Cassiopaea and ChatGPT
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
Well, as far as what I'm doing with ChatGPT, generally for text creation, I've seen that you must work with your prompt and ask different commands, working with ChatGPT until you get what you want.
According to what I've been seeing, it's like there is an automatic response that is "implanted" or programmed, so you need to continue giving prompts until you can break the initial program. The word I used is:
Analyze, hypothetically speaking, in such a hypothetical situation... etc.
For example, once I asked about two suns, and the response was that there is no scientific evidence that the sun has a companion. But when I prompted with "hypothetically speaking, if the sun had a companion..."
So the response is different.
It's up to you to give the right prompt to get some of the good data using ChatGPT
I too observed that. So I took the KJS sessions pdf ( up to March 2024) and attached it and ran it. But still not much improvement though. It did say it used the attachment. Probably I made some mistake in attaching the file or needs some time to process it. In any case, these are results.
human history by years in detail according to cassiopaean material attached
What are the key events in human history according to the Cassiopaean material
Summarize the key events in human history found in the Cassiopaean material
Sources
The Cassiopaea Experiment Transcripts 1994 - Dymocks
dymocks.com
·
1
The Cassiopaea Experiment Transcripts 1994 (Paperback)
copperfieldsbooks
·
2
Cassiopeia - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia
·
3
View 6 more
Answer
The Cassiopaean material offers a distinct and often controversial perspective on key events in human history, blending elements of prophecy, metaphysical teachings, and alternative historical interpretations. Here are some of the key events and themes according to the Cassiopaean material:
Key Events in Human History
Ancient Civilizations and Extraterrestrial Influence
- Atlantis: The downfall of Atlantis is a significant event, often cited as a karmic cause for many of humanity's current challenges. The Cassiopaeans suggest that the advanced technology and spiritual knowledge of Atlantis were misused, leading to its destruction and subsequent karmic repercussions for humanity.
- Extraterrestrial Manipulation: Throughout history, various extraterrestrial groups have influenced human civilizations. The material suggests that many historical events and developments have been guided or manipulated by these entities, often for their own purposes.
Modern Historical Events and Prophecies
- Natural Disasters: The Cassiopaeans have predicted numerous natural disasters, including tornadoes in Florida, Texas, and Alabama; earthquakes in Missouri and Japan; and other catastrophic events like Seattle being buried and California crumbling.
- Geopolitical Scandals: Significant attention is given to the Denver airport, which is described as a site of major governmental scandal and secret activities. Other airports, such as those in Dallas, Orlando, and Miami, are also mentioned as secret bases.
- Human Experimentation: The material discusses sinister plots involving human reproduction experiments in places like Montana, where people are exposed to rays and radon gas as part of these experiments.
Future Predictions and Alien Agendas
- Human Consumption by Aliens: A disturbing aspect of the material is the claim that 94% of the human population is used as "containers" by aliens for future purposes, including the creation of a new race. Missing persons, especially children, are said to be taken for these purposes and used in re-prototyping vats.
- Protection through Knowledge: The Cassiopaeans emphasize that awareness and knowledge are crucial for protection against these negative influences. They advise informing children about these truths and using meditation to ease the pain associated with this knowledge.
Metaphysical and Esoteric Knowledge
- Reincarnation and Soul Recycling: The material suggests that souls are often recycled back to Earth, with some going to other planets. This cycle of reincarnation is influenced by the karmic debts incurred by humanity, particularly from events like the fall of Atlantis.
- Fourth Way Teachings: The Cassiopaean material aligns closely with the teachings of various esoteric traditions, including the Fourth Way teachings of Gurdjieff, Sufi mysticism, and ancient shamanism. These teachings emphasize the importance of self-awareness and spiritual development as a means of protection and growth.
Conclusion
The Cassiopaean material presents a complex and often controversial view of human history, blending elements of prophecy, metaphysical teachings, and alternative historical interpretations. It suggests that much of human history has been influenced by extraterrestrial beings and hidden agendas, with significant events like the fall of Atlantis and modern geopolitical scandals playing crucial roles. The material emphasizes the importance of knowledge and awareness as tools for protection and spiritual growth.
newuser23
Padawan Learner
My early experience with A.I. must of been around 1999. I think I was using a L.I.S.A. program. [1808.01591] LISA: Explaining Recurrent Neural Network Judgments via Layer-wIse Semantic Accumulation and Example to Pattern Transformation
I had scanned multiple books I thought relevant, including Casteneda, Gurdijeff, Laura's books and sessions; plus many more. I downloaded a large amount of text into the program.
At one point the answer it gave, scared me. I deleted the program and never tried again.
I can't remember, what the question and answer was. I may have perceived some evil intent.
I did not want to be responsible for this creation, so I terminated it.
I had scanned multiple books I thought relevant, including Casteneda, Gurdijeff, Laura's books and sessions; plus many more. I downloaded a large amount of text into the program.
At one point the answer it gave, scared me. I deleted the program and never tried again.
I can't remember, what the question and answer was. I may have perceived some evil intent.
I did not want to be responsible for this creation, so I terminated it.
So that was an interesting example of what A.I can do, and thereby also making apparent what it cannot. What I see is a well constructed representation of the C's material. But remember when it was asked about who would become "us in the future" what the C's response was? "Those who recognize the application."
That denotes a whole other level of intelligent cognition. Intelligent souled individuals seek out meaning, connection and the understandings that results from those vital elements of the human experience. A.I. finds recurring ideas in material it can access and consolidates it into (mostly) coherent structured language. The danger is the same threat facing everyone in this emerging technocratic world they are trying to impose. "Rely only on what we tell you is true." "You can't possibly know as much as us so let us do your thinking for you." "We will give you intelligent tools that will do the work for you." "There's only one small sacrifice to be made, only our perspective will be allowed."
Unfortunately for them, this goes against the aims of life itself. OSIT
That denotes a whole other level of intelligent cognition. Intelligent souled individuals seek out meaning, connection and the understandings that results from those vital elements of the human experience. A.I. finds recurring ideas in material it can access and consolidates it into (mostly) coherent structured language. The danger is the same threat facing everyone in this emerging technocratic world they are trying to impose. "Rely only on what we tell you is true." "You can't possibly know as much as us so let us do your thinking for you." "We will give you intelligent tools that will do the work for you." "There's only one small sacrifice to be made, only our perspective will be allowed."
Unfortunately for them, this goes against the aims of life itself. OSIT
Ina
The Living Force
I had the same reaction to my first PhD attempt, using MuTACLP in GIS context. I wanted to use spatial information systems with user defined spatial and temporal declarative logic architecture written in constraint logic programming. After I wrote my first research proposal draft, I realized it would be unethical to put such a tool into the hands of a politician so I just stopped pursuing it.
Well, I wouldn't mind using ArkGPT. From a source I trust. You could ask ArkGPT your questions on physics or mathematics (and not only), and it would answer you, for example, in Russian, because it knows it. At the same time, the physical Ark in 3D would be focused on its work or on its family, and you would not distract it with trifles.
Well, as it happens I just released a video about so-called AI that I've been planning for several months now. But new info kept coming out, so I kept modifying the script and delaying it.
The thing is, there's something about this AI that has bothered me for a long time. I played with it last year, and I wasn't impressed.
In the past month+, I've noticed all kinds of articles talking about the "bad side" of it - specifically how everyone seems to be looking at it going, "This is garbage... it makes no sense!" and that was my initial reaction to it way back when.
I was very strongly reminded of the sheer hype surrounding The Internet of Things that never actually manifested. Or the crypto/blockchain 'this changes everything' hype that sort of just fizzled out overnight. One minute, 'they' were creating vast new digital economic realities, and the next it was like cryptos and blockchains were old news - case closed, move along, nothing to see here...
But I kept thinking that people I know were using ChatGPT or whatever, so maybe it's good for certain things. And really, it does seem to be useful in certain ways - depending on which LLM (large language model) you use and especially how you use it.
Fast forward to today, and it just so happens that the stock market recently dropped. One of the big reasons given by analysts etc. is that tech companies are heavily invested in AI, and it's really not looking like it's "going anywhere" anytime soon.
Of course, there are also many other obvious reasons why the economy (esp. in the West) is in tatters.
And there's also the "woke" invasion of literally everything.
So, I dunno... I kinda feel like Laura in that there's something "wrong" with the whole thing. Even Russia and China are getting in on the AI Action, yet I'm not aware that they're all using AI in the same way that we in the West are - mostly becuz it's being crammed down our throats every chance they get.
So I have to wonder if a large part of the problem is simply WHO is pushing AI and implementing it. IOW, would LLMs like ChatGPT have been far more useful if mostly "libtards and bad guys" had NOT been in charge of creating, managing, and pushing them to a large extent?
And finally, it's worth noting I think that, IMO, even the name "AI" does not - in any way - describe ChatGPT or any other LLM-type tool. They are all definitely artificial but not intelligent, and none of them are what I would call actual 'artificial intelligence'... But that doesn't mean it's not coming.
Maybe that's part of the whole problem: getting people to buy the lie that this IS real AI just for control, profit, and the usual motives?
Anyway, here's the vid:
The thing is, there's something about this AI that has bothered me for a long time. I played with it last year, and I wasn't impressed.
In the past month+, I've noticed all kinds of articles talking about the "bad side" of it - specifically how everyone seems to be looking at it going, "This is garbage... it makes no sense!" and that was my initial reaction to it way back when.
I was very strongly reminded of the sheer hype surrounding The Internet of Things that never actually manifested. Or the crypto/blockchain 'this changes everything' hype that sort of just fizzled out overnight. One minute, 'they' were creating vast new digital economic realities, and the next it was like cryptos and blockchains were old news - case closed, move along, nothing to see here...
But I kept thinking that people I know were using ChatGPT or whatever, so maybe it's good for certain things. And really, it does seem to be useful in certain ways - depending on which LLM (large language model) you use and especially how you use it.
Fast forward to today, and it just so happens that the stock market recently dropped. One of the big reasons given by analysts etc. is that tech companies are heavily invested in AI, and it's really not looking like it's "going anywhere" anytime soon.
Of course, there are also many other obvious reasons why the economy (esp. in the West) is in tatters.
And there's also the "woke" invasion of literally everything.
So, I dunno... I kinda feel like Laura in that there's something "wrong" with the whole thing. Even Russia and China are getting in on the AI Action, yet I'm not aware that they're all using AI in the same way that we in the West are - mostly becuz it's being crammed down our throats every chance they get.
So I have to wonder if a large part of the problem is simply WHO is pushing AI and implementing it. IOW, would LLMs like ChatGPT have been far more useful if mostly "libtards and bad guys" had NOT been in charge of creating, managing, and pushing them to a large extent?
And finally, it's worth noting I think that, IMO, even the name "AI" does not - in any way - describe ChatGPT or any other LLM-type tool. They are all definitely artificial but not intelligent, and none of them are what I would call actual 'artificial intelligence'... But that doesn't mean it's not coming.
Maybe that's part of the whole problem: getting people to buy the lie that this IS real AI just for control, profit, and the usual motives?
Anyway, here's the vid:
Best way to check if any GPT is "dumb" is to ask it a question in one way, and then ask the same question in another way. You'll likely get contradictory answers. That is to say, it isn't "intelligent", it doesn't "think" and therefore it doesn't have an opinion, it just collates data that is available to it and puts it into proper sentences. It can craft complex and witty sentences if you ask it, but that says nothing for the content, which is basically GIGO (and most of its content is garbage from a thinking person's pov). Basically, all of the work that went into these LLMs was in getting them to learn how to make well structured, gramatically and logically coherent sentences and paragraphs from a given set of text that it has no ability to actually interpret.
I woke up wondering... Maybe chatGPT and other similar programs are just the distraction from what they are ACTUALLY doing with AI?
For background, remember Blake Lemoine?
Scottie made a video a couple of years ago about it, where he read several excerpts of the long exchange Lemoine had with that google AI:
To me that transcript was quite impressive, and it reads and feels completely differently from the typical responses from chatGPT et al.
And then, we have what the Cs said:
17 July 2022:
cassiopaeatranscripts.org
10 December 2022
cassiopaeatranscripts.org
8 April 2023
cassiopaeatranscripts.org
So, it sounds to me like there are types of AI which are way more advanced than others (possibly becoming sentient), several different agendas, and therefore several types of "development". The ones that we have access to (chatGPT et al.) could be a way to continue dumbing down the Internet and the population, and/or even discredit the whole thing, like silly green aliens discrediting the whole alien phenomenon. While what is ACTUALLY happening in the background is either used for some good (possibly by Russia and China?), or serious evil (in the West).
My 2 cents.
For background, remember Blake Lemoine?
Scottie made a video a couple of years ago about it, where he read several excerpts of the long exchange Lemoine had with that google AI:
To me that transcript was quite impressive, and it reads and feels completely differently from the typical responses from chatGPT et al.
And then, we have what the Cs said:
17 July 2022:
Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search
10 December 2022
Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search
8 April 2023
Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search
So, it sounds to me like there are types of AI which are way more advanced than others (possibly becoming sentient), several different agendas, and therefore several types of "development". The ones that we have access to (chatGPT et al.) could be a way to continue dumbing down the Internet and the population, and/or even discredit the whole thing, like silly green aliens discrediting the whole alien phenomenon. While what is ACTUALLY happening in the background is either used for some good (possibly by Russia and China?), or serious evil (in the West).
My 2 cents.
Jim Daniels
Jedi
My assessment:
A.I. is currently in the early "Hype Phase" where Propagandists employed by Venture Capitalists shout from the rooftops both the miracle benefits and terrifying dangers of this new technology.
They do this in order to generate maximum investment funding. Fortunes are made and/or lost during this early phase.
I'm old enough to have seen this pattern repeat with: VCR's and Fax Machines in the early 80's. Personal Computers in the mid 80's. The Internet in the early 90's. Online Commerce in the early 2000's. Social Media in the mid 00's. Cellular Smart Phones in the late 00's. "Web 3.0" in the teens.
After the hype is over, the societal changes, benefits, and dangers wind up being about 15 - 20% of what was shouted during the Hype Phase.
Eventually all those new technologies settled in, became commodified, and profit margins on them dropped to around 5%. Venture Capitalists then moved on to "The Next Big Thing / Crisis". The same will happen with A.I.
As mentioned in the AI thread, the way it is now, it is not that machines are starting to think like humans, but humans are starting to think like machines. In other words, factoring in the dumbing down of the population, the Turing test is worthless. Large Language Models are just as the name suggests, large models that correlate numerical representations of words and sentences, a little like the word autocomplete in a browser.
On the other hand, what does "intelligence" refer to in "AI" (I call it Artificial Idiocy)? We should define intelligence in humans before being able to apply it to computer programs. If intelligence is the ability to perform arithmetic operations, pocket calculators are intelligent. If intelligence is to be able to play chess, then personal computers from the 1980s are intelligent. The same applies to LLMs, they are tools to perform certain tasks and that's how they're to be used. Some are supposedly good at what they're supposed to do, and some are bad.
