Bill Gates: Reduce CO2 By Depopulating With Vaccines

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/203922-Bill-Gates-Reduce-CO2-by-depopulating-with-vaccines

I think its pretty clear in the above video that Gates is talking about lowering birth rates by increasing standards of health, and not about deliberately infecting people with vaccines to kill them off as the video's maker implies. He says the population is expected to grow to 9 billion, and that with vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services, the population could grow as much as 10-15% less than the projection. He is definately not talking about "wiping 1 billion people off of the face of the earth". Whoever made the video is maybe a bit too paranoid.
 
Just his introduction with CO2 math and temperature increase speak for itself. A brilliant mind as Gates should made his homework about global warming before saying such a non-sense. Even if his intentions are noble, we shouldn't forget that he is currently "helping" this planet together with Rockeffeler foundations to help "make Green Africa" with GMO, preparing Svalbard "doomsday" seed vault, that he was pretty disappointed with results of the swine-flu vaccination, and that he was the head of the Beast called Microsoft which still today "saving" a millions of hours of our productive work by nursing Windows/Office&Co hell by reinstalling, buying new hardware, coping with viruses, fighting with instabilities, etc.
Yes, people could change, but I didn't hear a single word about Gates "enlightenment" that changed his well known predator's habit to sincere self-to-others.

"He asked TOP SCIENTIST a several times"... what top scientists, that what are involved in Climagate scandal? :)

On this video he looks to me really funny, pathetic and more like a puppet who is trying hard to pay out "debt" to the Master that was accumulated during all this years when he was on a mission to conquer the IT world with Microsoft.

Also, he talks about people as a numbers, people just look very cool as background image of his presentation (colorful and happy), but he has a problem with that "P" variable and he would like to fix it to some extent with vaccination on the first place? Interesting, it seems that vaccination is very high on his list how to "help us".
 
Kesdjan said:
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/203922-Bill-Gates-Reduce-CO2-by-depopulating-with-vaccines

I think its pretty clear in the above video that Gates is talking about lowering birth rates by increasing standards of health, and not about deliberately infecting people with vaccines to kill them off as the video's maker implies. He says the population is expected to grow to 9 billion, and that with vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services, the population could grow as much as 10-15% less than the projection. He is definately not talking about "wiping 1 billion people off of the face of the earth". Whoever made the video is maybe a bit too paranoid.

What I don't understand is how he thinks vaccines could help to lower the population growth.
 
Perceval said:
Kesdjan said:
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/203922-Bill-Gates-Reduce-CO2-by-depopulating-with-vaccines

I think its pretty clear in the above video that Gates is talking about lowering birth rates by increasing standards of health, and not about deliberately infecting people with vaccines to kill them off as the video's maker implies. He says the population is expected to grow to 9 billion, and that with vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services, the population could grow as much as 10-15% less than the projection. He is definately not talking about "wiping 1 billion people off of the face of the earth". Whoever made the video is maybe a bit too paranoid.

What I don't understand is how he thinks vaccines could help to lower the population growth.

Lacing vaccines with stuff like polysorbate 80 and HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) which cause sterility as well as all the nasty things in vaccines that are detrimental to health is probably what he's thinking of.
 
Odyssey said:
Perceval said:
Kesdjan said:
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/203922-Bill-Gates-Reduce-CO2-by-depopulating-with-vaccines

I think its pretty clear in the above video that Gates is talking about lowering birth rates by increasing standards of health, and not about deliberately infecting people with vaccines to kill them off as the video's maker implies. He says the population is expected to grow to 9 billion, and that with vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services, the population could grow as much as 10-15% less than the projection. He is definately not talking about "wiping 1 billion people off of the face of the earth". Whoever made the video is maybe a bit too paranoid.

What I don't understand is how he thinks vaccines could help to lower the population growth.

Lacing vaccines with stuff like polysorbate 80 and HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) which cause sterility as well as all the nasty things in vaccines that are detrimental to health is probably what he's thinking of.

So you think he WAS referring to vaccines as a way to depopulate?
 
Well, he could have been thinking of "new vaccines" (maybe a birth control vaccine??) to lower population growth and not specifically to lower the population that is already here. But knowing what we know about vaccines and Bill Gates' questionable activities, whatever either of them have to offer to the people can't be good.

Also it seems that increasing standards of health, as Gates says he wants to do, would only make people more fertile because being sick and malnourished only makes you less fertile, less able to carry to term, with higher rates of infant mortality.
 
I wonder why he spoke about this. We know about this project of world depopulation, but why the PTB want it to go public at this moment? Is it a way to test the public reaction (or no-reaction) ?
 
Revisiting this thread and the comments from more than 11 years ago is kind of interesting considering what has happened since then with Covid and the handling of the situation. How will we look back on our posts and comments 11 years from now, given we are even here?

Looking at these videos from Ice Age Farmer: Farmers Panic, Can't Get Supplies to Grow Food and this Lancet's 'Great Transition' for 'Planetary Health' (eat ze bugs) The current Covid vaccines have their own side effects or were they intended. In addition, the Covid handling has stemmed the flow of goods. In some countries the message is that all will not return to normal until all people are vaccinated and Covid is gone. Would the title as a statement then be more true if it said "Reduce and control the population through CO2, virus and vaccine policies?
 
Sott.net

I think its pretty clear in the above video that Gates is talking about lowering birth rates by increasing standards of health, and not about deliberately infecting people with vaccines to kill them off as the video's maker implies. He says the population is expected to grow to 9 billion, and that with vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services, the population could grow as much as 10-15% less than the projection. He is definately not talking about "wiping 1 billion people off of the face of the earth". Whoever made the video is maybe a bit too paranoid.
The article no longer exists.

The article.PNG
 
The article no longer exists.
Maybe the content made some claims that were not true and was unpublished. On Sott.net there were a number of article that related to the search depopulation. I took some and ordered them according to year, but not date, so the order is only approximately chronological.
2009 Connecting the Dots: Mass depopulation on its way and the Secret Team's management of the world
2012 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: "Vaccines reduce population growth"
2012 The Many Ways Cancer Becomes the Ultimate Soft-Kill Operation
2012 The War On Mankind And The Conspiracy To Create A Global Ecological Civilization
2012 Genetically modified foods, depopulation, and California Proposition 37
2013 Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert Gohmert: 'Scary' that elites would use vaccines for 'culling the population' of humans
2013 Vaccine inventor & genetic engineer jokes about depopulation & biological warfare
2014 Vaccines and depopulation experiments
2014 Big owner of Monsanto shares: Does Bill Gates want population control?
2014 Georgia Guidestones officially updated with the year 2014
2014 The UN has a global depopulation agenda
2014 Depopulation Corn: The forgotten element in the GMO debate
2014 The West selectively uses human rights issues to destroy North Korea
2015 WHO furthering depopulation agenda? Declares contraceptive safe despite its numerous adverse side effects
2015 Pathological new world: Bill Gates' "temporary" sterilization microchip in beta female testing by end of year
2016 Industry pressure: Another vaccine documentary pulled from film festival
2017 Depopulation corn: Is GM corn the reason for rising infertility rates?
2017 Fear porn or a serious depopulation agenda?: Bill Gates warns that bioterrorism could kill 30 million people
2017 Vaccine hysteria: Setting the stage for an ugly, end-game scenario
2019 WHO now says your child's presence in school counts as 'informed consent' for vaccination - parental presence 'not required'
2019 Restoring Glass-Steagall (without the Green New Deal) is the only way to avoid complete economic collapse
2020 The geopolitical operation of the 'global elite' should be named 'a crime against humanity'
2020 The Gates contraceptive microchip, 'Global warming' and depopulation
2020 Bill Gates and the depopulation agenda: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. calls for an investigation
2020 The psychopaths who've dreamt and acted on a desire to depopulate the earth
2020 Utopia, coming to a world near you
2020 The Covid-19 Vaccine: Is The goal Immunity or Depopulation?
2020 Objective:Health - Bill Gates: Philanthropist, World Savior, AntiChrist
2020 Delingpole: German economist says 'great reset will cause a crash worse than 1930s'
2021 Eugenics is alive and well: Covid-19 scam is the engine for accomplishing depopulation
2021 Eugenics, The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Clash of Two Systems
2021 Depopulation and the mRNA Vaccine: The New York Times predicts massive population reduction but clearly leaves some things out
2021 Climate change fueled witch hunts....Then and now
2021 The Elites' Plans Are Pure, Unalloyed Evil
2021 Medical insanity, as described by an MD
2021 The mRNA vaccine's poisonous potions: Medical malpractice or 'slow motion genocide'?
The above list reveals that there is something to the topic.

