Something tells me that if Q is really a psyops then why does the deepstate want to get rid of it?
@Heather,Hi @goyacobol. I believe my source for that is that Greg Hunter interview with Alex Newman that I linked to, and can do so again for you. I thought it was an especially helpful "wrap up" of the situation right now, and I recommend your watching the whole thing.
If I have time, I may transcribe some of it, offer some notes, etc., since there is some good information there to consider. But in the meantime, here it is:
Alex Newman - Biden Presidency Means the End of America - YouTube
And whether we want it or not, we have no control over it, we can 'digest' what is happening, not letting ourselves be disturbed and trying to look at the reality as it is. And with a little bit of luck, take steps in the right direction. not only to "survive", but to maintain a healthy body and mind and peace of mind.
Clearly, people have to suffer, and that is only, perhaps, before us, to understand that it is not the 'System' that is good or bad there, but they themselves.
That's exactly how it works: the psyops managed to convince you and others that this stuff has to be important because it's attacked. I suggest you further study evil and its forces to protect yourself from this kind of trap in the future.
As Joe stated, if Trump hesitates to play the military card, they are giving him much "motivations" to do it.Oh my, another hit for the Cs it seems: instant, in-your-face totalitarianism!
The C's actually did not say, they were a psyops, they said "INSIDER" of spyops, is't that something else?That's exactly how it works: the psyops managed to convince you and others that this stuff has to be important because it's attacked. I suggest you further study evil and its forces to protect yourself from this kind of trap in the future.
The C's actually did not say, they were a psyops, they said "INSIDER" of spyops, is't that something else?
Like a undercover cop, going undercover to bust drug dealers.
If Q is a insider of psyops, he/she/ they probably know a lot a truth actually.
Maybe I'm wrong. But I just wanted to point it out to you.
(Approaching Infinity) There's been this phenomenon on the internet: QAnon. It's an anonymous 4chan and 8chan poster who alleges to be an insider in some government structure who gives predictions and vague cryptic statements that are often then looked back on and confirmed by real events - at least in interpretation if not in actual fact. It has become a semi-popular phenomenon, but Google Analytics says it's not so popular. Then the Washington Post did a poll in Florida that found that 58% of Floridians were familiar with Q, and 25% held favorable opinions on the Q phenomenon. So, this gets back a question on forum as to the identity of Q. So, first question: Who is behind Q?
A: An "insider" of psyops.
Donald Trump has warned that efforts to impeach him are causing "tremendous anger" - but stressed he wants "no violence" in the run-up to Joe Biden's inauguration.
Speaking to reporters for the first time since last week's deadly riots at the US Capitol, Mr Trump declined to answer questions on whether he would resign.
This push to destroy the man is beyond all reason, not that the DC establishment is reasonable these days. It carries with it the danger that they will put him in a position where he feels he has nothing left to lose, making "doing what needs to be done" more appealing to him.
After having exerted its creative action, time begins that work of destruction from which neither gods nor men escape. Having reached a certain level of strength and complexity a civilization ceases to grow, and having ceased to grow it is condemned to a speedy decline. The hour of its old age has struck.
This inevitable hour is always marked by the weakening of the ideal that was the mainstay of the race. In proportion as this ideal pales all the religious, political, and social structures inspired by it begin to be shaken.
With the progressive perishing of its ideal the race loses more and more the qualities that lent it its cohesion, its unity, and its strength. The personality and intelligence of the individual may increase, but at the same time this collective egoism of the race is replaced by an excessive development of the egoism of the individual, accompanied by a weakening of character and a lessening of the capacity for action. What constituted a people, a unity, a whole, becomes in the end an agglomeration of individualities lacking cohesion, and artificially held together for a time by its traditions and institutions. It is at this stage that men, divided by their interests and aspirations, and incapable any longer of self-government, require directing in their pettiest acts, and that the State exerts an absorbing influence.
With the definite loss of its old ideal the genius of the race entirely disappears; it is a mere swarm of isolated individuals and returns to its original state-that of a crowd. Without consistency and without a future, it has all the transitory characteristics of crowds. Its civilization is now without stability, and at the mercy of every chance. The populace is sovereign, and the tide of barbarism mounds. The civilization may still seem brilliant because it possesses an outward front, the work of a long past, but it is in reality and edifice crumbling to ruin, which nothing supports, and destined to fall in the first storm.
To pass in pursuit of an ideal from the barbarous to the civilized state, and then, when this ideal has lost its virtue, to decline and die, such is the cycle of the life of a people.