Cancer: causes and cures

3DStudent said:
Thank you for sharing your story, I found it really inspiring! I'm going to try it out, as I have some familial issues as well. I figure we can sort of respect the divine in others, realizing they're a part of the whole with their own lessons. And of course it doesn't mean we will be on the same path and may part with them. And they're doing the best they can with the knowledge they have at the moment.

So yeah, even if I have an idea, I don't expect it to necessarily work anytime soon. I think like you had, maybe an unexpected event has to happen where it's not forced. But at the very least, having the seed of that knowledge should help. There's probably something to say about love being knowledge, which helps to heal these things. Thanks again. :-)
Click to expand...
I have repeated many times in this forum the usefulness in reading A Wanderer’s Handbook. It’s channeled and written by the people who did the Ra channeling. Mostly Carla, then abridged later by her husband to make it shorter.

It’s worth the time, if found it very helpful to learn to adjust mindsets- especially towards or fellow earthlings.


Free download, I was so impressed I bought a hard copy.

A Wanderer's Handbook

A Wanderer's Handbook is a reference manual for spiritual outsiders: people who feel they may be ETs or who feel they are isolated in their spiritual journey.
www.llresearch.org
 
Glenn said:
You know, since my diagnosis of multiple myeloma, I have been wondering about this. I have for years now been taking large doses of supplements. Vit C, NAC, you name it, pretty much all the things discussed here, and yet, it didn't seem to help avoiding the present diagnosis.

Maybe it has mitigated things, who knows, as maybe things would be worse than without them.

I think that karmic things, or decisions made before incarnation are stronger, and are meant to direct or enhance your progress at this time when things are accelerating. Or like someone else said, you can look at it maybe like you need some DNA upgrades, and some more suffering is needed to help things along... Some thoughts.
Click to expand...
You know, I would like to add to these thoughts, as I have kind of observed something in my ongoing treatments.

Every time you go for the weekly treatments, (steriod/chemo) they ask you a slew of questions, any pain, any swelling, any rashes, hows your bowels/sleep/ to name a few. So far those answers have been no, I think that all those supplements have sort of paid things forward. I think those are common effects, not only from the condition itself, but for the treatments given for it. And to not have them so far tells me that something is working.

Of course, the prayers you have given can not be discounted. 🙏

So, so far so good.👍
 
Here's a tweet that puzzle me a little bit.
It's ok about Fenbendazole as being effective vs cancer, but the other thing that this tweet claims is new to me, and i do not know what to think about. From what i read or learn so far, cells become cancerous when they lack oxygen (for which the cause would be mainly due to the electrosmog, in summary) and go into fermentation mode. But this tweet says that it's caused by a parasite. And it's true that the Fenbendazole or the ivermectin (and the 2 others) are both anti-parasite drugs. So ... what to think about ? Could it be, for some cancers, a combination of both ? Something like when you have cells that goes into fermentation mode they are good preys of some sort of parasites which "mutate" them into cancerous cells ?

Here's the translation of the french text :

3 weeks of #Fenbendazole and nothing at all 😖🤦🏽‍♂️

CANCER IS A PARASITE... !!!

A new protocol for the treatment of cancer has arrived, which is supposed to destroy the multi-billion dollar cancer industry.
The protocol confirms that the true nature of cancer is a parasite, so
If you have cancer, or know someone who does, mention it and help them start their cancer journey.
Cancer is a parasite: the cure is anti-parasite. The truth has been known for decades...

https://twitter.com/x/status/1899772598596108575
 
Saw this today:

Exciting News: Peer-Reviewed Publication of Groundbreaking Cancer Protocol

"We are pleased to announce that the first-of-its-kind protocol utilizing Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole for cancer treatment has been peer-reviewed and officially published on September 19, 2024.

This study and protocol align with the work the Beat Cancer Foundation has been advocating and educating clients about for nearly five years Our focus on metabolic therapies, non-toxic repurposed drugs, and integrative treatments has contributed to improved survival times, disease stabilization, and our ultimate goal—achieving complete remission.

We would like to extend our deepest gratitude to the lead authors, Dr. Ilyes Baghli and Dr. Pierrick Martinez, for their groundbreaking contributions to advancing new therapeutic strategies for cancer."

 
I want to start a discussion thread regarding the new and most recent of orthomolecular medicine, released in September 2024. I know that there are some controversial aspects already discussed in other threads and even by the C's, and it is regarding the use of intravenous vitamin c versus oral vitamin c as is the case of the lipisomal vitamin. According to this review by prominent orthomolecular doctors such as Dr Baghli and Dr Makis, who consider turbo cancers a consequence of covid vaccines, intravenous vitamin c in megadoses does offer a great benefit, however it would be worth discussing with evidence which is more convenient. Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol
 
broken.english said:
En mi opinión, la ingesta oral de vitamina C en grandes cantidades, como 10 g al día, no es viable para la mayoría de las personas debido a problemas de tolerancia intestinal. Lo que a mí me funciona sin problemas es la vía intravenosa.

En cuanto a la tasa de éxito en los tratamientos contra el cáncer, no tengo experiencia.
Click to expand...
what dosage you use and for what purpose what dosage you use and for what purpose?
 
The other aspect of alternative cancer care is the MMS (Miracle Mineral Solution) as advertised by Jim Humble, that is a 2% sodium chlorite solution, has popped up again from sources that I generally assess as reliable, and backed by studies that seem to be reliable, too.

Maybe we should reassess this aspect, too?
 
( Slightly off topic ) Re. Jim Humble :

Session 26 April 2010 :

(...)

(Rabelais) Who are Jim Humble's handlers?

A: This sort of thing works through several levels of deniability. Therefore, few so called cointelpro agents realize that they have made a pact with the "devil".

Q: (Perceval) Was their motivation for inviting him financial?

A: Yes.

Q: (Perceval) They figured they could sell a lot of his stuff.

(Ailén) It still sounds fishy because of this creation of his religion. Where'd he get that idea from?

A: Remember why you discontinued your subscription to the magazine?

Q: (L) Yeah, because it had become nothing but what I would consider to be cointelpro. It was like the whole character of it changed. I cancelled my subscription back when we lived in Florida, and that was eight or nine years ago. And I wasn't interested in anything they were doing since. So you asked something about the religion thing?

(Ailén) Yeah, where did that idea come from?

A: Humble is "handled" at a different level. You could say that he is more in the league with Vincent Bridges and his ilk.

Q: (L) Well, you said that Vinnie was like a "hot popper", and pathological. Does that apply to Jim Humble?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) So, that means that he is some type of psychopath?

A: Yes.

(...)
 
broken.english said:
Fueron 7,5 g (parece ser el estándar en Alemania) intravenosos y formaban parte de un protocolo sanitario general emitido por mi médico. Así que no hay un objetivo específico en este caso.
Click to expand...
wow but what this protocol says is that for cancer and its metastasis is one mg/kg of weight 2 or 3 times per week, if you weigh 60 kilos the minimum would be 50 to 150gr per week.
 
In powdered form 1x 7,5 or x2 daily 3,5g Vitamin C seems doable without major issues, ( fwiw , i'm not a trained health pro. ) , from personal experience , a bit over 14 years ago got up to - 8g for a while , my normal weight was well below normal back when , close to 60kg actually , when it's normal range is usually about 80 to 85kg , These days i do about a half tablespoon of it daily on empty stomach and have no bowel issues from it , to say that if there's no biological malfunction to prevent it , the human body should expel any non needed excess , like say with magnesium , however with ( oral ) liposomal vitamtin C maybe there's no need for such volume daily for a positive impact , especially when combined with iodine (ie) . ( fwiiw / my 2x cents/ blah )
 
saxigari said:
wow but what this protocol says is that for cancer and its metastasis is one mg/kg of weight 2 or 3 times per week, if you weigh 60 kilos the minimum would be 50 to 150gr per week.
Click to expand...

The various protocols on IV vitamin C vary widely. For example this paper here has the following proposal:
PROPOSED HYBRID ORTHOMOLECULAR PROTOCOL

Intravenous Vitamin C
Intermediate- and high-grade cancers:
Dose of 1.5g/kg/day, 2-3x per week (Fan, et al., 2023).
Established as a non-toxic dose for cancer patients
(Wang, F., et al., 2019).

Earlier in the same paper they refer to the pioneers of IV vitamin C therapy who used much lower quantities:

"The pioneers of intravenous vitamin C cancer treatment,
Cameron and Pauling, observed improved survival times
for many cancers (lung, stomach, colon, breast, kidney,
rectum, and bladder). They observed survival times multiplied by 55 after 1 year, in terminal cancer patients treated
with intravenous injections of ascorbate: 22% in the
treated group and 0.4% in the control group in patients
considered to be incurable following standard treatment.
Their intervention consisted of an intravenous injection of
10 g/day for approximately 10 days and orally thereafter
(Cameron & Pauling, 1978)."

The difference between these two protocols is huge. Just as an idea, maybe the appropriate dosage could be determined on an individual basis by use of kinesiology.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom