Blockchain technology

Scottie said:
McAfee is a "character", but this vid is pretty interesting anyway (at least the first 15 minutes or so):

It's an important video because he is teaching people that there are many side-channel attacks circumventing otherwise strong security. Smartphones are especially vulnerable. For example, all it takes to reveal typed passwords/gestures on your smartphone is one app with access to the accelerometer sensor. See study here: "Practicality of Accelerometer Side Channels on Smartphones" Even regular desktop computers are vulnearble in many, many ways. No wonder that McAfee is developing his own software and hardware!

The bottom line is that one needs to be an expert in technology and economics to make dealing with cryptocurrencies reasonably safe. But most people aren't.

This seems to be confirmed by the fact that, until now, most of the 'hacks' of Bitcoin only targeted wallet applications (i.e. 'banks'). The Bitcoin algorithm itself had only one major security flaw in its history: a simple integer overflow error discovered in 2010. 184 billion bitcoins (!) were created in one transaction. The error was spotted within hours, the transaction was rolled back, and the Bitcoin blockchain continued on.

However, the bigger danger to the Bitcoin core protocol seems to come from its greatest strength: The assumption that the majority (51%) of participating nodes is honest. Its Proof-of-Work protocol provides incentives which created industrial-scale mining pools. The 4 largest mining pools contribute more than 50% of the hash rate. If some agency with sufficient budget managed to provide a larger incentive to those 4 mining pools than can be gotten from mining -- assuming that the mining pools can be bribed --, this agency would have effectively united them. If such an attack succeeded, it still would not allow theft of Bitcoins (because "mathematics can't be bribed"), but I guess it would seriously undermine trust in the system. For this reason, there are now other blockchains under development which focus on Proof-of-Stake rather than Proof-of-Work.

In short, no matter how good a technical system humans invent, it seems that they still cannot escape their human nature and all that that implies.

Meanwhile, there is one true example of a pyramid/ponzi scheme, OneCoin, which led to arrests and criminal investigations in many countries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OneCoin
 
I haven't been paying much attention to cryptocurrencies until this summer, since there was a good chance that they would be just outright banned. But that hasn't happened - in fact, it seems that the establishment wants the cryptocurrencies to survive.

There seem to be several reasons for this:

1. In the short term, cryptocurrencies take away some of the heat off gold, so that it is easier for them to keep the price of gold down and in this way, keep the appearance that fiat currencies are still stable.

2. In the longer term, it is pretty clear that a cashless society is desired, so as to increase control and maybe make negative interest rates something you cannot escape. In this regard, they probably see cryptocurrencies as a way to make purely digital currencies appear "cool" - hoping that it will translate into acceptance of a cashless society after fiat currencies crash.

3. Something I haven't considered before, but which makes a lot of sense (from this Clif High interview: _https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gS9xzbgM074), is that no matter how wealthy the elites are, they still depend on the society for their privileged position. Which is probably why they don't want a catastrophic collapse, but more of a transition. In a catastrophic collapse, there is more of a risk for them of losing control and wealth entirely, whereas a smoother transition with just a gradual increase of control has less risks.

The problem is that the fiat currency system will collapse - even the elites cannot prevent that. So how can they prevent a societal catastrophe that may cost them everything? They need to give people a way to preserve savings through the currency collapse, which is where cryptocurrencies come in.

It's pretty certain that governments will create their own digital currencies at some point, though it's also pretty certain that central banks will take a huge hit due to the fiat currencies collapsing. And so will many private banks, of course. So the success of imposing a cashless society is far from certain, in my opinion, since at that point banks, central banks and probably the establishment political parties will be in a precarious position. They will probably have to make concessions to the public, so as to keep society (and their own wealth/power) from a catastrophic collapse. Which in turn, makes it likely that decentralized cryptocurrencies will be allowed to stay.

In other words, the middle to long term outlook for the major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin is pretty good. Probably one of the best investment options right now.
 
The whole blockchain tech area is in extreme flux right now.

Even though Russia's ministry of finance said that Bitcoin should be regulated and published a draft bill to fine people exchanging Bitcoins into 'real' money, the founder of Ethereum created a company in Russia to give technical blockchain support to a state-owned development bank.

A Putin advisor announced the creation of an association dedicated to promote blockchain technologies in government and commercial structures, and Putin met briefly with the founder of Ethereum.

Other governments and banks are also taking these technologies seriously and consider developing their own technologies.

New blockchains, start-ups, and applictions are sprouting by the hundreds right now, under a lot of pressure from governments. Exchanges are facing difficulties.

Mining tokens is booming so much that graphics cards are sold out within minutes. Crytocurrency values now are boosting stock prices of popular chip manufacturers like AMD or NVIDIA.
 
Russia Makes U-Turn on Cryptocurrencies After Backing From Putin

September 9, 2017

Russia is drawing up rules about how to conduct initial coin offerings, breaking ranks with China after President Vladimir Putin signaled his approval for digital currencies.

While China slapped a blanket ban on ICOs this month, the government in Moscow plans to regulate cryptocurrencies like securities rather than outlawing them, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov told reporters on Friday. That marks a full reversal from his ministry’s proposal last year to punish people who use digital currencies with up to seven years in jail.

Appetite for the new instruments has been growing ever since Putin met in June with the founder of the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency after bitcoin and gave his blessing for Russia to develop blockchain, the technology underlying bitcoin. A consortium of lenders including Sberbank PJSC is now seeking to use the technology to cut costs, while a presidential aide last month announced plans for an ICO.

“The state certainly understands that cryptocurrencies are a reality, there is no point in prohibiting them,” Siluanov told reporters in Moscow. “It is possible to regulate them, so the Finance Ministry will draw up a bill by the end of the year.”

Putin’s Embrace

That reality wasn’t always apparent in Russia. Before Putin’s meeting with Vitalik Buterin, the Russian-Canadian founder of Ethereum, the legal status of cryptocurrencies was unclear.

Since then, a company co-owned by the president’s internet ombudsman, Dmitry Marinichev, has announced a plan to raise $100 million in an ICO to fund a domestic digital currency-mining operation. Herman Gref, Sberbank’s Tesla-driving chief executive, has put the weight of Russia’s biggest bank behind a modified ethereum protocol dubbed Masterchain to make interbank money transfers safer and faster.

Not all Russian officials are believers, however. [Central] Bank of Russia Governor Elvira Nabiullina warned Friday at the same forum that there was “gold fever” surrounding digital currencies and said that they shouldn’t be used as a surrogate for money.

_https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-08/russia-makes-u-turn-on-cryptocurrencies-after-backing-from-putin

So it looks like Putin's government welcomes the decentralized digital currencies while the "independent" Central Bank of Russia is sceptical. In this regard it should be noted that the Russian Central Bank is basically controlled by the IMF and its rules, which means that, for example, it has to buy foreign reserves (USD and EUR) in order to be able to give credit inside of Russia.

Considering that in the Oliver Stone interviews one of the books that was prominently seen in Putin's office was about the nationalization of the Russian Central Bank as a way to full Russian independence, I think it is very likely that the Central Bank and the ruble will be nationalized. The Russian government is probably just waiting for the right time to do end this financial dependence on the IMF and the USD.
 
I collected and categorized some news headlines from the last week or so: (manually collected from coindesk.com, a news website dedicated to blockchain technology)

Governments in support:

A minister in Russia's government said this week that cryptocurrencies and blockchain are "impossible to ignore."
Australia is plotting an ambitious new Digital Economy initiative and blockchain is part of the plan, a new paper reveals.
A Chinese government-backed IT research body has launched a new research lab in order to support the development of blockchain technology in China.
The executive director of the Reserve Bank of India has confirmed that research into a "digital rupee" is still ongoing.
The EU has already spent millions of euros funding startups that are working with blockchain, public data reveals.
The municipal government for the U.S. city of Boise has formed a new partnership aimed at exploring public-sector blockchain use cases.
The municipality of Chiasso in Switzerland will start accepting tax payments in bitcoin next year, according to a report.
U.S. government agencies are reaching out to the blockchain community for help drafting an action plan for bringing its IT systems up to speed.
Ukraine's justice ministry has begun testing the use of a blockchain to digitally auction seized assets, according to a report.

