Iron said:
Perhaps with the consciousness being the element that gives a higher probability to a given scenario? Or maybe... what the awareness of a being can hold together at a given moment? The image that is coming to my mind is like a tunnel of light, first density to seven, more awareness being able to hold their own in the presence of more light ( greater densities ) and being able to act in the lower as well, in a more direct sense than our present reality of having "hints" or "predilections" of other lives.
I hope this makes sense!
Here's what the C's said about consciousness, awareness and gravity from this thread: http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=18023.msg166698#msg166698.
Also, when you say "the awareness a being can hold together at a given moment" I can't help but think of Castaneda's assemblage point.
[quote author=JGeropoulas ]
Q: (L) Gravity [which has consciousness] seems to be a property of matter. Is that correct?
A: And....[anti-matter]
[...]
A: Gravity [which has consciousness] binds all that is physical with all that is ethereal through unstable gravity waves!!!
Q: (L) Is antimatter ethereal existence?
A: Pathway to.
Q: (L) Okay.
A: Doorway to.
Q: (L) Are unstable gravity waves... no, hold everything... do unstable gravity waves emanate from 7th density?
A: Throughout.
Q: (L) Do they emanate from any particular density?
A: That is just the point, there is none.
[...]
Q: (L) There is no emanation point?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, they are a property or attribute of the existence of matter, and the binder of matter to ethereal ideation?
A: Sort of, but they are a property of anti-matter, too!
Q: (L) So, through unstable gravity waves, you can access other densities?
A: Everything.
[...]
Q: (L) I thought that gravity was an indicator of the consumption of electricity; that gravity was a byproduct of a continuous flow of electrical energy...
A: Gravity [which has consciousness] is no byproduct. It is the central ingredient of all existence!
[..."Divine Cosmic Mind, Holy awareness in all creation"...]
Q: (L) I was evaluating by electric flow and consumption... and I was thinking that electricity was evidence of some sort of consciousness, and that gravity was evidence that a planet that had it, had life...
A: We have told you before that planets and stars are windows. And where does it go?
Q: (L) The windows?
A: The gravity.
Q: (L) Oh. Gravity must go into the ethereal dimensions or densities.
A: Good!
Q: (L) Well, where does gravity go. The sun is a window. Even our planet must be a window!
A: You have it too!!
Q: (L) So, gravity is the unifying principle... the thing that keeps things together, like the way all the fat pulls together in a bowl of soup.
A: Gravity [which has consciousness] is all there is.
Q: (L) Is light the emanation of gravity?
A: No.
Q: (L) What is light?
A: Gravity.
Q: (L) Is gravity the same as the strong and weak nuclear forces?
A: Gravity [which has consciousness] is “God.”
[...]
Q: (L) Is gravity the “light that cannot be seen,” as the Sufis call it: the Source.
A: Please name something that is not gravity [which has consciousness]
[...]
[/quote]
Then there's this excerpt from session 960629:
Q: (L) [...] The first thing is in regard to the
Santilli session: is awareness equal to gravity?
A: It is a part therein.
[...]
A: Gravity does not ever get increased or decreased; it is merely
collected and dispersed. [of which light is an energy expression, and energy can neither be created nor destroyed - law of energy conservation]
Q: (L) If gravity is collected and dispersed, and planets and stars are
windows, and you say that human beings "have" gravity, does that
mean that the human beings, or the life forms on a given planet or in
a given solar system, are the collectors of this gravity?
A: No. Gravity is the collector of human beings and all else! Make
"collector" singular.
Q: (L) Is STO the equivalent of dispersing gravity?
A: No, STO is a REFLECTION of the existence of gravity dispersal.
Q: (L) Is STS also dispersal of gravity?
A: No. Collection is reflected. STS is reflection or reflected by
collection of gravity.
[...]
A: Then change the thought pattern. Gravity is the "stuff" of all
existence; therefore it has an unchanging property of quantity.
Q: (L) So, gravity is not being "used," per se?
A: Close.
Q: (L) You said that light was an energy expression of gravity. Then
you said...
A: You can utilize gravity, but you cannot "use" it. [same as energy, see above comment] You cannot
increase or decrease that which is in perfectly balanced static state.
[...]
A: Yes. Remember, density refers to one's conscious awareness
only. Once one is aware, all [many spirals of the planchette]
conforms to that awareness.
Also, this excerpt from session 960622 is connected to the topic:
[...]
A: No. All are as one in timeless understanding of all there is.
Q: (L) If, at 5th density a person has timeless understanding, what is
it about them that determines that they will "recycle" as opposed to
moving to 6th from 5th?
A: Contemplation reveals needed destiny.
Q: (L) So, being united with other beings on 5th, you come to some
sort of understanding about your lessons....
A: Balanced. And this, my dear, is another example of gravity as the
binder of all creation... "The Great Equalizer!"
Q: (L) In this picture in my mind, the cycle moves out, in dispersion,
begins to accrete and return to the source. Is this correct?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Is this, in fact, that exactly half of all that exists, is moving into
imbalance, while the other half is moving into balance?
A: Close.
Q: (L) All the cosmos? All that exists?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is it possible that one area of the cosmos has more of the
balance seeking energy while another has more of that which is
seeking imbalance?
A: Oh yes!
Q: (L) Is the Earth one of those areas that is more imbalanced than
balanced at the present time?
A: Yes, but rapidly moving back toward balance.
Q: (L) Is the Realm Border part of this balancing?
A: Yes.
[...]
Q: (L) Is 3rd density awareness the only density with perception of
time?
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, what others?
A: 4,5,6,7.
Q: (L) But I thought that time perception was an illusion?
A: YOUR perception of it is an illusion. Remember the example of
the dogs and cats riding in a car?
Q: (L) Yes. Ouspensky and the horse. So, time, as an essential
thing, DOES exist?
A: But not as you know it. When we refer to "timelessness," we are
speaking from the standpoint of your familiarity only.
Q: (L) Does time then exist, and does space have a limit?
A: You are getting confused because your inborn linear perception is
clouding the image your efforts are trying to produce.
[...]
In other words, it would seem that whether a soul is moving towards balance or imbalance determines the probability of the contexts or scenarios in which the soul finds itself/fluctuates to. The reflection of gravity dispersal relates to STO relates to movement towards balance, the reflection of gravity collection relates to STS relates to movement towards imbalance. Maybe it has to do with where we consciously focus our awareness? That's how I understand what you were saying.
This gravity/consciousness/awareness/timelessness issue has really been nagging me for quite a while... I feel like a six year old trying to understand Schroedinger's equation, though my understanding of time is probably a lot smaller than the understanding of a six-year-old of quantum physics
