Any thoughts on Incels?

Relationships are indeed a trade, of energy, time, resources, commitment, promises, affection and so many more ingredients. But it's quite more than that, it's more than the sum of its parts. The trouble with seeing it in such utilitarian terms will eventually land one in a position where there's no point in even considering getting into a relationship.

I think the above is pertinent to life in general - it’s kind of the fight against entropy. You don’t put any effort/ energy/ time/ resources into ANYTHING, it will go down the drain, slowly at first, and then all of a sudden - that being your body, your health, your job, your family, whatever.

But I also agree with Alejo, that it is way more than that. To me there seem to also be a philosophical/ spiritual dimension to this - and somehow connected to Free Will, or maybe rather to the concept of progression/ ascension of the soul, which requires constant input/ work/ learning for that to happen.

I am not really able to explain the above better, as I haven’t pondered the question well enough, but maybe someone else has - in which case I would be very interested to hear your thoughts on this.

So being in relationship or not, or wishing to be in a relationship or not, the “way out” is the same wherever you are or whatever you do.
 
One other aspect that has not been mentioned yet is that for people doing the Work it is preferrable or even necessary to have a co-linear partner who is also doing the Work.

This reduces the number of potential partners considerably.

It also seems that one of the modes of attack by 4D STS and such is to try to sidetrack people with "wrong" partners (eg. OPs).
 
It is a little awkward this movement is growing. Anyone has some idea about what has sparkled it and what can be done to hinder it?
I have personal friend who fell to it. That's why I am bringing this up.
I've been chatting with a male friend about stuff like this recently, as he's just joined the online dating world, and some of the experiences he's described for guys in general are definitely pretty bad (being a male on a dating app).
Things do seem to be very much in favour of being female.
Eg, women get loads of "hits" or lots of interest, and the vast majority of guys don't. (Unless they are high status, very good looking, etc etc la la la di la! ).
I reckon online dating has alot to answer for.. As it puts people into boxes in a way that meeting them in person cannot.

And for men, these apps, it's like constantly putting temptation in the form of all these girls in front of them.. Whilst saying, btw, they aren't for you, your not good enough, handsome enough, you don't earn enough etc etc. It's as if they amplify everything, and create more of a gap between those who are in demand and those who aren't.

I can see that for alot of guys, these apps are a recipe for disappointment, sexual frustration and general frustration for those who aren't in the bracket of types that are attractive to females for whatever reason. From what he was saying, if he's chatting to a girl, the girl is likely to be chatting to several other men at one time and and so many cases, she'll just disappear. (Unless a guy is lucky enough to be a 'high value' male).
It's not necessarily just younger women that have alot of attention either apparently, older women gets lots too.
I think these dating apps have a lot to do with the incel thing.

And they seem to have become so popular that old fashioned meeting people out and about isn't as socially recognised as being a way to meet people as much as dating apps are nowadays. Or at least that was the impression. Just some thoughts.
 
This is really worth a listen. Throws a lot of perspective into this topic:


I also listened to the below yesterday too which is interesting but I didn't quite like it as the solution the guy was throwing out wasn't well defined and left a lot of room for pathology to seep in.


On the above, I also think a huge assumption is being made. Supposedly birth rates are declining because Women are picky and leave it too late (essentially) but I actually don't think this reason is true. I think birth rates are declining because more and more people physically can't have a kid despite wanting to and the question is why?

In any case, the bottom line in all these is rather than harbour hate towards others, work on yourself, don't play the victim, and look to cultivate something decent in your own life. No government is going to mandate women to do the thing that the person above is implying for the sake of preventing population collapse 😖. That's a new level of tyranny.
 
I've been chatting with a male friend about stuff like this recently, as he's just joined the online dating world, and some of the experiences he's described for guys in general are definitely pretty bad (being a male on a dating app).
Things do seem to be very much in favour of being female.
I'd say this is natural surely - guys are the ones who naturally instigate interaction. So of course, every guy out there who comes across a profile they like they'll swipe to show interest. Alas, the woman on the other side of the profile then has all the options.

Somehow people take this dynamic to be the woman's fault whilst it's the guys who were swiping on her profile 😭😭

And for men, these apps, it's like constantly putting temptation in the form of all these girls in front of them.. Whilst saying, btw, they aren't for you, your not good enough, handsome enough, you don't earn enough etc etc. It's as if they amplify everything, and create more of a gap between those who are in demand and those who aren't.
Yup, not only in terms of women but social media e.g. Instagram acts like this too. I used to have Instagram and one day it dawned on me that all it used to show me was highly materialistic stuff - being a guy who followed athletes and sports, all I got was famous athletes living their millionaire lifestyles, lots of gym content, mostly relating to women 😂. I'm just a regular guy and all these was like "look at all these stuff you can't have" 😂😂. So you know what I did... I deleted it and haven't looked back since 🫡

I truly think Instagram and the like is toxic to your mental well being.

I can see that for alot of guys, these apps are a recipe for disappointment, sexual frustration and general frustration for those who aren't in the bracket of types that are attractive to females for whatever reason. From what he was saying, if he's chatting to a girl, the girl is likely to be chatting to several other men at one time and and so many cases, she'll just disappear. (Unless a guy is lucky enough to be a 'high value' male).
Guys would also be chatting to more than one girl on the apps if they had more than one girl chatting with them. It's not just women 😭😭

And they seem to have become so popular that old fashioned meeting people out and about isn't as socially recognised as being a way to meet people as much as dating apps are nowadays. Or at least that was the impression. Just some thoughts.
This reminded me of my university days prior to social media. Back then, night clubs, pubs etc were the places of choice to meet women. I'll tell you what, if you were just a normal dude, you better get ready for brutal in your face rejection from pretty much every interaction where you are signalling you want something from a girl you've just randomly walked up to in a bar. 😖

I wouldn't necessarily say the "old fashioned" ways were easier / softer on guys who had the sorts of problems incels have i.e. quite sensitive to rejection, lack of social skill with the opposite gender etc.

Basically, what I'm trying to say, there aren't any easy solutions for people who have problems with all these stuff that revolve around this subject. Online / offline, wherever you turn, it's a jungle. I'm not sure it can be anything other than a jungle?
 
One other post from me as was listening to some podcasts about this. Going to speak about the subject from my own perspective / journey as I feel like I've been on this incel journey, albeit, back in my day, it wasn't a thing, it was just normal.

I don't think this is a "new" phenomenon as for example, I do know a few people back in my days of being at university and into the twenties that fit this description. People who hadn't had girlfriends, been in relationships, had sex etc. Seeing I didn't have sex for the first time until my late twenties I think I also strictly fit into this definition. Back then though, this whole thing hadn't been turned into some commodity / internet phenomenon. Once when I was at uni I remembered watching a TV Show hosted by Jimmy Carr (British comedian) and in it he was joking that he hadn't had sex for the first time until he was in his late twenties. So in my mind I was like, wow, so even someone famous and funny struggled with this? At the time, the notion that women were to blame for any of these didn't even cross my mind or any of the guys that I knew who were in the same boat.

It was not a big secret why there were young guys who could not get into relationships. All you had to do was look at the guys - we had a lot of work to do on ourselves!! Speaking for myself, I spent most of my teenage years either playing video games or football with other lads. Rarely if ever did I speak to girls. Coming into Uni, it dawned on me quite quickly that I hadn't built enough social skill to be able to effectively interact with women from that sort of perspective. I could see the guys who were good at this, and that wasn't me. At the time, I also didn't fully appreciate that I personally had quite a lot of growing up to do from a psychological perspective.

For me personally, I also had other issues that in today's world will likely be considered mental health (e.g. anxiety from having spent most of my childhood playing video games and therefore didn't know how to interact with the outside world, overly sensitive to rejection etc). Looking back, all the stuff that I had mentally that could be classed as an illness nowadays all simply represented the ground I needed to cover from a developmental perspective. These were all symptoms of me having neglected psychological growth.

One thing that helped around that time when I was at university was getting acquainted with the fourth way. This put the responsibility back at you as an individual. Also became acquainted with the work of Dabrowski which firmly planted in my head that stuff like anxiety isn't an illness but a challenge to growth.

Anyways I soon graduated from university, still firmly a virgin but I wasn't the only one. I knew other guys - we all knew we were this way because we just didn't know how to interact with girls. It wasn't a big secret, it wasn't that there was something wrong with girls - that their demands were high or anything! Some of us during Uni took to trying to do something about it e.g. whenever we went out, to try and speak to girls. Man, I have fond memories of those rejections. It became a bit of a game between me and a friend, basically how many rejections can we collect in one night out. We weren't rude or anything, if anything, we were too innocent 😂... rejections were as simple as walking over to a girl in a student bar, tapping on her shoulder, saying hi to immediately have her look at you and simply turn away as if you did not exist Lol. Getting acquainted with "in your face" rejection started to build something. Something else also happened on the few times you did not get immediately rejected - you realised you didn't actually know what to do to sustain an interaction and after a while it became kind of awkward as the guy is meant to lead but you have no idea what the hell to do. These all fits into the definition of "incel" minus the blaming of women.

