Canadian Orwellian world: Lockdowns, vaccines passports and more

And those two should get a room.
... at the Trump International Hotel and Tower: Toronto. Discounts.

You know, after a thought, I wondered if there was another reason Pierre regained his federal seat in an Alberta riding. If Alberta separates, and if it came to an election between Danielle Smith and Pierre, I think Pierre would win. He has 80% support here.

32nd Alberta general election
...the next election is scheduled for October 18, 2027. However, the Election Act is subject to the powers of the lieutenant governor of Alberta to dissolve the legislature before that time, in accordance with the usual conventions of the Westminster parliamentary system.

Just a thought.
 
In the series of constatations of Canada's decline, in Quebec province, one in two women who are victims of violence and have the courage to ask for help for emergency accommodation are met with a closed door.


"As you read these lines, a woman is trying to get help from a shelter for women who are victims of domestic violence. This call, far from being a trivial matter, is undoubtedly the result of long and careful consideration. She may have hesitated before dialing this number that no one ever wants to call in their lifetime. One does not declare oneself a victim of domestic violence overnight.

It is a complex process, fraught with fear, doubt, profound shame, and the grief that is rarely discussed: the grief of recognizing that life with this person one once loved has become unbearable. Dangerous.
(...)
Now imagine being refused the help that was described to you as a lifeline pulling you out of a volcano. Imagine being put on an eight-week waiting list for assistance without accommodation. Imagine browsing classified ads and realizing you can't afford any of the available rents, and that in the midst of a housing crisis, you have no choice but to stay home with your abuser.

Imagine the loss of confidence and hope. "This appeal requires immense courage. As I write this, one in two requests for accommodation is refused. Out of a total of 19,306 requests, shelters and support centers have had to say no nearly 10,000 times, much to their regret."
(...)
Shelters and support centers do more than simply provide shelter for women fleeing abusive homes; their responsibilities are immense, at all hours of the day and night. They not only answer every call from women in distress, but also try to find them a bed as quickly as possible, even when all the rooms in their shelter are full.

They assess each woman's risk level with sensitivity and foresight, participate in rapid response teams, and juggle supporting a crying child, a woman in shock arriving with her suitcase, a busy phone line, court appointments, and the struggle to find housing—all while working 24/7 on a salary that pales in comparison to other, more attractive sectors. All this, in addition to running the shelter, ensuring everyone is well-fed, reassured, and comfortable, that the environment is warm and welcoming, that the bathroom is clean, and that a surprise water leak is dealt with in the middle of the night. Just another day in the life.

These remarkable women, who perform miracles day in and day out, work in precarious conditions with the strength of a community that refuses, and will always refuse, to give up. If the shelters are overflowing, if we can no longer support every woman in danger, our safety net will crumble. It's an absolute catastrophe.

So far in 2025, Quebec has recorded nine femicides in the context of domestic violence."
 
The following has recently been put on by legal representatives at Rights Probe. Many Canadians may feel it in their bones, that it is all coming soon - all laid out with provisions to bring back other Bills sitting on shelves.

All this seems rather lockstep to the UK and other EU places, simply mechanisms to help keep the current wicked leaders in power, as some have suggested.

Will add the discussion and some highlights of the Bill/ACT - and one should listen to their discussion nuances over each part.

Could very much be wrong, yet have a sense that on the eve of Parliaments Christmas break, it could be introduced for vote and passed. After that, it will be given Royal Assent.

What Bills C-8 and C-9 mean for your freedom of expression​


A panel discussion held by the Free Speech Union of Canada (FSU) on November 4, 2025, with FSU directors Prof. Bruce Pardy, Lisa Bildy, and Hannah Park Roche.

On the table: Bill C-9 and its potential to create a “thought police” scenario, where citizens mired in a legal minefield run the risk of severe consequences for what used to be considered civil liberties and the fabric of Canadian democracy. At stake is our freedom to think, say, and believe as we choose—yes, even the right to hate.

Also on the table: Bill C-8, which would grant the government sweeping powers to cut off telecommunications services to individuals deemed a “threat” without the need for any criminal offense. We only need consider the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa to fathom the possibilities of how this legislation could be weaponized.

The primary focus concerns Bill C-9 and its capacity to unleash a chilling wave of censorship that criminalizes emotions rather than actions. Prof. Pardy warns this could pave the way for a two-tier justice system, where individuals are prosecuted not for their deeds but for their thoughts, echoing the oppressive tactics of authoritarian regimes. He provides the following example of the strange(r) land we may soon live in:

“Let’s say you have somebody committing an assault. They commit it for hate. They commit it for greed. They commit it because they don’t care. Which of those two? Which of those three things is worse? If you assault somebody randomly on the street because you’re a psychopath and don’t care, is that better or worse than if you attack somebody because you hate them? For my money, that’s irrelevant. The crime is in the violence.”

That logic is absent in the context of Bills C-8 and C-9, which lack the legal certainty critical to the rule of law; this erosion of certainty is already long evident in Canada and would be further jeopardized by these proposed legislations. Canada need only look to the U.K. for what’s in store: arrests daily for merely offensive comments and a place on the register for “non-crime hate incidents” ...

Follow the discussion as the panel examines the ramifications of these bills on debate, unpopular opinion, faith, symbols, identifiable groups, protest actions, and (so much) more.

1765062593881.jpeg1765062616465.jpeg1765062636893.jpeg1765062655727.jpeg1765062668966.jpeg
Good luck, Canada.

 
Back
Top Bottom