Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

What Alana posted in another thread got me thinking:



I watched the full presentation of that guy and also a follow up presentation of him. While I think he might be a bit too black and white and a bit mislead/wrong in some of his reasoning, I think he could be onto something there in more ways than one.

Taking the above into account, what if the overarching agenda from a broader perspective might look something like that:

What Israel/Mossad is doing is done on purpose. For example, they want people to see how evil they are and what evil they are doing in Gaza and the rest of the world including what has happened now with Kirk. The more evil and public it is, the better. One goal of that is to galvanize the whole world against “the jews“ and hate them. They want to be hated/shunned as much as possible in order to bring forth “the end of days“, “the apocalypse“ after which they “will be saved“ by “god“ and be put in charge of the world as “the chosen people“. And a new holocaust might be one good way towards goals of that sort. If so, how Netanyahu behaved after the assassination might be on purpose on some level, maybe even from himself. They want people to suspect Israel and hate them more and more.

Now, I think it might be likely that the “Zionist“ “true believers“ are pretty much a very powerful human cult, but that even they are just puppets here that are currently the most useful/powerful direct way in which 4D STS can achieve its goals. And it is probably likely too that public figures like Netanyahu are now behaving like that because they are puppets of that death cult in the background that knows how they can position him in order to follow his nature and reveal them. So Netanyahu might be puppeteered in that way without really knowing it. And it is probably also likely that that death cult is a relatively small minority within the jewish denominations.

So, what we see globally with things switching back to “the right“ including with events like that Kirk assassination might be manipulated in that direction on purpose in order to slowly but surely bring forth another Hitler and “Holocaust“, and Apocalypse and then a new “jewish“ aristocracy that “will rule the world“ maybe quite openly with their reptilian god. The Lizard are “coming back“ to “rule“ and be worshipped more directly/openly again.


Another thing that stood out for me in the memorial is that, as far as I could see, Israel/Jews and/or judeo-christianity wasn’t mentioned once. The closest thing in that regard was when Vance shortly mentioned Jerusalem but right after that made it clear that Kirk wasn’t there but in America. Why is that? I mean, there appears to be a strong current now that justifiably and probably correctly blames “Israel“ or at least thinks it isn’t unlikely at all that they killed Kirk. So, what do people get away with when they then see a memorial that almost completely ignores “the jews“ while thwy suspect that “Zionist/Jews“ are in control of the government? They see that as a confirmation of their reasoning in that regard? Especially because it is such a strong contrast to the usual “Israel love“ that people were bathed in at almost every turn especially in events like this, for decades. A reverse psychology kind of thing/manipulation going on here?

Which brings be back to Kirk and how that “Israel“ revelation is coming out and back to how gaslighting works. Maybe the best way to create as much hate as possible is not to actually openly reveal “secrets“ of that sort but to do it in a gaslighting fashion?: Large parts of the internet now actually seem to know more or less the truth about “Israel“ while the mainstream (on purpose?) pushes conflicting lies that are so silly and clear while they insinuate that people can surely not be right in their perceptions. Doesn’t that increase hate more than just coming out with it at all fronts when the real goal is actually to make people hate “the jews“ again for a nefarious larger plan in which “the jews“ are also just pawns in the game of 4D STS?
 
Last edited:
Watched a few of the memorial speeches and have mixed feelings about all this.

I'm not sure that the STS guys are very good at predicting such a massive reaction by the people. The reason being that at least part of it doesn't come from the usual psychological programming, but from the soul - in recognition of the slaughter by dark forces of a truly decent and "godly" guy, in the best sense of the word. So they might not have expected that strong of a reaction. But they are also very good at containing and redirecting that sort of energy, getting the masses back to the usual state of "psychologically conditioned reaction".

As to the memorial event, on the one hand, Lord knows we need some Godliness, a religious re-orientation towards at least a baseline of decency, recognition of evil and degeneracy, and standing up to it unapologetically. On the other hand, you can already smell the machinations behind the scenes (of TPUSA and more broadly) to turn this energy in the direction that the evil overlords want.

Interesting that many people have compared Kirk to Paul - on the surface just in the sense of his "mission", but probably hitting on a deeper truth: This all feels like a replay of the original conflict between the "Christian zealots"/Peter/the Jerusalem church", aka. the "Judeo-Christians", and Paul's Christians, aka. team Tucker & Co.

We'll probably see both dynamics playing out simultanously, no matter where this all goes politically: the "true Gospel" will take roots for those with eyes to see, where the seed falls on fertile soil; these people will follow a path of soul-development and alignment with the Cosmos. Meanwhile the "false Gospel", based on glorifying a list of tenets ("the law") will spread as well, taking those who believe it down a very dark path that ends with destruction and the belief in false Messiahs promising earthy rewards.

Note how Tucker, in his speech, focussed on self-development and self-awareness, as well as the powers that be who hate the truth, while other speeches focussed more on Christian tenets as "the truth". The difference can be subtle, but still reflects the original conflict between Paul's Christ and the Zealots' Christ.
 
While following speculations like the ones I posted above one could also play with the idea that the PTB might have made a significant miscalculation here, not in the obvious sense, but in the sense that they didn’t expect that some crucial/sane/decent parts of christian theology could re-emerge as a rather large “disinfectant“ against some of their larger plans.
 
There are quite a number of famous and outspoken people (most especially on the right) who have rather recently “found god“ and then went directly into big established organized religions like catholicism, often seemingly going full in. Here is a small selection:

Tucker, Candace, Milo, Tate, Russell Brand, Ian Carroll.

How many of those people are capable to question some things in their new “homes“ I‘m not so sure. I think Tucker, Candace and Carroll might be more inclined to be able to do so compared to others.
 
It's very good for people to become aware of the reality of spiritual evil (STS). What is not so good is for them to flee mindlessly back into organized religion. It's a trap.
Exactly, the entire current political, cultural and spiritual situation in US and the western world is being "directed" by someone from one extreme to the other, that is, from left to right. At least that's my impression.

So basically, nothing will change, same game, different dynamics. The same divide et impera manipulation tactics, it's insane. The only hope is for as many people as possible to see the mand behind the curtain, otherwise nothing will change.
 
Back
Top Bottom