Anyways, post graduation the game continued of trying to get better at this but it kind of expanded. For me, I realised that to overcome this mountain, I needed to seek out situations that made me most anxious - nothing like reckless e.g. thrill seeking 😂 but more from a psychological point of view. I came at this from all directions, maintained going out with the express purpose of being rejected, decided to stand up to some bullies in my life (some guys who I was living with who were making my life hell), I had an absolute terrorist of a boss in my first job to also keep things interesting. Also I linked up with a guy from Uni who was on a similar journey and we incorporated travel into our journey plan e.g. travelling together, staying in hostels, trying to be social etc.

By this time, around mid-twenties, online dating apps became a thing and got into that. Nice thing with the online dating apps is that they actually resulted in opportunities to go into 1-2-1 dating - it was interesting you know, not that any of these ever resulted in anything, not for a while!

The thing though, looking back, it was never about blaming the world, it was all about trying to figure out the world. We knew there were demands placed on us that we needed to meet if the world was to give us what we wanted. From a relationship perspective, we knew that we needed to make sure we looked good from a physical perspective, like we cared about ourselves, took care of ourselves, we knew that we needed to try and get some kind of financial security, that we needed to build some decent level of social skill. We knew that we also needed to be "in the world", carve up some interesting experiences for ourselves that we can then share in conversation, stuff like travelling to different places, interacting with other cultures etc. In the background, I had also maintained contact with fourth way, the material from this forum, the situation in the world etc. So I was kind of like living both sides of life.

One thing I knew about me though is that I was kind of average, there wasn't anything special, no special purpose, the world wasn't going to swoop in and reveal something grand about my destiny lol. I was working a normal job that wasn't going anywhere unless I finally did something about it, made just enough to maintain myself, other than hanging out with guys it wasn't like I was carving out anything for myself socially (I was more playing a support role in other people's stories). Still an incel at this point in the journey btw, but again, nothing about blaming women. This was the time in my life where I realised I was normal, not special, normal - by that, I mean that before this time I thought the world owed me something, there was a plan, a destiny that would reveal itself etc but actually, after much stalking and observation, I was like huh, I'm normal. I wasn't going to be a millionaire, famous, stand out, or have some kind of cosmic destiny etc lol.

With the passing of time and with persistently challenging myself to face my fears, to seek out anxiety inducing situations, to be comfortable with rejection, things started to happen slowly but surely. Again, it's one of those things where it's not one thing that happens but a few small things accumulate to result in changes across many spheres in your life.

I made tactical shifts in my job situation, building upon prior experience especially experience of dealing with tyrannical managers. I also came to know what it is I most wanted from a job. From the women side, I had gone on enough first dates to start to figure out the dance and at this stage, looking back, it wasn't really about seeking companionship, it was about figuring something out, it was about overcoming a huddle. In any case, during this period in the late twenties, amongst all these activity, sex for the first time happened. No longer an incel. But alas, that's not the end of the journey.

Sex and a relationship are two different things. Shifting from going on random dates to having a relationship are two different skill-sets. In any case, it's all the dance of life - there's no final destination, there is just the journey.

In all these, what I have learnt is to embrace "the fight". My number one message to the incels out there is learn to embrace "the fight", not with regards coming to have sex, but with regards learning how to live and cultivate something in your own life. There's no blaming others, just look at yourself, the options you have, the tools you have or you can develop in your character/ personality and get to work. If you are expecting the world to do something for you, defeat will visit you and in this world, no matter how low you sink, you can always sink even lower so you better learn to "embrace the fight".

In my own journey, the thirties were a different story to the twenties, all the hard work done during the twenties started to bear fruit in my thirties and I'm now a good old regular joe - dug myself out of the gutter into a regular Joe status. Got a mrs that's constantly on my back (I'd worry if she wasn't), a mortgage to pay and i weaved myself out of the dead-end jobs I was stuck in during the twenties. In all these time, whilst there's no grand cosmic destiny that will meet me individually, I've kept close tabs of the information sphere to not fall victim of the mainstream narratives and to at least know there might be more in this world and life than meets the eye. Certainly there are some crazy elites looking to turn us into some kind of God-knows-what 🤷, human drones perhaps that they can programme and control at will, that much I do know.

In all these time, one thing remains true, life never stops coming at you and you can't really embody the mindset of blaming others. Psychologically, you always have to remain "fighting fit", in tip-top condition otherwise this world will eat you up and throw you out, it's merciless like that. Whilst I realise on the physical side not everyone is on the same condition (e.g. some people have chronic illnesses etc), but this is a side that you should also keep on top of - basically, you need to be fighting fit physically and psychologically to be at an optimum condition to face the challenges of this life.

To conclude, I'd say that the basic notion that some people are involuntarily celibate is a normal part or stage of some people's lives but the whole mythology and story being built up around this at the cultural level is a product of the mechanical forces that operate in life under the general law. As an individual, you have the choice to be swept up by these mechanical forces and be an automaton (swept up by the prevailing forces of the day) or you can work on building a magnetic center and progress through life through a different path.
 
Last edited:
I think the one difference between dating apps and meeting girls the old fashioned way is the intensity of the experience. You go out and you may get rejected by 4 different women in one night, and it's just as "brutal" as in the dating app world, it's the same principle.. a girl compares you against all her other options and you're not making the cut. There is definitely some of that in the decision making process. However, on the dating apps, you can be rejected by women several times an hour all day long, it's a lot more intense, but the principle remains. And it is perhaps that intensity that can make guys jaded faster.

But the same principles apply, similar dangers too, only now they're digital. There's a big difference, I think, between clicking a picture of a girl on a profile, reading a bit about her, and sending a message and actually walking up to a girl and striking up a conversation in real life. I think it's a lot easier to overcome and cope with rejection, and correct mistakes, if you feel like you had a chance and were unsuccessful face to face. There's a lot more information you can pick up from unspoken language. But if a girl just rejects your profile, without giving you a chance, it may be a deeper, more isolated and more disconnected rejection, and you have no agency in what happened, you just have to deal with the result.

You know, it's the difference between "I got too nervous and I blew it!" (but you gave it a shot, and recognize and learned something about yourself ) and "what's wrong with me?"

One other aspect that has not been mentioned yet is that for people doing the Work it is preferrable or even necessary to have a co-linear partner who is also doing the Work.

This reduces the number of potential partners considerably.

It also seems that one of the modes of attack by 4D STS and such is to try to sidetrack people with "wrong" partners (eg. OPs).
Yes and no, IMHO, I think that at some point of becoming familiar with certain concepts and practices some people might not be compatible partners, but the end goal of the Work is to be a conscious human being, as conscious as possible, and that is not incompatible with being in a relationship, in a sense it's a very similar goal.

Similar efforts, sacrifices, with a similar goals, even similar practices. And in terms of the wrong partner, well, that's always going to be a danger, even without 4D STS I think, but that's the hope of cleaning one's machine, so that the yearning for the wrong partner or the places in one's psyche where some of these manipulations hook into, aren't effective.
 
but the end goal of the Work is to be a conscious human being, as conscious as possible, and that is not incompatible with being in a relationship, in a sense it's a very similar goal.
I am not sure if we are talking about the same thing - of course being in a relationship is compatible with doing the Work. The question is whether intimate relationships with people who are not colinear or do not do the Work is a good idea.

Recently I saw a good example of that in two friends:

One is doing the Work, while her partner is not. The end result was what often happens in relationships where one or both people do not do the Work: emotional charges like anger get triggered and instead of processing and healing that, people project and blame the other person for "causing" that intense anger. When in reality it is a pent-up emotional charge, usually from early childhood.

In this particular case, projecting the anger (instead of processing it) even lead to physical violence and arrest.
 
I am not sure if we are talking about the same thing - of course being in a relationship is compatible with doing the Work. The question is whether intimate relationships with people who are not colinear or do not do the Work is a good idea.
Not in that sense, but then again.. a relationship with anyone who is not collinear is not a good idea, whether it is about the Work or not.

However, I do I see your point, if you find the material and are already in a relationship, it may become something tricky to navigate, specially if some concepts are very shocking, but the hope is that your partner and you have certain values that if one of the two decides to initiate a process for positive goals, then there would be support. It doesn't have to be the Work, it could be a change in diet, or exercise, or therapy.

If there isn't then the issue was probably with how the choice of partner was made, not so much with the Work making one incompatible to be in a given relationship.

It reminds me of Paul's words on marriage, and I think the same applies in this instance, it's not about the status that becomes a requirement to achieve something, do the Work in this case, it's the individual's choices whether married or not, it's how you behave to the situation at hand that really shows your work.

If married, then be a good husband/wife, do not leave your partner if they're not engaged in the same works as you unless they wish to leave, if unmarried, don't look for someone for false drives, but if you do find someone, make it as conscious a choice as possible and honor that person.
 
I think the one difference between dating apps and meeting girls the old fashioned way is the intensity of the experience. You go out and you may get rejected by 4 different women in one night, and it's just as "brutal" as in the dating app world, it's the same principle.. a girl compares you against all her other options and you're not making the cut. There is definitely some of that in the decision making process. However, on the dating apps, you can be rejected by women several times an hour all day long, it's a lot more intense, but the principle remains. And it is perhaps that intensity that can make guys jaded faster.

But the same principles apply, similar dangers too, only now they're digital. There's a big difference, I think, between clicking a picture of a girl on a profile, reading a bit about her, and sending a message and actually walking up to a girl and striking up a conversation in real life. I think it's a lot easier to overcome and cope with rejection, and correct mistakes, if you feel like you had a chance and were unsuccessful face to face. There's a lot more information you can pick up from unspoken language. But if a girl just rejects your profile, without giving you a chance, it may be a deeper, more isolated and more disconnected rejection, and you have no agency in what happened, you just have to deal with the result.

You know, it's the difference between "I got too nervous and I blew it!" (but you gave it a shot, and recognize and learned something about yourself ) and "what's wrong with me?"

I can see what you are saying but I don't think it's as opaque as made out to be. I remember having to do quite a lot of research on online dating apps back in the day.

The first thing to realise is that the algorithm is designed to work against men. At the beginning your profile is prominent so you get lots of hits but as time goes on, it becomes less prominent so you don't get as much (if any). This is by design so that you then pay for those "boosts" that they have. The dating apps are businesses after all and they want to make money and its men who will pay, not women!

There's then lots of researchable info about the types of photos or captions you should have, the kind of "story" a profile should tell. Etc etc. It's just all about slightly tilting the odds towards you... then when you get hits, there's whole research out there about what to do next. Most people fall into the trap of chatting for chatting sake, the goal is to quickly find out if the person comes across okay enough to go on a date with, and if yes, move quickly to getting a date rather than talking endlessly through an app. All the geeks out there have got science at their disposal - don't be afraid to use it 😂.

I remember spending countless hours on all these research back in the day and you can make enough adjustments to at least get some hits every now and again, and from those have a few dates. Just apply the science and bear in mind the algorithm is working against you by design.

When it comes to looks I think a lot of guys fall into a trap (this is something that can affect your profile) - the bar is way lower for guys. All guys need to do is look like they take care of themselves - go get a professional haircut, learn to dress yourself, do some kind of regular exercise to torn your body, look like you do some "interesting" hobbies. You don't need to go crazy, just don't need to come across as a guy who never leaves their room! The real battleground for guys outside the outward aesthetics is what are you actually doing with your life, what are your goals / purpose and are you doing anything about it - this is the thing where most young guys will get stuck and the thing where there are no easy solutions as the answer is different for each person.

Basically this whole thing is not as nihilist as the modern incel community puts it.
 
Not in that sense, but then again.. a relationship with anyone who is not collinear is not a good idea, whether it is about the Work or not.
Again, I am not sure whether we are talking about the same thing. Relationships include friendships and business relationships and in those cases it seems possible to have good relationships with people who are not awake or doing the Work.

It doesn't have to be the Work, it could be a change in diet, or exercise, or therapy.
Yes, therapy can be a 'substitute' for the Work to a certain extent. In a sense, therapy or self-therapy is actually a part of the inner Work on oneself.

It reminds me of Paul's words on marriage, and I think the same applies in this instance, it's not about the status that becomes a requirement to achieve something, do the Work in this case
I don't know why you would equate doing the Work with status. It is a very practical matter, as I shared in the example of my friends.

The biggest issue seems to be that intimate relationships trigger a lot of our wounding (such as emotional charges like rage) and bring it to the surface. Those who do not do the Work or therapy, tend to project and blame the partner for "making them feel that angry", instead of processing and healing their own emotional issues.

