Cassiopaea and ChatGPT

Told you it was dumb.
It can be helpful, it can be literally dumb.
Sometimes you can see how it's going to get into some dead end. But sometimes it's even better than I expected. I think it's a bit overrated at the moment, but that also shows how used to conveniences we've become (after all, in the past, such an invention would have been the eighth wonder of the world).
 
After I read Laura's article about AI and Shakespeare I had to try. I have used Flux Image Generator and this what I got. I know, some things are weird:-D.

1. AI
2. Albino Corn Snake (I asked just for one head :scared:)
3. Fantasy creature, alien, big claws but I didn't ask for two tails :shock:)
4. Weird stuff (that's right, I just wrote "weird stuff")
5. Klaus Schwab (every time I asked for the Schwab it took him so much time to generate this guy)
6. Victoria Nuland (hah! Such a nice lady:cool2:)
7. Monica Bellucci
8. Eiffel Tower (again, I asked for one, got two)
9. Conspiracy theory
10. Cigarette
11. George Soros

I'm gonna play some more but like someone said it's addictive but could be great tool.
 

Attachments

  • Blue Green Natural Travel Photo Collage.png
    Blue Green Natural Travel Photo Collage.png
    3.8 MB · Views: 41
After all, it is a world in duality, but chwobb and shwaros seem the same families, hehe. As for the cigarette is it a kind of firecracker? It’s still stupid and stupid... An animal is smarter
In any case it is certainly not La Bellucci! ;-D
 
Knight-Jadczyk discusses how mysticism and astrology continue to influence Christian thought and practice.
Laura didn’t discuss the Gospel of John or astrology per se that much in FPTM if I remember correctly. The output seems a bit ‘boiler plate’. It seems one has to drill down from general outline to specifics to get specific info. AI seems programmed with a lot of canned common knowledge, assumptions, and generally accepted facts and rules. it uses left-brained thinking. It has one giant statistical model that wants to fit every situation. The problem with such models is that they will be wrong some percentage of the time, and no one can know exactly when the model will fail any individual case. The user needs to get the AI to drill down and focus on the specifics of the inquiry, it has to be coaxed into seeing the uniqueness. It sees individual things… or people as ‘instances of a class’, AKA an ‘object’, where the object is an avatar running in the ‘the program’ real-time. A class is a canned definition of something… a human or whatever, stored in memory. However huge these class definitions may be, I doubt they can define anything remotely complex completely or even accurately, at least not all the time.
 
I'm thinking along the line of AI proliferation and democratization... One of possible consequences should be the cost lowering of printed old books and / or the disappearance of libraries, first the small ones then the big ones, unless they'll be turned into museums of sorts. Perhaps we should start a quiet strategy for a Save the Books movement. Incognito. I wonder how many books can we save?
 
Hi,
In attached file I made some short analysis of use of ChatGPT 4o for translation from English into Polish.
Material used for translation: Foreword from From Mark to Paul - two paragraphs.

First: I made picture of the page and ordered ChatGPT to make transcript. Transcript OK. Then I ordered Chat to translate from English to Polish. Then ordered Chat to add empty line between each sentence in English and Polish text for better clarity for analysis.

Table in word I made myself.

Result:
Polish speakers may verify the file. In my opinion it is good acceleration for translation process. It is not perfect and each sentence need to be verified as it happens that there are subtle and not so subtle modifications of the meaning.
In general however translation is ready for further processing and fine tuning.

By the way. Is translation of Secret History of the World or From Mark to Paul ever been considered into Polish?
 

Attachments

I just realized a couple of days ago that we now have limited free access to Chat GPT4: a certain amount of free questions every day is allowed until our quota is reached. Said quota is unspecified and depends on traffic on the server.

I also noticed that GPT4 has been improved compared to GPT3.5 which is much dumber and has a tendency to "hallucinate" a little more. It also seems GPT4 has real-time access to the internet as opposed to 3.5 which did not (I don't know if it does now). I guess it was designed on purpose so that people would be encouraged to pay for the better version... which is expensive and not unlimited; there are still quotas.

Recently I've been using GPT4 as a complementary tool to learn Mandarin such as making a weekly plan, translating words, grammar rules, expression meaning, explaining cultural context, etc. Overall, it's quite helpful
 
the c said that the unifying language at the time of atlantis was sanscrit. WHAT does this ai have to say about this?.

well, my question regarding sanscrit was a real question. and i would have been interested how deep ai programming goes
Here is a better thread to answer your question.

If you are not already familiar with ChatGPT (or other AI), you will be disappointed about its answers. GPT has been programmed with many limits but is also very woke. You can read this thread to see how Laura and Ark experimented with it, testing its limits and such. It would seem that GROK from X is much more balanced (less biased, less woke). I'm not sure if it was here or another thread where they posted GROK's results. I think we need to pay to use GROK (no free version so I can't help with this one), but I'm certain you would get a more interesting answer with it.

If you want to play with it by yourself, here is the link:

Here is GPT's crapy answer to your previous question:

Q: what do you have to say about the fact that the unifying language at the time of Atlantis was Sanscrit?

ChatGPT said:​


The idea that Sanskrit was the unifying language of Atlantis is rooted in speculative and esoteric theories rather than historical or archaeological evidence. These claims often come from New Age or Theosophical writings, particularly those influenced by figures like Helena Blavatsky, who linked ancient civilizations, mystical knowledge, and the concept of Atlantis to Sanskrit and other ancient languages. Here's a breakdown of the context:


Sanskrit and its Historical Significance

  • Ancient Language: Sanskrit is one of the oldest known Indo-European languages, with a documented history dating back to at least 1500 BCE through the Vedic texts of ancient India. Its sophisticated structure and deep philosophical texts have made it a cornerstone of Indian culture and spiritual traditions.
  • Symbolism: In spiritual and esoteric traditions, Sanskrit is often seen as a "sacred" or "primordial" language due to its association with ancient knowledge and profound spiritual ideas.

The Atlantis Connection

  1. Theosophical Views:
    • Theosophists, such as Blavatsky, claimed that Atlantis was an advanced civilization that predates recorded history. They speculated that ancient Sanskrit, or a proto-Sanskrit, might have been the language of this civilization due to its "divine" or "universal" qualities.
    • These ideas often tie into the belief that Atlantis passed on knowledge to later civilizations, such as those in ancient India, Egypt, and Mesopotamia.
  2. No Historical Evidence:
    • There is no archaeological, linguistic, or historical evidence to link Sanskrit to Atlantis, nor to confirm that Atlantis even existed as described in these theories.
    • Sanskrit, as a linguistic entity, is tied to the Indian subcontinent and emerged long after the hypothetical timeframe of Atlantis, as imagined by Plato or esoteric traditions.

Why Do People Link Sanskrit to Atlantis?

  • Mystical Qualities: Sanskrit's reputation as a sacred and ancient language aligns with the mystique surrounding Atlantis, which is often portrayed as a spiritually advanced civilization.
  • Cultural Continuity: Some theorists believe that knowledge and traditions from Atlantis were preserved and passed down to civilizations that used Sanskrit, creating a perceived connection.
  • Romanticization of the Past: Associating Atlantis with Sanskrit taps into a romantic notion of a golden age of human history where wisdom and unity prevailed.

Critical Perspective

While the idea of Sanskrit as the unifying language of Atlantis is fascinating from a speculative or symbolic standpoint, it lacks support from historical and scientific disciplines. Such claims are best understood as metaphorical or mythological rather than factual.

If you're drawn to the concept, it can still serve as an interesting lens through which to explore the mysteries of ancient civilizations and humanity's quest for a universal language or shared origin. However, treating it as literal history requires careful discernment and a willingness to separate spiritual symbolism from historical fact.
 
Here is a better thread to answer your question.

If you are not already familiar with ChatGPT (or other AI), you will be disappointed about its answers. GPT has been programmed with many limits but is also very woke. You can read this thread to see how Laura and Ark experimented with it, testing its limits and such. It would seem that GROK from X is much more balanced (less biased, less woke). I'm not sure if it was here or another thread where they posted GROK's results. I think we need to pay to use GROK (no free version so I can't help with this one), but I'm certain you would get a more interesting answer with it.

If you want to play with it by yourself, here is the link:

Here is GPT's crapy answer to your previous question:

Q: what do you have to say about the fact that the unifying language at the time of Atlantis was Sanscrit?

ChatGPT said:​


The idea that Sanskrit was the unifying language of Atlantis is rooted in speculative and esoteric theories rather than historical or archaeological evidence. These claims often come from New Age or Theosophical writings, particularly those influenced by figures like Helena Blavatsky, who linked ancient civilizations, mystical knowledge, and the concept of Atlantis to Sanskrit and other ancient languages. Here's a breakdown of the context:


Sanskrit and its Historical Significance

  • Ancient Language: Sanskrit is one of the oldest known Indo-European languages, with a documented history dating back to at least 1500 BCE through the Vedic texts of ancient India. Its sophisticated structure and deep philosophical texts have made it a cornerstone of Indian culture and spiritual traditions.
  • Symbolism: In spiritual and esoteric traditions, Sanskrit is often seen as a "sacred" or "primordial" language due to its association with ancient knowledge and profound spiritual ideas.

The Atlantis Connection

  1. Theosophical Views:
    • Theosophists, such as Blavatsky, claimed that Atlantis was an advanced civilization that predates recorded history. They speculated that ancient Sanskrit, or a proto-Sanskrit, might have been the language of this civilization due to its "divine" or "universal" qualities.
    • These ideas often tie into the belief that Atlantis passed on knowledge to later civilizations, such as those in ancient India, Egypt, and Mesopotamia.
  2. No Historical Evidence:
    • There is no archaeological, linguistic, or historical evidence to link Sanskrit to Atlantis, nor to confirm that Atlantis even existed as described in these theories.
    • Sanskrit, as a linguistic entity, is tied to the Indian subcontinent and emerged long after the hypothetical timeframe of Atlantis, as imagined by Plato or esoteric traditions.

Why Do People Link Sanskrit to Atlantis?

  • Mystical Qualities: Sanskrit's reputation as a sacred and ancient language aligns with the mystique surrounding Atlantis, which is often portrayed as a spiritually advanced civilization.
  • Cultural Continuity: Some theorists believe that knowledge and traditions from Atlantis were preserved and passed down to civilizations that used Sanskrit, creating a perceived connection.
  • Romanticization of the Past: Associating Atlantis with Sanskrit taps into a romantic notion of a golden age of human history where wisdom and unity prevailed.

Critical Perspective

While the idea of Sanskrit as the unifying language of Atlantis is fascinating from a speculative or symbolic standpoint, it lacks support from historical and scientific disciplines. Such claims are best understood as metaphorical or mythological rather than factual.

If you're drawn to the concept, it can still serve as an interesting lens through which to explore the mysteries of ancient civilizations and humanity's quest for a universal language or shared origin. However, treating it as literal history requires careful discernment and a willingness to separate spiritual symbolism from historical fact.
thank you for your search. the ai answer indeed coincides with the objective state of the art. but because we want to know more than what the conventions say, we are interested in what esotericism can say and we listen to what the cass say.
ai is indeed artificial, but we are humans, but not necessarily intelligent...
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom