2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

@ge0m0,

Thanks for an interesting video interview. I had a long nap before watching/listening to the show. I think that many questions about Patrick Byrne were made more clear by his details. It is one of those informational finds that maybe bringing a big hammer with you while thinking might be useful. There certainly were some wow moments in there for me.

P.S.
Could not help noticing you are from Fairfax, VA (I graduated from Annandale H.S and my aunt and uncle lived in Fairfax) so I know you are probably more sensitive to what is happening in D.C. than many. It is sometimes a small world.
My wife grew up in Annandale and when to HS there. I went to Madison in Vienna. Small world, indeed.

As far as being sensitive, I would say yes and no. Everybody around here is sort of tied to the Swamp/Deep State because the Federal Gov't is the gift that keeps on giving in this region's economy. I'm not a name dropper, but the people I know and connections I've made over the years is astounding when I reflect on it. Nevertheless, I am a mind-your own-business type of person; it's not my world and I have reservations about whether or not I can change it or even if I should if I could. I respect that who follow that calling, but I've not found it to be mine.

I guess I could also say that, thanks to decades of so-called "Work", I have finally gotten to a place of (mostly) dispassion. As the C's say, enjoy the show. Or as a particular Himalayan Master I love and trust had said, play the role you are given. In other words, surrender to the Divine, do your duty, and you are free from liability [
] (it's an inside joke as I know a prominent member of that particular live audience is an attorney). As far as I can be, I'm unconcerned for outcomes. That is to say, like the wonderful quote by J. Krishnamurti, "I don't mind what heppens" so much anymore. Of course, out of respect for free will and compassion and all that, I have preferences, but I don't have the necessary perspective (none of use do, I suppose, saving the likes of the C's or other such "High Beings") to judge what is the best outcome. Mysterious ways and all that.
 
Why do these people insist on talking about China hacking the election???
China is an effective boogeyman, I suppose. What it looks like more to me is that the global NWO cabal, including domestic and foreign actors, have certainly been causing mischief. It's like a sports team wins or loses and credit or blame goes to the superstar. In today's geopolitics there seems to be agreement that China is LeBron.
 
I think this is projection. You're taking what you know about how western governments operate and essentially saying this is how non western governments operate as well. I'm not saying it's necessarily incorrect but I'd ask for some semblance of evidence.

What do you know about the inner machinations of China?
Maybe is more about how RICO's work. Governments seem to be among the most well-funded of that bunch. It's got little to do with particular cultures and much more to do with ponerization.
 
- i beg to differ with you .. who has more control over more people and has more resources to engage that
if world wide control is their goal ..
( after all they can't feed the country as it is .. need more always need more power/land/resources .

i like this short video all of it except for her warning about 25th of Dec ?? we will see ..

-

-
[24 Dec 2020] Christmas Update . . .SUPER RED PILL . . . ..
9 minutes

 
No need to worry about posting your opinion. I just don't agree based on all the "Q" has "said". It has been, IMO, mostly nonsense designed to wind people up. Nothing of any consequence has been forthcoming from that source. If it has, I'd like to see it.
I didn't plan to answer you, and I was lacking for an example of a good thing that Q brought ... and I think that one just felt.
Note that 6 month before, I knew nothing about it, I just learnt on Q during these past month, let's say since July/August.

One good if not one of the main aim of Q (assuming it's a psyop) is to create an army of "digital soldiers". Correct if i'm wrong but this term is bound to Q.
And this term can now be seen from more to more referenced or used by many, like a rallying signal, and we have here a good example in the recent wonderfull french article released this Thursday (I juste posted here on the forum about, in the corona thread), here's the english-traduced passage :

This dictatorship, unprecedented in its scale, modelled on the Chinese Communist Party, is on a forced march, you have seen it, you see it because if you still have the curiosity, the flair and the quest for truth that are the essence of journalism, you have the information, as all those who have replaced you at the drop of a hat, have it. I'm talking about whistleblowers and all those who relay them, the so-called digital soldiers. Because yes, they are soldiers, because we are at war. Many of them have fallen over the years, been sidelined, interned, murdered, "committed suicide". Some of them were even journalists, like Julian Assange, to name only him, whose news is still hot. It is a shame for all of you who had abandoned and sometimes disowned him.

and even if Q can be used for ... let's say bad purposes, we can see that it provoked a very nice & positive movement of truth-seekers worlwide. These people are common people who regroup and organize to spread information. The french website les deqodeurs is a good example, succeeding to make 2 live per week with 20.000 people following it in direct is incredible: even if they are not true on all, I think they are actually playing a key role in France for opening the minds. My bet is the following : the main guy in France behind this is Leonardo, and I bet he has a key SDA role in France.
One idea : if you perform a last session with the C's for this year, I would like to ask them one question, you may ask further after, this would be : Does Leonardo of the french "Les Deqodeurs" is in contact with you (the C's) ? (or influenced by ...)
 
@Heather,

I think Fitts sees a big picture and she does not give much hope for a cure but she does see that the PTB have a fear of the "population". Sadly, it seems that in the U.S. and those affected by our role in the "big" picture (our "central role" as the "enforcers" of military control) puts almost the whole planet at a crossroads.

The bill being claimed "Nullifies the President's use of the Insurrection Act." is H.R. 6395 July 7, 2020. Maybe some scholarly lawyers here can give us a better idea if that is true.

Catherine Austin Fitts seems to have little hope and I can understand that. She does not know that in the cosmic picture this take-over wishful thinking will fail.
I still think Fitts tweeted the article she did since it flew in the face of what she had been saying: namely, that the Deep State WANTS Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act (or declare Martial Law) since this would mean the "temporary" suspension of civil rights, which the Deep State would use as their opportunity to seize guns, property, and put people in prison.

However, from listening to Fitts address this several times, I have the feeling she may be conflating the Insurrection Act and Martial Law, actually, so that's something to look into further since they are not the same.

Here's an explanation I found on Reddit. We should verify this however.


Answer:
Martial law is when the military imposes a justice/legal system that is independent of the normal civilian one. So under martial law you'd have things like military courts, and laws set by the military.

The Insurrection act, at least as it's currently being discussed, would allow the US military to be deployed in support of the normal civilian legal system.

If the above answer is correct, then perhaps the Defense Bill, in foreclosing on the Insurrection Act option, means to force Trump to declare Martial Law instead which, unlike the Insurrection Act, implicates the "temporary" suspension of constitutional rights.

But, again, we should verify the distinction between the two.
 

Supreme Court sets Pennsylvania response date in Trump election challenge for two days after Biden inauguration​

The Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared to shun President Trump's Pennsylvania election challenge by setting the date for the state's response to Jan. 22 — two days after President-elect Joe Biden's inauguration.

Trump, who filed the suit on Monday, requested that the court expedite the case's proceedings and require Pennsylvania to respond by today. In a petition filed to the court, Trump's lawyers wrote that speeding up the timeline is essential "because once candidates have taken office, it will be impossible to repair election results tainted by illegally and belatedly cast or absentee and mail ballots."

"Without expedited review, petitioner’s appellate rights-and this court's power to resolve the important constitutional and legal questions presented for this election may be irrevocably lost," wrote John Eastman, Trump's attorney in the case.

Eastman told the Washington Examiner that he expects the court to expedite the case and move up the response date.
 

Trump Goes To War On RINOs​



Populist Press can exclusively report that a source close to the president said that Trump is prepared to spend whatever is necessary to get RINOs to address the election theft in a constitutional manner.

President Trump has already authorized $5 million to crush disloyal Republicans in battleground states, who he helped get into office but didn’t return the favor.

It’s becoming clearer that Trump’s cash-flush PAC could be deployed in two years against remaining Republican incumbents Trump doesn’t like. Trump’s tweets and public statements have already drummed some GOP officials out of office during his administration, but the PAC could be a potent new tool in his continued quest to shape the party.

The Trump forces sent up a warning flare on Wednesday when they launched a $5 million TV and radio advertising blitz calling on Republican-controlled state legislatures to hold hearings on voter fraud. Some of the commercials are running in Georgia, whose governor, Brian Kemp, is up for reelection in 2022 but has come under heavy criticism from the president for not bending to Trump’s calls to overturn the election results.

The ads urge listeners to call Kemp and legislators and “demand they inspect” voting machines “and hear the evidence.” Previously, Trump openly encouraged outgoing GOP Rep. Doug Collins to mount a primary challenge against Kemp during a recent campaign visit to Georgia.

The offensive comes ahead of the Jan. 6 congressional vote to certify the Electoral College, which would finalize President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the November elections. Many Republicans are expected to vote in favor of validating the electoral votes, and people close to the president say that itself is not a litmus test for whether a lawmaker will get a Trump-endorsed primary challenge.
 
Merry Christmas!
Some of this is a review of what Millie Weaver has already presented with the infiltrated zoom chats with federal workers plotting the coup. Slow walking the judicial process is mentioned which we are seeing. She says there has been a sting operation in place since the 2018 midterms. Space Force has been designated as the 18th branch of the Intelligence community and its capabilities where used to monitor the 2020 election.

Tore, a whistle blower, worked with John Brennan and had access to his communications until approximately 1.5 yrs ago. She has presented a sworn affidavit to Sidney Powells legal team that in 2013 she witnessed the Obama administration setting up the rigged voting system in Ukraine that was later used here. John Brennan and James Clapper were responsible for ushering the intelligence of that election.

The HAVA Act was initiated after the Gore/Bush election and requires voting machines to be inspected and certified annually. This hasn't been done since Feb. 2017 so technically all those elected after that date aren't legally certified! 🤪

The 12th amendment and dueling electors are discussed.


Patrick Bergy the creator of Shadownet has been invited to testify before Congress on 12/21/20 about social media using psychological warfare tactics on the public.

 
Last edited:
Last night @Andromeda asked me what I thought was going to happen re: the election. I said that, while I have no evidence to back it up, I have the feeling that Trump will get another term amid a lot of chaos and recriminations and there will be serious repercussions as a result. The thinking/feeling is based on the dynamic of this entire episode, the fact that it has continued so long, Trump's personality, the duplicitous nature of the PTB and the fact that the rigging was so flagrant that even many Democrats suspect it. In addition, it just seems to me that the 'time is right' for such an event.

There is a theory proposed by a Russian economist that various economy movers and shakers may have an interest in keeping Trump in place for now. Unless, of course, they do want the economy to collapse.


He said the following to the Russian TV channel:

"We did a simulation of the Biden plan and the Trump plan. As a result, we got the following picture: the difference is that if you follow Trump's program, of course the American economy will still be falling, but not much faster than the world as a whole. In general, the situation will be under control," said Khazin.

According to him, if the second presidential term of President Donald Trump follows, the maximum recession in the next two years in the United States will be about 20%.

"And the implementation of Biden's plan, as he will execute it, will lead to a decline of the U.S. economy by half over the next two years. That is a collapse," he pointed out.

"This could happen for a very simple reason: the United States of America has accumulated very large debts. And it is extremely difficult, on the one hand, to manage these debts so that creditors get something, and on the other hand - to keep demand. The U.S. economy is based on the stimulation of the middle class demand," said the expert.
 
Back
Top Bottom