive aspect of all this in-fighting and chaos.
Not too long ago (about 17 years ago) the Cs mentioned how it may turn out. Many possible players are mentioned by @Laura and @ark.

Session 18 January 2003:
(A) Okay, there is Bush and his Skull and Bones. And then, there is the Illuminati. And they are looking for something. So, probably somebody behind Bush is also looking for something. So, the only way for us to help, is to work on this project. And then, hopefully, these people will halt this mass destruction hoping they will get what they are after: grail or whatever. Because if they destroy the world, they will get nothing.

(L) And then meanwhile, there is the North Korean guy - the mirror image of George Bush; everything he says and does is modeled from George Bush. It is actually comical to watch them. "I'm going to blow up the world!" "No you're not, I'm going to blow it up first! I'm going to turn America into a sea of fire." And Bush is saying "I'm going to bomb Iraq back to the stone age." "No you're not! We're going to bomb YOU back to before the Stone Age!" They are like two identical characters! Crazy! We are in a hell of a mess. Any comments?

A: The situation looks bleak indeed. But remember the Achilles heel of STS: Wishful Thinking.

Q: In this case, how is wishful thinking going to help?

A: There will be a big miscalculation made. It will reveal the "Man behind the curtain."

Q: So, we just keep doing what we are doing. And just like Bridges, they will make a mistake and reveal themselves for what they are. Is there anything else we need to know that we haven't asked?

A: Just keep on the path. You are doing well! Goodbye.

End of Session

It is kind of difficult to know which "miscalculation" will be the main one that causes the revealing of the "Man behind the curtain".

More recently in 2016 (only 4 years ago) the Cs mentioned the "Man behind the curtain" again. This time it was in relation to blackmail which seems to be something we are observing more now.

Session 12 November 2016:
Q: (Joe) Is one of the main reasons that Trump and every other president who comes into power immediately goes and makes nice with Israel, has that got a lot to do with this Epstein guy and others like him who blackmail everybody? Essentially, does Israel control by blackmailing? It's not so much that Israel's our best friend, but...

A: Close. Watch closely for events that will reveal the "man behind the curtain."

Q: (L) And that is in the context of Jeffrey Epstein and Israel blackmailing people in power - literally everybody.

(Joe) Do they have anything on Trump?

A: Not much.

Q: (Joe) That gives him some leverage.

The first reference of "Man behind the curtain" talks about a big "miscalculation" and the more recent session talks about "events" that will reveal the "man behind the curtain. Maybe it could be a series of miscalculations and subsesquent resulting events that will lead to a final huge "miscalculation". It is a good reason to "Watch closely for events" I think. So maybe what we are doing now is not a bad idea.
 
Last edited:
That site is very Q-oriented and makes a lot of claims but we should know more very soon I think. Seeing arrests would be nice but I will "wait and see". Sometimes I like to be wrong.

Yes it is, but if you check with our new 'go to guy' Juan O Savin he has the full picture.
 
I really enjoy Viva Frei and Robert Barnes legal 'take' on the election and (particularly Barnes's) perspective on what's going on behind the scenes regarding the election, law suits, Sidney Powell and our rights regarding mandatory vaccines. He doesn't think much of the Q movement. Or, "Releasing the Kracken" etc.

 
Back
Top Bottom