Buddy
The Living Force
Re: Hello Cassiopaea
I got it. Sometimes, the best answers are the ones you realize as opposed to being taken by the hand.
The work I referred to is only as important or useful if 'a new basis for their interpretation' is ALL you're looking for.
Laura is trying to pinpoint something specific and no work that concerns 'something evolving over time' can be useful if catastrophism isn't taken into consideration.
ark said:From "The Big U" by Neal Stephenson
"Ephraim had been talking the entire way. "So if you were the religious type, you know, you could say that the right side of the brain is the 'spiritual' side, the part that comes into contact with spiritual influences or God or whatever-- it has a dimension that protrudes into the spiritual plane, if you want to look at it that way-- while the left half is monistic and nonspiritual and mechanical. We conscious unicamerals accept the spiritual information coming in from the right side mixed in subtly with the natural inputs. But a bicameral person would receive that information in the form of a voice from nowhere which spoke with great authority. Now, that doesn't contradict the biblical accounts of the prophets-- it merely gives us a new basis for their interpretation by suggesting that their communication with the Deity was done subconsciously by a particular hemisphere of the brain."
Laura said:Problem is, catastrophism makes a monkey of evolution...
I got it. Sometimes, the best answers are the ones you realize as opposed to being taken by the hand.
The work I referred to is only as important or useful if 'a new basis for their interpretation' is ALL you're looking for.
Laura is trying to pinpoint something specific and no work that concerns 'something evolving over time' can be useful if catastrophism isn't taken into consideration.