Next, I tried to find a similar article to the one linked to in the post that began the thread. The post was from March 5, 2010. On that date there was an article on Voltairenet.org by F. William Engdahl:
Bill Gates talks about ‘vaccines to reduce population’
by F. William Engdahl
Microsoft founder and one of the world’s wealthiest men, Bill Gates, projects an image of a benign philanthropist using his billions via his (tax exempt) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to tackle diseases, solve food shortages in Africa and alleviate poverty. In a recent conference in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy: population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics.
VOLTAIRE NETWORK | FRANKFURT (GERMANY) | 5 MARCH 2010

gates_enfants_1_reference2-c6a48.jpg

Gates made his remarks to the invitation-only Long Beach, California TED2010 Conference, in a speech titled, “Innovating to Zero!.” Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares, "First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent." (author’s emphasis).

In plain English, one of the most powerful men in the world states clearly that he expects vaccines to be used to reduce population growth. When Bill Gates speaks about vaccines, he speaks with authority. In January 2010 at the elite Davos World Economic Forum, Gates announced his foundation would give $10 billion (circa €7.5 billion) over the next decade to develop and deliver new vaccines to children in the developing world. [1]

The primary focus of his multi-billion dollar Gates Foundation is vaccinations, especially in Africa and other underdeveloped countries. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a founding member of the GAVI Alliance (Global Alliance for Vaccinations and Immunization) in partnership with the World Bank, WHO and the vaccine industry. The goal of GAVI is to vaccinate every newborn child in the developing world.

Now that sounds like noble philanthropic work. The problem is that the vaccine industry has been repeatedly caught dumping dangerous—meaning unsafe because untested or proven harmful—vaccines onto unwitting Third World populations when they cannot get rid of the vaccines in the West. Louise Voller, Kristian Villesen, [2]. Some organizations have suggested that the true aim of the vaccinations is to make people sicker and even more susceptible to disease and premature death. [3]

Dumping toxins on the Third World
In the aftermath of the most recent unnecessary Pandemic declaration of a global H1N1 swine flu emergency, industrial countries were left sitting on hundreds of millions of doses of untested vaccines. They decided to get rid of the embarrassing leftover drugs by handing them over to the WHO which in turn plans to dump them for free on select poor countries. France has given 91 million of the 94 million doses the Sarkozy government bought from the pharma giants; Britain gave 55 million of its 60 million doses. The story for Germany and Norway is similar. [4]

As Dr. Thomas Jefferson, an epidemiologist with the Cochrane Research Center in Rome noted, “Why do they give the vaccines to the developing countries at all? The pandemic has been called off in most parts of the world. The greatest threat in poor countries right now is heart and circulatory diseases while the virus figures at the bottom of the list. What is the medical reason for donating 180 million doses?”. [5] As well, flu is a minor problem in countries with abundant sunshine, and it turned out that the feared H1N1 Pandemic “new great plague” was the mildest flu on record.

The pharmaceutical vaccine makers do not speak about the enormous health damage from infant vaccination including autism and numerous neuro-muscular deformities that have been traced back to the toxic adjuvants and preservatives used in most vaccines. Many vaccines, especially multi-dose vaccines that are made more cheaply for sale to the Third World, contain something called Thimerosal (Thiomersol in the EU), a compound (sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate), containing some 50% mercury, used as a preservative.

In July 1999 the US’ National Vaccine Information Center declared in a press release that, "The cumulative effects of ingesting mercury can cause brain damage." The same month, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) alerted the public about the possible health effects associated with thimerosal-containing vaccines. They strongly recommended that thimerosal be removed from vaccines as soon as possible. Under the directive of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997, the Food and Drug Administration also determined that infants who received several thimerosal-containing vaccines may be receiving mercury exposure over and above the recommended federal guidelines. [6]

A new form of eugenics?
Gates’ interest in inducing population reduction among black and other minority populations is not new unfortunately. As I document in my book, Seeds of Destruction, [7] since the 1920’s the Rockefeller Foundation had funded the eugenics research in Germany through the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institutes in Berlin and Munich, including well into the Third Reich. They praised the forced sterilization of people by Hitler Germany, and the Nazi ideas on race “purity.” It was John D. Rockefeller III, a life-long advocate of eugenics, who used his “tax free” foundation money to initiate the population reduction neo-Malthusian movement through his private Population Council in New York beginning in the 1950’s.

The idea of using vaccines to covertly reduce births in the Third World is also not new. Bill Gates’ good friend, David Rockefeller and his Rockefeller Foundation were involved as early as 1972 in a major project together with WHO and others to perfect another “new vaccine.”

The results of the WHO-Rockefeller project were put into mass application on human guinea pigs in the early 1990’s. The WHO oversaw massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization, became suspicious of the motives behind the WHO program and decided to test numerous vials of the vaccine and found them to contain human Chorionic Gonadotrophin, or hCG. That was a curious component for a vaccine designed to protect people against lock-jaw arising from infection with rusty nail wounds or other contact with certain bacteria found in soil. The tetanus disease was indeed, also rather rare. It was also curious because hCG was a natural hormone needed to maintain a pregnancy. However, when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier, it stimulated formation of antibodies against hCG, rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy, a form of concealed abortion. Similar reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones came from the Philippines and Nicaragua. [8]

Gates’ ‘Gene Revolution in Africa’
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, along with David Rockefeller’s Rockefeller Foundation, the creators of the GMO biotechnology, are also financing a project called The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) headed by former UN chief, Kofi Annan. Accepting the role as AGRA head in June 2007 Annan expressed his “gratitude to the Rockefeller Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and all others who support our African campaign.” The AGRA board is dominated by people from both the Gates’ and Rockefeller foundations. [9]

Monsanto, DuPont, Dow, Syngenta and other major GMO agribusiness giants are reported at the heart of AGRA, using it as a back-door to spread their patented GMO seeds across Africa under the deceptive label, ‘bio-technology,’ a euphemism for genetically engineered patented seeds. The person from the Gates Foundation responsible for its work with AGRA is Dr. Robert Horsch, a 25-year Monsanto GMO veteran who was on the team that developed Monsanto’s RoundUp Ready GMO technologies. His job is reportedly to use Gates’ money to introduce GMO into Africa. [10]
Annan-ed2a0.jpg

Kofi Annan, right, examines seed maize with Saleem Esmail of the Western Seed Company. (Photo courtesy AGRA)

To date South Africa is the only African country permitting legal planting of GMO crops. In 2003 Burkina Faso authorized GMO trials. In 2005 Kofi Annan’s Ghana drafted bio-safety legislation and key officials expressed their intentions to pursue research into GMO crops. AGRA is being used to create networks of “agro-dealers” across Africa, at first with no mention of GMO seeds or herbicides, in order to have the infrastructure in place to massively introduce GMO. [11]

GMO, glyphosate and population reduction
GMO crops have never been proven safe for human or animal consumption. Moreover, they are inherently genetically ‘unstable’ as they are an unnatural product of introducing a foreign bacteria such as Bacillus Thuringiensis (Bt) or other material into the DNA of a given seed to change its traits. Perhaps equally dangerous are the ‘paired’ chemical herbicides sold as a mandatory part of a GMO contract, such as Monsanto’s Roundup, the most widely used such herbicide in the world. [12] It contains highly toxic glyphosate compounds that have been independently tested and proven to exist in toxic concentrations in GMO applications far above that safe for humans or animals. Tests show that tiny amounts of glyphosate compounds would do damage to a human umbilical, embryonic and placental cells in a pregnant woman drinking the ground water near a GMO field. [13]

One long-standing project of the US Government has been to perfect a genetically-modified variety of corn, the diet staple in Mexico and many other Latin American countries. The corn has been field tested in tests financed by the US Department of Agriculture along with a small California bio-tech company named Epicyte. Announcing his success at a 2001 press conference, the president of Epicyte, Mitch Hein, pointing to his GMO corn plants, announced, “We have a hothouse filled with corn plants that make anti-sperm antibodies.” [14]

Hein explained that they had taken antibodies from women with a rare condition known as immune infertility, isolated the genes that regulated the manufacture of those infertility antibodies, and, using genetic engineering techniques, had inserted the genes into ordinary corn seeds used to produce corn plants. In this manner, in reality they produced a concealed contraceptive embedded in corn meant for human consumption. “Essentially, the antibodies are attracted to surface receptors on the sperm,” said Hein. “They latch on and make each sperm so heavy it cannot move forward. It just shakes about as if it was doing the lambada.” [15] Hein claimed it was a possible solution to world “over-population.” The moral and ethical issues of feeding it to humans in Third World poor countries without their knowing it countries he left out of his remarks.

Spermicides hidden in GMO corn provided to starving Third World populations through the generosity of the Gates’ foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and Kofi Annan’s AGRA or vaccines that contain undisclosed sterilization agents are just two documented cases of using vaccines or GMO seeds to “reduce population.”

And the ‘Good Club’
Gates’ TED2010 speech on zero emissions and population reduction is consistent with a report that appeared in New York City’s ethnic media, Irish.Central.com in May 2009. According to the report, a secret meeting took place on May 5, 2009 at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, President of Rockefeller University, among some of the wealthiest people in America. Investment guru Warren Buffett who in 2006 decided to pool his $30 billion Buffett Foundation into the Gates foundation to create the world’s largest private foundation with some $60 billions of tax-free dollars was present. Banker David Rockefeller was the host.

The exclusive letter of invitation was signed by Gates, Rockefeller and Buffett. They decided to call themselves the “Good Club.” Also present was media czar Ted Turner, billionaire founder of CNN who stated in a 1996 interview for the Audubon nature magazine, where he said that a 95% reduction of world population to between 225-300 million would be “ideal.” In a 2008 interview at Philadelphia’s Temple University, Turner fine-tuned the number to 2 billion, a cut of more than 70% from today’s population. Even less elegantly than Gates, Turner stated, “we have too many people. That’s why we have global warming. We need less people using less stuff (sic).” [16]

Others attending this first meeting of the Good Club reportedly were: Eli Broad real estate billionaire, New York’s billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Wall Street billionaire and Council on Foreign Relations former head, Peter G. Peterson.

In addition, Julian H. Robertson, Jr., hedge-fund billionaire who worked with Soros attacking the currencies of Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea and the Asian Tigen economies, precipitating the 1997-98 Asia Crisis. Also present at the first session of the Good Club was Patty Stonesifer, former chief executive of the Gates foundation, and John Morgridge of Cisco Systems. The group represented a combined fortune of more than $125 billion. [17]

According to reports apparently leaked by one of the attendees, the meeting was held in response to the global economic downturn and the numerous health and environmental crises that are plaguing the globe.

But the central theme and purpose of the secret Good Club meeting of the plutocrats was the priority concern posed by Bill Gates, namely, how to advance more effectively their agenda of birth control and global population reduction. In the talks a consensus reportedly emerged that they would “back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.” [18].

Global Eugenics agenda
Gates and Buffett are major funders of global population reduction programs, as is Turner, whose UN Foundation was created to funnel $1 billion of his tax-free stock option earnings in AOL-Time-Warner into various birth reduction programs in the developing world. [19] The programs in Africa and elsewhere are masked as philanthropy and providing health services for poor Africans. In reality they involve involuntary population sterilization via vaccination and other medicines that make women of child-bearing age infertile. The Gates Foundation, where Buffett deposited the bulk of his wealth two years ago, is also backing introduction of GMO seeds into Africa under the cloak of the Kofi Annan-led ‘Second Green Revolution’ in Africa. The introduction of GMO patented seeds in Africa to date has met with enormous indigenous resistance.

Health experts point out that were the intent of Gates really to improve the health and well-being of black Africans, the same hundreds of millions of dollars the Gates Foundation has invested in untested and unsafe vaccines could be used in providing minimal sanitary water and sewage systems. Vaccinating a child who then goes to drink feces-polluted river water is hardly healthy in any respect. But of course cleaning up the water and sewage systems of Africa would revolutionize the health conditions of the Continent.

Gates’ TED2010 comments about having new vaccines to reduce global population were obviously no off-the-cuff remark. For those who doubt, the presentation Gates made at the TED2009 annual gathering said almost exactly the same thing about reducing population to cut global warming. For the mighty and powerful of the Good Club, human beings seem to be a form of pollution equal to CO2.

F. William Engdahl


[1] "Bill Gates makes $10 billion vaccine pledge", London Telegraph, January 29, 2010.
[2] "WHO Donates Millions of Doses of Surplus Medical Supplies to Developing countries", Danish Information, 22 December 2009.
[3] One is the Population Research Institute in Washington.
[4] Louise Voller et al, op. cit.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Noted in Vaccinations and Autism.
[7] F. William Engdahl, Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, Global Research, Montreal, 2007, pp. 79-84.
[8] James A. Miller, ["Are New Vaccines Laced With Birth-Control Drugs"?, HLI Reports, Human Life International, Gaithersburg, Maryland; June-July 1995.
[9] Cited in F. William Engdahl, "Doomsday Seed Vault" in the Arctic: Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t, Voltaire Network, 19 October 2009.
[10] Mariam Mayet, "Africa’s Green Revolution rolls out the Gene Revolution, African Centre for Biosafety", ACB Briefing Paper No. 6/2009, Melville, South Africa, April 2009.
[11] Ibid.
[12] GMO Scandal: The Long Term Effects of Genetically Modified Food in Humans, by F. William Engdhal, Voltaire Network, 15 September 2009.
[13] Nora Benachour and Gilles-Eric Seralini, "Glyphosate Formulations Induce Apoptosis and Necrosis in Human Umbilical Embryonic, and Placental Cells", Chemical Research in Toxicology Journal, American Chemical Society, 2009, 22 (1), pp 97–105.
[14] Robin McKie, "GMO Corn Set to Stop Man Spreading His Seed", London, The Observer, 9 September 2001.
[15] Ibid. McKie writes, “The pregnancy prevention plants are the handiwork of the San Diego biotechnology company Epicyte, where researchers have discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm…the company has created tiny horticultural factories that make contraceptives…Essentially, the antibodies are attracted to surface receptors on the sperm,” said Hein. “They latch on and make each sperm so heavy it cannot move forward. It just shakes about as if it was doing the lambada.”
[16] Ted Turner, cited along with youTube video of Turner in Aaron Dykes, Ted Turner: "World Needs a ’Voluntary’ One-Child Policy for the Next Hundred Years", Jones Report.com, April 29, 2008.
[17] John Harlow, "Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation", London, The Sunday Times
May 24, 2009.
[18] Ibid
[19] United Nations Foundation, Women and Population Program.
If the above was published in March 2010. One finds on Archive.org from February 2010, a reference that may be related to the topic:
2010 FEB 21 Bill Gates TED Zero CO 2 By Depopulating 10 15% Using Vaccines, Health Care, Reproductive Health Services
by TED

Publication date 2010-02-21Usage Public Domain Mark 1.0Creative Commons LicensepublicdomainTopics 4cminewswire, Bill Gates, Depopulation, New Vaccines, Health Care, Reproductive Health Services, COVID-19 Vaccines, COVID-19, Carrie Madej, 4cminews, 4CMiTV, #4CM2010FEB21Language English

Remarks: Bill Gates suggests approx. 4:26 minutes into the speech; Population needs to be addressed as part of the contribution towards achieving Zero CO2 Bill gates said “if we do a really great job on New Vaccines, Health Care, Reproductive Health Services, we could lower that by perhaps 10-15% FULL STORY HERE: 2010 FEB 21 Bill Gates TED “Zero CO2 by depopulating 10-15% using Vaccines, Health Care, Reproductive Health Services – 4CMiTVworld

Hashtags: #4cminewswire, #BillGates, #Depopulation, #NeVaccines, #HealthCare, #ReproductiveHealthServices, #Covid19Vaccines, #COVID19, #CarrieMadej, #4cminews, #4CMiTV, #4CM2010FEB21,
Tags: 4cminewswire, Bill Gates, Depopulation, New Vaccines, Health Care, Reproductive Health Services, COVID-19 Vaccines, COVID-19, Carrie Madej, 4cminews, 4CMiTV, #4CM2010FEB21,

Content:
Raw Cut: Yes
Pundit Commentary: No
Edited by 4cm: Yes

SOURCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Original-Source
: TED
Original-Source-Published: 2010 FEB 21,
Original-Source-URL:
|

MEDIA CLIP PROPERTIES:
Length: (00:29:47:00 minutes)
Size: (1.21 MB)
Frame-W: 1920
Frame-H: 1080
Frame-Rate kbps: 25.00
Data-Rate kbps: 5717
Addeddate 2020-09-25 14:24:38Identifier 2010feb21_gates_ted_zero_co2_depopulating_10_15_using_vaccines_health_care_reproductive_servicesScanner Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.6.4
The discussion did not end in 2010. Later there was another statement that gave rise to speculations and refutations. It is just as much fun to quote the fact-checkers, here is one from Snopes, who ends with:
This is obviously a far cry from, as Your News Wire.com put it, having Bill Gates tell us “how we must all consent to a ‘kill the humans’ strategy, to ‘save the planet’ from the carbon dioxide we make.”
And now a few years later and looking around, this "false" interpretation is close enough to what is slowly happening with a stemmed flow of production, goods and services due to earlier or current lockdowns, governments claiming vaccination rates too low to be able to return to normal, "lack of truck drivers", and we suspect new CO2 measures to be added to "save the planet" from AGW and for future generations. People are led to consent to measures that they are told will save them from disease, from being the cause of the polar bear disappearing and from the planet becoming uninhabitable.

The article from Snopes follows, just in case they one day take it down to correct their own fact-checking.
Did Bill Gates ‘Admit’ Vaccinations Are Designed So Governments Can ‘Depopulate’ the World?
The computer magnate believes that vaccines can be used to reduce childhood mortality and ultimately reduce population growth through associated social changes, not as an agent of death.
Claim
Bill Gates has openly admitted that vaccinations are designed so that governments can depopulate the world.
Rating
False
About this rating

Origin
On 21 January 2016, dubious news and conspiracy theory site Your News Wire (now NewsPunch) published an article with the headline “Bill Gates Admits ‘Vaccines Are Best Way to Depopulate’”. The article opened with a damning assertion: “Bill Gates has openly admitted that vaccinations are designed so that governments can depopulate the world.”

To support this claim, the site presented a February 2011 video clip of Bill Gates being interviewed by CNN’s Sanjay Gupta about his foundation’s vaccination efforts:
Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Ten billion dollars over the next 10 years to make it “the year of the vaccines.” What does that mean exactly?

Bill Gates: Over this decade, we believe unbelievable progress can be made, in both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get out to all the children who need them … We only need about six or seven more — and then you would have all the tools to reduce childhood death, reduce population growth, and everything — the stability, the environment — benefits from that.
To make sure the point was not lost on the reader, Your News Wire repeated the “reduce population growth” emphasized above numerous times at a variety of different playback speeds, as if to suggest this were a slip of the tongue revealing some nefarious secret. This narrative was reinforced with another video that opens with this text
Next are two short excerpts from a recently filmed TED presentation (Feb 2010) by none other than Bill “Microsoft” Gates … As Gates casually addresses the issue [of reducing carbon emissions], he goes on to state that one way to accomplish this goal is to reduce the global human population.

In the first clip you will hear him state in plain language that he considers VACCINES to be desirable to that end. You will also casually hear him promoting HEALTH CARE and REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, to accomplish that same goal.

In the second excerpt you will hear Gates again confirming his profound affection for vaccines
The damming moment, according to Your News Wire was the following statement from Gates: “First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent …”

The suggestion, hinted at by both of these clips and argued later in the article, was that Gates knows vaccines are dangerous — and he is using this information to kill children in the developing world to stem population growth. In reality, however, Gates’ statements regarding vaccines and population growth were neither an accidental slip nor a nefarious admission of plans for a new world order.

As discussed in a 21 November 2011 Forbes cover story profiling the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, reducing population growth has always been integral to their stated mission of “improving people’s health and giving them the chance to lift themselves out of hunger and extreme poverty”:

In 1997, when he and Melinda first ventured into public health … they focused on birth control, funding a Johns Hopkins effort to use computers to help women in the developing world learn about contraception. The logic was crisp and Bill Gates-friendly. Health = resources ÷ people. And since resources, as Gates noted, are relatively fixed, the answer lay in population control.
As further discussed in this piece, Gates later came to the conclusion that birth control was not the best approach to achieve the goal of slower population growth, instead realizing that — counterintuitively — a reduction in childhood mortality was the best way to limit population growth:
In society after society, he saw, when the mortality rate falls—specifically, below 10 deaths per 1,000 people—the birth rate follows, and population growth stabilizes. “It goes against common sense,” Gates says. Most parents don’t choose to have eight children because they want to have big families, it turns out, but because they know many of their children will die.

“If a mother and father know their child is going to live to adulthood, they start to naturally reduce their population size,” says Melinda.
This is a point Gates has made repeatedly, and his views were clearly articulated in the 2009 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Annual Letter:
A surprising but critical fact we learned was that reducing the number of deaths actually reduces population growth … Contrary to the Malthusian view that population will grow to the limit of however many kids can be fed, in fact parents choose to have enough kids to give them a high chance that several will survive to support them as they grow old. As the number of kids who survive to adulthood goes up, parents can achieve this goal without having as many children.
In other words, Gates is not interested in using vaccines to reduce the population by using them as an agent of death or a tool to sterilize unsuspecting masses. Rather, Gates is interested in keeping more children alive in order to reduce the need for parents to have more children, thus limiting the overall population growth rate.
As evidenced in a 2014 paper published in Science that attempted to calculate future population growth, not everyone is convinced childhood mortality is the smoking gun to quell population growth:
Among the most robust empirical findings in the literature on fertility transitions are that higher contraceptive use and higher female education are associated with faster fertility decline. These suggest that the projected rapid population growth could be moderated by greater investments in family planning programs to satisfy the unmet need for contraception and in girls’ education.
But Gates’ view on childhood mortality contribution to population growth is increasingly discussed in the scientific literature and is still subject to debate. What is not up to debate are the intentions of the Bill and Melinda Gate’s Foundation with regard to vaccines and population growth, as articulated by Bill and Melinda Gates in their Foundation’s 2017 Annual Letter:
Melinda: Saving children’s lives is the goal that launched our global work. It’s an end in itself. But then we learned it has all these other benefits as well. If parents believe their children will survive — and if they have the power to time and space their pregnancies — they choose to have fewer children.

Bill: When a mother can choose how many children to have, her children are healthier, they’re better nourished, their mental capacities are higher — and parents have more time and money to spend on each child’s health and schooling. That’s how families and countries get out of poverty. This link between saving lives, a lower birthrate, and ending poverty was the most important early lesson Melinda and I learned about global health.
This is obviously a far cry from, as Your News Wire.com put it, having Bill Gates tell us “how we must all consent to a ‘kill the humans’ strategy, to ‘save the planet’ from the carbon dioxide we make.”
Sources
Adl-Tabatabai, Sean. “Bill Gates Admits “Vaccines Are Best Way to Depopulate.”
Your News Wire. 21 January 2016.
Herper, Matthew. “Bill Gates Admits “With Vaccines, Bill Gates Changes The World Again.”
Forbes. 2 November 2011.
gatesfoundation.org. “Foundation Fact Sheet.”
Accessed 10 March 2017.
gatesfoundation.org. “2009 Annual Letter.”
Accessed 10 March 2017.
Gerland, Patrick et al. “World Population Stabilization Unlikely This Century.”
Science. 10 October 2014.
Smeeding, Timothy M. “Adjusting to the Fertility Bust.”
Science. 10 October 2014.
gatesnotes.com. “2017 Annual Letter.”
Accessed 10 March 2017.
Would a better job for some fact checker be to fact check our weather forecasts retrospectively. There they wouldn't prevent people from discussing what is in front of them (the coming weather).
 
A recent per-reviewed paper indicates that at least 81.9% (≥ 104/127) of pregnant women experienced spontaneous abortion following mRNA exposure before 20 weeks, and 92.3% (96/104) of spontaneous abortions occurred before 13 weeks’ gestation:

 
The article no longer exists.

View attachment 51286
I found it. It turns out there is ONE copy on the Wayback Machine


It was a TED talk video, not really an article. I think you can find it on YT.
 
A recent per-reviewed paper indicates that at least 81.9% (≥ 104/127) of pregnant women experienced spontaneous abortion following mRNA exposure before 20 weeks, and 92.3% (96/104) of spontaneous abortions occurred before 13 weeks’ gestation:

In some countries they are pushing, I mean PUSHING, this on pregnant women !!!
Doctors appearing on TV doing this are Criminals.
 
A recent per-reviewed paper indicates that at least 81.9% (≥ 104/127) of pregnant women experienced spontaneous abortion following mRNA exposure before 20 weeks, and 92.3% (96/104) of spontaneous abortions occurred before 13 weeks’ gestation:
There was an interview with a funeral director in the UK and he had noticed that there were more still born babies or dead fetuses from preterminated pregnancies. He does not have enough data to do real statistics but as circumstantial evidence it supports the study you posted.
What is most shocking in the study is that it reveals very serious flaws with the CDC sponsored study used to justify the mRNA injections for pregnant women:
Abstract The use of mRNA vaccines in pregnancy is now generally considered safe for protection against COVID-19 in countries such as New Zealand, USA, and Australia. However, the influential CDCsponsored article by Shimabukuro et al. (2021) used to support this idea, on closer inspection, provides little assurance, particularly for those exposed in early pregnancy. The study presents falsely reassuring statistics related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in early pregnancy, since the majority of women in the calculation were exposed to the mRNA product after the outcome period was defined (20 weeks’ gestation). In this article, we draw attention to these errors and recalculate the risk of this outcome based on the cohort that was exposed to the vaccine before 20 weeks’ gestation. Our re-analysis indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion 7 to 8 times higher than the original authors’ results (p < 0.001) and the typical average for pregnancy loss during this time period. In light of these findings, key policy decisions have been made using unreliable and questionable data. We conclude that the claims made using these data on the safety of exposure of women in early pregnancy to mRNA-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19 are unwarranted and recommend that those policy decisions be revisited. Copyright © The Authors — Published Under the Creative Commons License Share/Alike (see https://creative commons.org/licenses/)
Depopulating with vaccines may not be by intention, but someone sure does not care if that is the outcome.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom