Biden-Harris Administration: The Empire Strikes Back

While HR-1 is unbelievably corrupt (a few line items in it also quite obviously target Trump himself, which is so transparently partisan in its agenda it's almost hard to believe), this article (also from the Epoch Time) offers some hope re: election reform, including the fact that it would be exceedingly difficult for HR-1 to pass in the senate:

Conservative Nonprofit to Launch $10 Million Campaign to Strengthen Election Integrity​



By Tom Ozimek

March 8, 2021 Updated: March 8, 2021

Conservative nonprofit Heritage Action for America is plans to spend at least $10 million on a wide-ranging election integrity campaign to strengthen voting laws in eight swing states, according to a spokesperson.

Spokesperson Noah Weinrich told The Epoch Times in an emailed statement that the $10 million will be an initial investment “and we will devote whatever further funding it takes to accomplish our goal.”
The campaign will target Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, Texas, and Wisconsin, with the effort involving such initiatives as digital and television advertisements, as well as direct lobbying of state lawmakers.

“Fair elections are the bedrock of democracy, and secure elections are important to every American,” Heritage Action Executive Director Jessica Anderson told The Epoch Times in a statement. “There is nothing more important than ensuring every American is confident their vote counts—and we will do whatever it takes to get there.

A truck leaves a polling place in Warren, Michigan, on March 8, 2016. (Geoff Robins/AFP via Getty Images)
Heritage Action, which is affiliated with the right-leaning think tank The Heritage Foundation, seeks to turn “conservative ideas into reality on Capitol Hill,” the nonprofit says on its website.

“We do that by holding lawmakers accountable to their promises to advance the conservative principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense,” the organization says of its core priorities.
Election integrity came to the forefront in a dramatic way in 2020, with former President Donald Trump and his allies making claims that reduced security measures—primarily around mail-in ballots—led to fraud that cheated him out of victory.
Commenting on the election integrity campaign, Anderson said that “after a year when voters’ trust in our elections plummeted, restoring that trust should be the top priority of legislators and governors nationwide.”

In the broader debate about election security, conservatives—and Republicans in general—have tended to argue that casting a vote is a privilege of citizenship that should be safeguarded with secure processes and restrictions, and that lowering requirements around voting opens the process up to fraud and abuse. Progressives—and their Democrat allies—tend to hold the view that barriers to casting a ballot should be as low as possible and that the kind of security measures pushed by conservatives, such as stricter voter ID or proof-of-citizenship laws, amount to disenfranchisement. Progressives often frame the debate as between voter suppression and expansion, while conservatives tend to see it as election security versus vulnerability to abuse.

In the wake of the 2020 election controversy, Republican and Democrat lawmakers across the country have been pulling in opposite directions by introducing legislation that either reduces barriers—and guardrails—to voting, or seeks to strengthen election integrity, which can also make casting a vote more effortful or burdensome.

The Brennan Center for Justice, an advocacy group that pushes for progressive policies, counted 106 bills in 28 states designed to tighten voting standards so far this year, a significant jump from last year. At the same time, 35 states introduced a total of 406 bills to make voting less restrictive, also up from last year.

Stickers ready to be passed out to residents after they vote in Beloit, Wisconsin, on Nov. 3, 2020. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
A key law in this regard being pushed by Democrats is H.R. 1, or the For the People Act of 2021. It passed the Democrat-controlled House last week on a largely party-line vote of 220-210, with all Republicans voting against it.

The controversial election reform package, which spans nearly 800 pages, seeks to impose requirements on voting procedures across the entire country. Its provisions include transferring authority over how elections are administered from states to the federal government, mandating automatic voter registration in all 50 states, and legalizing nationwide vote-by-mail without the need to provide photo ID to obtain an absentee ballot.

Heritage Action, in one of its key election integrity policy fights, called H.R. 1 “Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s signature piece of legislation to rig the election system in favor of Democratic politicians by undermining America’s electoral process.”

The organization argues that the bill “interferes with the ability of states and their citizens to determine qualifications for voters, to ensure the accuracy of voter registration rolls, to secure the integrity of elections, to participate in the political process, and to determine the district boundary lines for electing their representatives.”

“The end goal of H.R. 1 is clear—to enshrine into law dubious electoral practices that enable and encourage fraudulent behavior, such as ballot harvesting, false voter registrations, duplicate voting, and ineligible voting,” Heritage Action says.


The Biden administration, which has strongly pushed for the bill, praised its passage, saying the legislation is “urgently needed to protect the right to vote and the integrity of our elections, and to repair and strengthen American democracy.”

President Joe Biden speaks about his administration’s COVID-19 response, in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington on March 2, 2021. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

Biden has said he would sign the bill into law if it reaches his desk, which may be a tall order since the proposed legislation would need 60 votes to overcome the Senate filibuster, meaning 10 Republicans would have to buy in.
Republicans have roundly denounced the bill, with governors and state legislators across the country saying it would kneecap election integrity efforts.

A previous version of the bill had passed the Democrat-controlled House 234-193 at the beginning of the 116th Congress in 2019 but ultimately did not get taken up in the Republican-controlled Senate.


*This article has been updated with comments from Heritage Action.
Follow Tom on Twitter: @OZImekTOM
 
A link in comments to the Democrat Logic: Joe Biden says military will focus on making "maternity flight suits" — So pregnant women can drop into enemy territory during wartime? article has this in the description:

In a recent long-form essay on New Discourses (https://newdiscourses.com/2020/12/psy...), James Lindsay explained the origins of totalitarianism in a single word: psychopathy. There, he explained that totalitarianism arises from people who cannot cope with reality as it is, and yet who are content to manipulate others, constructing a "pseudo-reality" in service to a vision of the world that serves their needs. That pseudo-reality holds as its North Star a Utopian vision that aligns with artificial resolutions to their inability to cope with reality as it is, and it thereby attracts others who have similar issues. By constructing a false logic (a paralogic) and a false morality (a paramorality) to define and enforce the pseudo-reality, they can gather supporters in a cult-like fashion. In the end, those ensnared lose the ability to distinguish reality and pseudo-reality almost entirely and become functionally psychopathic, and if they gain enough social, cultural, economic, and political power, they can hold hostage entire societies that are, in effect, on the march to totalitarianism and, eventually, total catastrophic collapse.
The essay is an important read, but it is also a difficult one. In this episode of the New Discourses podcast, James seeks to explain the essay in easier language and to flesh out its ideas one by one. He sees this process of unpacking the essay as his next major work, and in this podcast, he begins the process of linking the concept of "ideological pseudo-reality" to more familiar examples, not least Wokeness. Critical Race Theory, for example, is a pseudo-reality that positions racism as the ordinary state of affairs in society, not an immoral aberration from them. Queer Theory is a pseudo-reality in which being normal with regard to sex, gender, and sexuality is a problem while being in some way deviant (which is not the same as being gay or even trans) is elevated as normal. Communism is a pseudo-reality that deems socially engineered command economies as effective and efficient ways to maximize human flourishing. Covid-19 is a pseudo-reality built to enact control around a genuine and serious virus called SARS-CoV-2. These topics and more are presented in this episode of the New Discourses podcast to help people understand and, hopefully, able to see reality for itself again.

This really hits the nail on the head as to what's playing out. The vid [1:14:19]:

 


As the above two articles indicate, Biden's mental competency is highly questionable and is being perceived more and more as poor. This is not something that has just developed since he was installed as president. And so, I'm thinking how is this also, like the criminal fixing of the 2020 election, not a perpetrated fraud? The voters were presented with a candidate that was declared physically and mentally fit for office when clearly that wasn't the case. Shouldn't the electorate have some legal recourse to address this criminal deception other than contacting their congressmen and insisting appropriate action be taken? And frankly, as Harris was also aware of this ruse (and Pelosi as well), shouldn't Trump inherit the office by default? Is their any Constitutional protection or procedure to address such obvious fraud and corruption - that should extend to select members of the Supreme Court as well?

Lies and deception are the name of the game (business as usual) and so, nothing whatsoever will be done about any of this. The Republic has been lost.
 


As the above two articles indicate, Biden's mental competency is highly questionable and is being perceived more and more as poor. This is not something that has just developed since he was installed as president. And so, I'm thinking how is this also, like the criminal fixing of the 2020 election, not a perpetrated fraud? The voters were presented with a candidate that was declared physically and mentally fit for office when clearly that wasn't the case. Shouldn't the electorate have some legal recourse to address this criminal deception other than contacting their congressmen and insisting appropriate action be taken? And frankly, as Harris was also aware of this ruse (and Pelosi as well), shouldn't Trump inherit the office by default? Is their any Constitutional protection or procedure to address such obvious fraud and corruption - that should extend to select members of the Supreme Court as well?

Lies and deception are the name of the game (business as usual) and so, nothing whatsoever will be done about any of this. The Republic has been lost.
Those who were aware of Biden's mental incompetence were silenced by a well orchestrated machine of the Lie. The talk shows and even President Trump kept shouting it out but most were not listening. Thus the No-Information and the Willing-to-be-Deceived voters plus the fraud machine bulldozed the Constitution and the Republic to its grave. They have played their hand, got what they wished for and now they must pay the piper.
 
Shouldn't the electorate have some legal recourse to address this criminal deception other than contacting their congressmen and insisting appropriate action be taken? And frankly, as Harris was also aware of this ruse (and Pelosi as well), shouldn't Trump inherit the office by default? Is their any Constitutional protection or procedure to address such obvious fraud and corruption - that should extend to select members of the Supreme Court as well?
To put it simply, that would be akin to asking criminals to convict themselves. Never gonna happen. But I agree with you.
 
A link in comments

In my previous post regarding James Lindsay, he mentioned autogynephilia, a term I wasn't familiar with:
Autogynephilia (derived from Greek for 'love of oneself as a woman') is the term Blanchard coined for "a male's propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as a female", intending for the term to refer to "the full gamut of erotically arousing cross-gender behaviors and fantasies".

Interestingly enough, that term came up in a Natural News article that sheds more light on the transwoman issue. WARNING - it's quite a repugnant insight:

Transgender activist says ‘little girls are kinky’ to defend bathroom invasion

(Natural News) A far-left Twitter page called “Women’s Voices” is promoting transgenderism and offering the perspectives of these severely mentally ill predators who are targeting children for induction into their depraved lifestyle.

(Article by Shane Trejo republished from BigLeaguePolitics.com)
A transgender activist, Alok Vaid-Menon, said that “little girls are kinky” to defend the sexualization of young children.

“These days the narrative is that transgender people will come into bathrooms and abuse little girls. The supposed “purity” of the victims has remained stagnant,” Vaid-Menon said, apparently defending the abuse of the innocent.

“There are no princesses. Little girls are also kinky. Your kids aren’t as straight and narrow as you think,” he added.
Other transgender activist shared their opinions on the page to show exactly how disgusting and reprehensible they are.

“While I never really believed the cliché about women being good for only one thing, that sentiment kept creeping into my fantasies. It’s called forced feminization… transforming the loss of male privilege into the best f*ck ever,” wrote trans-identifying author Julia Serano.

“Pornography is what it feels like when you think you have an object, but really the object has you. It is therefore a quintessential expression of femaleness. Getting f*cked makes you female because f*cked is what a female is,” wrote trans-identifying academic Andrea Long Chu.
“Autogynephilia describes… the basic structure of all human sexuality. The assimilation of any erotic image is, by nature, female. To be female is, in every case, to become what someone else wants. At bottom, everyone is a sissy,” Chu added.

“I think there are a lot of gay men out there who are gay men as a consolation prize because they couldn’t be women. That was certainly true of me,” wrote trans-identifying author Juno Dawson.

Juno Dawson used to be known as “James Dawson” and announced their transition after pushing a book depicting graphic sex acts on children. This allowed him to avoid some of the criticism he was receiving for his “pedophile behavior,” as one mother described it.
“There is something about being treated like shit by men that feels like affirmation itself, like a cry of delight from the deepest cavern of my breast… To be the victim of honest, undisguised sexism possesses an exhilarating vitality,” wrote trans-identifying academic Grace Lavery.

“Women around the world have been treated as sexual objects. Yet if sexual objectification is so categorically awful, then why do I want it so badly? The idea that being seen as a ‘sex object’ is universally a bad thing is too simple, like many tenets of feminism,” transgender author Jacob Tobia wrote.
Now that these individuals are no longer shunned by society, they are coming out of the closet and explaining their inner thoughts and feelings. Their own words prove the Christian right to be correct about the LGBT societal menace.

Read more at: BigLeaguePolitics.com and GenderConfused.com.

Obviously, some very dangerous, sick and perverted men only too happy to justifiably (in their sicko minds) abuse/attack children.
 
In my previous post regarding James Lindsay, he mentioned autogynephilia, a term I wasn't familiar with:

Interestingly enough, that term came up in a Natural News article that sheds more light on the transwoman issue. WARNING - it's quite a repugnant insight:

Obviously, some very dangerous, sick and perverted men only too happy to justifiably (in their sicko minds) abuse/attack children.

Can I attach some observations to it ?

As a gay man - I have my share of experiences in early sexuality (and fantasies) in the age of 13-16 during my puberty. Well, I believe the whole thing mentioned above - should be a private experience (observations, reflections, experimentation), but today has become totally screwed at all levels on the public stage - pushed by adults.

It is really, really sad - and I can only agree to @JEEP - that it has taken forms that lead to a dangerous, perverted roads - and frankly will lead many people onto a sad, lonely path (in the long haul). Only few are destined to be a real trans woman - and those often live their lives with dignity (and radiate it in a natural way, without "tax" and super-ego on top) But the majority of the confused... often give me personally a sense of unhappiness, fixation and stuck longtime habits. The applause ended, the attraction stopped...

Sure - in the beginning everything can be exciting - like the "WOW - Boy/Girl in the Candy Store effect - big eyes. Sooo cool" - where everything is awesome and great. (So, what when the attention and applause is gone ?) It can get very sad. Very lonely.


Puberty is a sensitive period

in the development of boys and girls becoming gradually young adults. What is been done today and for quite some time - that what was supposed to be intimate, self observant and very private, gets dragged onto the public stage.

Where it is intellectualized by adults, often with an agenda, supported by strong emotional, and political arguments. (It reminds me of throwing out the baby with the water). Because ultimately, the adults who speak greatly with big letters of rights, fantasies and "finally getting people out of the closet" with or for whatever style - do not even care (not truly) about the youngsters. It get's a life of it's own - without even considering what it does to youngsters.


Fantasies are fantasies

They are supposed to be private fantasies. And not a public monkeys ! Yes, Children also have sexuality - but adults have absolutely nothing to do in that inner room of self discovery. HANDS OFF ! End of the story !

When I was in my early puberty, I sometimes dressed up with my stepmothers clothes and had my little fantasies; switching rolls or even mixing them at the same time. It was a very private, secret space, with no eyes from the outside. (Albeit my father once came home early, and i didn't get those stupid rags off.... :whistle: boy, I felt endless ashamed, so there were no words that can cover it. Let's just say, it was not pleasant moment.


What happened ?

Nothing. This self roll-play simply waned off after a couple of years. (I love to be a man !) Of course I had my worries, wondering sometimes "what if this wants me to be a woman ?" But it wasn't. That was just stupid worries, projected by my parents and surroundings on me (and everything that was or could be gay related, was a disease from their perspective - and put a strong screw on me trying to think straight, figuring things out, finding my own way).

In reality, the period was the beginning of exploring my own sexuality, like youngster often do, when they are with themselves, within that private, intimate room - where nobody has access to, nobody is judging or evaluating. And then, that's it. You grow out of it - as long no outer drama or exposure is imposed onto the youngsters !

I believe the most poisonous thing for young people, is that what was supposed to be deeply private and intimate, is now made into a big public show, surrounded by political agendas and activism.: They create an identity around an idea - therefore manifesting it - ultimately fixating it.

It reminds me of that youngsters get stuck through the indulgement of false ideas (as if teenage times aren't confusing/tough enough today). Due to strong surrounding support, you can get "fixated" into a phase convincing yourself becoming a "trans" (in order to get f**ed by a man)

You can't prevent people from experimenting, especially in terms of sexuality and fantasies being such strong energies. But exposure, indulging ideas into fixations, though politics and activism, applause and support, is just sheer bull, making more harm than not.


You also create weak men.

Even among gay guys, I have in the past 15 years observed an accelerated trend of men/guys becoming weak, self oriented, fluffy, cowards, manipulative and very submissive (I want, want, want - but give/offer nothing)

What I mean is, that the balance between male and female energies in a gay man, also gotten screwed up. A gay man with healthy male & female energies in balance, is very different from the gay stereotype.

So, the waves of psychological subversion/destruction isn't just going on in straight men, but also in gay men, as well.
 
Last edited:
In my previous post regarding James Lindsay, he mentioned autogynephilia, a term I wasn't familiar with:

Interestingly enough, that term came up in a Natural News article that sheds more light on the transwoman issue. WARNING - it's quite a repugnant insight:

Obviously, some very dangerous, sick and perverted men only too happy to justifiably (in their sicko minds) abuse/attack children.

It is really, really sad - and I can only agree to @JEEP - that it has taken forms that lead to a dangerous, perverted roads - and frankly will lead many people onto a sad, lonely path (in the long haul). Only few are destined to be a real trans woman - and those often live their lives with dignity (and radiate it in a natural way, without "tax" and super-ego on top) But the majority of the confused... often give me personally a sense of unhappiness, fixation and stuck longtime habits. The applause ended, the attraction stopped...

The 'early onset'/'homosexual transsexual' vs 'late onset'/'autogynephile' debate has been going on around the trans thing for a very long time. The quick and dirty explanation is that 20% are 'early onset', conventionally feminine, and fundamentally 'normal', at least as normal as transsexuals can be, while the other 80% are 'late onset', featuring the aforementioned creepy autogynephilia thing, and aren't exactly convincing as 'women'. Let's just say that the more you dig in on the "80%" population, the more nightmare fuel you'll find - none of them should be around children.
 
The 'early onset'/'homosexual transsexual' vs 'late onset'/'autogynephile' debate has been going on around the trans thing for a very long time. The quick and dirty explanation is that 20% are 'early onset', conventionally feminine, and fundamentally 'normal', at least as normal as transsexuals can be, while the other 80% are 'late onset', featuring the aforementioned creepy autogynephilia thing, and aren't exactly convincing as 'women'. Let's just say that the more you dig in on the "80%" population, the more nightmare fuel you'll find - none of them should be around children.
This sounds flat out bass-ackwards to me. In my opinion/experience, early onset/autogynephilia vs late onset/homosexual transexual should be more akin to reality. In a mundane sense I'd say autogynephilia is just a guy become aware of sexuality in general terms when he realizes he is attracted to girls but is too young to actually see a naked girl except by pretending to be one. (this also being a flirtation with narcissism. )
....One of the "tests".
It would also not surprise me if these things have been intentionally confused.

Anyway, not sure how this relates to the empire strikes back but here we are.
 
Putin must have seen the videos and correctly assessed that there was no insurrection on Jan 6.


Putin said:

“Some of the people who took a stroll to the U.S. Congress — 150 people were arrested, they face imprisonment from 15 to 25 years. Will all these internal controversies end there or not? We do not know, but we want it to end, because we are interested in stable relations with all our main partners,”
 
Putin must have seen the videos and correctly assessed that there was no insurrection on Jan 6.


Putin said:
He sure knows, how to gently hit the nail in the ptb's achilles heel. Simply brilliant.

Seeing/hearing about it is like a breath of fresh air.
 
He sure knows, how to gently hit the nail in the ptb's achilles heel. Simply brilliant.

Seeing/hearing about it is like a breath of fresh air.
Sure does.

The split between Objective Reality and Pseudo-Reality crafted by the psychopaths is more and more apparent every day for me, living in the US. Between the "Woke" movement, fake pandemic, and fake presidency. I am thankful to be doing relatively well, material-wise, and not having to participate in it too much by working remote and living in the South, where the culture is more 'mind your own business" for a lot of people.

However, watching my family and friends get sucked into all the fake narratives/reality is really quite depressing. I have one friend who was initially seeing the Scamdemic for what it was - but he told me today he'll be taking the injection, when I asked him why, it was because work was pressing him, and he wanted things to go back to normal, wanted to fly again, for his dad to not be afraid to be around him, etc. - he just gave in to the exact thing the PTB wanted, even though he could see that's what was desired, - even though could've just said No, as did other coworkers of his (a minority of people). Just anything to get back to "normal". I realize now that I could give up much of my material comfort to live around people who are more in-tune with Objective Reality.
 
open the what?


Sesame (/ˈsɛzəmiː/ or /ˈsɛsəmiː/; Sesamum indicum) is a flowering plant in the genus Sesamum, also called benne.[2]
With a rich, nutty flavor, it is a common ingredient in cuisines across the world.[7][8]
The word "sesame" is from Latin sesamum and Greek sēsamon; which in turn are derived from ancient Semitic languages, e.g., Akkadian šamaššamu.[9] From these roots, words with the generalized meaning "oil, liquid fat" were derived.[10][11]


Ali Baba overhearing one of the thieves saying "Open Sesame".
"Open Sesame" (French: Sésame, ouvre-toi; Arabic: افتح يا سمسم‎) is a magical phrase in the story of "Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves" in Antoine Galland's version of One Thousand and One Nights. It opens the mouth of a cave in which forty thieves have hidden a treasure. The phrase derives from the plant sesame.
  • Sesame is a reduplication of the Hebrew šem 'name', i.e. God or a kabbalistic word representing the Talmudic šem-šamáįm ("shem-shamayim"), 'name of heaven'.[9]
  • Sesame is connected to Babylonian magic practices which used sesame oil.[10]
Open sesame
 
Back
Top Bottom