True enough, however, the noise to signal ratio isn't very good and there are so many other things that are far more useful in terms of learning the lessons of 3rd density - which is what gets you out of here - that I now consider that path pretty much a waste of time and energy.Madara Horseman said:Honestly, I've had my wtf moments on Fulcanelli, Canseliet and Riviere, but there are things to be learned by all three's findings in my humble opinion. Even Riviere.
(Joe) Is it true that the really tall giants - like 13 or 15 feet - were they alive under the same gravitational conditions as we have today?
A: Not exactly. Conditions on your planet changed significantly at the time of the destruction of the Roman Empire. Giants from that time forward faced increasingly difficult conditions and survival became untenable.
Q: (L) So there were some still left in pockets, is that it?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Those were the ones discovered by explorers after the Dark Ages.
(Chu) Did they have a language we might be familiar with if they lived that recently?
A: Yes
Q: (Chu) Which language?
A: Similar to Basque.
Q: (Andromeda) Like Atlantean. [...]
(Joe) So, gravity was less, let's say, to make it easy for them to...
A: Yes. Also electrical charge of planet.
Q: (L) That reminds me of all the really peculiar electrical phenomena recorded in the ancient Greco-Roman records that seemed to sort of stop when records picked up again after the destruction of the ancient world. But, of course, there were periods when things were really weird even after that. So the people before the end of the Roman Empire were seeing a lot more of our plasma men than we would see nowadays?
A: Yes
Q: (Andromeda) But the giants lived alongside little people then?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And was life easier for normal people then, as well?
A: Yes
Q: (L) It had probably been in decline beginning from even earlier periods...
A: Yes
Q: (L) So that was the last big change I guess, something like 540 AD.
Q: (L) Back to what you said... Okay, who should push to get a machine translator?
A: What elite are doing in preparation. Part of AI initiative.
Q: (L) So they want AI to build a machine translator that can translate alien speech?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Where are they getting alien speech from?
A: Interactions with "aliens".
Q: (L) So they have interactions with aliens now?
A: Yes and are at disadvantage.
Q: (Joe) So it's like they go to meetings with aliens. The aliens talk to them in English or whatever human language, and then they break off and discuss in their alien language? It's like being at a meeting with people you don't understand.
A: Something like that.
(Chu) Wait, what is this alien language like that needs to be translated?
A: Similar to Basque.
Q: (Chu) REALLY?! I KNEW IT! [laughter]
(L) You knew it?
(Chu) Well, they may not have fancy telepathy; they just speak an ancient language, like Basque.
(Approaching Infinity) There was a reference, I think it was a year ago, that Indo-European was the Kantekkian language, right? And it was like the remainder… or I can't remember the word that they used - the remainder of the Kantekkian language that survived and that was the origin of what we call Proto-Indo-European or something like that.
Session 14 January 2023 said:Q: (Ze Germans) What was the first Indo-European language created by the gene builders?
A: Indo-European was not "created". Language emerged into your reality.
Q: (L) It "emerged"...
A: Indo-European was a misnomer for the remnants of the Kantekkian language.
(L) Yeah. Didn't they say something about the Basque language too?
(Chu) That was more recent about the aliens.
(L) That was fairly recent.
(Chu) That was more recent about the alien language.
(L) The alien language.
(Chu) That it was similar to Basque.
(L) That's creepy. So, I would say that the modern, oh, well, okay... Let's ask.
(Altair) Which modern language is closest to Kantekkian?
A: Old Germanic.
Q: (Pierre) I have a question. It was reported that the speed of light was having variation between the twenties and the forties.
(Andromeda) 1929 and 1945.
(Pierre) And what is the cause of this variation?
A: Variations in density subjugation.
Q: (Joe) So does that mean the extent to which planet Earth 3D was subjugated to the influence of higher densities?
A: Density.
Q: (Pierre) And does density have something to do with gravity?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Does this variation in the speed of light affect our connection to the information field?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So it suggests that in 1929, there was a variation in the density subjugation. Does that imply an increased control of...?
A: Gravity wave.
Q: (Joe) Does it have anything to do with the 1929 Great Depression? That's the question.
A: More or less, yes.
Q: (Joe) And you were saying that was about 20 years, and what did you compare? The Great Depression and today?
(Joe) Are variations in the density subjugation a natural phenomenon?
A: Yes
Q: (Gaby) They said gravity wave. So it was something cosmological?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) How do variations in the speed of light affect/modulate the connection between us and the information field?
A: Gravity is the key.
Q: (L) So once you said that gravity is a binder. And you said that gravity is collecting information - or collecting knowledge is like collecting gravity.
A: Yes
Q: (L) Is sharing it like dispersing it?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So...
A: No more on this!
Q: (Joe) It's a very sensitive topic. We might get in trouble. [laughter]
Q: (Pierre) I have a question: Were the genetic modifications induced by the Black Death virus the main cause of the Renaissance?
A: Not main, but contributory.
Q:(Laura) Well, what was the main cause?
A: 4D influences of a psychic nature.