About Antarctica

[Alana]

Re: Antarctica

Hi Alana, this discovery took place in the Arctic Circle not Antarctica.

"“More specifically, the finding was made last August —as local media reveals—in Alexandra, an island located more than 1,000 kilometers from the North Pole…While people were cautious when the discovery was made a couple of months ago due to the lack of images and conclusive evidence, the news has gone viral as the team has posted a video where we can see a number of artifacts and the base completely in ruins.” _http://www.inquisitr.com/3628205/secret-nazi-base-on-alexandra-land-really-discovered-on-wikipedia-page/(video above)

You are right, I am very sorry, I mixed things up.

 

[JEEP]

Re: Antarctica

Having recently become aware of Dr. Farrell, I decided to nose around his website. Interestingly enough there was a posting today relating to Antartica - and no, I don't think it was an April Fool's joke. It was connecting some very unusual dots:

• a signed law calling for manned missions to Mars to be the chief goal of NASA for the next decade that was passed unanimously by both houses of Congress - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4336244/Trump-NASA-rare-consensus-mission-Mars.html?ito=email_share_article-bottom\%22
  
• Vice-President Pence had a little "Chat" with former Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin. This was the topic of this article that appeared just a few days before the signing of the aforementioned law:
  http://www.space.com/36103-buzz-aldrin-mike-pence-space-policy-white-house.html?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social\%22
  
• the reviving of the National Space Council

Mention was made of the fact that during the Clinton administration, a meteorite from Mars that contained clear indications of microbial life was found in, incidentally . . . Antarctica (hmm - watta u know)!
http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/snc/clinton.html/%22

Farrell:

Aldrin, one should remember, has been urging manned missions to return to the Moon for some time, and more importantly, manned missions to Mars, in particular to explore the Martian moon Phobos.
[...]
That [National Space] council was, of course, under then vice-president Lyndon Johnson, one of the major driving forces behind the Mercury-Gemini-Apollo era of NASA's "golden age" of manned space flight. Notably, however, the article is rather tight-lipped about what Aldrin and the Vice President talked about, though clearly it was about space policy. Then, days later, the law about Mars...All of this, you might imagine, has my high octane speculative motor working in over-drive, for Aldrin's visit with Pence follows, of course, his little junket to Antarctica, which followed former Secretary of State John Kerry's visit, who in turn followed the Patriarch of Moscow.

Farrell's "high octane speculation" is that something was found in Antarctica that has spurred all this recent activity.

Whatever it was, it was something that raised the "urgency meter" into the red zone, requiring many "visitors" to go down and have a"look for themselves", and to urge the President, not simply to issue executive orders or statements about NASA priorities, as was done from GHW Bush to Barack Obama, but rather, to pass a law, one that, again, gained unanimous support in Congress. In short, this law and this event I am viewing as directly related to whatever it is going on in Antarctica. [...] Oh yea,[...], don't forget that Lockheed-Martin is also in Antarctica...

_https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/04/trump-pence-buzz-mars/

Note: Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".

He is also into music theory, composes music, plays the harpsichord & another instrument that I forget right now. He has a pet bird named Murray (or did in 2015 - Murray kept 'beepiing' in the background during one of his interviews!). And boy, is he a chain smoker!

Also, according to his website, he has a recently launched collaboration w/ Catherine Austin Fitts.

 

[Neil]

Re: Antarctica

I've been reading some things on his site since he was brought up in this thread and I'm not quite sure what to make of him; he gives me kind of an off vibe. His penchant for "high octane speculation" kind of intimates to me that he really "wants to believe" and while he may be right in broad strokes about many of things he speculates about, it seems rather easy for him to get carried away. Bjorn also has a point, people who are active in the public sphere are really not the people that have anything to do with aliens or other woo-woo stuff; they're just stooges, mostly. Either the "discovery" in Antarctica has become so apparent that the lower echelons of the PTB are having to deal with it and figure out how they're going to spin it to the world, or Farrell has gotten too caught up in his high octane speculation and sort of lost the track...

I was following up on Putin's supposed intention to visit Antarctica, and while he never went himself, he did send a group of business leaders on a sort of engineering and design competition where they climbed Antarctica's highest mountain. There was a second expedition and Putin's video conference with them is transcribed on the Kremlin's website _http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/53199

Now if it's all ice and penguins I don't know why Antarctica would be so interesting except for a few climatologists and zoologists. I learned in school that the Antarctic was the best environment for testing technologies intended for use on other planets because it has the harshest climate that presents the most relevant design challenges. Antarctica is good practice for exploring Mars. So why does anyone want to go to Mars? Well, I think it does allow people to dream and leads to the discovery of technologies that might be useful for other things. It also gives the military industrial complex something more productive to do than kill people for no reason. If you can get a bunch of weapons scientists to work on laser cannons which can be used for space mining or a possible alien threat which they will probably never really be able to hit, it is still better than putting them on planes and pointing them at other countries. Such projects can raise morale, keep people employed, and secure loyalties within the military establishment, which seems to be vital defense against coups from the intelligence community.

There has also been a long standing conspiracy theory that the reason they want to build colonies on Mars is because there is alien, or at least Atlantean, tech to be recovered there. Farrell would say all of this is confirmation of his ideas about Antarctica, but it's really hard to say. It's probably circles working within circles of people intersecting at cross purposes who work within the "alien reality," leaving people like Farrell with really nothing more than wild guesses about what the overall direction is.

Then I could throw the latest Cassiopaean session in for spice, if we're really getting into the times where all sorts of creatures are going to be emerging from portals to the twilight zone, perhaps they really are nervous about how they're going to "manage" it and they have some kind of disclosure planned as a distraction from the more uncontrollable paranormal aspects of the phenomenon.

 

[angelburst29]

Re: Antarctica

There was a short discussion on Antarctica in the Clif High thread:
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,12975.585.html

For Today in Conspiracy Corner we travel all the way to Antarctica. That is where the 2nd man on the moon (official story) - iconic Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin sent out a cryptic Tweet he then later deleted. The Tweet featured a picture of a mysterious pyramid and the caption "We are all in danger. It is evil itself.”

http://www.break.com/article/apollo-astronaut-buzz-aldrin-tweets-from-antarctica-3067214

For medical reasons Aldrin had been evacuated from the South Pole on December 1st where he was visiting as part of a tourist group. The American hero was air lifted to New Zealand with fluid in his lungs, but soon recovered with antibiotics and rest. At least according to the official story. The strange Tweet opens up fresh questions about his REAL reason for going to Antarctica at the age of 86 and what exact illness he may have contracted from whatever he encountered down there.

The alleged pyramid is located adjacent to the United Kingdom’s Princess Elisabeth Station at the South Pole. It has been noted on Google Earth for its symmetrical, artificial looking appearance in contrast to other glaciers and rock formations in the area.

To top it off Secretary of State John Kerry also recently traveled to Antarctica in November supposedly to personally take a look at how the ice was melting on the continent and report his findings to international climate meetings happening in Marrakech, Morocco. After all he did negotiate the Paris Climate Agreement which is soon going to be terminated- so maybe this was one last hurrah for Kerry? I mean why did he have to go himself, why couldn’t he just talk to the scientists?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/11/14/here-are-pictures-of-john-kerry-in-antarctica-to-remind-you-global-warming-is-still-happening/?utm_term=.fb729a1d58fd

Rumors that Obama secretly visited Antarctica in March 2016 - Simultaneous to Obama's visit to the South Pole, his director of CIA, James Clapper, made a secret trip to Australia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B97kDYEIWvE (14:05 min.)

Like Hlat had mentioned, Buzz Aldrin's cryptic tweet was found to be fake.

UPDATE: Real Pyramids In Antarctica, Buzz Aldrin Disinfo Exposed (Video)
https://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2016/astronaut-buzz-aldrin-tweets-we-are-all-in-danger-it-is-evil-itself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAHfPReAiWQ (11:00 min.)

United States Astronaut Buzz Aldrin Tweeted an ominous message to the world using his official, verified Twitter Account, then strangely deleted the tweet later?? His words: "We are all in danger. It is evil itself." and showed a photograph of a pyramid located at the South Pole as show In the Video. BUT ITS FAKE!

Superstation95 even reported that it was from Buzz's Official page, but it was not!!!! If that would have been checked, they would have known this. Or they knew and decided to push it anyway!

Bottom line, the Alleged Buzz Tweet was NOT from His Account.

Secondly, there are very real pyramid type structures int his area. The fact that the new Belgian Base is at the base of one, shows the importance to the research they are really doing there. They chose this specific spot for a reason.

Learn More:
_https://www.yahoo.com/tech/m/386c61ae...

_https://www.google.com/search?q=princ...

This link contains false info, but its here for reference:
_https://www.superstation95.com/index....

Some recent articles on Antarctica.

Last week, officials from over a dozen countries gathered in Arkhangelsk, Russia for the international forum 'The Arctic: Territory of Dialogue'. Among the forum's senior participants was Russian nuclear energy giant Rosatom. Officials from the company and from the government previewed Rosatom's role in the new wave of intensive Arctic development.

Russian Nuclear Giant Rosatom on the Front Lines of Moscow's Arctic Expansion
https://sputniknews.com/russia/201704021052211048-rosatom-arctic-development-prospects/

02.04.2017 - Speaking at the forum, Rosatom CEO Aleksei Lihachev emphasized that the company has a wide array of projects and proposals in the areas of transport, energy, mining, and environmental protection, many of them taken into account by the government and by companies operating in the region.

For example, Rosatom's nuclear icebreakers are actively assisting in the creation of the so-called Northern Sea Route, the new northern shipping route running along the Russian Arctic coast from the Kara Sea to the Bering Strait. The Bilibino Nuclear Power Plant, meanwhile, provides power to the Arctic territories. Furthermore, the company is justifiably proud of its role in solving existing ecological problems associated with the so-called 'nuclear legacy', dismantling and disposing of nuclear-powered thermoelectric generators and helping to reduce radiation in contaminated areas. (Long article.)

Last week, President Putin took part in the fourth International Arctic Forum in Arkhangelsk, northern Russia. As Russian business news portal Expert Online points out, the area is at the crossroads of a third wave of large-scale economic development in the region. In addition, several factors make the present wave of development unique.

Northern Pivot: Why the Arctic is Set to Become Driver of the Russian Economy
https://sputniknews.com/russia/201704011052197679-russian-arctic-development-third-stage/

01.04.2017 - Last week, President Putin took part in the fourth International Arctic Forum in Arkhangelsk, northern Russia. As Russian business news portal Expert Online points out, the area is at the crossroads of a third wave of large-scale economic development in the region. In addition, several factors make the present wave of development unique.

On Thursday, the representatives of 14 countries, including the Russian president, gathered in Arkhangelsk, northern Russia for the international forum 'The Arctic: Territory of Dialogue', discussing everything from regional development and the need for cooperation to climate change and the impact of human activity on the region. (Long article.)

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Russian PM Dmitry Medvedev landed Wednesday on an island of Franz Joseph Land in the Arctic Ocean, far off Russia's northwestern coast, a Sputnik correspondent reported.

What Putin Did During His Visit to Franz Joseph Land in the Arctic Ocean (Photos)
https://sputniknews.com/russia/201703301052132811-putin-franz-joseph-land/

The politicians have been reviewing the results of a seven-year-long campaign to clean up the archipelago, which has been accumulating washed-up garbage for years.

Russia is open for constructive cooperation with other countries on the issues related to the Arctic region, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday.

Russia Open for Constructive Cooperation on Arctic-Related Issues - Putin
https://sputniknews.com/russia/201703301052121451-arctic-putin-cooperation-issues/

30.03.2017 - Earlier in the day, the Russian president called for preservation of the Arctic as a space of constructive dialogue and equal interaction.

"I will stress that Russia is open for constructive cooperation [in the Arctic region] and creates conditions for effective development [of such cooperation]," Putin said, speaking at the "Arctic: Territory of Dialogue" international forum.

Putin added that the economic program aimed at the region's development included more than 150 projects with potential multibillion investments.

Russia seeks to resolve all territorial disputes in the Arctic using international law, Putin added.

Russia's military infrastructure in the Arctic will be fully developed by 2020, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said at the ministry's conference call Friday.

