Foxx said:The problem is that the offer isn't genuine at all and all the red flags that have come up give that away: the purpose of alchemy isn't making gold, he could have just sent the book to Laura and Ark for review, he's charging $3,300 for a book (really??), he emailed Lisa after an article she wrote that was completely unrelated to gold, his entire email is full to the brim with word salad, he was banned here before, "ps. Sure, I channel my past life intuition and Billy is visited by ETs, but do these unusual sources of information deserve to be thrown out the window like the ouija board? I don't think so, I think they have a lot to offer us, as your group has shown."--a reason all on its own, etc. All of this is nonsense and does not show genuineness on Alex's part at all--it shows delusion. Have you read "The Wave" yet, Soluna?
Plain and simple--if you really could make gold, you'd never tell anyone how to do it because then the value of the gold you made would plummet--that's the whole point of gold. Or you might be assassinated.
And I'm not saying that it's not possible to make gold or to change metals or materials, I'm just saying there's currently zero evidence that this guy can do it and a large pile of evidence suggesting that he cant and even if he can, it's not really very useful to the work that we do here.
But I could be wrong and really all that would have to happen for that would be for Alex Putney to present his data in a clear and concise fashion for scientific scrutiny and experimental reproduction. However, if he does that, there really is little purpose for the process I imagine, because gold really isn't that useful to us here in 3D STS (that I'm aware of currently) except for being a fairly scarce resource that people currently pay a lot of money for.
I have read The Wave yes, and am working my way through The Secret History of the World now - I don't claim to have understood or absorbed everything I have read yet, and I imagine it will take some re-reads and research and a lot of self-reflection to come to increase my understanding, if only by a little.
I am aware - through reading and partially understanding some of the beginning chapters in The Secret World, that Alchemys aim is not the transmutation of metals - however, although this does seem to be one of the specific claims of Mr Putney, he does make some reference to it's biological(?) applications (I have no idea exactly what he means by this) - but it did make me consider the possibility that the transmutation of gold was not necessarily his 'end goal'.
Your comment - "Plain and simple--if you really could make gold, you'd never tell anyone how to do it because then the value of the gold you made would plummet--that's the whole point of gold. Or you might be assassinated"
I don't know about 'you' - but would the value of gold in the world today really make you hesitate to share the knowledge with others? I think perhaps at first, people would not believe that you could achieve this - so in order to make the knowledge credible you would need to share it with others who could confirm it's truth - and once the information was being shared and 'out there' it would be much harder to cover up and/or 'assassinate' the source.
Regardless, I do understand the possibility of 'good intentions', may not always have 'good' results. My opinion was that it 'seemed' a little abrupt for people interested in the sharing of knowledge and learning and researching, to suggest blocking someone who 'seemed' to want to share their knowledge if only to validate it, or indeed refute it.