Governments regulating:

Mexico's government is close to introducing legislation that would regulate fintech firms, including those that work with cryptocurrencies.
Australia has introduced a new bill that, if passed, would end the country's bitcoin "double taxation" issue.
The European nation of Malta is moving to advance its ongoing blockchain strategy with the creation of a new advisory board.
Chinese bitcoin exchange ViaBTC has announced it will be closing its website at the end of September – the second exchange in as many days to do so.
Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov said his department will regulate the use of cryptocurrencies in the country by the end of 2017.
Switzerland's financial markets regulator has cracked down on a trio of companies tied to an alleged cryptocurrency scam.
The EU is eyeing beefed-up penalties around crimes involving cryptocurrencies, such as ransomware, the European Commission said this week.
A self-regulatory body in China focused on online finance has issued a new warning on bitcoin exchange risks.
China-based BitKan has announced it will freeze over-the-counter trading on its cryptocurrency service, citing pressure from local regulators.
The U.K.'s Financial Conduct Authority is the latest in a wave of regulators to issue a formal warning on initial coin offerings.
An ICO startup has been accepted into Quebec's regulatory sandbox, demonstrating how regulators there want to accommodate the burgeoning industry.


Banks in support:

Researchers at Finland's central bank have dubbed bitcoin's economic system "revolutionary" in a new staff paper.
Israel's largest bank is working with software giant Microsoft to develop a blockchain-based platform for creating digital bank guarantees.


Banks regulating:

Malaysia's central bank could introduce rules around cryptocurrencies by the end of this year, according to statements by its governor.
Russia's central bank doesn't want to see cryptocurrencies classified as a form of foreign currency, according to statements from its governor.
Germany's central bank has published a new blockchain research paper.
A paper from the Bank of Namibia makes familiar points about the risks of money laundering and the perils of a stateless currency.


Industry:

IBM Ventures has its eyes on compliance and supply chain for its first cash investment in the blockchain industry.
A major state-owned telecommunications provider in Switzerland has created a new blockchain business.
IBM is building its blockchain work over a growing number of locations and employees, and Marie Wieck ties it all together.
With the help of Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Apple, the W3C is deploying a browser API that could extend cryptocurrency's payments potential.
The Internet Archive, the nonprofit dedicated to providing "open access to all knowledge," has spoken out on why it accepts bitcoin donations.
[urlhttps://www.coindesk.com/nebraska-lawyers-begin-accepting-bitcoin-following-state-panel-approval/]The lawyer who asked a Nebraska state ethics board about accepting bitcoin says his practice will soon begin taking the cryptocurrency.[/url]

Problems:

More than 1.65 million computers were targeted by cryptocurrency mining malware attacks in the first eight months of 2017, according to a new report.
 
The Russian authorities have decided to focus on legalizing the blockchain technology, as Deputy Finance Minister Alexei Moiseev told Sputnik on Tuesday.

Russia to Focus on Blockchain in Future - Deputy Minister
https://sputniknews.com/russia/201709261057703030-russia-finance-ministry-blockchain/

The Russian authorities have decided not yet to introduce the regulation of cryptocurrencies, but will instead focus on legalizing the blockchain technology, Deputy Finance Minister Alexei Moiseev told Sputnik on Tuesday.

"The positions of the departments did not get closer to each other. In this connection, it was decided [by Russian First Deputy Prime Minister Igor] Shuvalov to monitor [the situation with cryptocurrencies] now. For the time being, we are more engaged in legalizing blockchain from the viewpoint of it as a mechanism to register data so that the information stored in blockchain could have the same legal force as information stored [in other forms]," he said.

The Russian government is set to start the consideration of a bill aimed at regulation of cryptocurrencies in the country soon. Moreover, several high-ranking officials have proposed to create Russia's own cryptocurrency in order to replace Bitcoin, however, the initiatives haven't been welcomed by the Central Bank yet.

Digital currencies, also known as cryptocurrencies, have no material form and global currency regulation does not currently apply to them. An unlimited number of anonymous sources can issue and use such currencies. Central banks worldwide have treated the phenomenon with caution, although some have started exploring the possibilities it offers and even developing their own cryptocurrency.


Russia could become a world leader in the adoption of the blockchain technology next year, Chairman of Russia’s Vnesheconombank (VEB) Sergey Gorkov told Sputnik on Saturday, stressing that the mass use of the technology will take place in 2019-2020.

Russia May Become World Leader in Blockchain Technology Adoption in 2018
https://sputniknews.com/russia/201709091057251503-russia-blockchain-tech-leader/

Gorkov said that the blockchain technology will be implemented in Russia by 2020.

"We did not expect such an upsurge of interest [in the blockchain], technologies, I believe, will become a reality in 2017-2018,… 2018 will be the year of 'trial and error,' while 2019-2020 — a real period of implementation," he said.

Gorkov noted that the VEB would prepare directions for the development of blockchain in October and was also negotiating with Rostelecom telecommunications operator and the Russian Post on the possibility of using the technology.

"We have created a group at the level of the Russian government on the introduction of blockchain, no other country in the world has it. I believe that in 2018 Russia could become a leader in the adoption of the blockchain technology," Gorkov pointed out.

Blockchain technology is a distributed database, all replicas of which are regularly updated to add the information about all new transactions. Every time a transaction occurs, it is encrypted in a block, which is then sent out to all network users. Each block has a time-stamp and a reference to the previous block, which allows to establish the sequence of transactions. The data is therefore transparent and very difficult to change, which makes it a helpful security solution for any distribution or transaction processes.
 
This might be of interest?

CBS's Showtime caught mining crypto-coins in viewers' web browsers 25 Sep 2017
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/09/25/showtime_hit_with_coinmining_script/

Who placed the JavaScript code on two primetime dot-coms? So far, it's a mystery

The websites of US telly giant CBS's Showtime contained JavaScript that secretly commandeered viewers' web browsers over the weekend to mine cryptocurrency.

The flagship Showtime.com and its instant-access ShowtimeAnytime.com sibling silently pulled in code that caused browsers to blow spare processor time calculating new Monero coins – a privacy-focused alternative to the ever-popular Bitcoin. The hidden software typically consumed as much as 60 per cent of CPU capacity on computers visiting the sites.

The scripts were written by Code Hive, a legit outfit that provides JavaScript to website owners: webmasters add the code to their pages so that they can earn slivers of cash from each visitor as an alternative to serving adverts to generate revenue. Over time, money mined by the Code-Hive-hosted scripts adds up and is transferred from Coin Hive to the site's administrators. One Monero coin, 1 XMR, is worth about $92 right now.

However, it's extremely unlikely that a large corporation like CBS would smuggle such a piece of mining code onto its dot-coms – especially since it charges subscribers to watch the hit TV shows online – suggesting someone hacked the websites' source code to insert the mining JavaScript and make a quick buck.

The JavaScript, which appeared on the sites at the start of the weekend and vanished by Monday, sits between HTML comment tags that appear to be an insert from web analytics biz New Relic. Again, it is unlikely that an analytics company would deliberately stash coin-mining scripts onto its customers' pages, so the code must have come from another source – or was injected by miscreants who had compromised Showtime's systems.

Here's a screenshot of the code on showtime.com, seen by El Reg before it was removed. The mining script was loaded early on the page, we note.
(Screenshot image)

And on Showtime Anytime: (Screenshot image)

We contacted both Showtime and New Relic today asking for more details. Showtime refused to comment. New Relic told us it had nothing to do with the mystery code.

"We take the security of our browser agent extremely seriously and have multiple controls in place to detect malicious or unauthorized modification of its script at various points along its development and deployment pipeline," New Relic's Andrew Schmitt told us.

"Upon reviewing our products and code, the HTML comments shown in the screenshot that are referencing newrelic were not injected by New Relic's agents. It appears they were added to the website by its developers."

We also asked Code Hive for details on the user account the injected code was mining for. "We can't give out any specific information about the account owner as per our privacy terms," the outfit informed us. "We don't know much about these keys or the user they belong to anyway."

The outfit did confirm to us, however, that the email address used to set up the account was a personal one, and was not an official CBS email address, further suggesting malicious activity.

Pirate Bay

Coin Hive's mining code was at the center of some attention last week when file-sharing search engine The Pirate Bay admitted it had added the coin-gathering JavaScript on its pages in order to test its profitability in an effort to get rid of ads on its site.

The code was poorly configured – web admins are allowed to set the hashing rate – and resulted in people's machines slowing to a crawl, sparking complaints. Following the outcry, The Pirate Bay acknowledged the presence of the mining script, calling it "only a test" and promised to limit the CPU usage to make it less annoying. A few days later, the organization dropped the idea all together.

Code Hive not only offers in-page mining but also mining through URL shorteners and CAPTCHAs. The huge advantage to the website operator using the code is that not only does the script use someone else's processing power but also their electricity, meaning that you can make money with very little effort. So long as you are willing to annoy your visitors.

Coin Hive's pitch is that this script could allowed publishers to pull annoying ads from their website – which is something that could become more important as browsers increasingly block ads.

However, the code has already been inserted in browser extensions and on typosquatted websites. And now, it looks as though someone may have tried to hack Showtime's website in order to insert the code and make money while not having any direct impact on the website itself.

If Coin Hive wants to be seen as legitimate rather than a tool for hackers and malware authors, it is going to have to rapidly figure out a better authorization system for big websites and work on making itself less attractive to scammers. Meanwhile, ad blocking tools are now killing the JavaScript on sight. ®
 
Data said:
Probably one of the most rational talks about Bitcoin, delivered in front of Canada's senate 3 years ago. It starts with a short lecture followed by an extended Q&A session by the senators.

Despite this being 2 hours long, it is probably one of the best videos I've seen covering the high level dissenting arguments against bitcoin. Thank you for sharing this Data!

It was interesting that a pressing question early on was "how do we regulate the Bitcoins!!!?" The main rationale being that if we don't regulate, crime will go through the roof. Here's the thing; money-laundering, the funding of "terrorism", as well as other illicit activities existed before Bitcoin and the Blockchain. So I'm not sure that can stand as a valid counter argument. Furthermore, I think the second video really gets to the crux of the matter here, which are the banks.

If you strip out the hype around getting rich quick and/or speculating with cryptos, what we're left with is an implementation of technology that circumvents the financial industry's main source of control, which is centralization. The fact that you can get a Bitcoin or ( insert other relatively liquid cryptocurrency here ) loan directly from other users is a very disconcerting issue to banks and other lending companies. In fact, it could be seen as leveling the playing field a bit, osit.

What about security? Eh, I've seen some pretty egregious things done in the past regarding fairly large companies that possess personal data. And I'm not even talking about the Equifax debacle. Andreas points out in the video that hacks either happen at the user's end or an exchange. The blockchain itself is pretty robust from what I can tell.

The key things to keep in mind if people want to experiment are as follows:

1) Exchanges are just that. Do not keep any amount of money in an exchange wallet longer than necessary. As a caveat, the only reason I would use an exchange is to make interest from lending. This is something I've been looking into.

2) You can avoid exchanges altogether by either trading for Bitcoins (local bitcoin) or selling things in "exchange" for Bitcoin or other cryptos at Ebay-esque type sites.

3) Paper wallets are your friend.

Now, there is a spectrum to the term paper wallet. Some people simply avoid website wallets, which is to say, a website that controls your keys and is no different than simply having a bank account imo. Others create their main wallets locally on their personal phones. Now this is something I would caution against because phones just aren't that secure. Another option is to generate private wallet keys on your computer which should be sufficient for most provided they don't hold a substantial amount of money on it. To this point, the level of security should match the amount of money you have in your wallet/s. Decentralization can be a good thing in this context but it also means the end user needs to take a more active role in securing their valuables because the responsibility for security shifts.

Unfortunately, the most secure option for paper wallet involves a couple of things: Finding a wallet key generator, reading the code to ensure there is no funny business, downloading said code and running it against a hash to ensure what you downloaded is an exact replica of what you found. Then, you will need to use that key generator on a computer that does not have access to the internet or any other network connectivity during the process of generating your private wallet keys. And by connectivity, I mean it is advised that one take out the ethernet/wifi card and/or remove related drivers from the computer before proceeding. Ideally this computer shouldn't be used to access the internet after this process as well.

Now the above is in no way user friendly to the general populous but Andreas wasn't lying when he said that most in the field, up until very recently, thought that this was only going to be nerd money. However, those that have exorbitant sums in cryptos either know how to do the above or pay someone else to do it for them.
 
One thing that was mentioned briefly in this thread that has me concerned about cryptocurrency prospects, is quantum computers. Without quantum-safe encryption, all cryptocurrencies are vulnerable to being decrypted extremely fast by one such machine, which would tank the entire market, given that it's driven by artificial scarcity derived from a classical computer taking a long time to run the algorithm that finds the coins. Given the recent mainstream progress in developing such a device, it is pretty likely that the PTB already have one secretly, and if so, would be able to crash the market at their whim. On the other hand, they would have to "show their hand" by doing so, and probably wouldn't do it lightly.

So.. wait until everyone is invested and the market is big and everyone thinks they found a way to circumvent PTB currency control, then crash the whole thing with the "invention" of a quantum computer. If this happens, any existing quantum-safe currencies may spike in value, which may be ones developed by the PTB central banks themselves. Or maybe investors will get cold feet and stay away from cryptocurrencies completely, possibly being herded back to traditional currencies. The C's have said that we're going all digital money (before there is no more money at all), and I'm sure whatever form that takes the PTB will want to make sure they ultimately control and oversee it, and seek to compromise anything that they can't control.

Here's an article exploring the quantum effect on cryptocurrencies:
https://medium.com/the-quantum-resistant-ledger/be-prepared-for-quantum-computing-era-bb1a9ec6cd35
Some computer scientists say quantum computers are moving closer to reality and will cripple bitcoin’s encryption systems and doom bitcoin. Governments are investing aggressively in quantum computers, which are ultra powerful.

Quantum computers, first theorized by physicist Richard Feynman in 1982, have promised a new era of computing. The theory has only recently translated into significant real-world advances, with NASA, the CIA and Google working on a quantum computer. Computer scientists now warn the machines will cripple existing encryption methods and destroy bitcoin’s technological foundations.

Andersen Cheng, co-founder of Post Quantum, a U.K. cybersecurity firm, told Newsweek that bitcoin will end the day the first quantum computer arrives. He said the quantum computer will undermine the cryptography surrounding bitcoin’s public and private keys.

Bitcoin recipients share their public key with the sender. To spend bitcoin, a bitcoin owner must use their private key. If another party learns the private key, that party can spend all the bitcoin.
Martin Tomlinson, a professor at the Security, Communications and Networking Research Centre in Plymouth University, said a quantum computer can calculate the private key from the public one in a minute or two. By learning all the private keys, someone would have access to all available bitcoin. Tomlinson did not know when the first quantum computer will appear that will have this capability, but he noted that extensive research is under way. The European Commission announced a $1.1 billion project earlier this ear aimed at bringing a “quantum revolution.”

It seems like you could have a quantum-safe cryptography, but it would require consensus from all the bitcoin users to change the underlying encryption method and algorithm, which apparently can't happen without major disruption to the current system.

Here is some recent progress on quantum computing, suggesting that we are pretty close to having a device in the next few years that may cause the aforementioned ruckus:

Google to prove quantum supremacy this year by demonstrating a 49-qubit quantum computer that can out-compute any current classical computer:
https://www.sciencealert.com/google-s-quantum-announcement-overshadowed-by-something-even-bigger

IBM used a quantum computer to simulate a chemical reaction:
https://futurism.com/ibm-just-broke-the-record-of-simulating-chemistry-with-a-quantum-computer/

Microsoft is developing a topological qubit and a programming language for their quantum computers:
https://www.engadget.com/2017/09/26/microsoft-new-coding-language-is-made-for-quantum-computers/

University of Tokyo theorizes of a new method to create quantum computers:
https://futurism.com/researchers-claim-they-just-invented-the-ultimate-method-for-quantum-computing/

Some challenges and uncertainty:
https://singularityhub.com/2017/09/26/what-it-will-take-for-quantum-computers-to-supercharge-machine-learning/

So lots of questions - how soon will a "quantum supremacy" level device that is practical for real-world applications exist? Will various industries adapt without consequence - will this be like Y2K with a smooth transition, or will various sectors experience a "collapse"? We probably have only a few years before we find out.
 
SAO said:
So lots of questions - how soon will a "quantum supremacy" level device that is practical for real-world applications exist? Will various industries adapt without consequence - will this be like Y2K with a smooth transition, or will various sectors experience a "collapse"? We probably have only a few years before we find out.

Quantum computing is definitely coming. The processing power, as well as the number of related research papers have been rising exponentially over the last years.[1] Indeed it's just a matter of time until today's internet technology will have to be considered broken. Forward secrecy of state-of-the-art encryption is already considered broken with the expectation of quantum computing.[1]

As Antonopoulos points out, good systems are anti-fragile, meaning that harder attacks only result in higher resilience. This adaptation to threats from the 'evil empire' is done by the 'warriors' of the Open Source community. The success of the internet is a direct result of a brutal battle fought behind its scenes. This everlasting battle goes on: Post-quantum cryptography libraries are already under early development.[2][3][4][5][6]

Bitcoin (or any other blockchain tech) can theoretically adapt because it's just an Open Source program. If Bitcoin doesn't adapt in time, then it will certainly be disrupted or even die - perhaps even deserve to die. And if Bitcoin dies, it will be replaced by the next project that already has adapted -- because "the cat is already out of the bag" as McAfee says. The question is: Will the Bitcoin community allow Bitcoin's death after 8 years of successful operation?

[1] https://archive.fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/quantum/
[2] https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs
[3] https://github.com/exaexa/codecrypt
[4] https://github.com/quininer/sarkara
[5] https://pqcrypto.org/
[6] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/05/nist_starts_pla.html
 
Another one to watch and possibly make a small investment in is NEO (AKA-Chinese ETH).

There is a lot of hype about this already unfortunately, and it is very volatile. However the potential gains are massive if it becomes the de-facto cryptocurrency for China, who with all their bluster about cracking down on crypto, are more likely to regulate it and take the lead globally.

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/neo-price-surges-founder-says-government-collaboration-possible/
In the interview, which was partially translated into English by Yicai Global, Da makes several significant statements about China’s crackdown on cryptocurrency. Most notably, hespeculates that a future collaboration between NEO and the Chinese government is a possibility. Here’s the relevant statement:

“I do not expect the government to call me in the short term and say, ‘Let’s use Neo as the blockchain technology infrastructure in China.’ But in the medium term? Why not? I think it’s possible.”

Sitting at a current "market cap" (which is just simplistic ValueOfCoin * NumberOfCoins) of $1.5 billion, if this gains any sort of traction and collab with Chinese government then it could easily reach $100bn "market cap".

There are a number of data points suggesting this may be the case. I'm running out of time but will try to post some links in the next few days. Suffice it to say that China uses Baidu instead of Google, Alibaba instead of Amazon, WeChat instead of Facebook, Huwaei over Apple. NEO is written for Chinese developers of which there are millions. It is built to be compliant with tough Chinese anti-money laundering laws. It already appears to be very friendly with Chinese agencies/government.

Also China has a history of 'Banning' emerging finance sectors, letting them crash in value, and then returning with fully regulated and controlled and better version of that market.

NEO GAS is what is actually used to power transactions on the NEO blockchain - it is more scarce and probably a better buy.
 
In this video from 2014, Antonopoulos and Molyneux discuss big failures of Bitcoin exchanges/wallets/banks due to incompetent management and engineering, who operated such systems like central banks: where the bank owned all the Bitcoins (owned all the customer's private keys). He compares this with the flaws of traditional banking systems while pointing out that not a single bit was ever stolen from the Bitcoin alorithm itself. Despite this fact, the currency itself has been wrongly blamed for these bank failures in an attemt to shift the blame away from the real issues. However, the failure of such banks was no failure of the market, explaining what this market is. He says that such failures are a blessing in disguise because other exchanges/wallets/banks learned from it, a process called anti-fragility. He gives tips about how to keep Bitcoins safe (you own and protect your own private keys) and why customer eductation is paramount.

Bitcoin vs. The Federal Reserve | Andreas Antonopoulos and Stefan Molyneux

Stefan Molyneux and Andreas Antonopoulos discuss the fall of Mt. Gox, the greatly exaggerated death of Bitcoin, the joy of failure within the Bitcoin economy, the incredible opportunity Bitcoin provides those without access to the modern banking system, and the difference between Bitcoin and the Federal Reserve System and fiat currencies worldwide.

 
Some selected news articles from the past week or so. The overall picture paints a mixed flurry of activity, with governments and banks exploring their own use of blockchain technology while regulating or even banning existing fiat-crypto exchanges.

Governments:

A Ukrainian official described bitcoin as a risky investment and a vehicle for fraud but downplayed any systemic concerns about the cryptocurrency.
Banks in Singapore have closed the accounts of a number of cryptocurrency firms without expanation, according to a news report.
CoinDesk advisor Michael Casey explains China’s recent moves against bitcoin exchanges and ICOs in a wider geopolitical context.
A conference in Washington this week saw officials from the U.S. government reaffirm their commitment to investigating possible blockchain use cases.
Russia Likely to Ban Bitcoin Payments, Deputy Finance Minister Says

Banks:

Nigerian Central Bank Director: Cryptocurrency Wave 'Cannot Be Stopped'.
The president of the European Central Bank has indicated that his institution does not have the authority to regulate cryptocurrencies.
Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), the largest bank in the country, is trialling blockchain technology for fund transfers to and from the U.S.

Industry:

One of Australia's largest power providers is working with blockchain startup Power Ledger on a platform aimed to facilitate energy trading.
South Korea is getting a new cryptocurrency exchange – one backed by an already established fintech firm called Dunamu.
USV's Fred Wilson says investors should diversify ahead of any potential "big crash" in cryptocurrencies.
A former principal at Fortress Investment Group is reportedly moving to establish a $500 million hedge fund focused on cryptocurrency and blockchain.
A well-known gold dealer headquartered in London is now accepting bitcoin payments for its precious metal products.

Technology:

Professional services firm Accenture has been awarded a patent tied to its work on an "editable blockchain."
A plan to hard fork the bitcoin blockchain, and change its mining algorithm, is emerging.
 
Back
Top Bottom