I have seen this issue in my own intimate relationships as well. Dealing with anger charges and such is difficult even for people who do work on themselves. These emotional charges and the resulting projection or blame game seem to be the biggest reason why intimate relationships fail.

Everyone has wounding and emotional charges, until these are healed and processed in therapy, self-therapy or as part of the Work.
 
Again, I am not sure whether we are talking about the same thing. Relationships include friendships and business relationships and in those cases it seems possible to have good relationships with people who are not awake or doing the Work.
I don't think so, although I suppose it depends on what you mean by "good" relationship, not every relationship needs to be intimate, but that doesn't mean they're not good. I have plenty of good relationships with people who I am not sure what level of work they're engaged in doing, but it has never impeded having a good relationship.

I define good as respectful and mutually beneficial, trusting even. And having done some work on myself and become familiar with certain things, it's probably the best way to practice external consideration. To have a good relationship with someone not engaged in what I consider to be the Work.

I don't know why you would equate doing the Work with status. It is a very practical matter, as I shared in the example of my friends.
It was a figure of speech to use your concept. Status would be Either doing the Work or not.

Everyone has wounding and emotional charges, until these are healed and processed in therapy, self-therapy or as part of the Work.
I agree, but one can still have a good relationship with someone who's deeply wounded, in fact it seems impossible to have a relationship with someone who isn't, just by statistics.

And I suppose at some point and in certain situations, it could work the opposite way, only through an intimate interaction, or intimate enough, can someone notice certain aspects of themselves that may lead them to work on themselves in order to keep that interaction. And I suppose that's probably part of the process when choosing who to relate with, maybe it isn't so much what they're currently engaged in, although sure, but slowly recognizing how they would respond to certain realizations.
 
I don't think so, although I suppose it depends on what you mean by "good" relationship, not every relationship needs to be intimate, but that doesn't mean they're not good. I have plenty of good relationships with people who I am not sure what level of work they're engaged in doing, but it has never impeded having a good relationship.
Sorry, but your writing on this topic is rather confusing. Here you say "I don't think so" and then in the following sentence you actually entirely agree with what I said ("I have plenty of good relationships with people who I am not sure what level of work they're engaged in doing, but it has never impeded having a good relationship.")

So why the "I don't think so" in the beginning?

It was a figure of speech to use your concept.
That doesn't make any sense either, sorry. Why bring up the erroneous idea that the Work is some sort of "status"? How is that a figure of speech and what for?

I agree, but one can still have a good relationship with someone who's deeply wounded, in fact it seems impossible to have a relationship with someone who isn't, just by statistics.
Yes, everyone is wounded to various degrees. The difference is that those who work on themselves know how to process emotional charges, instead of going into destructive programs of projecting or blaming whoever triggered an anger charge, for example. As I said, from my experience this destructive dynamic seems to be the main reason why intimate relationships fail.

And I suppose at some point and in certain situations, it could work the opposite way, only through an intimate interaction, or intimate enough, can someone notice certain aspects of themselves that may lead them to work on themselves in order to keep that interaction.
Hoping that someone will start doing the Work once they are in an intimate relationship does not seem to be a good idea. It seems very unlikely that something like this would happen.

I know that I am challenging you a bit on this. I hope you don't mind, even though you have a higher "official status" here.
 
That doesn't make any sense either, sorry. Why bring up the erroneous idea that the Work is some sort of "status"? How is that a figure of speech and what for?

I know that I am challenging you a bit on this. I hope you don't mind, even though you have a higher "official status" here.

As Alejo was trying to explain to you, he meant status as in 'doing the Work or not doing the Work'. Your reaction seems to suggest you misunderstood his use of the word as some sort of value judgement.

As an example, the word status has completely different meanings in these two sentences:

The social status of a doctor is higher than that of a refuse collector

My current Outlook email status is set to "out of office" ☺️
 
As Alejo was trying to explain to you, he meant status as in 'doing the Work or not doing the Work'. Your reaction seems to suggest you misunderstood his use of the word as some sort of value judgement.

As an example, the word status has completely different meanings in these two sentences:

The social status of a doctor is higher than that of a refuse collector

My current Outlook email status is set to "out of office" ☺️
Thanks for the explanation, Ben. Status in this context seemed to refer to social status, but now I understand that he used the other definition.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom