Cassiopaean sessions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arena
  • Start date Start date
Re: cassi transcipt explanation help

anart said:
crystal13 said:
ive just looked back at the cassi transcipts i read. in one it says the humanrace were genetically engineered to be slaves by lizards from qaddeera in the star system zeta reticuli. then later on in the transcripts it says the cassiopeans genetically engineered the humanrace for soul development.
i know weve been tinkered with alot but who engineered us first was it the cassis then the lizzies manipulated our genetics.
thanks for any help. :halo: :huh:
Click to expand...

Hi crystal13, have you read the Wave Series yet?
Click to expand...

Also, if you have a question about a specific session, it would help a lot if you quoted the fragment you wish to discuss, as it is important for the rest of us to see what exactly you are referring to. For example, the statement about the Cassiopaeans genetically engineering humanity; that is not how I remember it at all, although I can see how it could be interpreted that way.

I'm sure the Wave will clarify many things for you. Enjoy! :)
 
Early cassiopean transcripts

Found copies of cass transcripts at this site: -http://unedited.bravehost.com/allsessions2.html. He spells it -ean not -aean but apart from that it looks like an identical copy. Copycat?


[Mod note: Changed thread title to protect identity of individuals involved in C's sessions.]
 
Re: Early cassiopean transcripts

As far as I know, this was the unedited version. This version doesn't protect the free will of those that have chosen not to reveal their names. Perhaps a mod can change the title and take care of this.
 
Re: Early cassiopean transcripts

3D Student said:
As far as I know, this was the unedited version. This version doesn't protect the free will of those that have chosen not to reveal their names. Perhaps a mod can change the title and take care of this.
Click to expand...

Thank you hithere.

We have taken note of that.
 
Re: Early cassiopean transcripts

Welcome to the forum, Hithere.

Copies of the C's transcripts and short segments of the same appear on various online sites. These unauthorized transcripts are often misinterpreted by readers unfamiliar with the story surrounding the exchange.

Are you familiar with the WAVE series? We recommend that persons read this work in order to fully understand the history and context of what the C's were relaying to Laura at the time of each transcript.

You can purchase the books (http://www.qfgpublishing.com/) or read the series for free online here: http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/waveindex.htm

WAVE Introduction said:
This series of articles, written by Laura Knight-Jadczyk, demonstrates the unique nature of the Cassiopaean Experiment. In her skillful collecting of the pieces of the puzzle from throughout the transcripts, in-depth research, personal experiences, weaving them into a finished product, Laura brings added depth and dimension to the original transmissions. Laura presents what the Cassiopaeans - We are YOU in the future - have to say about the eventuality of The Wave - FROM the future - including an exploration of the limitations of man's present estate, in cognitive, biological, historical and ontological terms.
Click to expand...

Hope this helps
 
Re: Early cassiopean transcripts

Hithere, I suspect that those transcripts are posted by Vincent Bridges and/or Stormbear Williams. They are certainly making false legal statements in assigning ownership of them to another individual. While I am not at liberty to disclose the legal settlement agreement to you due to the terms of the agreement, I have fowarded it to the webhost with a request that they remove those pirated transcripts.
 
Re: Early cassiopean transcripts

As long as the transcripts aren't tampered with, it serves to spread the transcripts and bring further "fame" as the cass labelled it in Mirror, Mirror On The Wall:
"Q: Are we going to be able to survive this flame war and attack from Maynerd and Alvin Wiley? A: No. Q: Why not? A: They will open the door to fame. Q: What?! HOW can that be possible? Huh? (A) From slandering us?! A: No, but have contacts who will be interested. Q: (A) They have ... who? (L) They have contacts that will be interested. That's weird. [...]"

Were they referring to moving out of the USA when they said that you were not going to survive the attack; i.e. metaphoric?
 
Re: Early cassiopean transcripts

In the June, 22 1996 session the cass advise that all their quoted words should be put in sequence:

"Q: (V) I am wondering about the significance of the quoted words. Is it some kind of code?
A: Maybe you should go back to the beginning, and arrange all our quoted statements in sequential order?
Q: (L) Do you mean ALL the transcripts?
A: Yup!"

Will there be posted any on this? Didn't find any reference to it in search cass site.
 
Re: Early cassiopean transcripts

hithere said:
In the June, 22 1996 session the cass advise that all their quoted words should be put in sequence:

"Q: (V) I am wondering about the significance of the quoted words. Is it some kind of code?
A: Maybe you should go back to the beginning, and arrange all our quoted statements in sequential order?
Q: (L) Do you mean ALL the transcripts?
A: Yup!"

Will there be posted any on this? Didn't find any reference to it in search cass site.
Click to expand...

You may find of interest what Laura has written about codes in the transcripts:

[quote author=Laura on August 30, 2008, 03:07:12 AM]. . .indeed there are "codes" in the transcripts, but the years and experience have shown that they only ever mean anything, or lead to anything, to me, personally. Keep in mind that the Cs are "us in the future" and that is not addressed to just anyone, but most particularly to me and to those members of my "soul group." Reading the raw transcripts without knowing the full context will get you nowhere except into just another wishful thinking bubble.[/quote]
 
Re: Early cassiopean transcripts

Thank you for your time to answer that Jerry, I didn't find that reference in my (too quick) search. :)
 
Laura said:
Re: Hello Cassiopaea



Good suggestion. And yes, I think that Organic Portals are an important aspect of this issue.

As I continue to peel away the historical layers in my research, it becomes more and more obvious that the largest segment of the population are the "moral exoskeletons." They rely on "authority" to give them their "world view" and this is a particularly bad thing when the authorities are pathological - psychopathic.

The world wasn't always this way and one of the things that is exercising me at the moment is trying to pinpoint where, when and how psychopathy originated. At the moment, I'm toying with the idea that it is a cross between the Cro-Magnon and the Neanderthal with the "creative drive" of the Cro-Magnon emotional nature and the superior Cro-Magnon brain, being modified by the Neanderthal instinctive substratum (moving center and sex center of Gurdjieff and Mouravieff).

That's my very loose working hypothesis for the moment and I'm digging for clues.

In her book, The Civilization of the Goddess, archaeologist Marija Gimbutas wrote about the differences between the Old European system, which was goddess and woman-centered, and the later Bronze Age Indo-European patriarchal culture which replaced it. The archaeological evidence shows that gynocentric and gylanic societies were peaceful, they honored homosexuals, and they espoused economic equality for all. There were either no psychopaths in these societies, or they understood pathology and actively eliminated it when it was found.

Such a society has the ability to give structure to the OP - those requiring authority to guide their lives - in such a way that their following of authority is healthy and beneficial not only for themselves, but for all others in society.

Psychopathy seems to be at the root of the "androcratic", or male-dominated societies such as the Kurgan peoples that invaded Europe and imposed upon its natives the hierarchical rule of male warriors.
Click to expand...
Just listening to this which touches upon some of the above concepts - being taught to Chinese highschool students


Some AI translated text

The Concept of Old Europe​

Gimbutas referred to the civilization of Old Europe, which thrived before the rise of patriarchal societies. This civilization was marked by:

  • Egalitarianism: There was little distinction between genders, and society was largely peaceful.
  • Artistic Expression: The reverence for the mother goddess was celebrated through art and cave paintings.
  • Compassionate Values: The society was characterized by compassion and a lack of organized warfare.

Linguistic Evidence of Proto-Indo-European​

Linguistic studies have traced many modern European languages back to a common ancestor known as Proto-Indo-European. This language is believed to have originated in either Anatolia (Turkey) or the steppes of Ukraine. Linguists have identified key vocabulary that reflects the culture and lifestyle of these early people, including:

  • Words for Wheel: Indicating they were among the first to invent the wheel.
  • Dairy Products: Suggesting they were the first to develop lactose tolerance, allowing them to consume milk.
  • Domestication of Horses: Indicating they were the first to successfully domesticate horses, which transformed their mobility and lifestyle.

Archaeological and Genetic Evidence​

Recent archaeological discoveries and advances in DNA technology have confirmed many of Gimbutas's hypotheses about the Proto-Indo-Europeans. Evidence shows that these people were taller and healthier due to their dairy-rich diet and that they developed technologies such as the wheel and horse domestication around 3500 BC.

The Transition to Conquest​

The transition from the peaceful societies of Old Europe to the violent conquests by the Proto-Indo-Europeans raises critical questions. Two primary theories exist:

  1. Conquest: This theory posits that the Proto-Indo-Europeans spread their language and culture through violent means, akin to the conquests of Genghis Khan.
  2. Cultural Diffusion: This theory suggests that the spread of language and culture occurred through peaceful means, as people adopted the language of those they interacted with.
Recent DNA evidence leans towards the conquest theory, indicating a violent takeover that eradicated the existing populations.
Click to expand...

Conclusion
Click to expand...

Marija Gimbutas's theories challenge conventional narratives about the development of human societies. Her research suggests that Old Europe was a peaceful, egalitarian civilization ruled by women, which was ultimately transformed by violent conquests that established patriarchal structures. Understanding this history is crucial for recognizing the cultural constructs that shape our present-day beliefs about gender, power, and society.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom