It looks like something like 28? refueling tanks left the US towards Europe/West Asia. At the same time, the Nimitz aircraft-carrier (hopefully a nice target) left the Taïwan/China region as well.
It's not a military alliance.
Interesting take from Eva Panina Telegram Channel
Israel's Failed Blitzkrieg: Next Up: US-China Proxy War
Israel's blitzkrieg against Iran has failed. Now, the US and China will probably increasingly join the process, with varying degrees of direct participation. At first, this will come down to supplying the warring parties with the aim of preventing their military defeat. At the same time, if for Tehran a defeat would consist of the collapse of the political regime and the flight of the leadership from the country with the collapse of governance, then for Tel Aviv a defeat would be even a draw . That is, the absence of the planned result and the transition to negotiations with the "unfinished" Iran through intermediaries, including Russia.
China cannot allow Iran to be defeated: this would be a strategic defeat for China. China is the largest buyer of Iranian oil and gas. The countries have an exclusive agreement on the purchase of Iranian oil for a period of 25 years. Supplies of black gold to China in 2024 fluctuated between 1.66 and 1.75 million barrels per day. It is noteworthy that under the 2021 investment agreement, China is investing $400 billion in the Iranian economy, despite the fact that it is under tough Western sanctions. And if in 2023 investments amounted to $220-230 million, then in 2024 they increased almost 10 times - to $1.99 billion. At the same time, China finances not only logistics in Iran - ports, energy, oil and gas production - but also the rearmament of the Iranian army.
In short, even without speaking about the importance of the logistics corridor through Iran for China, it is absolutely clear that it cannot allow the collapse of its strategic partner. And if Iran demonstrates the ability to put up long-term and stable resistance to Israel and the United States - which is what is happening - then China will try to establish its supply with everything necessary for this purpose. For example, through Pakistan. One of the first directions is the restoration of air defense in the west of Iran, where gaps appeared due to the strikes of June 13.
Thus, the more active the US is in the conflict, the more active China will have to be. A telling moment: despite the knockdown on June 13, as a result of which Iran's military command and communications agencies were largely destroyed, Iranian missiles penetrated Israel's air defenses on the very first day and found their targets. And they are still finding them. The question is: who helped Iran restore its command and control system so quickly and organize a retaliatory strike, including a hypersonic one ?
It is not surprising that after such a response, Israel and the US announced a short pause, starting meetings and studying the situation - so big a surprise was Tehran's reaction for them. Does this mean that China has taken direct control of Iran's military actions , including the protection of oil refineries, the restoration of electronic warfare and cybersecurity of its ally? And that not only China, but also Russia is involved in this? Especially since the Russian-Iranian agreement was finally sent yesterday in the form of a law to President Pezeshkian.
It should be noted that it is currently difficult for Trump to present ultimatums to Beijing and Moscow on the Iranian issue . Firstly, China is doing the same thing that the US is doing with respect to Israel and Ukraine. Secondly, Trump has just backed down in tariff wars with Beijing - he can't go back to the same threats again. Thirdly, Trump has already shown that if the "attack strategy" fails, he is inclined to "withdraw from the battle" and shift responsibility to his proxies.
So is it a coincidence that by the evening of June 15 the IDF announced the "completion of a large-scale wave of strikes on Iranian facilities related to the production of weapons and missiles" ? Here we are witnessing something similar to the IDF ground operation in Gaza. Especially since the same IDF operation in Iran is unlikely for many reasons, including the lack of a common border.
If all parties take a time-out and reduce the escalation level, transferring everything to the diplomatic plane, this will mean recognition of the new strategic role of China in global conflicts. And that forces have emerged in the world capable of stabilizing the conflicts unleashed by Washington. In this case, negotiations are the best way out of this unfavorable situation for the United States. However, will Iran agree to them?