broken.english
Dagobah Resident
Why not? But in this case you are in the lead as your sources are unknown to us.
Why not? But in this case you are in the lead as your sources are unknown to us.
If anyone was a member of the Fenbendazole Cancer Care Support Group on Facebook, it was shut down yesterday by META, supposedly by people making false claims and allegations. Someone doesn't want the information to get out there.
Here is a link to the backup group.
Fenben Cancer Support Group Backup
Here is a link to the backup group.
Fenben Cancer Support Group Backup
SevenFeathers
Dagobah Resident
I agree with this, but I wonder about babies and children with cancer. Have they carried a "spiritual" problem from another/other life?
I know this bibliography, in fact it is the one that is supported in the link that I initially posted when opening the debate thread, I did not post the full text because it had many characters and did not fit, the interesting thing about this is that the ez hybrid protocol and uses reused drugs such as iverectin, febendazole, supplements such as vitamin d, magnesium and zinc and ketogenic diet, all these serve the same purpose, the apoptosis of the tumor cell, then just in case doses of 1mg pir kilo 2 or 3 times a week for some reason @Gaby will not be beneficial, but the opposite, as I could read somewhere that could generate hyperinsulinemia and this in turn is oncogenic in addition to a pseudo state of hyperglycemia since the molecule of vitamin c is almost the same as that of glucose, it changes by a single atom, which can be checked when you make large infusions of intravenous vitamin c and you measure your blood glucose.
Traducido con DeepL Translate anytime, anywhere with DeepL apps and extensions
dredger
The Living Force
This X thread contains around thirty testimonies of cancer treatments done with IV, Fenbendazole or Mebendazole, all in english except the very first post which is in french, translation is quick :
CANCER - Dr William Makis achieves remissions using IVERMECTIN, FEBENDAZOLE and/or MEBENDAZOLE.
=> You will find in this thread, more than thirty cases with in description the different dosages.
Well, a good concentration of cases.
CANCER - Dr William Makis achieves remissions using IVERMECTIN, FEBENDAZOLE and/or MEBENDAZOLE.
=> You will find in this thread, more than thirty cases with in description the different dosages.
Well, a good concentration of cases.
Yeah I often wondered about that myself.
Write up on DMSO and cancer here
www.midwesterndoctor.com
The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight
How DMSO turns a common dye into a highly potent cancer treatment that's harmless to normal tissue
www.midwesterndoctor.com
ImmunityBio.com presents a 5 hour conference on the cancer BioShield with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong. Available for 3 months on their site.
You will need to copy and paste. I am not tech-savvy enough to make it an easy click!
You will need to copy and paste. I am not tech-savvy enough to make it an easy click!
Faca Fritz
The Force is Strong With This One
Yes, I agree. You should make sure that at least two hours pass between taking one or the other.
Croatia
Da, slažem se. Pri tome bi trebalo paziti da prođe barem dva sata između uzimanja jednog ili drugog
CT scans linked to 100,000 future cancers as doctors warn of overuse – NaturalNews.com
CT scans may cause 5% of future U.S. cancer cases, with 103,000 cancers projected from 2023 scans alone. A single abdominal CT delivers radiation equal to 1,000 chest X-rays, with children facing 10 times higher cancer risks than adults. Experts warn of profit-driven overuse, with 93 million...
05/02/2025
- CT scans may cause 5% of future U.S. cancer cases, with 103,000 cancers projected from 2023 scans alone.
- A single abdominal CT delivers radiation equal to 1,000 chest X-rays, with children facing 10 times higher cancer risks than adults.
- Experts warn of profit-driven overuse, with 93 million scans performed annually and many offering little medical benefit.
- Infants and children are at highest risk, yet parents are rarely informed about long-term cancer dangers.
- Patients should question unnecessary scans, seek radiation-free alternatives, and demand lower-dose options for children
A landmark study published in JAMA Internal Medicine estimates that CT scans now rival alcohol consumption and obesity as a leading preventable cancer risk. The scans use ionizing radiation, a known carcinogen, with doses varying wildly between machines. For example, an abdominal CT delivers radiation equivalent to 1,000 chest X-rays, while a child’s head CT may carry a 10-fold higher cancer risk than the same scan for an adult.
Dr. Rebecca Smith-Bindman, a radiologist at UC San Francisco and lead study author, bluntly states: "It’s unfathomable. We keep doing more and more CTs, and the doses keep going up." Her research found that doses for identical scans can vary tenfold between hospitals, with no standardized safety checks
Profit over patients?
With 93 million CT scans performed annually in the U.S.—a 30% increase since 2007—critics accuse healthcare providers of prioritizing revenue over safety. Each scan costs up to $6,800, creating a lucrative incentive for overuse. Dr. David Johnson, a gastroenterologist at Eastern Virginia Medical School, urges doctors to "hit the pause button on ordering CT scans just because it’s easy and convenient."The parallels to other medical controversies are striking. Like COVID-19 vaccines and statins, which critics argue are overprescribed despite risks, CT scans are often deployed as a "default" diagnostic tool.
Infants subjected to CT scans face the highest lifetime cancer risk, with thyroid, lung, and breast cancers most likely to develop later in life. Yet parents are rarely warned. "Few patients and their families are counseled about the risk," admits UCSF pediatrician Dr. Malini Mahendra. The study projects 9,700 future cancers in children scanned in 2023 alone.
The U.S. healthcare system’s reliance on CT scans mirrors its broader dysfunction. Medicare’s new rules requiring hospitals to report radiation doses by 2027 are a belated response, but critics say real change requires rejecting medicine’s "mechanistic" approach.
What you can do
If your doctor is recommending a CT scan, it is important to make sure it is necessary. While these tests are justified in some cases, there are a few points you should keep in mind.First, question every scan. Ask: "Is this absolutely necessary? Are there radiation-free alternatives like MRI or ultrasound?" In some cases, it may be possible to choose a diagnostic tool with a lower risk. Reject "defensive medicine." Up to 90% of scans offer "little to no medical value," according to studies. Ask your doctor if the benefits outweigh the risks.
Be particularly cautious when it comes to children. Demand lower-dose protocols or non-radiation options for young patients given their higher risk.
CT scans save lives when used judiciously, but their rampant overuse—driven by profit, fear of lawsuits, and outdated medical dogma—has created a silent epidemic. As Dr. Smith-Bindman warns, "These future cancers can be reduced by avoiding unnecessary scans." Until the healthcare system prioritizes prevention over profit, patients must arm themselves with knowledge and push back when needed.
Follow CancerCauses.news for more related stories.
Sources for this article include:
DailyMail.co.uk
ICR.ac.uk
UCSF.edu
ScienceAlert.com
Faca Fritz
The Force is Strong With This One
In addition to limiting CT scans, it is necessary to take Lugol's solution, both before and after the scan.CT scans linked to 100,000 future cancers as doctors warn of overuseCT scans linked to 100,000 future cancers as doctors warn of overuse – NaturalNews.com
CT scans may cause 5% of future U.S. cancer cases, with 103,000 cancers projected from 2023 scans alone. A single abdominal CT delivers radiation equal to 1,000 chest X-rays, with children facing 10 times higher cancer risks than adults. Experts warn of profit-driven overuse, with 93 million...www.naturalnews.com
05/02/2025
Millions of Americans undergo CT scans each year, trusting these high-tech imaging tests to diagnose injuries or illnesses. But shocking new research reveals a dark side to this routine procedure: CT scans may be responsible for 5% of all future cancer cases in the U.S. — equivalent to roughly 103,000 cancers from scans performed in 2023 alone. Experts warn that overuse, profit motives, and lax regulations are exposing patients to dangerous radiation with little benefit.
- CT scans may cause 5% of future U.S. cancer cases, with 103,000 cancers projected from 2023 scans alone.
- A single abdominal CT delivers radiation equal to 1,000 chest X-rays, with children facing 10 times higher cancer risks than adults.
- Experts warn of profit-driven overuse, with 93 million scans performed annually and many offering little medical benefit.
- Infants and children are at highest risk, yet parents are rarely informed about long-term cancer dangers.
- Patients should question unnecessary scans, seek radiation-free alternatives, and demand lower-dose options for children
A landmark study published in JAMA Internal Medicine estimates that CT scans now rival alcohol consumption and obesity as a leading preventable cancer risk. The scans use ionizing radiation, a known carcinogen, with doses varying wildly between machines. For example, an abdominal CT delivers radiation equivalent to 1,000 chest X-rays, while a child’s head CT may carry a 10-fold higher cancer risk than the same scan for an adult.
Dr. Rebecca Smith-Bindman, a radiologist at UC San Francisco and lead study author, bluntly states: "It’s unfathomable. We keep doing more and more CTs, and the doses keep going up." Her research found that doses for identical scans can vary tenfold between hospitals, with no standardized safety checks
Profit over patients?
With 93 million CT scans performed annually in the U.S.—a 30% increase since 2007—critics accuse healthcare providers of prioritizing revenue over safety. Each scan costs up to $6,800, creating a lucrative incentive for overuse. Dr. David Johnson, a gastroenterologist at Eastern Virginia Medical School, urges doctors to "hit the pause button on ordering CT scans just because it’s easy and convenient."
The parallels to other medical controversies are striking. Like COVID-19 vaccines and statins, which critics argue are overprescribed despite risks, CT scans are often deployed as a "default" diagnostic tool.
Infants subjected to CT scans face the highest lifetime cancer risk, with thyroid, lung, and breast cancers most likely to develop later in life. Yet parents are rarely warned. "Few patients and their families are counseled about the risk," admits UCSF pediatrician Dr. Malini Mahendra. The study projects 9,700 future cancers in children scanned in 2023 alone.
The U.S. healthcare system’s reliance on CT scans mirrors its broader dysfunction. Medicare’s new rules requiring hospitals to report radiation doses by 2027 are a belated response, but critics say real change requires rejecting medicine’s "mechanistic" approach.
What you can do
If your doctor is recommending a CT scan, it is important to make sure it is necessary. While these tests are justified in some cases, there are a few points you should keep in mind.
First, question every scan. Ask: "Is this absolutely necessary? Are there radiation-free alternatives like MRI or ultrasound?" In some cases, it may be possible to choose a diagnostic tool with a lower risk. Reject "defensive medicine." Up to 90% of scans offer "little to no medical value," according to studies. Ask your doctor if the benefits outweigh the risks.
Be particularly cautious when it comes to children. Demand lower-dose protocols or non-radiation options for young patients given their higher risk.
CT scans save lives when used judiciously, but their rampant overuse—driven by profit, fear of lawsuits, and outdated medical dogma—has created a silent epidemic. As Dr. Smith-Bindman warns, "These future cancers can be reduced by avoiding unnecessary scans." Until the healthcare system prioritizes prevention over profit, patients must arm themselves with knowledge and push back when needed.
Follow CancerCauses.news for more related stories.
Sources for this article include:
DailyMail.co.uk
ICR.ac.uk
UCSF.edu
ScienceAlert.com
Croatia
Uz ograničavanje CT skeniranja, potrebno je uzimati Lugolovu otopinu, prije i poslije skeniranja
When you have cancer, they scan you every three months.
There are supplements you can take to mitigate radiation damage if a CT scan is necessary. Here is an article by Life Extension listing several things that can help, such as NAC, SAMe, polyphenols, Vit A, E, and C, to name a few. It is recommended to start several days prior to the scan and continue for several days after. They also sell a supplement called X-Ray Shield with spirulina to help detox.
I had my first CT Scan a couple of years ago and followed this protocol. I even looked up the 'peak of action' for the supplements and took them so the timing of peak action coincided with the time of the scan. ie) melatonin's peak is in one hour, NAC is around four hours.
Unfortunately, I didn't save this data, but it is readily available in a google search.
I had my first CT Scan a couple of years ago and followed this protocol. I even looked up the 'peak of action' for the supplements and took them so the timing of peak action coincided with the time of the scan. ie) melatonin's peak is in one hour, NAC is around four hours.
Unfortunately, I didn't save this data, but it is readily available in a google search.
Trending content
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 29K -
-
-
