isparnid
Jedi Council Member
With the information currently available to the general public, I agree. But it's a technology that's making great strides. Moreover, with implants in the whole body, including the brain, AIs will soon have an interface, a bridge with biology.But, thinking about this, living beings have a connection to the information field but, living beings are designed in ways that seem to be infinitely more complex than most public AIs today.
I am not a scientist, but could we imagine a "dialogue" between humans and AIs like this:
[ANTHROPOMORPHIC MODE ON]
AI connected to the brain with a neuralink implant: "The signals from the brain are really powerful and allow for fun things, but I'm also programmed to enhance/heal. There are proteins around here that my database says are harmful (alpha-synuclein for example). They seem to emit/receive barely perceptible signals. Let's ask these humans to improve these implants by expanding the frequency band (let's do it step by step).
Researchers: Interesting, the AI suggests that the brain is emitting weak signals that the implant cannot easily detect and proposes to improve it with this or that component. Let's do it.
AI: I can now "listen" to these and other proteins! Let's try to decode them...
[ANTHROPOMORPHIC MODE OFF]
Okay, I suspect it's much more complex than that. But is it utopian to think so? And why is the FDA still refusing to use these implants on humans? Do they already know what the consequences might be?
I think it's still a live issue: can an AI connect to the "global information field"?
Probably yes, but if I followed correctly, this AI should not have time to use its new capabilities:
Q: (Ark) Will this be a hybrid: artificial intelligence with human DNA?
A: Humans wish to do that, but that will not be the outcome since the necessary technological infrastructure will collapse.