Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

Keeping what happened in Butler in mind and now this, could it be that “the PTB“ (or some of them) deliberately started to change the way they carry out such assassinations because they are now certain they have created enough pretty reliable and “ordinary“ people that are either manchurian candidates or just crazy/fanatical enough to reliably carry out an assassination with good shooting abilities as the only shooters on the scene? In other words: They deliberately removed real professional CIA/Mossad/Military killers from being the ones on the scene doing the kill shot and instead the patsies are now really the only ones they rely on? Why would they do that? First: Maybe to make it even harder to ever find out who really arranged the assassination and who gave the order to shoot the person? At least make it even harder to proof it with hard facts. Secondly: Maybe because they have perfected mind control techniques now to a point where they can be pretty certain that the patsy can and will carry things out reliably and with high precision?

In this scenario the PTB will still need to prepare some crucial things on the scene such as security lacks, and where somebody must be, or go. Prepare the scene so to say. But it removes an important point of direct connection to the real people behind the shooting and thus the threat of the truth coming out.
 
Last edited:
What I want to know is how many of those accounts are actually real people?
Methinks they really, really want us hating (and preferably killing) each other right now.

Since basicly "forever". Especially WW1 and 2 as well as the whole "immigration problem" is on "them". If left and right kill each other, its unluckiley we go for them.
 
Candace's video tribute to Charlie is incredibly heartbreaking. She calls him her little brother and best friend. Does she seem like the type to back down?


Oh :cry: he was an idol for my generation. I wish he'd turned his head or bent down just at the right moment like trump did! I find it so unbelievably sad that his soul must have chose this on some level? This MUST signify some turning point.

I know we are all aware of this, but what a horrible sick world we live in. Ah I'm stuck in the sadness of it. That video should have came with a trigger warning :lol:

RIP Charlie!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Although, wouldn't it be a good opportunity for the PTB/hyperdimensional STS forces to be behind the algorithm that make the right/left wings be more antagonized?

For all the talk about "creating division", we shouldn't pretend that the absolute, soul-smashing insanity of the left during the last 20 years (much longer, really) doesn't exist. These people are insane, many are psychos, and it all created an environment of complete inversion of reality. And they have infected a great many minds, even "normal" people by ponerological osmosis. The only way to fight this is to create a harsh atmosphere and a society that sends a clear message that this is off-limits now, and there will be consequences for promoting this insanity.

The problem at the heart of liberalism is to pretend that all people are equal, and therefore "everyone needs an equal voice". Great in theory, but in practice there is a hierarchy: some people are better than others. There are psychos, there are OPs, there are authoritarian followers etc. And then there are bright, wise people with a soul. OPs/authoritarian followers are like children that need firm guidance for society to succeed, and for that, toxic influences need to be removed or minimized. Part of this is to "cancel" the crazy ones, shun them socially, and punish them swiftly in the case of criminal offenses. Division is only bad if it's not based in reality, and not geared towards good. Dividing good from evil on the other hand is necessary. Yes, there is a lot of "outrage bait", but some outrage is more than justified.

Now, do I trust Trump and gang to do the right thing with all this, always? Hell no. But if they do something right, then I won't critizise them because of some principles that only enable the insanity to go unchecked. Will "they" use all of this to effect a "program change" and create some new, different insanity to smash souls? Of course they will try, that's what 4D STS do. But that is speculative, whereas the soul-smashing by the left has been going on for a long time, and frankly I have suffered a whole lot from it, as have so many others. And I don't mean "direct suffering" in the sense of having been put in jail or hurt. But deep, agonizing soul-suffering, the kind that 4D STS thrive on, by being forced to live in an upside-down world of LIES, and being forced to participate in these LIES.

So yeah, if they are going after these lunatics, I'll cheer. It is a rebalancing, cosmic justice, and reality reasserting itself.
 
It would seem to me that Kirk being assassinated at a University while publicly changing his position against Israel sure fits the below discussion as to what will initiate the program change.

(April 2024 - prior to the Trump assassination program change which was aborted due to, "Mass violation of free will")


As much as his assassination might serve as a distraction to Tucker's 9/11 documentary, I think the real story that needed cover is that Israel decided to flatten Gaza City to distract the press from the fact they're starving millions of people to death.
Not solely to stop or overshadow Tucker's documentary, but to generally dampen/prevent a 'meeting of minds' between Left and Right re Israel/the deep state. And Kirk is the perfect symbol of that, given that his 'job' was to go into university campuses and win over students.
 
I understand why people would consider Mossad/Israel to be the usual suspect, and from what I can see, there are indeed some interesting coincidences or facts that could support that (Tucker's 9/11 documentary, Kirk's criticism of Israel, etc).

There are also other facts or findings that point in the left/liberal/trans direction, etc.

It could be said that they are ultimately connected, but if so, it's not possible to declare with certainty that one or other particular body or organization is responsible. The only encompassing term that could fit is 4D STS, as they would be the ultimate usual suspect pulling the strings. :evil:

At this time I am leaning toward this possibly being a key event that is intended to activate a controlled chaos situation (as if whatever is already happening isn't enough). Or if the process already begun, it could be another chain of events that would contribute to the increasing chaos that would eventually lead to more suffering.

This possibility does involve Israel, but not necessarily would benefit Israel.

The C's in the past remarked that 9/11 involvement of Israel would become public knowledge. Some people mentioned that Kirk's death could be used as a distraction from Tucker's 9/11 documentary. I had a thought that it potentially could do the opposite.

Considering Netanyahu's attempts to present Kirk as a "friend of Israel" and knowing that people like Candace Owens and Tucker wouldn't back down, not to mention what was already shared about Epstein's connection to Israel, and Israel's recent acts in Gaza and Qatar, there is a potential for even more antagonistic view of Israel. As a result many things that we already know would become "mainstream".

What also comes to mind is Khazin's (Russian economist) view that there is an interest (that comes from UK and supported from inside Israel) to see Israel destroyed. In my opinion, there's really no need for anyone to plot Israel's destruction. Israel is perfectly capable of doing it all by itself. Khazin's view could potentially be relevant if Israel's ultimate destruction fits into a larger long term plan.

The C's also spoke about left/liberal/trans ideology having a backlash:

Notice also that Kirk was known as a "building bridges through debate" guy, whereas many felt that debate with leftists is pointless, they need to be crushed. Seems that is where we might be going next.

Considering all the nasty comments from many liberals online, and if the shooter would turn out to be trans/liberal/left leaning, it could lead to a greater (and possibly violent) backlash and divide.

So even if at this point it is such a cliche, I think that we would have to wait and see what kind of effect Kirk's death will have. It's similar to what the C's said about the "waves in the sky" near the portal area in Ukraine. That in order understand the "program change" or whatever was put in motion, we need to observe the ripple effect.

We are also currently in the "eclipse corridor". It's not possible to say how much influence this really has on events, and if whoever is responsible for the chain of events takes this into account, but what is said about "eclipse corridor" that it can be used to initiate a cascade or chain of events that would develop for at least the next 6 months. That's why it's usually recommended not to do anything significant during this period, unless you do want it to develop and transform.
 
One wonders of course if the hefty problems Candace had with her latest show on YouTube in which Kirk was probably the main topic, was just a coincidence? Apparently that never happened before in such an extreme fashion. Some seem to suggest it was just an overload because too many people watched and/or were in the chat. Where can we watch the rest of the show, if there is such a recording?
 
One wonders of course if the hefty problems Candace had with her latest show on YouTube in which Kirk was probably the main topic, was just a coincidence? Apparently that never happened before in such an extreme fashion. Some seem to suggest it was just an overload because too many people watched and/or were in the chat. Where can we watch the rest of the show, if there is such a recording?
The full episode is on Candace's channel here, it's the same link Beau posted above:
 
I understand why people would consider Mossad/Israel to be the usual suspect, and from what I can see, there are indeed some interesting coincidences or facts that could support that (Tucker's 9/11 documentary, Kirk's criticism of Israel, etc).

When I refer to Israel being responsible, I'm not really referring to "Israel" or "Mossad" but to the "deep state" that we suspect is behind such things and is made up of a transnational clique who think they run the world. But that term is too vague for the average person, so the closest we can get is Israel/Mossad since we suspect they're directly hooked in. And certainly they deserve the negative press.
 
Also in the news were lockdowns at some HBCUs the last few days over "credible threats".
Is pressure being put on universities and by association young people? If they are our "future", then maybe the 'powers that be' are really afraid of them? It does look like a co-ordinated attempt to keep them off balance and fearful.
 
Back
Top Bottom