Re: Bomb attack Belgium airport
Niall said:
The head of the Ukrainian Security Service, Vasily Gritsak, has
publicly suggested that the Brussels attacks were carried out by Russia as part of its "hybrid war against the West."
Russian PM Medvedev has denounced him as a 'halfwit', and his comments won't be taken seriously in Western Europe, but it's interesting how the psychopathic mind cannot help but reveal the likely rationale for the attacks by the real perps: 'striking at the heart of Europe' in order to 'keep it on side'.
Gritsak looks even worse than a halfwit, considering Daesh has now claimed responsibility and the insertion of a claim that, "Salah Abdeslam, the mastermind behind the November Paris Attacks, arrested in Belgium" might have anything to do with the reasons for the Brussels attacks, is only acting as
a diversion away from the main culprit, which I suspect includes Erdogan? I sense, Erdogan is behind the planning of this Brussels attack, including the incident that happened in Ankara about two weeks ago? It might help boost Turkey's EU membership application - to help accelerate negotiations for Turkey's entry into the EU?
Daesh Claims Responsibility for Brussels Attacks
http://sputniknews.com/europe/20160322/1036738411/daesh-resposibility-brussels-attacks.html
Islamic jihadists have claimed responsibility for the deadly Brussels attack.
Belgian Police Discover Undetonated Suicide Belt at Brussels Airport
http://sputniknews.com/europe/20160322/1036746082/brussels-airport-unexploded-belt.html
EU-Turkey Deal 'Lays Foundation for Conflict Where Europe Will Be Victim'
http://sputniknews.com/politics/20160322/1036736482/europe-erdogan-deal-folly-analysis.html
Last week, European countries announced that they had reached an agreement with the Turkish government aimed at slowing the influx of refugees. For his part, French political analyst Thierry Meyssan suggests that in making this deal, Europeans "are preparing the foundations for a vast confrontation of which they will themselves be the victims."
On Friday, the heads of 28 EU states announced that they had reached an agreement with Ankara on 'irregular migrants' arriving in Greece, who would be returned to Turkey and swapped on a one-for-one basis for documented Syrian refugees, who would be admitted into EU member states.
In addition to financial aid and promises to review Turkey's EU membership application, the deal included the controversial step of offering visa-free access to the EU for Turkish citizens, which would allow them 90 days' freedom of movement in Europe, something critics have warned member states would be unable to control.
Perhaps among the most outspoken independent critics of the deal is independent French political analyst Thierry Meyssan who, in his recent article for the Voltaire Network, suggested that by signing the agreement, EU leaders have effectively "taken a step further in their pact with the devil."
For starters, Meyssan warned, "a large part of the 3 billion Euros annually allotted to Ankara will serve to finance support for the jihadists, and as a result will increase the number of migrants who are fleeing the war" in Syria.
Moreover, the analyst added, "by repealing the visa regulations with Turkey in the next few months, the Europeans are establishing free circulation between the Al-Qaeda camps in Turkey and Brussels."
Ultimately, Meyssan suggests, "by crushing the Iraqi and Syrian people under the pressure of the jihadists whom they are indirectly financing, and abandoning the Turkish people to the dictatorship of President Erdogan, [Europe is] preparing the foundations for a vast confrontation of which they will themselves be the victims."
EU Makes a Deal - Meyssan notes that amidst this background European governments, "panicked by the reaction of their populations against the massive entry of migrants, "attempted to work out "a procedure which would leave Turkey to solve their problems for them." Brussels agreed to "pay 3 billion euros annually to Turkey to help it deal with its obligations, but with no structure for verifying the use of this funding," to end visa requirements for Turkish nationals, and to accelerate negotiations for Turkey's entry into the EU.
"In other words, blinded by the recent electoral defeat of Angela Merkel, the European leaders have settled for applying a temporary solution to slow the flux of migrants, but without seeking to resolve the origin of the problem, and without taking into account the infiltration of jihadists among the refugees."
'Munich Precedent' Having laid out President Erdogan's ideological roots, and the lengths his governments has proved willing to go through to strengthen their hold over Turkey, Meyssan suggested
that European leaders' behavior in connection with the migrant crisis is now all too reminiscent of the Munich Agreement of 1938, which allowed Nazi Germany to annex portions of Czechoslovakia, strengthening Adolf Hitler and ultimately leading Europe down the path to the Second World War.
"Now, under our very eyes, the same errors are being repeated. The European elites consider the Syrian Republic to be an adversary – either they are defending the colonial point of view of Israel, or they hope to recolonize the Levant themselves and appropriate the gigantic and still unexploited reserves of gas."
"They therefore supported the secret operation by the United States for 'regime change' and pretended to believe the fable of the 'Arab Spring'. After nearly five years of proxy war, noting that President Bashar al-Assad is still there despite the fact that his resignation has been announced a thousand times, the Europeans have decided to finance – to the tune of 3 billion euros per year – Turkish support for the jihadists, [and to] allow them victory and the end to the migrations."
As in the case of Munich, Meyssan argues, Europe will "realize, too late, that by repealing the visa regulations for Turkish citizens, they have authorized the free circulations to Brussels from the Al-Qaeda camps in Turkey."
"The comparison with the end of the 1930s is all the more pertinent since during the Munich agreements, the Nazi Reich had already annexed Austria without provoking any particular reaction from the other European states. Today, Turkey already occupies the northeast of a member state of the European Union (Cyprus), and a strip a few kilometers wide in Syria, which it administers via a specially nominated wali ('prefect')."
In other words, "not only does the European let that pass, but by its attitude, encourages Ankara to pursue its annexations with no regard for international law."
Ultimately, Meyssan warns, "in 1938, the European elites believed in the friendship of Chancellor Hitler; today they believe in the friendship of President Erdogan." This line of thinking, he suggests, is not only erroneous – it is dangerous as far as the European continent is concerned.