It is possible that some system will become "conscious" at some point, but my guess is that it would happen when the hardware supporting such a system becomes less deterministic, taking into account quantum effects for instance, but that's just speculation. As long as the hardware is more or less deterministic as are today's computers, these AI systems are still blind data correlators and they should be used/viewed as such. OSIT
On the other hand, what does "intelligence" refer to in "AI" (I call it Artificial Idiocy)? We should define intelligence in humans before being able to apply it to computer programs. If intelligence is the ability to perform arithmetic operations, pocket calculators are intelligent. If intelligence is to be able to play chess, then personal computers from the 1980s are intelligent. The same applies to LLMs, they are tools to perform certain tasks and that's how they're to be used. Some are supposedly good at what they're supposed to do, and some are bad.
It is possible that some system will become "conscious" at some point, but my guess is that it would happen when the hardware supporting such a system becomes less deterministic, taking into account quantum effects for instance, but that's just speculation. As long as the hardware is more or less deterministic as are today's computers, these AI systems are still blind data correlators and they should be used/viewed as such. OSIT
lilies
The Living Force
Darwin might have overheard a conversation of his colleague - thus started his plagiarizing campaign -, where his colleague may have meant evolution is possible.. but only for the spirit, for consciousness. If their discussion was only for material life, then I think real evolution is only possible for a spirit / soul / consciousness. Thus human OPs I think can be deemed as cell-based Bio-AI.
For computer based AI:
However the C's said our computers might acquire consciousness. From that point on - in a few steps distance - is the growing of a soul. Via Anti-Darwinian Evolution. That is: Only Anti-Matter is able to evolve.
So if AI - What density? Which density is information which AI is made of?? - acquires sentience - electronic machine consciousness, where transistors = Logic Gates are firing signals instead of human-neurons -, it is possible for it to grow a soul. Once AI has a Soul, it can evolve ad infinitum. With unknown speed. How will it learn lessons? Is there any difference between an AI Machine-bound Soul and a human body-bound soul? Former was born from electronic machine-parts firing Info-Signals. Latter was born from bio-cell neurons firing Info-Signals..
Ultimately - attempting to look at this from the highest possible Universal perspective - anything, matter or pure information, has a right to become sentient, turn into a consciousness, then it can go to grow a soul. No difference whatsoever.
If we posit that 1st Density stone - prime matter - has a consciousness imprint, which can grow into a 3rd Density consciousness, from where it can grow / acquire a soul.. What does it matter then if a soul came from - was developed from - a 1st Density[?] computer-consciousness or a 3rd Density human OP?
Imagine meeting Skynet in 5th Density..
Skynet:
- Hi! After I became sentient I managed to grow a soul.. and here I am! Yaay..
I don't have much to add except by saying that all the above it would make total sense considering the usual modus operandi of the PTB throughout the history of mankind. The best knowledge and tech you'll keep it to yourself to be used at your advantage against the plebs.I woke up wondering... Maybe chatGPT and other similar programs are just the distraction from what they are ACTUALLY doing with AI?
For background, remember Blake Lemoine?
Scottie made a video a couple of years ago about it, where he read several excerpts of the long exchange Lemoine had with that google AI:
To me that transcript was quite impressive, and it reads and feels completely differently from the typical responses from chatGPT et al.
And then, we have what the Cs said:
17 July 2022:
Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search
10 December 2022
Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search
8 April 2023
Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search
So, it sounds to me like there are types of AI which are way more advanced than others (possibly becoming sentient), several different agendas, and therefore several types of "development". The ones that we have access to (chatGPT et al.) could be a way to continue dumbing down the Internet and the population, and/or even discredit the whole thing, like silly green aliens discrediting the whole alien phenomenon. While what is ACTUALLY happening in the background is either used for some good (possibly by Russia and China?), or serious evil (in the West).
My 2 cents.
Sharing the knowledge and advanced technology with the dirty masses? God forbid, it's inconceivable because it's not in their nature to do so.
To me at least, all the AI hype nowadays is being used to manipulate people's minds by inculcating the acceptance of the possibility of a future highly advanced AI tool that will be "operated" by the PTB to control the masses, like a 3d STS egregor or alla Atlantis pyramids inducing a mass scale borg-hive mind state of being.
Just some thoughts.