Russian Arctic Military Infrastructure to Be Fully Developed by 2020
https://sputniknews.com/russia/201703311052153102-russia-arctic-infrastructure/

Russia has plans to build and equip military facilities mainly on the Novaya Zemlya archipelago, the Franz Josef Archipelago, the New Siberian archipelago and the Wrangel Island.

It is also expanding trade and exploration activities in the Arctic by building transport and energy production infrastructure, as well as installing military facilities and developing the Northern Sea Route linking Europe and Asia.

 

[JEEP]

Re: Antarctica

• a signed law calling for manned missions to Mars to be the chief goal of NASA for the next decade that was passed unanimously by both houses of Congress - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4336244/Trump-NASA-rare-consensus-mission-Mars.html?ito=email_share_article-bottom\%22

Still continuing to check out Farrell's website & was intrigued by his comments on articles re metallic hydrogen & time crystals. I think I saw the headline re time crystals on Sott but didn't read it, but did read a recent article about our sun being composed of liquid metallic hydrogen.
Farrell referenced this article (also one re time crystals):
http://www.sciencealert.com/hydrogen-has-been-turned-into-a-metal-for-the-first-time-ever
http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-just-announced-a-brand-new-form-of-matter-time-crystals

From the first link:

Most importantly, physicists think that metallic hydrogen could be a room-temperature superconductor, which would mean the material could conduct electricity with zero resistance - and without having to be cooled to crazy temperatures first.
[...]
The material could also be the most powerful rocket propellant ever discovered, with incredible energy stored up in its bonds capable of blasting us to distant worlds.

Farrell:

Recall the experiments of Evgenny Podkletnov with circular superconductors that appeared to take on contrabaric (antigravity) properties. Now, instead of having to supercool those superconductors, simply make them of metallic hydrogen, in big enough rings, and oh, say, stack two of them upon the same axis of rotation, and counter-rotate those superconducting currents (which would have to be appropriately massive), and what do you get?

Well, before you think this rings a bell (and it does to some degree), recall NASA's proof of concept experiments in space warp technologies, being led by Dr. Harold "Sonny" White, who, you'll recall, reworked the metric of Miguel Alcubierre's paper on space warps to a smaller mass-energy conversion, and you have the NASA drawings of Dr. White's warp drive space ships with their clearly evident rings or "engines" that produce the warp.

While all this is hyper-dimensional-speculation-just-this-side-of-fantasy, I have to wonder if it really is that, for what it appears we're being shown are the first steps in a technology tree that could lead from fantasy to reality, and in that respect, I cannot help but recall both DARPA's stated goal for the USA to become "warp capable" in a mere century, and to recall that what we're shown usually lags behind - often far behind - what we're not being shown. And I can't help recall in the context of all this hyper-dimensional-speculation-just-this-side-of-fantasy, the alleged statements of Ben Rich, that "we" had found "an error in the equations" (shades of Dr. White reworking Alcubierre's equations), and that we now could "take ET home." I cannot also help but recall President Trump's strange connection to Nikola Tesla via his MIT physicist uncle, Dr. John Trump, and the President's statements on making space a national priority.

Well, that last detail came as a surprise to me. And, I can't help but wonder if the real 'disclosure' is going to involve all these super technological advances being revealed as something new rather than what the secret gov/space command has been utilizing for who knows how long. I mean, if whatever was found/observed in Antarctica has tipped off this sudden push to get to Mars, then warp drive spaceships will probably be required & the cat must be let out of the bag?

_https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/01/metallic-hydrogen-time-crystals-hyper-dimensional-speculation/

Another blip on the radar: "Thus, like it or not, sooner or later, celestial mining is coming. The question is, what effect will it have? We have no precedent in human history for such a sudden massive injection of commodities into the global economy."
_https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/01/things-make-go-hmmmm-nasa-ten-quintillion-dollar-asteroid/

It will probably take the influx of $10 quintillion to pay off the national debt!

From last link:

What's really at the center of them is yet another of those "unusual coincidences" that one notices when one connects discrete and apparently completely unrelated dots. In this case, the dots in our pointillistic picture are the quadrillions of dollars worth of derivatives sloshing around on bank ledgers in our "system" of finance, the enormous amount of cash that is also sloshing around in the system as a result of central bank quantitative easing, and, of course, all that "stuff" out there in space just waiting for us to go and get. It has always struck me as extremely odd that while we were watching the financial meltdown of 2007-2008, the bailout hearings, and the massive derivatives fraud (again, in the quadrillions of dollars), that this same time period saw the beginning of all those articles on space mining, asteroid mining, and so on. It was as if all those people who were asking "if there's seventeen quadrillion dollars of derivatives out there, which is several times the entire GDP of planet Earth, how are we possibly going to pay for it?" In other words, people were noticing the books simply didn't balance at all.

Well, I've been maintaining for a long time the possibility that space was long ago secretly "collaterallized", and that all that paper liquidity might not, in fact, be mere paper liquidity at all, but actually "backed" by something, like, the asteroid belt. In that admittedly high octane speculative financial universe (pun intended: think the South Sea Bubble here, only replace the Caribbean with outer space), the books might balance after all. One loan asteroid can balance out all those derivatives, and then some.

So I noticed, with some interest, not only the Goldman Sachs influx into the new Trump administration, but also noted he made space a priority in his inauguration address.

I don't know about you, but all these things make me go "Hmmmm..."

Me too - hmmm ...

 

[Neil]

Re: Antarctica

Well the expanding into space thing makes sense because it is the only thing left to keep the explore, expand, exploit, exterminate economic model going. Space mining makes some sense, but the initial investment to make it viable is huge. As for utilizing the hyperdimensional technologies to make it happen, the real questions in mind have always been: will humanity really be allowed to do it, and if so, under what terms?

From a less STS-centric perspective, space exploration at some point in a society's evolution seems natural, because your species is more likely to survive and achieve greater complexity and organization if it is spread across many worlds with many different possibilities instead of being concentrated in one place. We appear to actually be on the other end of this spectrum. We are one of the many worlds which is an experiment of the original race which "expanded."

So I don't think Farrell is too far out in left field on this one, but again, some of his details may be off or a bit lacking.

 

[Cosmos]

Re: Antarctica

A pattern I noticed in other conspiracies like this one is, that when a lot of people are on to it and the net is filled with grand speculations about it with not much hard data at all, that if there is really such a big deal behind it, one would think that the PTB wouldn't make it so easy for the peeps on the net to find out about it.

There is also the possibility that this conspiracy isn't one at all and people read much more into it then there really is.

 

[JEEP]

Re: Antarctica

Well the expanding into space thing makes sense because it is the only thing left to keep the explore, expand, exploit, exterminate economic model going. Space mining makes some sense, but the initial investment to make it viable is huge. As for utilizing the hyperdimensional technologies to make it happen, the real questions in mind have always been: will humanity really be allowed to do it, and if so, under what terms?

From a less STS-centric perspective, space exploration at some point in a society's evolution seems natural, because your species is more likely to survive and achieve greater complexity and organization if it is spread across many worlds with many different possibilities instead of being concentrated in one place. We appear to actually be on the other end of this spectrum. We are one of the many worlds which is an experiment of the original race which "expanded."

So I don't think Farrell is too far out in left field on this one, but again, some of his details may be off or a bit lacking.

Farrell put up a post yesterday, GOLDMAN SACHS, PLATINUM, AND ASTEROID MINING, w/ his thoughts re this article, Goldman Sachs: space-mining for platinum is 'more realistic than perceived'.

The article notes that the price of launch vehicles - you know, the noisy chemical rocket kind - has begun to plummet, making the cost of getting up there to "get stuff" is falling accordingly:

The price of spacecraft is plummeting, thanks to reusable rockets from Elon Musk's SpaceX and Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin. It used to cost $35 million (£28 million) to send one person up on a Soyuz rocket. Today, Virgin Galactic hopes to get space tourists into space for something like $250,000 (£200,000), Goldman says. More broadly, the price of all new rockets is falling over time:

Ok, that's nice. Falling rocket prices, tourism, trips to the Moon for vacations. All of this is, of course, couched by Goldman in terms of a "feasibility study" [...] But, that's not the jaw dropper; [...] While most of this article reads like the typical bland business-risk-feasibility management study, the opening paragraph is a stunner, there's no other way to put it:

"Goldman Sachs is bullish on space mining with "asteroid-grabbing spacecraft." In a 98-page note for clients seen by Business Insider, analyst Noah Poponak and his team argue that platinum mining in space is getting cheaper and easier, and the rewards are becoming greater as time goes by. (Emphasis added)"

As G.L.R. put it to me in the email in which the article was shared (and I am citing the exact words here): "Really? I don't recall reading that we actually were mining in space so how can an accurate comparison be done to determine that its cheaper now?"

Uhm... er... yea.

But of course, the opening paragraph of the article are the article's author's words (in this case, the author being Mr. Jim Edwards). So, perhaps were reading too much into it, parsing too closely. But G.L.R. sent along another article about the same Goldman Sachs study, and again, one finds some curious wording by a completely different article author:

Goldman Sachs says mining platinum from asteroids is a ‘realistic’ way for bankers to earn BILLIONS

In the Sun article by Mr. (or Ms.) Jasper Hamill, note the following italicized statement, which I present in context:

"Prospecting probes can likely be built for tens of millions of dollars each and Caltech has suggested an asteroid-grabbing spacecraft could cost $2.6bn."

The bank added: "Space mining could be more realistic than perceived."(Emphasis added)

More "realistic", or is that simply a euphemism for "more real".

[...]>[Goes on adding in tidbits/blog comments that are related - see article: _https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/04/goldman-sachs-platinum-asteroid-mining/] and what does one have? I've stated all along that with the commercialization of space comes, inevitably, its militarization and weaponization. After all, one has to protect those developing assets from..."whomever". And I've also said, all along, that chemical rockets - cost declines or not - are just a very inefficient means of space travel, much less mining asteroids. And hence, perhaps, what we have here, is an inadvertent, or perhaps deliberate, admission that the mining of celestial bodies is already under way, and by technologies that "don't exist."

There is indeed a financial aspect to this speculation that makes some sense here, for if one has been following the financial news lately, and particularly those stories about Russia and China buying massive amounts of gold (and one assumes, to a lesser extent, silver), and the constant trickle of stories about their plans to move to gold-backed currencies, the USA and other western powers seem all too unperturbed by the news, as if they "knew something", and had their own hidden financial system, and sources of bullion and precious metals. And as I've said before, there is a lot of "missing money" that is completely unaccounted for, and no one seems inclined to look for it. Remember those quadrillions of dollars of "bad paper" on banks' books? How would one offset that? Well, a rich asteroid or two would do the trick.

Farrell's use of the word hyperdimensional, as referenced in the previous metallic hydrogen article link, was to express an even higher level of speculation than his usual 'high octane' speculation. However, in his many interviews available on youtube recounting the German/Nazi scientific developments before/during/after WWII, he mentions a German (I think) physicist whose work brought hyperdimensional aspects down to an ordinary level > I'm totally butchering this concept as I can't recall exactly how it was expressed & physics is not something I'm the least bit literate in. I'm finding it all quite fascinating even if it is way over my head.

 

[Jones]

Re: Antarctica

Something that I recall from when Buzz Aldrin was evacuated from Antarctica – he was apparently treated by a Dr David Bowie. I remember this as I’d read an assignment that in part had asked for an interpretation the lyrics to ‘Life on Mars?’ by David Bowie the singer who coincidently died a few months before.

_http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-06/buzz-aldrin-treated-by-dr-david-bowie-in-space-oddity/8097056

_http://www.smh.com.au/world/space-oddity-former-astronaut-buzz-aldrin-treated-by-dr-david-bowie-in-hospital-20161206-gt5hgf.html

‘Life on Mars?’ was written by Bowie in 1971 according to Wikipedia and released in 1973. Coincidently, 1971 is also the year that Wikipedia lists as being when Aldrin left NASA.

Life on Mars?

It's a God-awful small affair
To the girl with the mousy hair
But her mummy is yelling no
And her daddy has told her to go

But her friend is nowhere to be seen
Now she walks through her sunken dream
To the seat with the clearest view
And she's hooked to the silver screen

But the film is a saddening bore
For she's lived it ten times or more
She could spit in the eyes of fools
As they ask her to focus on

Sailors fighting in the dance hall
Oh man look at those cavemen go
It's the freakiest show
Take a look at the lawman
Beating up the wrong guy
Oh man wonder if he'll ever know
He's in the best selling show
Is there life on Mars?

It's on America's tortured brow
That Mickey Mouse has grown up a cow
Now the workers have struck for fame
'Cause Lennon's on sale again (some suggest an alternate wording here using Lenin instead of Lennon – ’71 was also the year that John Lennon released his ‘Imagine’ album)

See the mice in their million hordes
From Ibiza to the Norfolk Broads
Rule Britannia is out of bounds
To my mother, my dog, and clowns

But the film is a saddening bore
'Cause I wrote it ten times or more
It's about to be writ again
As I ask you to focus on

Sailors fighting in the dance hall
Oh man look at those cavemen go
It's the freakiest show
Take a look at the lawman
Beating up the wrong guy
Oh man wonder if he'll ever know
He's in the best selling show
Is there life on Mars?

 

[JEEP]

Re: Antarctica

However, in his many interviews available on youtube recounting the German/Nazi scientific developments before/during/after WWII, he mentions a German (I think) physicist whose work brought hyperdimensional aspects down to an ordinary level

For those who may be interested, I just came across a very explicit recounting of the actually Hungarian electrical engineering genius that Farrell has referenced quite frequently in this particular Farrell/Jim Marrs interview, Joseph Farrell the Great Libraries hold Deep Secrets. Go to 8:35 for the intro question that leads to Farrell's description of the discovered concept:

https://youtu.be/uGYZYH-D-90

Farrell's best interviews are w/ hosts who DO NOT interrupt what he is saying in order to interject their own thoughts/comments. So often it seems he's about to say something significant that gets cut off by the host interjecting - which is the case in this interview. It could be that nothing is really left out - he covers it subsequently - but it just seems that way. How is it a good interview process to butt in when the interviewee is right in the middle of a sentence - and then what was going to be spoken maybe never is? Annoying & frustrating!

 

[Vulcan59]

FWIW, a documentary about Antarctica which seems to be well documented and posted on Youtube on 8th April 2017.

https://youtu.be/237F1_aLXZ8

 

[latulipenoire]

FWIW, a documentary about Antarctica which seems to be well documented and posted on Youtube on 8th April 2017.

https://youtu.be/237F1_aLXZ8

Really interesting doc, thank you for sharing it, Vulcan. It exposes many aspects of the topic, including the declassified information relating to the military exploration of Greenland in the 60's, which could very well be a blueprint of what's going on in Antarctica ever since the first known expeditions.

For me, it brings even more questions to mind, due to the covert nature of our governments. I've been thinking that Antarctica could've been a nice spot to hide things from humanity at large...Even with satellites and the internet all around us...

 

[Yozilla]

I don't know if anybody posted about this phenomenon, jet here it is:

Australian scientists investigating ice caves under Antarctica's glaciers say they are so warm they could support animals and plants.

Around Mount Erebus, an active volcano on Ross Island in Antarctica, steam has hollowed out extensive cave systems.

Dr Ceridwen Fraser from the ANU Fenner School of Environment and Society says forensic analyses of soil samples from these caves has revealed intriguing traces of DNA from algae, mosses, and small animals.

"It can be really warm inside the caves, up to 25 degrees Celsius in some caves," Fraser says.

From: http://www.businessinsider.com/warm-caves-under-antarctica-which-could-support-secret-life-2017-9

From: https://antarcticfudgesicles.wordpress.com/2010/11/18/mt-erebus-ice-caves/

https://youtu.be/ab7Wgh2xXYA

fwiw

 

[aragorn]

Here's a recent video clip with some quite interesting finds. Especially the structure he calls 'horse shoe building no 2', as when you see it with enhanced contrast (at the end of the video), is quite astonishing. What on earth is that thing?!

 

[aragorn]

Wow, this one is interesting! The most interesting part starts ca at 5:50. I do wonder what they are excavating over there? Or whatever they are doing...