So if there is no beginning and no end, then there can be no us in the middle. But we know we exist. So when we see a beginning and an end, what are we really looking at? If there is no beginning and no end, then is there even a forward and back?
What does this do to our definition of a dimension? How do we define a dimension when we can't terminate the ends at "nowhere"? Does it wrap around at some far point? Does it wrap into the next dimension? How do we terminate the ends without a discontinuity?
What if no consecutive dimensions are perfectly orthagonal? Could this be related to the curl term in Maxwell's equations? Not that I know anything about that... And Dzhanibekov effect?
One thing I noticed recently is that there can be no empty dimensions. If you have any dimension that is zero, then you have no volume, no space. Therefore there must be either infinite dimensions or no dimensions. And we know that there are dimensions. No guarantees that I know what I'm talking about.
The Cs have described us as wave riders and transient passengers. What if our assumptions determine where we "go" next, and that trajectory moves us through a constant transformation of dimensions which reinforces the assumptions that keep us rooted in this representation of reality?
The Cs say we have been brainwashed and programmed not to understand this. We know that one way to do that is to control language. If we stop using a word, we become unable to understand the idea that word represents. So if there is a word that replaces the beginning and end paradox, what would that word be? And what idea does it represent?
What does this do to our definition of a dimension? How do we define a dimension when we can't terminate the ends at "nowhere"? Does it wrap around at some far point? Does it wrap into the next dimension? How do we terminate the ends without a discontinuity?
What if no consecutive dimensions are perfectly orthagonal? Could this be related to the curl term in Maxwell's equations? Not that I know anything about that... And Dzhanibekov effect?
One thing I noticed recently is that there can be no empty dimensions. If you have any dimension that is zero, then you have no volume, no space. Therefore there must be either infinite dimensions or no dimensions. And we know that there are dimensions. No guarantees that I know what I'm talking about.
The Cs have described us as wave riders and transient passengers. What if our assumptions determine where we "go" next, and that trajectory moves us through a constant transformation of dimensions which reinforces the assumptions that keep us rooted in this representation of reality?
The Cs say we have been brainwashed and programmed not to understand this. We know that one way to do that is to control language. If we stop using a word, we become unable to understand the idea that word represents. So if there is a word that replaces the beginning and end paradox, what would that word be? And what idea does it represent?