Yeah, so, as the video demonstrates, the FBI uses MIND CONTROL when it conducts interviews of whistleblowers.Federal Agents turned the screw on USPS whistle blower RIchard Hopkins.
Project Veritas has his back.
Well I am officially beyond the point of speculating on this madness. It is interesting that Hannity/Ingraham/Tucker talk about this stuff on a network that was the first to say biden won. Fox also refuses to change the calls on certain states.The question was asked several times, why was Tucker and a few others allowed to speak in this vain where many others have been censored to the point of deplatforming across all the other social media sites? Whether Tucker really believes most of what he says is the question that I am still not sure of, but the fact that he was allowed to say it seems like it was controlled opposition. Sometimes it seems like he was the voice of reason for the right and would give them hope that something, somewhere was being done to stop this train wreck from happening.
But what if his coverage of all the insanity with the virus and riots were designed to instill more fear for the right so that when Biden was handed the election it would give a preview to what's to come for everyone who voted for Trump as a way to keep them in line?
@HeatherYeah, so, as the video demonstrates, the FBI uses MIND CONTROL when it conducts interviews of whistleblowers.
Here's how the FBI employs mind control techniques to get a whistleblower to change his story (couldn't resist transcribing this):
FBI agent to Richard Hopkins, USPS whistleblower: This storm is getting crazy, right? It's out of a lot of people's control. And so the reason they called me in is to try harness that storm, try to REEL it back in before it gets REALLY crazy.
Richard Hopkins [sounding tentative, possibly frightened]: I understand.
FBI agent: Because we have Senators involved. We have Department of Justice involved. [we hear muffled reaction from Hopkins: "wow," he's saying] We have Trump's lawyer's team's gotten a hold of me. I'm not--well, I AM, actually. I am trying to twist you a little bit, because in that, believe it or not, your mind will kick in. We like to control our mind. And when we do that, we convince ourselves of a memory. But when you're under a little bit of stress, which is what I'm doing to you purposely, your mind can be a little bit clearer. And we're going to do a different exercise too, to make your mind a little bit clearer. So, but this is all on purpose. I'm NOT scaring you. But I AM scaring you."
Conversation cut off at this point in the video, unfortunately. I would have liked to hear more.
I'm confused, @Ocean, did Hopkins recant his original story after they did this to him? It doesn't sound like it. Project Veritas, in this tweet you linked to, claims Hopkins "doubled down" on his story, meaning his original story, it would seem. So, then the Washington Post must have spun from whole cloth this lie about Hopkins' recanting his story that the USPS was backdating ballots to meet the deadline. It's always stunning when [cough cough] "reputable" news organizations blatantly lie like that. So, why have the FBI go the mind control route in the first place? Just have the Post lie, like they always do. Seems a lot less complicated, and doesn't leave a messy trail, like this utterly indicting video -- who shot that video, by the way? And how did Veritas get it?
Anyway, here Hopkins recants the Washington Post's claim that he recanted his original story:
Somehow all this is reminding me of how the FBI and/or intelligence agencies target vulnerable individuals and work them either with "mind control light," as in the above interview, or using more invasive methods, such as drugging, electroshock, etc.
And you see even in this little interview how the FBI is working against the president and the team he's assembled to deal with the Biden camp's voter fraud operation. So, it couldn't be more clear what side the FBI is on.
Perhaps this damning evidence of Deep State backstabbing will convince Trump to fire yet another corrupt FBI director (the first being Comey). Christopher Wray, the present director, was appointed by Trump. Obviously, Trump had been poorly advised re: such a choice.
Here's a brief piece on why Trump has dragged his feet on firing Wray (i.e., firing Comey led to the appointment of Mueller, and we all saw what happened there):
Trump 'would like' to fire his own FBI director but 'can't stomach' another Comey debacle: Ex-officials
President Donald Trump has ratcheted up criticisms of FBI Director Christopher Wray after he said that Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report found no evidence of a "deep state" conspiracy to bring down the president.Given that Trump is now openly feuding with the man he picked to run the...www.rawstory.com
@Heather
I checked. The Project Veritas video was posted on their site 15 hours ago .
Anything could have happened since then. If Richard Hopkins HAS recanted then the FBI must have put the fear of God in him!
Poor guy.
I'm not an American but I think the FBI is rotten to the core.
I think Trump needs to get better advisors.
Thanks, @Ocean. I don't see any mention of his actually recanting his original story, just the story the Post wrote.@Heather
I checked. The Project Veritas video was posted on their site 15 hours ago .
Anything could have happened since then. If Richard Hopkins HAS recanted then the FBI must have put the fear of God in him!
Poor guy.
I'm not an American but I think the FBI is rotten to the core.
I think Trump needs to get better advisors.
Hopkins told Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe, however, that he has NOT retracted his claims. O’Keefe announced on Twitter that federal agents “coerced” Hopkins for four hours to sign a statement he didn’t understand while depriving him of legal representation.
Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick is offering $1 million in rewards to people who can help uncover voter fraud in the presidential election.
Patrick on Tuesday said in a press release to the media that any person who comes forward with evidence that leads to an arrest and final conviction of voter fraud will be paid a minimum of $25,000. The money would come from Patrick’s campaign funds.
“I support President Trump’s efforts to identify voter fraud in the presidential election and his commitment to making sure that every legal vote is counted and every illegal vote is disqualified,” Patrick said. “President Trump’s pursuit of voter fraud is not only essential to determine the outcome of this election, it is essential to maintain our democracy and restore faith in future elections.”
Arguably the most famous headline in the newspaper’s 150-year history, DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN is every publisher’s nightmare on every election night.
Like most newspapers, the Tribune, which had dismissed him on its editorial page as a “nincompoop,” was lulled into a false sense of security by polls that repeatedly predicted a Dewey victory. Critically important, though, was a printers' strike, which forced the paper to go to press hours before it normally would.
The ink was hardly dry on 150,000 copies of the paper when radio bulletins reported that the race was surprisingly close. The headline was changed to DEMOCRATS MAKE SWEEP OF STATE OFFICES for the second edition. Truman went on to take Illinois and much of the Midwest in this whopping election surprise. Radio comedian Fred Allen noted Truman was the “first president to lose in a Gallup and win in a walk.” The Tribune blamed the pollsters for its mistake.