Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

Maybe these two statements sum up the result (whether intended or not) of the Kirk assassination.


Guess we'll see if Camacho Trump is doing another "crazy Ivan" with regards to Religion, and given his close family ties , may not be quite as some Americans will envision it , and even further how much of a pull he might have at doing it, as events have showed him not to be as free to do as he wills. ( my 2x cents)
 
* Robinson was never on that roof. The individual in the stairwell and roof security camera footage was a look-alike who had no weapon and was there for one sole purpose: to make Robinson into a patsy.
There is also a posibility that it was him on the roof, with no gun (if he'd been told to drop it off at the location it was found, prior to getting up on the roof), but he did leave a screwdriver up there (I wonder if they tested that for prints?). This would only work if the shot came from another position and not up on that particular roof. It would also mean that the gun found, never fired. Is there a way of testing that? Also, having thought of that, could it have been fired on a prior occassion, just not on that one?

Honestly this is like playing "Cludo"! Nothing is simple or straight forward and yet it was in front of multiple people. In the end it looks like a conspiracy.
 
I apologise, I could have written that better.
To be precise, I think the order of consideration for the type of shot (as a basic hierarchy for beginning each analysis) should be as follows:
1) shot came from the front, the wound we see is an entry wound
2) the shot came from the left, the wound we see is an exit wound
3) the shot came from the front, the wound we see is an exit wound

Hence, lower on the list of consideration.
Hope that makes it clear.
Sure! The shot has to come from somewhere, but there are other factors to be questioned (in my mind). The two other most important ones I think are: type of weapon, and type of bullet. Some experienced shooters have questioned all three!

1. Not the right weapon,
2. Not the right bullet,
3. Not the right direction - therefore not the right shooter!

Once you get these three sorted with some degree of certaintly (which is obviously not going to come from official sources if they were in any way involved or implicated), then you can explain the behaviour of the bullet once it hits it's target without having to resort to 'divine intervention' or 'magic bullets', cool though they are. Come to think of it, these two explanations might be used as a distraction?

I think the only thing that anyone can agree upon with any degree of certainty was that there was only one shooter and only one shot. There's a lot of disagreement on the internet about the three points above, mostly by experienced shooters.
 
About that rifle photo: Why is the rifle on a cardboard box? Was it left in the box by the shooter?
I thought Tyler said something about putting the rifle in a cardboard box, but where did it come from and when did it happen? He obviously didn't have it when he was fleeing with the rifle in the towel. Was the box just laying there by the chicken coop? Was it at the preplanned drop off rather than just opportunistic? Certainly can't trust anything that's been said is actually true. I'm somewhat suspicious of the people whose homes were involved with the video and the rifle.

I think the bolded part is important. If the masses will not accept the cover story being put out (unlike what happened in past assassinations) and continue to investigate and demand the deep state perpetrators to be held accountable, there is less chance that the next stage of their plan will be able to manifest.
And can't that be said about the Epstein situation - he didn't kill himself and release the files! This latest distraction is helping to push it out of the public eye, and how likely that another even more sensational distraction is in the works to push the Kirk assassination out as well?!
 
So Alex Jones spoke with Andrew Kolvet, and he (the surgeon?) specified that what happened was that the bullet went in at an angle, coming *down* into his body, then ricocheted from within the body upwards, where they then found the bullet. Maybe another instance of what @Niall was talking about - releasing tidbits to then retroactively get their story straight?

Jones said pretty much the same thing, in a bit more detail, on his show (bullet entered neck at slight angle, deflected by spine toward heart/ribs, where it fragmented, one of which was found in the shoulder.):


FWIW, this is a crazy story Grok directed me to, involving an AK47 (about half the power of a .30-06):

We present an unusual case of gunshot injury with an atypical bullet entry wound, profound injury to the face, lodgment in the right carotid sheath, and 'wandering’; a first of its kind in East Africa.
 
Some have suggested in the language of religion that “the devil has overplayed his hand“. I can’t help but feel that this might actually is what happened, or at least I hope so. What do you think?

I watched almost the whole memorial yesterday except the final words of Trump. What I found interesting is that there was almost no words of revenge against “the left“ although some might have tried to frame it in that way. As a whole it seemed like a large funeral/church gathering. Somehow it sounds/feels like a revival of coming back or closer to spirituality to me. And at times I couldn’t help to feel grateful and hopeful for some of the qualities humans possess in dark hours.
 
Back
Top Bottom