Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians

N1mTzo

Jedi
Q: Who?

A: The searcher, the sepulcher, the one who carries the staff
in constant search for greener pastures.

A: Last clue for tonight: Look for the vibratory frequency light. Good Night.


We have previously seen how Alfalfa ties in with Rhineland, Wisconsin but we now see references to ‘undreamed of treasures’, ‘near tracks well worn’, ‘sepulcher’ and, ‘the one who carries a staff’’.

Now a sepulcher or sepulchre is a small room or monument, cut in rock or built of stone, in which a dead person is laid or buried. This ties us in nicely with Poussin’s painting of the ‘Shepherds of Arcadia’, which features a tomb with the bearded figure of the Shepherd king (Hercules?) pointing to the inscription on it, which may in turn link us back to “What does stein mean, is it "written in stone?".

Laura then followed up the statement about undreamed of treasure in the alfalfa fields of Rhineland in the session dated 26 July 1997:​
Q: You previously talked about 'undreamed of treasure in alfalfa fields of Rhineland.' Is this a physical, spiritual or knowledge based treasure?

A: It is all three.


Hence, what we are looking for, i.e., the Holy Grail, is not merely a physical thing for it also has spiritual and knowledge dimensions to it as well.

Finally we have a quote from Laura in the session dated 27 January, 2012:

Q: One thing I do want to understand, since it is involved in all of this, is the idea of the 'Shepherd.' All of the ancient legends and stories and myths lead, ultimately, to something about the 'shepherd,' or the 'Shepherd King.'

A: Shepherd is most likely to be struck by lightning, due to staff, and thus "enlightened," or "illumened!!"
We know that Abraham, who was Yahweh's "messenger", used the guise of a shepherd "to cover" so as not to attract too much attention. He (Abraham) traveled across the Middle East, to places like the Temple Mount (Jerusalem), the cave of Machpela (Hebron) and others in search of some KNOWLEDGE of the ancients.
I like the theory that Yahweh used the "shepherd" Abraham to search for ancient artifacts that remained in Egypt and Canaan after the war of the gods. Artifacts of the gods (the Ark of the Covenant and others) were kept in temples and pyramids of Egypt and in ancient megalithic structures (Makhpela Cave, Temple Mount, Baalbek, Palmyra and others).
Abraham several times visited Machpela (she is the tomb of the Patriarchs), since Yahweh pointed her out to him. Abraham received "the clothes of Adam" for some action in this cave!
In the cave of Machpela (Hebron), according to legend, Abraham buried his wife Sarah. He bought the land on which this cave is located. He settled nearby, and when he himself died, he was also buried in this cave.
Moreover, Abraham was not a farmer, but he had a herd of animals and moved in search of green pastures.
 

MJF

Jedi Council Member
We know that Abraham, who was Yahweh's "messenger", used the guise of a shepherd "to cover" so as not to attract too much attention. He (Abraham) traveled across the Middle East, to places like the Temple Mount (Jerusalem), the cave of Machpela (Hebron) and others in search of some KNOWLEDGE of the ancients.
I like the theory that Yahweh used the "shepherd" Abraham to search for ancient artifacts that remained in Egypt and Canaan after the war of the gods. Artifacts of the gods (the Ark of the Covenant and others) were kept in temples and pyramids of Egypt and in ancient megalithic structures (Makhpela Cave, Temple Mount, Baalbek, Palmyra and others).
Abraham several times visited Machpela (she is the tomb of the Patriarchs), since Yahweh pointed her out to him. Abraham received "the clothes of Adam" for some action in this cave!
In the cave of Machpela (Hebron), according to legend, Abraham buried his wife Sarah. He bought the land on which this cave is located. He settled nearby, and when he himself died, he was also buried in this cave.
Moreover, Abraham was not a farmer, but he had a herd of animals and moved in search of green pastures.
You make some very good points here. If we re-read the biblical accounts with one eye on perceiving aliens and their technology within the text, then we may start to unravel what was really going on. The only problem we face here is that the C's have told us that Abraham is a composite person comprising Paris/Abraham/Moses and Jacob. This makes it more difficult to discern in what persona he was doing what and the timeframe he may have done it in, given that we can't trust the biblical chronology anymore. Moreover, place names in the Bible may not equate with the actual place where a particular event happened. Talk about making things difficult for us.

Thus, saying that Sarah/Nefertiti died and was buried in Machpela (Hebron) does not mean that she necessarily died and was buried there. Similarly, where the Bible states that Abraham died and was buried in the same cave, this runs counter to what the C's said since, if Abraham was also Moses as they have told us, then they also said that Moses lived as a Bedouin for 40 years in the wilderness and was then taken whilst still alive by STO forces and is now preserved in a state of hyper stasis. I was only reading the Genesis account myself this morning where it states that Moses died and was buried after he was first allowed to see but not enter the promised land. Hence, we have to make a choice I guess between following the biblical account or going with the C's alternative view. I have discovered a reference though to an ancient apocryphal book called 'The Assumption of Moses'. I still need to track it down but it may indicate that there were those who thought Moses may have been assumed in the same way that Enoch and the prophet Ezekiel were (fiery chariots anyone!), which most ancient alien observers would say meant by UFO.

Abraham's name means Father of many nations but his original name was 'Abram'. It is curious that the second part of his name is "ram", which may be derived from 'Ra' the Egyptian sun god. Approximately a generation after Akhenaten's death, Ramses II came to the Egyptian throne, the greatest pharaoh of the 19th dynasty. Like Abraham he was supposed to have red hair, which suggests perhaps Celtic roots (excuse the pun). I just wonder if there may be a family connection between Abraham and Ramses. After all, the C's have said that King Solomon was in reality the Pharoah Narmer.

As for the War of the Gods, I have read an account in Sumerian texts of a great battle that may have occurred over the Giza complex and the Great Pyramid of Egypt in particular. This account may have echoes in the Greek myths of the battle between the Titans (who were giants) and the Gods of Olympus. Dr Joseph Farrell promotes the theory that the Great Pyramid was used as a weapon system at one stage, specifically as a 'maser' using phased array interferometry, a technique in which waves are superimposed to cause the phenomenon of interference that could be used to destroy targets at great distances. I hope to develop this theory in due course but the take away for now is that when the battle was over, the victors destroyed or buried some of the key components that made the system work. Could one of these components have been the Merkaba perhaps and was it placed in the niche of the Queen's chamber and used as a lensing device?​
 

moyal

Jedi
Q: One thing I do want to understand, since it is involved in all of this, is the idea of the 'Shepherd.' All of the ancient legends and stories and myths lead, ultimately, to something about the 'shepherd,' or the 'Shepherd King.'

A: Shepherd is most likely to be struck by lightning, due to staff, and thus "enlightened," or "illumened!!"


This quote by the C’s links back to what they said about “the searcher, the sepulcher, the one who carries the staff in constant search for greener pastures. We all know that a shepherd carries a staff or crozier (as carried by Christian bishops since Christ is the Good Shepherd and his ancestor King David was also a shepherd boy). However, the Was and other types of staves (the plural of staff) was also a sign of a pharaoh’s authority in Ancient Egypt. For this reason they are often described as "sceptres", even if they are full-length staffs. The staff with the longest history seems to be the heqa-sceptre (the "shepherd's crook"). Sceptre - Wikipedia. This object of royal power seems to have been a universal one in ancient times and was followed by Mesopotamian kings, Persians rulers, the Greeks, Etruscans and Romans amongst others and still persists down to our own age. We should also consider Moses, who as an Egyptian prince was trained by the Egyptian priesthood. He carried a staff that not only swallowed up the Egyptian priests snakes in a magic contest but famously opened up a stream of gushing water when he struck a rock with it in the desert, thereby quenching the thirst of the children of Israel (symbolic perhaps of enlightenment quenching the thirst of those seeking knowledge, wisdom and understanding). Was Moses’ staff really a high tech gadget perhaps? One should also consider magicians carrying wands and druid priests carrying staffs in this same context.​
And then there is the Pilgrim's staff, which is also called Jakobsstab (= Jacob's Staff) in German language.
Heiliger_Jakobus.jpg

Notice the peculiar look of the staff. Almost like some sort of a divce...

Interestingly a Jacob's Staff (or Jakobsstab) is also...
Jakobsstab-2.jpg

...used to refer to several things, also known as cross-staff, a ballastella, a fore-staff, a ballestilla, or a balestilha. In its most basic form, a Jacob's staff is a stick or pole with length markings; most staffs are much more complicated than that, and usually contain a number of measurement and stabilization features. The two most frequent uses are:

  • in astronomy and navigation for a simple device to measure angles, later replaced by the more precise sextants;
  • in surveying (and scientific fields that use surveying techniques, such as geology and ecology) for a vertical rod that penetrates or sits on the ground and supports a compass or other instrument.
The simplest use of a Jacob's staff is to make qualitative judgements of the height and angle of an object relative to the user of the staff.
...
The origin of the name of the instrument is not certain. Some refer to the Biblical patriarch Jacob, specifically Gen 32:11. It may also take its name after its resemblance to Orion, referred to by the name of Jacob on some medieval star charts. Another possible source is the Pilgrim's staff, the symbol of St James (Jacobus in Latin). The name cross staff simply comes from its cruciform shape.

The original Jacob's staff was developed as a single pole device, in the 14th century, that was used in making astronomical measurements. It was first described by the French-Jewish mathematician Levi ben Gerson of Provence, in his "Book of the Wars of the Lord" (translated in Latin as well as Hebrew). He used a Hebrew name for the staff that translates to "Revealer of Profundities", while the term "Jacob's staff" was used by his Christian contemporaries. Its invention was likely due to fellow French-Jewish astronomer Jacob ben Makir, who also lived in Provence in the same period. Attribution to 15th century Austrian astronomer Georg Purbach is less likely, because Purbach was not born until 1423. (Such attributions may refer to a different instrument with the same name.) Its origins may be traced to the Chaldeans around 400 BC.

Although it has become quite accepted that ben Gerson first described Jacob's staff, the British Sinologist Joseph Needham theorizes that the Song Dynasty Chinese scientist Shen Kuo (1031–1095), in his Dream Pool Essays of 1088, described a Jacob's staff. Shen was an antiquarian interested in ancient objects; after he unearthed an ancient crossbow-like device from a home's garden in Jiangsu, he realized it had a sight with a graduated scale that could be used to measure the heights of distant mountains, likening it to how mathematicians measure heights by using right-angle triangles. He wrote that when one viewed the whole breadth of a mountain with it, the distance on the instrument was long; when viewing a small part of the mountainside, the distance was short; this, he wrote, was due to the cross piece that had to be pushed further away from the eye, while the graduation started from the further end. Needham does not mention any practical application of this observation.

During the medieval European Renaissance, the Dutch mathematician and surveyor Metius developed his own Jacob's staff; Dutch mathematician Gemma Frisius made improvements to this instrument. In the 15th century, the German mathematician Johannes Müller (called Regiomontanus) made the instrument popular in geodesic and astronomical measurements.

Now, the interesting thing is that there are (fringe) theories, that the peculiar look of the Pilgrim's staff (Jakobsstab) is the way it is, because, the design goes back long before pre-christian times. That it was a gauge for standard meassure in megalithic times going back till Atlantis.

Basically, the old Pilgrim's routes where the streets, on which the remaining atlantic adapets after the deludge spread rescued old "scientific" knowledge to the dispersed flocks of the remaining humanity.
 

N1mTzo

Jedi
The only problem we face here is that the C's have told us that Abraham is a composite person comprising Paris/Abraham/Moses and Jacob. This makes it more difficult to discern in what persona he was doing what and the timeframe he may have done it in, given that we can't trust the biblical chronology anymore. Moreover, place names in the Bible may not equate with the actual place where a particular event happened. Talk about making things difficult for us
Yes, this (many characters and many eras) was a real PROBLEM before, but now everything (including thanks to your messages) falls into place.
There was probably a short period in History when there was a desperate race for artifacts (as well as knowledge) left over from the war of the gods.
Later, this short period was stretched over hundreds (even thousands of years) and many eras (from Ancient Egypt to Antiquity and even the Romans) and many NEW personalities were introduced, many of whom were simply invented in order to completely confuse everything. Events that did not exist are introduced, or they are distorted so much that they become incomprehensible (to us).
In this race (for knowledge / artifacts) Yahweh (aka Shalim / Salem, the god of the evening dawn in Ugaritic mythology) and other aliens (whose names we do not know) participated. This is only a small part of the truth that has become known to us.
And then Pharaoh Akhenaten (hybrid guy) with his incomprehensible god Aten (solar god!) Becomes a completely "understandable" biblical god Yahweh (Shalim / Salem is the god of the dawn, its capital is Jerusalem). God Baal (the adversary of Yahweh) turns into Zeus / Jupiter / Teshub / Indra (and many other names) with a residence in Baalbek (modern Lebanon). Etc.
Also, thanks to the comprehension of information from the Old Testament (Torah, other Jewish sources), we learn that the dimensions of the Tabernacle (the tent for keeping the Ark of the Covenant) are COMPLETELY the same as the dimensions (length / width / height) of the king's chamber in the Great Pyramid in Giza. And the dimensions of the Ark of the Covenant (the box in which it was kept) correspond to the size of the granite sarcophagus in the king's chamber (in the Great Pyramid).
We know that Egypt has dozens of pyramids and hundreds of sarcophagi (of various sizes). So how many Ark of the Covenant-like artifacts were there in reality? And how many (was it just one) of them were stolen by shepherd guys like Abram / Moses?

Thus, saying that Sarah/Nefertiti died and was buried in Machpela (Hebron) does not mean that she necessarily died and was buried there. Similarly, where the Bible states that Abraham died and was buried in the same cave, this runs counter to what the C's said since, if Abraham was also Moses as they have told us, then they also said that Moses lived as a Bedouin for 40 years in the wilderness and was then taken whilst still alive by STO forces and is now preserved in a state of hyper stasis. I was only reading the Genesis account myself this morning where it states that Moses died and was buried after he was first allowed to see but not enter the promised land. Hence, we have to make a choice I guess between following the biblical account or going with the C's alternative view. I have discovered a reference though to an ancient apocryphal book called 'The Assumption of Moses'.
Yes, we have no evidence that Abraham / Sarah is buried in Machpel. And we will not check it in any way, tk. the entrance to the second, lower cave (it is double, or maybe triple!) was concreted after an attempt by Israeli activists to penetrate there (this is the "official version"). But we know for sure that the mountain itself, on which Makhpela is located, is lined with huge megaliths (hundreds of tons in weight), and at the top there is a temple.
There are similar megalithic blocks (and temples) in Jerusalem, Balbek, Palmyra (Syria), Aladzha-Huyuk (Turkey), the pyramids of Egypt and many other places.
Megalithic blocks are an indicator of a very advanced ancient civilization. And it is precisely such places (where there are megaliths) that Abraham visited in search of ancient artifacts!
By the way, a grave / crypt is a convenient way to guard (and visit) a place without attracting undue attention from others.
We know that Abraham (the shepherd himself) actually bought a field of green grass (for grazing), and the cave was just a "bonus" in this deal. And Sarah's death was just a pretext for the deal.
Likewise, David bought a field (Mount Moriah in Jerusalem) for grazing. Curious, isn't it?


Abraham's name means Father of many nations but his original name was 'Abram'. It is curious that the second part of his name is "ram", which may be derived from 'Ra' the Egyptian sun god. Approximately a generation after Akhenaten's death, Ramses II came to the Egyptian throne, the greatest pharaoh of the 19th dynasty. Like Abraham he was supposed to have red hair, which suggests perhaps Celtic roots (excuse the pun). I just wonder if there may be a family connection between Abraham and Ramses. After all, the C's have said that King Solomon was in reality the Pharoah Narmer.
We know (from the Egyptian chronicles) that the father of Ramses 2 (Pharaoh Seti 1) participated in excavations and restorations in the pyramids of Egypt. Pharaoh Seti 1 clearly found some ancient artifacts of the gods in the pyramids / temples of Egypt.
It is also known from the chronicles that Pharaoh Ramses 2 (son of Seti 1) used some kind of super weapon in the conquest of Canaan (the siege of Dapur, the cities of Galilee) and the war with the Hittites. This super weapon in ancient pictures resembles a rod (jet, long stick) of the god Thoth. Even a description of how it all happened has been preserved. The work known as The Poem of Pentaura describes the Battle of Kadesh. When Ramses 2 almost lost all his troops and was left ONE against the army of the Hittites, he appealed to the god Amun, and then began to incinerate his opponents. And the rest of the enemies simply could not even approach him, they were paralyzed. (here we see the action as in the clothes of Adam / Nimrud, which also paralyzed people and animals).

Now about the relationship of Abraham / Moses and Ramses 2. It can be assumed that Moses (and Aaron too, because he is the brother of Moses) was the son of Ramses 2.
We know that Ramses had several wives (and concubines) and many children, most of their names are unknown to us.
Several sons also participated in the war with the Hittites and helped their father in battles, that is, they saw their father's super weapon in action, and maybe even knew how to handle this super weapon.
This version fits well the fact that Moses had free entrance to the Pharaoh and without any problems stole the rod of Thoth (I will call it that), the Ark of the Covenant and, possibly, some other artifacts. The Old Testament doesn't explain it at all

As for the War of the Gods, I have read an account in Sumerian texts of a great battle that may have occurred over the Giza complex and the Great Pyramid of Egypt in particular. This account may have echoes in the Greek myths of the battle between the Titans (who were giants) and the Gods of Olympus. Dr Joseph Farrell promotes the theory that the Great Pyramid was used as a weapon system at one stage, specifically as a 'maser' using phased array interferometry, a technique in which waves are superimposed to cause the phenomenon of interference that could be used to destroy targets at great distances. I hope to develop this theory in due course but the take away for now is that when the battle was over, the victors destroyed or buried some of the key components that made the system work. Could one of these components have been the Merkaba perhaps and was it placed in the niche of the Queen's chamber and used as a lensing device?
The Great Pyramid of Egypt (and others, of course) used 4D technologies, Finsler geometry and gravitational waves, which were generated by the Ark of the Covenant (or some devices similar to it), being in a granite sarcophagus.
This use is suggested by the description of the work of the Ark of the Covenant in the hands of Moses (and his charges) in the conditions of the "field temple" (which was constantly on the way, moved).
Any attempts by modern writers / scientists to attribute the pyramid to work on the principles of our 3D electro-magnetic physics looks dubious. - This is my opinion, I do not insist.
 

MJF

Jedi Council Member
And then there is the Pilgrim's staff, which is also called Jakobsstab (= Jacob's Staff) in German language.
View attachment 45708

Notice the peculiar look of the staff. Almost like some sort of a divce...

Interestingly a Jacob's Staff (or Jakobsstab) is also...
View attachment 45707



Now, the interesting thing is that there are (fringe) theories, that the peculiar look of the Pilgrim's staff (Jakobsstab) is the way it is, because, the design goes back long before pre-christian times. That it was a gauge for standard meassure in megalithic times going back till Atlantis.

Basically, the old Pilgrim's routes where the streets, on which the remaining atlantic adapets after the deludge spread rescued old "scientific" knowledge to the dispersed flocks of the remaining humanity.
This is really fascinating stuff. It shows how ancient scientific ideas were preserved across millenia. This is the basic idea of Gardiner and Osborn's book The Shining Ones. The book seeks to follow a wandering priesthood of shaman through the ages who were in effect scientists passing on their knowledge in myth and symbolism and by these methods keeping alive ancient knowhow. Measuring things is one of the basic aspects of science. Freemasonry, as a modern mystery school, keeps this tradition alive through its masonic tools and devices such as the right sided triangle (Pythagoras) for creating perfect right angled structures and the dividers or compass for measurements. Even theodolites, which today are precision instruments used for measuring angles in the horizontal and vertical planes and are described according to the angle reading system incorporated in the instrument, are merely a modern variant on the same angular measuring system.

It is interesting to note that the giants of antiquity were renowned for measuring - recall that the C's have confirmed, for example, that the Nephilim were involved in the building of Baalbek. Giants were also supposed to have been involved in the building of Stonehenge as well and that structure we now know was built according to very precise alignments.

We also know that ancient temples and megalithic sites were deliberately located on special grid points occurring within the undulating EM grid that covers the Earth, which was no doubt knowledge preserved from Atlantis. It also ties in with the ancient ley lines or dragon lines as the Chinese called them.
 

Attachments

  • 1622236966773.jpeg
    1622236966773.jpeg
    7.2 KB · Views: 0
  • 1622236966703.jpeg
    1622236966703.jpeg
    4 KB · Views: 0
  • 1622236966630.jpeg
    1622236966630.jpeg
    3.4 KB · Views: 0
  • 1622236966526.jpeg
    1622236966526.jpeg
    3.4 KB · Views: 0
  • 1622236966421.jpeg
    1622236966421.jpeg
    3.7 KB · Views: 0

MJF

Jedi Council Member
Yes, this (many characters and many eras) was a real PROBLEM before, but now everything (including thanks to your messages) falls into place.
There was probably a short period in History when there was a desperate race for artifacts (as well as knowledge) left over from the war of the gods.
Later, this short period was stretched over hundreds (even thousands of years) and many eras (from Ancient Egypt to Antiquity and even the Romans) and many NEW personalities were introduced, many of whom were simply invented in order to completely confuse everything. Events that did not exist are introduced, or they are distorted so much that they become incomprehensible (to us).
In this race (for knowledge / artifacts) Yahweh (aka Shalim / Salem, the god of the evening dawn in Ugaritic mythology) and other aliens (whose names we do not know) participated. This is only a small part of the truth that has become known to us.
And then Pharaoh Akhenaten (hybrid guy) with his incomprehensible god Aten (solar god!) Becomes a completely "understandable" biblical god Yahweh (Shalim / Salem is the god of the dawn, its capital is Jerusalem). God Baal (the adversary of Yahweh) turns into Zeus / Jupiter / Teshub / Indra (and many other names) with a residence in Baalbek (modern Lebanon). Etc.
Also, thanks to the comprehension of information from the Old Testament (Torah, other Jewish sources), we learn that the dimensions of the Tabernacle (the tent for keeping the Ark of the Covenant) are COMPLETELY the same as the dimensions (length / width / height) of the king's chamber in the Great Pyramid in Giza. And the dimensions of the Ark of the Covenant (the box in which it was kept) correspond to the size of the granite sarcophagus in the king's chamber (in the Great Pyramid).
We know that Egypt has dozens of pyramids and hundreds of sarcophagi (of various sizes). So how many Ark of the Covenant-like artifacts were there in reality? And how many (was it just one) of them were stolen by shepherd guys like Abram / Moses?


Yes, we have no evidence that Abraham / Sarah is buried in Machpel. And we will not check it in any way, tk. the entrance to the second, lower cave (it is double, or maybe triple!) was concreted after an attempt by Israeli activists to penetrate there (this is the "official version"). But we know for sure that the mountain itself, on which Makhpela is located, is lined with huge megaliths (hundreds of tons in weight), and at the top there is a temple.
There are similar megalithic blocks (and temples) in Jerusalem, Balbek, Palmyra (Syria), Aladzha-Huyuk (Turkey), the pyramids of Egypt and many other places.
Megalithic blocks are an indicator of a very advanced ancient civilization. And it is precisely such places (where there are megaliths) that Abraham visited in search of ancient artifacts!
By the way, a grave / crypt is a convenient way to guard (and visit) a place without attracting undue attention from others.
We know that Abraham (the shepherd himself) actually bought a field of green grass (for grazing), and the cave was just a "bonus" in this deal. And Sarah's death was just a pretext for the deal.
Likewise, David bought a field (Mount Moriah in Jerusalem) for grazing. Curious, isn't it?



We know (from the Egyptian chronicles) that the father of Ramses 2 (Pharaoh Seti 1) participated in excavations and restorations in the pyramids of Egypt. Pharaoh Seti 1 clearly found some ancient artifacts of the gods in the pyramids / temples of Egypt.
It is also known from the chronicles that Pharaoh Ramses 2 (son of Seti 1) used some kind of super weapon in the conquest of Canaan (the siege of Dapur, the cities of Galilee) and the war with the Hittites. This super weapon in ancient pictures resembles a rod (jet, long stick) of the god Thoth. Even a description of how it all happened has been preserved. The work known as The Poem of Pentaura describes the Battle of Kadesh. When Ramses 2 almost lost all his troops and was left ONE against the army of the Hittites, he appealed to the god Amun, and then began to incinerate his opponents. And the rest of the enemies simply could not even approach him, they were paralyzed. (here we see the action as in the clothes of Adam / Nimrud, which also paralyzed people and animals).

Now about the relationship of Abraham / Moses and Ramses 2. It can be assumed that Moses (and Aaron too, because he is the brother of Moses) was the son of Ramses 2.
We know that Ramses had several wives (and concubines) and many children, most of their names are unknown to us.
Several sons also participated in the war with the Hittites and helped their father in battles, that is, they saw their father's super weapon in action, and maybe even knew how to handle this super weapon.
This version fits well the fact that Moses had free entrance to the Pharaoh and without any problems stole the rod of Thoth (I will call it that), the Ark of the Covenant and, possibly, some other artifacts. The Old Testament doesn't explain it at all


The Great Pyramid of Egypt (and others, of course) used 4D technologies, Finsler geometry and gravitational waves, which were generated by the Ark of the Covenant (or some devices similar to it), being in a granite sarcophagus.
This use is suggested by the description of the work of the Ark of the Covenant in the hands of Moses (and his charges) in the conditions of the "field temple" (which was constantly on the way, moved).
Any attempts by modern writers / scientists to attribute the pyramid to work on the principles of our 3D electro-magnetic physics looks dubious. - This is my opinion, I do not insist.
You raise many interesting points here, some of which deserve more elaboration I think, particularly the use of super weapons by Ramses, as that could be very useful in a theory I have about Ramses. I would just make a few specific comments on two of the points you made:

"Megalithic blocks are an indicator of a very advanced ancient civilization. And it is precisely such places (where there are megaliths) that Abraham visited in search of ancient artifacts!"

Although megalithic structures do indeed signify evidence of an advanced civilisation, they are in fact a degraded version of the technology of the older source civilisation, Atlantis. The C's indicated this when they mentioned that the giant pyramid off Bermuda was 5,000 feet high (almost a mile) and was a pure crystalline structure. In comparison, the Great Pyramid of Giza is merely 500 feet high and made of granite and limestone blocks. That doesn't mean it isn't very impressive but it is still a crude structure in comparison to what the Atlanteans had. On the planet Mars they have even dscovered a regular five-sided pyramid that is huge in scale, almost certainly built by the Atlanteans.
"Now about the relationship of Abraham / Moses and Ramses 2. It can be assumed that Moses (and Aaron too, because he is the brother of Moses) was the son of Ramses 2."

Do you have any evidence to support your theory that Moses was the son of Ramses II? If so, I would like to see it. Most scholars like to place the Exodus of Moses and the Israelites in the reign of Ramses II but the C's were clear that it occurred in the reign of Akhenaten who was an 18th dynasty pharaoh.

After his death, Akhenaten was succeeded by two short-lived pharaohs, Smenkhkare and Neferneferuaten, of which little is known. In 1334 Akhenaten's son, Tutankhaten, ascended to the throne: shortly after, he restored Egyptian polytheist cult and subsequently changed his name in Tutankhamun.

The last two members of the Eighteenth Dynasty—Ay and Horemheb—became rulers from the ranks of officials in the royal court, although Ay might also have been the maternal uncle of Akhenaten as a fellow descendant of Yuya and Tjuyu.
Ay may have married the widowed Great Royal Wife and young half-sister of Tutankhamun, Ankhesenamun, in order to obtain power; she did not live long afterward. Ay then married Tey, who was originally Nefertiti's wet-nurse.
Ay's reign was short. His successor was Horemheb, a general during Tutankhamun's reign whom the pharaoh may have intended as his successor in the event that he had no surviving children, which came to pass. Horemheb may have taken the throne away from Ay in a coup d'état. Although Ay's son or stepson Nakhtmin was named as his father/stepfather's Crown Prince, Nakhtmin seems to have died during the reign of Ay, leaving the opportunity for Horemheb to claim the throne next.

Horemheb also died without surviving children, having appointed his vizier, Pa-ra-mes-su, as his heir. This vizier ascended the throne in 1292 BC as Ramesses I, and was the first pharaoh of the Nineteenth Dynasty.

Ramesses II c. 1303 BC – July or August 1213; reigned 1279–1213 BC, also known as Ramesses the Great, was the third pharaoh of the Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt. He is often regarded as the greatest, most celebrated, and most powerful pharaoh of the New Kingdom, itself the most powerful period of Ancient Egypt. His successors and later Egyptians called him the "Great Ancestor".
He is known as Ozymandias in Greek sources from the first part of Ramesses's regnal name, Usermaatre Setepenre, "The Maat of Ra is powerful, Chosen of Ra".

Hence, as you can see, Ramses II came to the throne long after Akhenaten and by then Egypt had recovered from the biblical plagues that coincided with the eruption of Thera.
 
Last edited:

moyal

Jedi
This is really fascinating stuff. It shows how ancient scientific ideas were preserved across millenia.
...
We also know that ancient temples and megalithic sites were deliberately located on special grid points occurring within the undulating EM grid that covers the Earth, which was no doubt knowledge preserved from Atlantis. It also ties in with the ancient ley lines or dragon lines as the Chinese called them.
The ideas about the Pilgrims roads and the Jacob's Staff I found in a book by Heinz Kaminski.

Here is some excerpt from an article which tries to debunk the later works about Atlantis from Kaminski as esoteric and pseudo-scientific, but concedes that his his early work about the Pilgrims roads is quite profound:

The megalithic 'Stonehenge/Wormbach system'.

Among the esoteric Atlantists, whose work needs a differentiated and thorough consideration, belongs Prof. Heinz Kaminski (1921 - 2002), who became known to a larger public in Germany mainly as an astronomer and longtime director of the observatory in Bochum. However, Kaminski also published two books in which he deals more or less directly with the Atlantis problem. First, "Sternenstraßen der Vorzeit - Von Stonehenge nach Atlantis" was published in 1995, in which the author mainly dealt with a megalithic cult and orientation network in Western and Central Europe, which he claims to have discovered.

Stonehenge-Wormbach-System.jpg
Fig. 1 The megalithic 'Stonehenge/Wormbach system' presented by Prof. Kaminski in 1995.

In this first Atlantis book Kaminski, who had a profound historical knowledge, presented himself quite rational and scientific. His core thesis is absolutely discussable in principle from an alternative-historical point of view: "The early historical cultural area Wormbach, Germany, lies on an exactly east/west running line, i.e. the same geographical latitude as Stonehenge in England. This relationship, which I found in 1988, led to the previously unknown megalithic cult network covering western and central Europe, a metrological and geographical network, the Stonehenge/Wormbach system. West/East and North/South cult lines connected already in megalithic times (4000 - 1500 B.C.) the then supra-regional cult sites in the megalithic cult network can still be found today as important Christian centers in places with a supra-regional worship of Mary or Michael, bishoprics and in the further development up to today's large cities. The contemporary order of Europe is based on these megalithic masterminds."

Kaminski referred to these "rectilinear west/east and north/south lines, lines that correspond to today's latitudes and longitudes, respectively, and thus interconnect the ancient cult sites [...] in reference to H. Dontenville in his >La Mythologie française< pointed out cultural relationship between Mont Sainte-Odile to the Pays de Léon and the concept of >star roads< also transferred to pilgrim roads by L. Charpentier (1979), but now in the discovered overarching network structure, as cult lines or star roads of 1st and 2nd order."

If it had remained with this book, Kaminski would possibly have found his place in the gallery of alternative, non-conformist prehistorians of the 20th century, even if his thesis, which is quite interesting from a border-scientific-atlantological point of view, should not stand up to a thorough examination. After all, Prof. Kaminski's system is largely based on the presupposition of a "repeatedly visible cultural site continuity", which, however, he proves - if at all - only rudimentarily back to the Megalithic period.
The megalithic 'Stonehenge/Wormbach system'.


Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
 

MJF

Jedi Council Member

N1mTzo said:​

"So how many Ark of the Covenant-like artifacts were there in reality? And how many (was it just one) of them were stolen by shepherd guys like Abram / Moses?"

This is a very good question. We need to make a distinction for future reference here between the device that was the Ark of the Covenant and the Merkaba/Mother Stone or Holy Grail (Baphomet). The former was created by the Lizzies and given to Akhenaten, the latter was, the Gift of God, given to a group who were in contact with the C's on Kantek and brought to Earth with them. Here is what the C's said - with some comments of my own in red within parantheses:

Session 2 February 2003:

Q: One of the questions we would like to clear up is the issue of the Holy Grail and the Ark. Is the Ark of the covenant - the ark thing given to the early pre-Mosaic Jews that you have described previously - the same as the Holy Grail?

A: No.

Q: (L) So there are two completely different technologies?

A: If you wish to term it such.

Q: (L) Why did they answer the question that way? What is the distinguishing thing between them? (A) Maybe 'as such' refers to the fact that you termed it 'technology.' Maybe this is not quite the correct term. Technology can be part of it, but maybe not the most important part. (Galahad) Is one an STS tool and the other an STO tool?

A: Yes and no.

Q: (Galahad) Thanks guys! That's real clear!

Q: (L) So, we have a whole different set of clues to look at here. Alrighty then! Was what we are calling the Ark of the Covenant at Baalbek?

A: No. But there were certainly those who had advanced knowledge.

Q: (L) I hate it when they do that: blow my theory to bits. Was there a "grail faction" and an "ark faction?"

A: Pretty much.

Q: (L) Was Baalbek built by the Ark Faction or the Grail Faction? [The Nephilim were involved in the building of Baalbek.]

A: It was Ark Faction.

Q: (Galahad) Well, we got that part right. (L) Once before we discussed Nefertiti and Sarah being one and the same person. We have now been discussing the idea, based on some significant clues in ancient documents, that this individual was also Helen of Troy. Is this, in fact, a useful idea to follow? Is it a correct assessment of the clues?

A: Indeed!

Q: (L) That would mean that, according to the story, that Paris/Alexander would be the same individual as Abraham and that Herodotus' story of Paris and Helen sojourning in Egypt was true?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) We have the brother issue to deal with. We have Abraham and his nephew, Lot. Then we have Moses and Aaron, Jacob and Esau, Isaac and Ishmael. Were all of these sets of brothers just different aspects or views on the same stories, a set of singular individuals, whether brothers or not?

A: Pretty much though with added elements from other stories blended in.

Q: (L) Was it a brother/brother relationship as in actual brothers?

A: No. The "brother" relationship was created to legitimize a "false" line of transmission. [Jacob instead of Esau]

Q: (L) So there wasn't a brother, or Aaronic relationship present, assuming any part of that story was true. Is that it?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) One aspect of the variation on the story was that Jacob gave his brother, Esau, the 'blessing' and some 'gift.' Does this reflect an accurate part of the story that Moses, in his form as Jacob, passed something on to someone else’s - something that was important?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Was it Moses/Abraham who was doing this?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Who did he pass it on to?

A: It was finally understood by "Moses" that the danger of the object [The Ark] was greater than the ability of descendants to resist corruption. He handed it over to those who had created it.

Q: (Galahad) Was it STS or STO forces that created it?

A: STS. [The Holy Grail by contrast, the Gift of God, was created by STO forces]


Q: (Galahad) So, the Ark was an object created by STS. Did this amount to some sort of realization on Moses' part? Did he start to wake up?

A: Yes. The story of the "contending with the angel" was the significant turning point as well as the moment of return.

Q: (L) What was the blessing he gave to quote Esau, if giving the object to the "angel" was the event of returning the ark? What was the story there?

A: Two separate events.


They had previously discussed aspects of the aabove in the Session of 23 August, 2001:

Q: (L) Now, I have a little problem with my writing. First of all, did the eruption of Thera occur in 1627 BC or thereabouts?
A: Close.
Q: (L) What stimulated the eruption of Thera?
A: Venus.
{Here I think that "Venus" is a code for the giant comet described by Victor Clube}
Q: (L) Well, about 40 years after that there was the comet cluster, in 1588 BC, correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, it seems that Nefertiti disappeared from history in the 12th year of the reign of Akhenaten. He then died in the 17th year of his reign. If Nefertiti was Sarah, where was she during this five year period, if Akhenaten died going after her when Abraham/Moses carried her off?
A: Locked up.
Q: (L) So, Nefertiti is Sarah and Abraham came and rescued her somehow, is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And that happened at the time of the passage of the comet cluster, between 1627 BC and 1588 BC - dramatic events which is what enabled that particular drama to take place...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So Abraham retrieved Sarah and Akhenaten went after them and drowned in the river or something?
A: Close.
Q: (L) So, from 1627 BC to 1588 BC - that's 39 years - almost exactly 40 years of "wandering in the desert," so to say. So they must have escaped when Thera blew and forty years later, the comets came. What was Abraham and his crew doing during that time?
A: Bedouins.
Q: (L) How many were in this tribe?
A: 623.
Q: (L) So it wasn't multiple thousands of people as the Bible would have us believe. Okay, is Abraham the same individual as is presented as his son, Isaac?
A: No.
Q: (L) Did Sarah, known to the Egyptians as Nefertiti, give birth to a child when she was 90 years old?
A: No.
Q: (L) Was Sarah the mother of Isaac?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Why did Abraham want to sacrifice his son?
A: Did not happen.
Q: (L) Who was Hagar the Egyptian?
A: Princess of Egypt.
Q: (L) Was she Sarah's maid?
A: No.
Q: (L) Was she Sarah's daughter?
A: Right nurture to.
Q: (L) What do you mean? I don't understand.
A: Sara's daughter by Akhenaten.
Q: (L) Did Abraham have a child by Hagar also, his wife's daughter by another man?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, that's pretty incestuous. Did Sarah actually get so jealous of her own daughter's child that she demanded that Abraham abandon her?
A: Close.
Q: (L) When did this tribe finally arrive in Israel and settle down. Was this after 40 years living as Bedouins?
A: Pretty much.
[ ]
Q: (L) Did they, or did they not, have the Ark of the Covenant? Was this given to this group of people by 4th density?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Who was it originally given to?
A: Abraham.
Q: (L) Who gave it to him?
A: Sara.
Q: (L) Is the story of Rachel stealing the household gods from her father may have really been the story of Sara stealing the Ark from Akhenaten?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) No wonder Akhenaten was hot to follow them. He wasn't after Sara, he wanted his Ark back.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Who gave the Ark to Akhenaten?
A: STS 4th Density.
Q: (L) I begin to smell a rat! We have read that David's grandmother, Ruth, was a Moabite. That story is a whole other mystery too. Okay, where does the story the Jews tell about being imprisoned, enslaved, crushed, etc come from? What is the source of this tribal memory of being in captivity?
A: Sumerian concept.
Q: (L) Okay, that makes sense. So the Sumerian contribution to the Bible stories mix is the enslavement idea. They had this ancient legend of having been genetically created to be slaves. They were servants to the gods, but not the Pharaoh.


And in a session dated October 7, 1994 the C's had said this about Abraham/Moses:

Q: (L) You said that the Exodus occurred in 2676; is that B.C. or years ago?

A: B.C.

Q: (L) If the Exodus occurred in 2676 B.C., that is 4,670 years ago more or less, this would mean that this was not related to the comet cluster which came in 1588 B.C.

A: Correct.

Q: (L) Who was the god that spoke to Moses on the mount?

A: Audible projection of Lizards.

Q: (L) Did Moses at any time realize that he had been duped by the Lizzies?

A: No.

Q: (L) Yet, the other night you said that Moses is also doing work with Christ on another plane, is that correct?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Well, if he was misled by the Lizzies, how did he get to be a good guy?

A: Taught afterward.

Q: (L) After what?

A: Plane transfer.

Q: (L) Did Moses die?

A: No.

Q: (L) Who took him?

A: Us.


What the C's are saying is the event that we think of as Exodus really took place in Sumeria over a thousand years before Akhenaten and Abraham/Moses's time. This may have been the Israelites Hebrew forefathers who were possibly Scythian Celts breaking free of Sumerian slavery. For those used to the Biblical chronology, this is very confusing indeed.

Coming back to the Ark of the Covenant, it may have looked a bit like this:

1622247650444.jpeg

This Egyptian casket was found inside Tutenkhamun's tomb so is contemporary with Abraham/Moses.
I attach a link to an article on this subject called 'The Poles of the Ark and Tutankhamun’s Chest': The Poles of the Ark and Tutankhamun’s Chest - TheTorah.com. The articles quotes:

The ark is a portable wooden chest made in typical Egyptian style, and extant chests from the ancient Near East, particularly Egypt, reveal parallels to almost every detail of the ark as described in priestly and other biblical texts. Indeed, a gable-lidded chest found in the tomb of the fourteenth century Pharaoh Tutankhamun [See Figure above] is equipped with carrying poles.

This chest exhibits general similarities to the ark as described in the priestly account:
  • Dimensions – All three of its dimensions are based on the cubit and its width equals its height, as is the case with the ark (Exod 25:10 = 37:1).
  • Zer – The chest is also crowned with a cavetto cornice, a feature that I have identified with the זֵר that adorns the ark in the priestly account (Exod 25:11 = 37:2).
  • Wood – Like the ark, the chest is made of wood (cf. Exod 25:10 = 37:1; also Deut 10:1, 3).
  • Four Poles – A British Museum catalogue entry on the chest displays a photograph of its poles [Figure 2] and includes the following description:
Unlike the other chests found in the tomb this chest, no doubt because of its size and weight when full, was provided with four poles so that it could be carried by bearers on their shoulders. Each pole slides backwards and forwards through two bronze rings, attached to boards which are fixed at the bottom of the box. A collar at the back end of the pole, greater in circumference than the ring, prevents the pole from slipping forward through the inner ring.

Comparing Poles: Bible and Tutankhamun​

The photograph and description express several other details of similarity between the poles of the Tutankhamun chest and the poles of the ark as described in Exodus:
  • They are made of wood (cf. Exod 25:13 = 37:4);
  • They are slid through metal rings near each of the chest’s four feet (cf. 25:12 = 37:3);
  • They are aligned along the chest’s long sides (cf. 25:14 = 37:5).
  • They are also fashioned and positioned in a way that would make it difficult to slide them out of the rings and remove them entirely from the chest (cf. Exod 25:15).
In addition, I came across another article, which dealt with the question how many Arks were there: The Two Arks: Military and Ritual - TheTorah.com

The Two Arks: Military and Ritual​

Tradition and source criticism both see two ark traditions in the biblical text: The Ark of the Covenant and the Ark of the Testimony. The former accompanies Israelite troops into battle; it appears in Numbers 10 (וַיְהִי בִּנְסֹעַ הָאָרֹן) and in the stories of battles against the Philistines and Ammonites in Samuel. The latter remains in the Tabernacle, serving as a seat for YHWH’s glory and revelation.

The Priestly Ark: Communication with YHWH

This image of a Battle Ark contrasts with Exodus 25:10–22, where the Ark is first introduced. Here YHWH commands Moses to tell the Israelites to build the Tabernacle, and the Ark is one of the many pieces of furniture inside the Tabernacle, alongside a table, a lamp, and an incense altar.[3] This ark is a wooden box overlaid with gold, upon which is the kapporet, a solid gold cover with figures of two cherubs facing each other, wings spread and touching.[4] The end of the passage explains the function of the Ark and its kapporet:

Here, the Ark is a receptacle for the ʿedut, “testimony,” an obscure term generally understood to refer to the tablets of the Decalogue. The kapporet is designed to be a place of revelation, where YHWH will meet Moses, and speak to him.

Nothing in the texts about the Ark in Exodus implies that it should be carried by the army during battle. If anything, we are told that when YHWH is occupying the Tabernacle, even Moses may not enter it.

Even the High Priest could only enter it once a year for an atonement ritual, and even this had to be accompanied by elaborate preparations lest he encounter YHWH and die (Lev 16). This rule that nobody could enter the precinct while YHWH is occupying the Tabernacle is in tension with the image of Israelites carrying the Ark with them to use in battle.

When a covenant / berit is enacted, there is almost always an active element involved in concretizing it. Covenants in the Bible involve sacrificing animals, circumcision, walking between rocks, spraying of blood, etc. The most common verb associated with berit is כ.ר.ת, which means “to cut.” This active element is ever present in biblical covenants. You have to do something very concrete in order to enter into the covenant. This active image fits well with the depiction of the Ark as a sign of God’s active presence in the camp, assisting Israel in war.

In contrast, the Priestly source does not vary its terminology, but consistently calls the Ark אֲרֹן הָעֵדֻת (Aron HaʿEdut), Ark of the Testimony.[33] Like berit, the term ʿedut is a reference to the object contained inside the Ark (Exod 25:16, 21). Deriving from the Hebrew word עד (ʿed), meaning “witness,” the Testimony in the Ark is a reminder of YHWH’s laws and presence.

The Priestly Ark is part of an attempt by the Priestly authors to tame problematic ritual objects by incorporating them safely into the Priestly world of the Temple. In this way, they consolidate their power over the holy. We see something similar with their treatment of cultic objects such as the Ephod and the Urim ve-Tummim, which in non-Priestly sources are divinatory objects, and in the Priestly source are part of the High Priest’s outfit.

In this case, they turned the Ark of YHWH’s Covenant, a powerful magical weapon used by the Israelites in battle, into the Ark of the Testimony, a piece of furniture, hidden away in the sacred precinct of the Tabernacle. While they go into great detail about the beauty of the Ark and its golden cover, which contrasts sharply with Deuteronomy’s simple wooden box, at the same time, they remove this dangerous object from the hands of the people. The only access any human being has to the object in the Priestly text is through the medium of YHWH’s disembodied voice calling out from between the cherubim.

Tomorrow, I hope to do a post on Rachel and the idols of her fathers house.
 

MJF

Jedi Council Member
The ideas about the Pilgrims roads and the Jacob's Staff I found in a book by Heinz Kaminski.

Here is some excerpt from an article which tries to debunk the later works about Atlantis from Kaminski as esoteric and pseudo-scientific, but concedes that his his early work about the Pilgrims roads is quite profound:
Kaminski would find a lot of support today from people like Graham Hancock, Andrew Collins and Dr. Joseph Farrell no doubt. Many others have since noticed the correspondences between these ancient megalithic sites and temples and modern churches, cathedrals and shrines, many of which lay on well known and sometimes ancient pilgrimage routes. I think this also ties in with the idea of a wandering shamanic priesthood of the 'Shining Ones', which almost certainly would have included the druids of northern Europe. I think we are probably looking at the White Sect or Great White Brotherhood, which would eventually incorporate the Essenes in the Middle East.

People should also bear in mind when you are loking at France in the megalithic period that the C's had this to say about France in the Session dated August 17, 2003:

Q: (Galahad) What was the year of the Narmer rebellion.

A: 3211 BC

Q: (L) The events that are being described in the "Where Troy Once Stood" book, are they fairly accurate?

A: Yes and No. There are many events presented as one time-wise.

Q: (L) Is it so that, at a certain period, Egypt was in the north of France and also the other countries; did they ever exist as the author describes them with the names he gives them?

A: Around 2200 BC

Q: So that would mean that even the Trojan war story was layered on top of the 1600 BC event. Does that (2200BC) coincide with one of the catastrophes that Baillie talks about?

A: Check it out


This may be reflected in the fact that the famous megalithic site of Carnac in Brittany, North-West France: Carnac - Wikipedia shares the same name etymologically speaking as the Temple of Karnak in Egypt: Karnak - Wikipedia. This leads to a connection with Akhenaten as well.

Temple of Amenhotep IV (deliberately dismantled)

The temple that Akhenaten (Amenhotep IV) constructed on the site [of Karnak] was located east of the main complex, outside the walls of the Amun-Re precinct. It was destroyed immediately after the death of its builder, who had attempted to overcome the powerful priesthood who had gained control over Egypt before his reign. It was so thoroughly demolished that its full extent and layout is currently unknown. The priesthood of that temple regained their powerful position as soon as Akhenaten died, and were instrumental in destroying many records of his existence.
 

MJF

Jedi Council Member
The Story of Rachel in the Bible and the idols of her Father

Rachel in the traditional biblical tale was the second, and favourite, of Jacob’s two wives. Here is what Wikipedia has to say about her:

Rachel (Hebrew: רָחֵל‎, romanised: Rāḥêl, lit:‘ewe') was a Biblical figure, the favourite of Jacob’s two wives, and the mother of Joseph and Benjamin, two of the twelve progenitors of the tribes of Israel. Rachel's father was Laban. Her older sister was Leah, Jacob's first wife; their mother was Adinah. Her aunt Rebecaa was Jacob's mother.

It is interesting that her name when literalised means a ‘ewe or female sheep.

Rachel is first mentioned in the Bible in Genesis 29 when Jacob happens upon her as she is about to water her father's flock. She was the second daughter of Laban, Rebecca's brother, making Jacob her first cousin. Jacob had travelled a great distance to find Laban. Rebekah had sent him there to be safe from his angry twin brother, Esau, who he had cheated out of his inheritance.

During Jacob's stay, he fell in love with Rachel and agreed to work seven years for Laban in return for her hand in marriage. On the night of the wedding, the bride was veiled and Jacob did not notice that Leah, Rachel's older sister, had been substituted for Rachel. Whereas "Rachel was lovely in form and beautiful", "Leah had tender eyes". Later Jacob confronted Laban, who excused his own deception by insisting that the older sister should marry first. He assured Jacob that after his wedding week was finished, he could take Rachel as a wife as well, and work another seven years as payment for her. When God "saw that Leah was unloved, he opened her womb" (Gen 29:31), and she gave birth to four sons.

Notice that seven, as in seven years, is the number of perfection.

Rachel, like Sarah and Rebecca, remained unable to conceive. Rachel then became jealous of Leah and gave Jacob her maidservant, Bilhah, to be a surrogate mother for her. Bilhah gave birth to two sons that Rachel named and raised (Dan and Napthali). Leah responded by offering her handmaid Zilpah to Jacob, and named and raised the two sons (Gad and Asher) that Zilpah bore. According to some commentaries, Bilhah and Zilpah were half-sisters of Leah and Rachel. After Leah conceived again, Rachel was finally blessed with a son, Joseph, who would become Jacob's favourite child.

Rachel's son Joseph was destined to be the leader of Israel's tribes between exile and nationhood. This role is exemplified in the Biblical story of Joseph, who prepared the way in Egypt for his family's exile there.

After Joseph's birth, Jacob decided to return to the land of Canaan with his family. Fearing that Laban would deter him, he fled with his two wives, Leah and Rachel, and twelve children without informing his father-in-law. Laban pursued him and accused him of stealing his idols. Indeed, Rachel had taken her father's idols, hidden them inside her camel's seat cushion, and sat upon them. Laban had neglected to give his daughters their inheritance (Genesis 31:14–16).

Not knowing that the idols were in his wife's possession, Jacob pronounced a curse on whoever had them: "With whoever you will find your gods, he will not live" (Genesis 31:32). Laban proceeded to search the tents of Jacob and his wives, but when he came to Rachel's tent, she told her father, "Let not my lord be angered that I cannot rise up before you, for the way of women is upon me" (Genesis 31:35). Laban left her alone, but the curse Jacob had pronounced came true shortly thereafter.

Near Ephrath, Rachel went into a difficult labour with her second son, Benjamin. The midwife told her in the middle of the birth that her child was a boy. Before she died, Rachel named her son Ben Oni ("son of my mourning"), but Jacob called him Ben Yamin (Benjamin). Rashi explains that Ben Yamin either means "son of the right" (i.e., "south"), since Benjamin was the only one of Jacob's sons born in Canaan, which is to the south of Paddan Aram; or it could mean "son of my days", as Benjamin was born in Jacob's old age.

However, let us ignore for the moment the traditional Biblical narrative and look at the story of Rachel through what the C’s have told us really lay behind the story, as it is very important to the trail of the Holy Grail and the Ark of the Covenant after Abraham/Moses left Egypt.

Session dated 23 August, 2001:

Q: (L) Who was Hagar the Egyptian?
A: Princess of Egypt.
Q: (L) Was she Sarah's maid?
A: No.
Q: (L) Was she Sarah's daughter?
A: Right nurture to.
Q: (L) What do you mean? I don't understand.
A: Sara's daughter by Akhenaten.
Q: (L) Did Abraham have a child by Hagar also, his wife's daughter by another man?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, that's pretty incestuous. Did Sarah actually get so jealous of her own daughter's child that she demanded that Abraham abandon her?
A: Close.
Q: (L) When did this tribe finally arrive in Israel and settle down. Was this after 40 years living as Bedouins?
A: Pretty much.


[ ]

Q: (L) Did they, or did they not, have the Ark of the Covenant? Was this given to this group of people by 4th density?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Who was it originally given to?
A: Abraham.
Q: (L) Who gave it to him?
A: Sara.
Q: (L) Is the story of Rachel stealing the household gods from her father may have really been the story of Sara stealing the Ark from Akhenaten?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) No wonder Akhenaten was hot to follow them. He wasn't after Sara, he wanted his Ark back.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Who gave the Ark to Akhenaten?
A: STS 4th Density.

Remember here that Abraham is also Moses and Jacob for these purposes and Sarah is not only Nefertiti but also Rachel. Hence, where Rachel is taking her father’s (Laban’s) idols, in reality it is Nefertiti stealing the idols, i.e., the Ark of the Covenant and probably the Holy Grail and other high tech artefacts as well, from Pharaoh Akhenaten, her husband.

Teraphim

However, it is interesting when you look into the word “idol”, or ‘Teraphim‘ from a Hebrew perspective, for the name connotes far more than just graven images made from metal, stone or wood.

Teraphim (Hebrew: תרף‎ teraph; plural: Hebrew: תרפים‎ teraphim) is a Hebrew word from the Bible, found only in the plural, of uncertain etymology. Despite being plural, Teraphim may refer to singular objects, using the Hebrew plural of excellence. The word Teraphim is explained in classical rabbinical literature as meaning disgraceful thing (dismissed by modern etymologists), and in many English translations of the Bible it is translated as idols, or household god(s), although its exact meaning is more specific than this, but unknown precisely.

However, from our perspective the rabbinical literature may be closer to the mark. What interests me is that the word ‘Teraphim’ is similar to ‘Seraphim’ save for the first letter. The Seraphim are a class, or choir, of angel in Jewish and Christian tradition.

A seraph (/ˈsɛrəf/, "the burning one"; plural seraphim /ˈsɛrəfɪm/) is a type of celestial or heavenly being originating in Ancient Judaism. Tradition places seraphim in the highest rank in Christian angelology and in the fifth rank of ten in the Jewish angelic hierarchy. A seminal passage in the Book of Isaiah (Isaiah 6:1–8) used the term to describe six-winged beings that fly around the Throne of God crying "holy, holy, holy".

However, there is emerging consensus that the motifs used to display seraphs in Hyksos-era Canaan had their original sources in Egyptian uraeus iconography. In non-biblical sources, they are sometimes called the Akyəst (Ge'ez: አክይስት "serpents", "dragons"; an alternate term for Hell).

In the Second Book of Enoch, two classes of celestial beings are mentioned alongside the seraphim and cherubim, known as the phoenixes and the chalkydri (Ancient Greek: χαλκύδραι khalkýdrai, compound of χαλκός khalkós "brass, copper" + ὕδρα hýdra "hydra", "water-serpent"—lit. "brazen hydras", "copper serpents"). Both are described as "flying elements of the sun" (flying saucers anyone!) that reside in either the 4th or 6th heaven (Density?), who have twelve wings and burst into song at sunrise.

The fact that the word ‘Teraphim’ is of uncertain etymology but is close to the word ‘Seraphim’, which can mean in non-biblical sources a serpent or dragon, makes me think of the Lizzies; particularly when the C’s have revealed that it was 4D STS forces that gave Akhenaten the Ark of the Covenant. There has to be more than a coincidence operating here.

However, getting back to the Bible, according to Genesis 31, Rachel takes the teraphim belonging to her father Laban when her husband Jacob escapes. She hides them in a saddle bag and sits on them when Laban comes looking for them, and claims that she cannot get up because she is menstruating. From this it can be deduced that they were small, perhaps 30–35 cm. Her exact motive in doing so is subject to controversy amongst the commentators: Some argue she took the teraphim in order that her father not have idolatrous paraphernalia, while others explain that she wanted to use them herself, and yet others say it was at the discretion of her husband Jacob.

I would ignore the reference to size here since, according to the C’s, this is merely a cover story. In other biblical stories where teraphim are involved, they can be much larger objects.

For example, in 1 Samuel 19, Michal helps her husband David to escape from her father Saul. She lets him out through a window, and then tricks Saul's men into thinking that a teraphim in her bed is actually David. This suggests the size and shape is that of a man. It also refers to "the" teraphim, which implies that there was a place for teraphim in every household. Van der Toorn claims that "there is no hint of indignation at the presence of teraphim in David's house." However, the same word is used in 1 Samuel 15:23 where Samuel rebukes Saul and tells him that "presumption is as iniquity and teraphim". Here the idea is that rebellion is just as bad as teraphim, the use of which is thus denounced as idolatry. Others explain that the teraphim in this context refer to decorative statues, not to idolatrous ritual items.

The teraphim were outlawed in Josiah’s reform (2 Kings 23:24), but are mentioned again in Hosea 3:4, where it says that "the Israelites will live many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or sacred stones, without ephod or teraphim." As in the narrative of Micah’s Idol, the teraphim is closely associated with the ephod*, and both are mentioned elsewhere in connection with divination it is thus a possibility that the Teraphim were involved with the process of cleromancy**.

*An ephod (Hebrew: אֵפוֹד‎ ’êp̄ōḏ; /ˈɛfɒd/ or /ˈiːfɒd/) was an artifact and an object to be revered in ancient Israelite culture, and was closely connected with oracular practices and priestly ritual. Ephod - Wikipedia (see figure below)

**Cleromancy is a form of sortition, casting of lots, in which an outcome is determined by means that normally would be considered random, such as the rolling of dice, but are sometimes believed to reveal the will of God or other universal forces and entities.

1622326240507.jpeg
Jewish High Priest wearing the sacred vestments. The ephod is depicted here in yellow.

In the Books of Samuel and Books of Chronicles, David is described as wearing an ephod when dancing in the presence of the Ark of the Covenant (2 Samuel 6:14, 1 Chronicles 15:27) and one is described as standing in the sanctuary at Nob, with a sword behind it (1 Samuel 21:9). In the book of Exodus and in Leviticus one is described as being created for the High Priest to wear as part of his official vestments (Exodus 28:4+, 29:5, 39:2+; Leviticus 8:7).

Elsewhere in the Bible, there are other less than flattering descriptions of teraphim:

In Zechariah 10:2 it states: "For the teraphim utter nonsense, and the diviners see lies; the dreamers tell false dreams, and give empty consolation. Therefore the people wander like sheep; they are afflicted for want of a shepherd."

Other suggested meanings and uses

Casper Labuschagne claims that it comes via metathesis from the root פתר, "to interpret". Karel Van der Toorn argues that they were ancestor figurines rather than household deities, and that the "current interpretation of the teraphim as household deities suffers from a one-sided use of Mesopotamian material."

That Micah, who worshipped Yahweh, used the Teraphim as an idol, and that Laban regarded the Teraphim as representing his gods, is thought to indicate that they were evidently images of Yahweh. It is considered possible that they originated as a fetish, possibly initially representative of ancestors, but gradually becoming oracular.

Benno Landsberger and later Harry Hoffner derive the word from Hittite tarpiš, "the evil daemon".

We should recall that Nefertiti was a Hittite according to the C’s, so this particular interpretation may well be relevant to us.

What is emerging here is a picture of a teraphim being something involved in divination, interpretation and/or oracular utterances (think of the Oracle of Delphi) and not just a simple statue or image. The fact that Laban, who we now know was Akhenaten, saw the teraphim as a representation of his god leads me to think that one of the teraphim that Rachel, as Nefertiti, took and gave to Jacob/Abraham/Moses was the Holy Grail or the crystal skull the Templars venerated as Baphomet. As regards oracular utterances, I am mindful of the C’s statement that Baphomet was a skull of pure crystal to which they added: “Swords points signify crystal transmitter of truth beholden“.

The Mercy Seat

We also know that Yahweh would manifest between the two angels flanking the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant. According to the Bible the kaporet (Hebrew: הַכַּפֹּֽרֶת‎ ha-kappōreṯ) or Mercy Seat was the gold lid placed on the Ark of the Covenant, with two cherubim beaten out of the ends to cover and create the space into which Yahweh was said to appear. This was connected with the rituals of the Day of Atonement ('Yom Kippur').

According Exodus 25:19; 37:6, the cover was made from pure gold and was the same width and breadth as the ark beneath it, 2.5 cubits long and 1.5 cubits wide. Two golden cherubim were placed at each end of the cover facing one another and the mercy seat, with their wings spread to enclose the mercy seat (Exodus 25:18–21). The cherubim formed a seat for Yahweh (1 Samuel 4:4). The ark and mercy seat were kept inside the Holy of Holies, the temple’s innermost sanctuary which was separated from the other parts of the temple by a thick curtain. The Holy of Holies could be entered only by the high priest on the Day of Atonement. The high priest sprinkled the blood of a sacrificial bull onto the mercy seat as an atonement for the sins of the people of Israel.

The etymology of kaporet (Hebrew: הַכַּפֹּֽרֶת‎) is unclear. The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion states that "some translate it simply as ‘cover’. The phrase 'Mercy Seat' is not a translation of the Hebrew term kapporet though, which appears in its place in the Masoretic text but instead is the translation by William Tyndale of the German term gnadenstuhl, from the same narrative position in Martin Luther's translation of the Bible into German; gnadenstuhl literally means 'seat of grace'.

1622326361029.jpeg

Though kapporet is probably derived from kaphar, which is often considered to mean ‘cover’, the literal meaning of kaphar is wipe out”, implying that kapporet means a thing of wiping out or thing of cleansing.

In the context of how the Ark of the Covenant was used in battle by the Israelites, this alternative meaning may be more appropriate for our purposes.

Interestingly, the Latin word "Caput", which may possibly have some etymological similarity to kaporet, means literally "head" and by metonymy "top". This would be very appropriate if the Mercy Seat was the top of a chest holding a crystal skull.

The Gift of God

The other name the C’s gave to the Merkaba was the ‘Gift of God’. There is an implication here that the Merkaba could provide the possessor anything they wanted, including perhaps food. This makes me think that the crystal skull could transmute matter and produce what you needed, perhaps like a Star Trek replicator machine or super 3D printer. This could explain how Moses was able to feed the children of Israel in the desert during the 40-year period following the Exodus with manna from heaven. However, this may be stretching things somewhat as there are other possible explanations for manna.

Super Technology

Although I have concentrated here on the high tech devices Akhenaten may have had in his possession and which Abraham/Moses stole, the Egyptian pharaohs were not unique among kings of ancient times for possessing special high tech or magical devices.

Just this week, I was watching an ‘Ancient Aliens’ programme, which concentrated on special relics, many of which were owned by kings and emperors. The programme made reference to the following kings who were reputed to have had special technology provided by the gods:

  • The Yellow Emperor of China who travelled in a flying dragon and had a special cauldron.
  • Emperor Jimmu (神武天皇, Jinmu-tennō) was the first legendary emperor of Japan who in Japanese mythology is regarded as a descendant of the sun goddess Amaterasu who gave him a magic mirror, a jewel and a sword as gifts. The mirror allowed him to see all that was going on within his island empire. Apparently, these gifts are still in the possession of the Japanese royal family today and only the Emperor or his Shinto priests are able to see them.
  • Woden, a god of the Anglo-Saxons (who was Odin to the Norse and Votan to the Germans) was meant to lead a hunt across the sky every year in a fiery eight-legged horse as the god of the wind (sounds like a flying machine to me!).
  • Apart from these legendary figures mentioned in the programme there is, of course, Odin who had a special spear as his chief weapon called Gungnir (A.K.A. “The Spear of Heaven”), which was a three-pronged spear (a trident) that only he could wield. The spear is described as being so well balanced that it could strike any target, no matter the skill or strength of the wielder.
  • Then there is Mjölnir (from Old Norse Mjǫllnir), which is the hammer of the thunder god Thor in Norse mythology, which he used both as a devastating weapon and as a divine instrument to provide blessings.
  • Finally, the Tuatha Dé Danann supposedly brought four magical treasures with them to Ireland. These were: Dagda’s cauldron, the Spear of Lugh, the Stone of Fal and the Sword of Light (sounds a bit like a light sabre from Star Wars doesn’t it).
I hope to have more to say on these magical treasures of the Tuatha Dé Danann in a future post.
 

N1mTzo

Jedi
And then there is the Pilgrim's staff, which is also called Jakobsstab (= Jacob's Staff) in German language.
Heiliger_Jakobus.jpg

Notice the peculiar look of the staff. Almost like some sort of a divce...

Interestingly a Jacob's Staff (or Jakobsstab) is also...

We should not mix together two fundamentally DIFFERENT objects that only look LIKE to each other:

1) There was a WEAPON of the gods, which they carried in their hands (rod, jet, vajara, long stick - many varieties). - There are a lot of examples describing the use of this weapon (killing people, gods, animals with it) in ancient literature.

2) There were also high-precision DEVICES (they were also held in their hands), with the help of which they built ancient structures (pyramids, temples and other megalithic structures).
A good example of the image of the INSTRUMENT (for construction - theodolite, level and others) I saw from a guy named Praveen Mohan.
Here is a video about appliances (for construction). The bas-reliefs depict Vishvakarman (divine master) and his instruments

EdtNbSZUEAQjZSI



Although megalithic structures do indeed signify evidence of an advanced civilisation, they are in fact a degraded version of the technology of the older source civilisation, Atlantis. The C's indicated this when they mentioned that the giant pyramid off Bermuda was 5,000 feet high (almost a mile) and was a pure crystalline structure. In comparison, the Great Pyramid of Giza is merely 500 feet high and made of granite and limestone blocks. That doesn't mean it isn't very impressive but it is still a crude structure in comparison to what the Atlanteans had. On the planet Mars they have even dscovered a regular five-sided pyramid that is huge in scale, almost certainly built by the Atlanteans.

Ancient history, as I imagine it at the moment, was not linear, there were periods of progress and regression.
Yes, the pyramids (most of them, as well as the temples of Egypt) were built by the Atlanteans BEFORE or some time AFTER the flood (12 thousand years ago). But after some time (after the construction of the Egyptian pyramids), the remnants of the civilization of Atlantis (this is the civilization of PEOPLE) completely degraded (or they flew to other planets / worlds / went underground - I don't know) and a kind of Stone Age began on Earth (low level of development of people).
And after that (the complete degradation of Atlantis and its descendants), the aliens (the civilization of GODS - there were several of them, from different star systems) built a lot of different megalithic structures throughout the planet Earth: Machu Pichku, Tiwanaku, Ollantaytambo, Aladzha-Huyuk, Jerusalem, Baalbek , Palmyra, Nimrod fortress, temples of India and dozens (perhaps hundreds) of others.
A little later, there was (probably not the first) war of the gods 6-7 thousand years ago.
Thus, we have several periods of DIFFERENT highly developed civilizations (Atlantean people and alien gods), after which megalithic objects (as well as artifacts, devices and tools, knowledge) remained. And then it turns out that both from the civilization of the Atlanteans (and there was still Lemuria!), And from the civilizations of the Gods, many artifacts (weapons, devices and knowledge) remained, for which later (the times of the Old Testament) guys like Yahweh fought.
-----------------------
I beg your pardon, but I greatly simplified the ancient history, since time is limited, and we also do not know a lot!

Do you have any evidence to support your theory that Moses was the son of Ramses II? If so, I would like to see it. Most scholars like to place the Exodus of Moses and the Israelites in the reign of Ramses II but the C's were clear that it occurred in the reign of Akhenaten who was an 18th dynasty pharaoh
This is my hypothesis, which is based on an analysis of the presentation of events as given in the Old Testament (and other Israeli sources).
The version of events set forth in Egyptian sources is completely different.
But we must understand that the Israeli and Egyptian sources contain a lot of lies.

Hence, as you can see, Ramses II came to the throne long after Akhenaten and by then Egypt had recovered from the biblical plagues that coincided with the eruption of Thera.
I think that modern Egyptology cleverly manipulates dates, invents some kings (pharaohs) and even dynasties. These guys (Egyptologists) attribute the construction of the pyramids to Cheops / Chefren / Mikerin!

Besides, this guy Aye (supposedly "uncle" of Akhenaten) looks very strange (doesn't he?) -
Berl%C3%ADn_cabeza_Amarna_01.JPG
It turns out that there were too many hybrid guys during the reign of Akhenaten in Egypt.


This is a very good question. We need to make a distinction for future reference here between the device that was the Ark of the Covenant and the Merkaba/Mother Stone or Holy Grail (Baphomet). The former was created by the Lizzies and given to Akhenaten, the latter was, the Gift of God, given to a group who were in contact with the C's on Kantek and brought to Earth with them. Here is what the C's said - with some comments of my own in red within parantheses:

There was probably some kind of technology in the Ark of the Covenant that could be used as both STS and STO. Give life energy (knowledge, images) or take it (as Yahweh did, animal sacrifices gave him).
The Old Testament describes how Yahweh gave Moses "spare parts" for the work of the Ark of the Covenant - these are the tablets (not to be confused with tablets and commandments).
The Talmud describes their form (tablets):


This is a cube with a cylinder carved inside

In addition, C's did not fully clarify the situation:
If the STS forces gave out the Ark of the Covenant, then why did Abraham / Moses steal it from Akhenaten (he is a fan of Yahweh)? And then Moses and his boys made thousands of animal sacrifices named Yahweh. I see no logic.
 

MJF

Jedi Council Member
We should not mix together two fundamentally DIFFERENT objects that only look LIKE to each other:

1) There was a WEAPON of the gods, which they carried in their hands (rod, jet, vajara, long stick - many varieties). - There are a lot of examples describing the use of this weapon (killing people, gods, animals with it) in ancient literature.

2) There were also high-precision DEVICES (they were also held in their hands), with the help of which they built ancient structures (pyramids, temples and other megalithic structures).
A good example of the image of the INSTRUMENT (for construction - theodolite, level and others) I saw from a guy named Praveen Mohan.
Here is a video about appliances (for construction). The bas-reliefs depict Vishvakarman (divine master) and his instruments

EdtNbSZUEAQjZSI





Ancient history, as I imagine it at the moment, was not linear, there were periods of progress and regression.
Yes, the pyramids (most of them, as well as the temples of Egypt) were built by the Atlanteans BEFORE or some time AFTER the flood (12 thousand years ago). But after some time (after the construction of the Egyptian pyramids), the remnants of the civilization of Atlantis (this is the civilization of PEOPLE) completely degraded (or they flew to other planets / worlds / went underground - I don't know) and a kind of Stone Age began on Earth (low level of development of people).
And after that (the complete degradation of Atlantis and its descendants), the aliens (the civilization of GODS - there were several of them, from different star systems) built a lot of different megalithic structures throughout the planet Earth: Machu Pichku, Tiwanaku, Ollantaytambo, Aladzha-Huyuk, Jerusalem, Baalbek , Palmyra, Nimrod fortress, temples of India and dozens (perhaps hundreds) of others.
A little later, there was (probably not the first) war of the gods 6-7 thousand years ago.
Thus, we have several periods of DIFFERENT highly developed civilizations (Atlantean people and alien gods), after which megalithic objects (as well as artifacts, devices and tools, knowledge) remained. And then it turns out that both from the civilization of the Atlanteans (and there was still Lemuria!), And from the civilizations of the Gods, many artifacts (weapons, devices and knowledge) remained, for which later (the times of the Old Testament) guys like Yahweh fought.
-----------------------
I beg your pardon, but I greatly simplified the ancient history, since time is limited, and we also do not know a lot!


This is my hypothesis, which is based on an analysis of the presentation of events as given in the Old Testament (and other Israeli sources).
The version of events set forth in Egyptian sources is completely different.
But we must understand that the Israeli and Egyptian sources contain a lot of lies.


I think that modern Egyptology cleverly manipulates dates, invents some kings (pharaohs) and even dynasties. These guys (Egyptologists) attribute the construction of the pyramids to Cheops / Chefren / Mikerin!

Besides, this guy Aye (supposedly "uncle" of Akhenaten) looks very strange (doesn't he?) -
Berl%C3%ADn_cabeza_Amarna_01.JPG
It turns out that there were too many hybrid guys during the reign of Akhenaten in Egypt.




There was probably some kind of technology in the Ark of the Covenant that could be used as both STS and STO. Give life energy (knowledge, images) or take it (as Yahweh did, animal sacrifices gave him).
The Old Testament describes how Yahweh gave Moses "spare parts" for the work of the Ark of the Covenant - these are the tablets (not to be confused with tablets and commandments).
The Talmud describes their form (tablets):


This is a cube with a cylinder carved inside

In addition, C's did not fully clarify the situation:
If the STS forces gave out the Ark of the Covenant, then why did Abraham / Moses steal it from Akhenaten (he is a fan of Yahweh)? And then Moses and his boys made thousands of animal sacrifices named Yahweh. I see no logic.
I tend to agree with most of what you say in your comments above. I enjoyed the video as well. I had not seen it before but it did make a lot off sense in explaining how these amazing temple structures were built to such sophisticated standards that we might struggle to replicate today. The tuning fork the presenter showed at the end of the video reminded me of what the C's had said about the wands that the pyramid builders used to levitate large stone blocks using sound vibration to cancel out the force of gravity, which techinques were still being used by Tibetan monks (as witnessed by western observers in the 1920's) at least until the Chinese invasion in the early 1950's. There was evidently good reason why the Nazis showed a great interest in Tibetan mythology and history and organised pre-war expeditions to Lhasa.

The temple complex shown in the video reminded me of Mayan structures in central America. The fact that Maya means 'illusion' in Hindi, as describes the illusion we all live in, can be no coincidence either. I saw an Ancient Aliens programme in which the Indian presenter in that video was shown some statues of Mayan gods by the writer and presenter David Hatcher Childress in a museum park in Columbia, South America (I think) and he immediately recognised the dieties and symbolism as those he was familiar with in ancient Hindu carvings and statues. He even had examples on his phone that he showed Childress, who was amazed at the correspondences. Of course, what these two civilisations had in common was the Lizzies, so I suppose, for us, it is really no surprise. Archaeleogy is unearthing more and more evidence that links Central and South American civilisations to ancient Egypt and India of antiquity as well, so in time we may see a grudging acceptance of this fact.

Where you say: "The Old Testament describes how Yahweh gave Moses "spare parts" for the work of the Ark of the Covenant - these are the tablets (not to be confused with tablets and commandments)."

Your reference to 'tablets' makes me think of the Emerald Tablets of Toth. Many ancient alien theorists rightly connect these tablets with high technology. Perhaps they could have been data storage or control devices. Maybe they were more sophisticated versions of our 'i pad' tablets today that are in effect computers. Who knows. However, one of the wars of the gods you mention is described in the Sumerian epic of the Enuma Elish, which I hope to write about in another post soon, as it may shed light on what happened to the Merkaba.

Unfortunately, I could not upload your image of the cube with a cylinder carved inside it.

Speaking of Ramses II, there is extant evidence within Egyptian records that show he was in contact with certain sky gods, who he referred to as the 'Gods of the Sky'. In fact some writers think that 'Beelzebub', the Jewish devil, doesn't mean 'Lord of the Flies' as conventionally explained but instead 'Lord of that which flies', which may again link us to the Lizzies. The Lizzies obviously played a more overt or open role in these societies than they did subsequently. It is not for nothing that most Central and South American cultures had a chief god who was called the 'feathered serpent'. And then you had the Annunaki in Mesopotamia. Apart from the great Deluge or Flood of Noah, which we know coincided with the destruction of Atlantis 12,800 years ago, there were numerous other disasters and floods in different parts of the world in subsequent ages, which could have destroyed advanced cultures plunging the survivors back into a stone age. These incidents may then have been conflated with the Great Flood. However, there is evidence for several large scale floods in the Tigris & Euphrates estuary until canals were built to divert the flood waters.

It is a good question why the Lizzies permitted Abraham/Moses to steal the Ark of the Covenant from Akhenaten. It should be remembered though that the Lizzies are time travellers and they may, therefore, have had a long term strategy in mind, which required Moses to play a particular part rather than Akhenaten and his family. I think that Akhenaten and his family were Perseids and they clearly were larhe skulled hybrids but then so was Nefertiti and her daughter Kore (the last surviving member of the Perseid family). We have still not explored who Nefertiti's family were, although we do know she was a Hittite from Anatolia (modern Turkey). The C's told Laura she would make a discovery when looking into Nefertiti's family, although by all accounts she was not from a high born, royal or esteemed family.

On the subject of Arks, some Jewish scholars think there may have been two Arks fulfilling quite different purposes. I will post an article on this subject in a follow-up post.
 

MJF

Jedi Council Member
The point is that in German language the same name is used for a medieval measuring device and also for a pilgrim's staff.
And that there is a theory that the premordial function of a pilgrim's staff was that of a transportable gauge.
I agree that we may be looking at a heavily degraded version of a more sophisticated high technology of the past. In Gary Osborn's explanation of some of the concepts Poussin was hiding in his paintings, there is a reference to the ancient three string technique for accurate measuring based on Pythagores right angle triangle theorem: See How to Square a Corner Using the 3-4-5 Method | Western Interlock
 

MJF

Jedi Council Member
Jacob Buries the Idols Beneath an Oak Tree

In my previous post about the idols of Laban, Rachel's father, I discussed how these idols may have been the Holy Grail and the Ark of the Covenant that Nefertiti/Sarah stole from Akhenaten and gave to Abraham/Moses. We also know from the C's that Moses had a change of heart about the Ark and returned it to the 4th Density STS forces that had given it to Akhenaten or his predecessors in the first place. But where did this happen and where is it recorded in the Bible.

By chance, I was looking at an article on Wikipedia that concerned Mount Gerizim, the mountain in Israel that is sacred to the Samaritans, who have always been regarded throughout history as heretics by orthodox Jews, even from antiquity. See Mount Gerizim - Wikipedia

The Samaritans regard Mount Gerizim, rather than Jerusalem's Temple Mount, as having been the location chosen by God for a holy temple. The mountain continues to be the centre of the Samaritan religion to this day and most Samaritans live in close proximity to Gerizim.

I don't want to bore you with the details of why the Samaritans took this contrary view of where the Temple should be located since you can read it in the article. Instead, I want to draw your attention to this passage in the article, which is of direct relevance to our quest for the Holy Grail and the Ark of the Covenant.

"Much later in the Book, when Joshua was old and dying, he gathered the people together at Shechem, and gave a farewell speech, and then wrote these words in the book of the law of Yahweh, and set up a stone as a witness, placing it next to the sanctuary of Yahweh, under the oak tree. Depending on the way in which the sources of Joshua were spliced together, this may just be another version of the earlier narrative Joshua placing the whitened stones slabs with the law inscribed on them, and some scholars believe that this narrative may have originally been in an earlier location within the Book of Joshua.

Scholars consider it plausible for the sanctuary to have been pre-Israelite. It is possible that the name of the mountain is indicative of this, as it is thought that Gerizim may mean mountain of the Gerizites, a tribe in the vicinity of the Philistines that, according to the Hebrew Bible, was conquered by David. A straightforward etymology for Gerizim would give the meaning of mountain cut in two. According to the narrative about Jotham in the Book of Judges, Shechem was a site where there was a sanctuary of El-Berith, also known as Baal-Berith, meaning God of the covenant and Lord of the covenant, respectively; scholars have suggested that the Joshua story about the site derives from a covenant made there in Canaanite times. In the narrative of Judges, Session 2 February 2003: is seemingly significant enough to have given its name to a nearby plain, and this pillar is thought to be likely to have been a totem of El-Berith; the Joshua story, of a stone being set up as a witness, simply being an attempt to provide an aetiology in accordance with later Israelite theology.

In the Biblical narrative, the oak tree, seemingly next to the sanctuary, was evidently in existence as early as the time of the Patriarchs, as Jacob is described in the Book of Genesis as having buried the idols of strange gods (formerly worshipped by his household) beneath it. According to a Jewish midrash, one of these idols, in the shape of a dove, was later recovered by the Samaritans, and used in their worship on Mount Gerizim."


Hence, we have a stone pillar being erected by Joshua, Moses's successor who led the children of Israel into the promised land, in a sanctuary of Yahweh (who may have been Baal-Berith and therefore linked to the Lizzies since Baal is another name for Beezelbub) under an old oak tree. We then have Jacob burying the idols of his father-in-law (Laban/Akhenaten) under the same oak tree. Here is the Bible account in Genesis 35:

"Then God said to Jacob, “Go up to Bethel and settle there, and build an altar there to God, who appeared to you when you were fleeing from your brother Esau.”

So Jacob said to his household and to all who were with him, “Get rid of the foreign gods you have with you, and purify yourselves and change your clothes. 3 Then come, let us go up to Bethel, where I will build an altar to God, who answered me in the day of my distress and who has been with me wherever I have gone.” 4 So they gave Jacob all the foreign gods they had and the rings in their ears, and Jacob buried them under the oak at Shechem. 5 Then they set out, and the terror of God fell on the towns all around them so that no one pursued them.

Jacob and all the people with him came to Luz (that is, Bethel) in the land of Canaan. 7 There he built an altar, and he called the place El Bethel, because it was there that God revealed himself to him when he was fleeing from his brother. 8 Now Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, died and was buried under the oak outside Bethel. So it was named Allon Bakuth.

9 After Jacob returned from Paddan Aram, God appeared to him again and blessed him. 10 God said to him, “Your name is Jacob, but you will no longer be called Jacob; your name will be Israel.” So he named him Israel.

11 And God said to him, “I am God Almighty; be fruitful and increase in number. A nation and a community of nations will come from you, and kings will be among your descendants. 12 The land I gave to Abraham and Isaac I also give to you, and I will give this land to your descendants after you.” 13 Then God went up from him at the place where he had talked with him.


14 Jacob set up a stone pillar at the place where God had talked with him, and he poured out a drink offering on it; he also poured oil on it. 15 Jacob called the place where God had talked with him Bethel.

According to the C's, Jacob is Abraham/Moses, so this may be the place where Moses returned the Ark of the Covenant and possibly the Holy Grail to the Lizzies. As with Joshua, he erects a pillar, Jacob's Pillar, to mark the spot, which is near to an oak tree, so the spot was called 'Allon Bakuth'. Could this also be the place where Hagar was dropped off as well with her son Ishmael, which in Genesis was described as the wilderness of Beersheba?

It is interesting that the Biblical account mentions that all the people were required to purify themselves and change their clothes. This might just be a ritual cleansing but it could also signify taking precautions against radiation. Then the Biblical account speaks of how:- "the terror of God fell on the towns all around them so that no one pursued them". We know the Ark had terrible powers, so maybe it created some sort of shock wave once deposited there that terrified the local inhabitants of the area.

However, let us return to the oak tree that was called "Allon Bacuth". In Hebrew this means "Massive Tree of Weeping", which given it may have been quite an old oak tree by then, this might have been a literal reference to the tree concerned. It is also connected to weeping but is this because of Deborah's death or a parting of the waves for certain people?

The C's have told Laura that "the trees will lead you to the answer" and we seem to have encountered references to trees all over the place in this thread. I would ask you to recall how the C's had suggested to Laura when she was researching into Alnwick Castle, the family seat of the Percy family, the Dukes of Northumberland, that she should research the Hebrew roots of the name ''Allen".

Generally speaking, most commentaries will tell you that the name Allen is a Celtic surname, originating in Ireland, and common in Scotland, Wales and England. It is a variation of the surname MacAllen and may be derived from two separate sources: Ailin, in Irish and Scottish Gaelic, means both "little rock" or "stone" and "harmony", or it may also be derived from the Celtic Aluinn, which means "handsome". Variant spellings include Alan, Allan, etc.

The nearest equivalent to "Allen" in Hebrew seems to be Allon, Elon, Ilan. Alon (אַלּוֹן in Hebrew), which is an Israeli surname and masculine given name and means "tree" or "oak tree".

I can't be certain but the very fact that 'Allen' in Hebrew means oak tree makes me wonder if the C's wanted us to make this connection. If so, the reason may be connected to Jacob's pillar or stone. This is what Wikipedia has to say about it:

The Stone of Jacob appears in the Book of Genesis as the stone used as a pillow by the Israelite patriarch Jacob at the place later called Bet-El. As Jacob had a vision in his sleep, he then consecrated the stone to God.

According to account given in Genesis (Chapter 28:10-22), Jacob was fleeing from his elder twin brother Esau, whom he had tricked out of receiving their father Isaac's blessing of the first-born. On his flight, Jacob rested at a city called Luz and used a group of stones as a pillow.


10 And Jacob went out from Beersheba, and went toward Haran.
11 And he lighted upon a certain place, and tarried there all night, because the sun was set; and he took of the stones of that place, and put them for his pillows, and lay down in that place to sleep.
12 And he dreamed, and behold a ladder set up on the earth, and the top of it reached to heaven: and behold the angels of God ascending and descending on it.
13 And, behold, the Lord stood above it, and said, I am the Lord God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac: the land whereon thou liest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed;
14 And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.
15 And, behold, I am with thee, and will keep thee in all places whither thou goest, and will bring thee again into this land; for I will not leave thee, until I have done that which I have spoken to thee of.

After waking up, Jacob exclaimed, "How dreadful is this place! this is none other but the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven." Subsequently, he called the place Bethel, which translates to "House of God". He set up the stone he had slept on as a pillow, and consecrated it. He also made a vow to God in reference to his eventual return.

So could this pillar erected at Bethel be the same pillar/stone as the one erected on the plain of Shechem at a site called the sanctuary of El-Berith, or Bethel under the oak tree called the Allon Bakuth? I think so. The C's also had this to say about the handing back of the idols, and in particular the Ark of the Covenant, in a 2003 session.

Session dated 2 February 2003:

Q: (L) That would mean that, according to the story, that Paris/Alexander would be the same individual as Abraham and that Herodotus' story of Paris and Helen sojourning in Egypt was true?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) We have the brother issue to deal with. We have Abraham and his nephew, Lot. Then we have Moses and Aaron, Jacob and Esau, Isaac and Ishmael. Were all of these sets of brothers just different aspects or views on the same stories, a set of singular individuals, whether brothers or not?

A: Pretty much though with added elements from other stories blended in.

Q: (L) Was it a brother/brother relationship as in actual brothers?

A: No. The "brother" relationship was created to legitimize a "false" line of transmission. [Jacob instead of Esau?]

Q: (L) So there wasn't a brother, or Aaronic relationship present, assuming any part of that story was true. Is that it?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) One aspect of the variation on the story was that Jacob gave his brother, Esau, the 'blessing' and some 'gift.' Does this reflect an accurate part of the story that Moses, in his form as Jacob, passed something on to someone else’s - something that was important?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Was it Moses/Abraham who was doing this?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Who did he pass it on to?

A: It was finally understood by "Moses" that the danger of the object [The Ark] was greater than the ability of descendants to resist corruption. He handed it over to those who had created it.

Q: (Galahad) Was it STS or STO forces that created it?

A: STS.


Q: (Galahad) So, the Ark was an object created by STS. Did this amount to some sort of realization on Moses' part? Did he start to wake up?

A: Yes. The story of the "contending with the angel" was the significant turning point as well as the moment of return.

Q: (L) What was the blessing he gave to quote Esau, if giving the object to the "angel" was the event of returning the ark? What was the story there?

A: Two separate events.

Q: (L) So, he returned the ark to the so-called angel. And then, he gave something to someone else. Previously, when I asked about this, you said that what he gave to Esau was "trampled leaves of wrath, the blue apples incarnate," and remarked that I should inquire into the "core meaning."


A: And who was "Kore?"

Q: (L) Was this Abraham's daughter?

A: It was the last living member of the Perseid family.


This brings us back to Hagar/Kore again and the 'trampled leaves of wrath'. I also wonder if the ladder the angels were ascending and descending was perhaps a ladder to a flying saucer? It might, of course, have a more metaphorical meaning though. So what was this stone pillar? The C's also had this to say in another session:

Q: What is the relationship between Perceval, Paran Sikarios, the Assassini, and Ishmael, the son of Hagar, at the well of the mirror?

A: Spear of Destiny.

Q: Are the Ishmaelis the carriers of the true bloodline, and the line of Isaac and Jacob, the Supplanter, the carriers of the monothiestic covenant, are the false line?

A: Close

Q: Are the Ishmaelis also the carriers of the knowledge of levitation, the cult of the head or the skull...

A: Try to connect to the Templars

Q: Did the Templars discover the secrets of the Ishmaelis, the Assassini, and is this what they carried into Europe, and then underground?

A: Buried in Galle.


This brings us back to Galle yet again and to the Holy Grail but the C's also mention the Spear of Destiny. What was this?
Jacob's Stone is also connected with Scottish and Irish mythology. This is what Wikpedia has to say about it:

Some Scottish legends surrounding the Stone of Scone, traditionally used for coronations of Scottish kings in the High Middle Ages, have identified this stone with the Stone of Jacob. Supposedly the Stone of Jacob was brought to Ireland by the prophet Jeremiah and thence to Scotland.

These legends also feature prominently in British Israelism, a set of beliefs that consider the British monarchy as the legitimate heir to the ancient Israelites. From 1308 to 1996, the Stone of Scone rested in the Royal throne of England at Westminster. On 23 December 2020 it was announced by the Scottish Government that the stone is to be relocated to a newly renovated 'Hall of Destiny' in Perth's city centre, only a few miles from Scone.


Well as Laura has said, we always seem to come back to the Scottish question in the end. But what about the Irish connection?

The C's talked of a Spear of Destiny. Is there then anything that looks more like a spear and is tied up with people's destiny. Well yes there is and it is located at the Hill of Tara in Ireland and it looks like this: See Lia Fáil - Wikipedia

1622412695749.jpeg

The Lia Fáil (Irish: [ˌl̠ʲiə ˈfˠaːlʲ], meaning Stone of Destiny (or also "Speaking Stone" to account for its oracular legend) is a stone at the Inauguration Mound (Irish: an Forrad) on the Hill of Tara in County Meath, Ireland, which served as the coronation stone for the High Kings of Ireland. It is also known as the Coronation Stone of Tara. According to legend, all of the kings of Ireland were crowned on the stone up to Muirchertach mac Ercae, c. AD 500.

It kind of looks more like a spear as well. It also seems to be Ireland's version of the Sword in the Stone, which is linked with the King Arthur legend. Continuing with Wikipedia:

There are several different, and conflicting, legends in Irish mythology describing how the Lia Fáil is said to have been brought to Ireland. The Lebor Gabala, dating to the eleventh century, states that it was brought in antiquity by the semi-divine race known as the Tuatha Dé Danann. The Tuatha Dé Danann had travelled to the "Northern Isles" where they learned many skills and magic in its four cities Falias, Gorias, Murias and Findias. From there they travelled to Ireland bringing with them a treasure from each city – the four legendary treasures of Ireland. From Falias came the Lia Fáil. The other three treasures are the Claíomh Solais or Sword of Light, the Sleá Bua or Spear of Lugh and the Coire Dagdae or The Dagda's Cauldron.

The Lia Fáil was thought to be magical: when the rightful High King of Ireland put his feet on it, the stone was said to roar in joy. The stone is also credited with the power to rejuvenate the king and also to endow him with a long reign. According to Lebor Gabála Érenn, Cúchulainn split it with his sword when it failed to cry out under his protégé, Lugaid Riab nDerg — from then on it never cried out again, except under Conn of the Hundred Battles and according to legend, at the coronation of Brian Boru in 1002.

According to one version of Gaelic Myth surrounding the Lia Fáil stone, a myth more associated with the Stone of Scone, the sacred stone arrived by ship belonging to the Iberian Danaan into the ancient port of Carrickfergus about 580 BC. On board was Eochaidh, son of a High King and a descendant of Érimón, Princess Tea Tephi and the scribe Simon Brauch. Princess Tea also had in her possession an ancient harp, whose origins some believe lie in the House of David. The stone was delivered to the Hill of Tara by the three. Scota later married High King Eochaidh, both had previously met each other in Jerusalem. Eochaidh recovered the ancient stone in Jerusalem before the invasion of the Babylonians. It is said all future Irish High Kings/British Monarchs inaugurated by the stone have tried to prove lineage back to the Royal Sage and his wife, Tea Tephi, the original bearers of the stone. Eochaidh's resting place is said to be in the Neolithic passage tomb, Cairn T at Loughcrew

However, historian William Forbes Skene commented: "It is somewhat remarkable that while the Scottish legend brings the stone at Scone from Ireland, the Irish legend brings the stone at Tara from Scotland.


Here again we encounter Princess Tara, Princess Tepi, and Scota to whom Scotland owes its name. We also have a confusion between the Stone of Scone and the Lia Fáil. I intend to try and resolve this confusion in a subequent post but I think there is some merit in both national traditions, however, time may have served to conflate these two origin stories together.
 
Top Bottom