Well it is probably OK to point out Nimoy using the trigger word though Nimoy clarified it as more of a religion thing in general as in Roddenberry didn't like Christian analogies being made with Star Trek either. Roddenberry could probably be said to have done something not optimal in a throwing out the baby with the bathwater kind of way. Too humanist at the expense of spirituality isn't a great thing. In my younger days I used to notice Star Trek the Next Generation paralleling my life though I don't remember any specific examples other than one I mentioned here before with numbers on doors paralleling my math/physics interest. I did notice Charles James Kirk being James T. Kirk-like.
I muted both of them on X because of all their nonsense. JG is like a boomer version of Ashton Forbes. He recently got in a spat with Gary Melton and behaved like a paranoid degenerate.
Thanks, It's possible the projectile missed major structures and the posturing was only temporary. Been to a few neck/brain injuries in my time including one who was temporarily a quadriplegic for several hours prior to discovery after coming off his motorbike. As we rolled him onto the spine board and removed his helmet his entire body regained full feeling. Been to several horse riding accidents where similar things happen to an injured neck. Temporary and localized paralysis, phantom pain etc. I've also seen the clenched fists caused by cardiac arrests, oxygen starvation and hypoglycemia, the latter resolving after a little glucose was received. Once went to a guy who suffered a massive cardiac arrest, lying flat on his back, hands tightly clenched, and arms splayed like CK's; 3 days after the event. There's a few variables that don't involve the spine or neck.
Fair enough , the human body is an amazingly complex machine. And since there won´t be any reliable autopsy available we have to work with publicly available videos/info. Gary Melton on one of his recent videos talked about the hidrostatic shock Ck´s body took , even if no direct hit from whatever was propelled by shaped charge to major organs its another possibility for major damage on critical areas. And yeah his security team looks like to be acting "on orders" that day , no visible blood from those around him from supposedly trying to stop a neck wound squirting blood ?(...) fwiw.
Don't have to in Australia, most will do it for free but shout down those who point out the obvious. Sad state of affairs.
And more specifically, 'kirk' is particularly associated with protestant christianity, especially in Scotland. So for someone like that, with that surname, to 'break from' the American (protestant, 'judeo-christian') Church, thus no longer espousing or supporting heavily OT-based interpretations of scripture that emphasize 'blessing Israel'... he's better off to them a dead (judeo-)christian martyr than a 'convert' (or rather, heretic, in their eyes).
No they're not. He got it completely wrong, and then he tried to justify his mistake (assuming it was just that, a mistake) after the fact, and you're helping him do so.
Wrong university!
What students? What meet-ups? Says who?
No it doesn't, at all. Webb conjectures that it was 'destroyed', you 'bite onto' his conjecture, then it's pointed out to him that he's at the wrong Dairy Queen, and yet, instead of being embarrassed, he shamefully persists in schizophrenic association of this (wrong) DQ with the paved-over crime scene where Kirk was shot... at a different university!!!
The likely meeting place of who and who? Also, Robinson didn't go to the airport. The 'mystery plane' issue was satisfactorily clarified, at least for now, about 40 pages back.
No that's not how it works on a consensus-building forum thread. If anything, we re-direct some of your thinking.
Robinson's dad ISN'T the 27-year vet of the Wash. County Sheriff's Dept. YOU are lazily choosing to believe someone in whose 'web' you appear trapped.
That's indeed what has been taking place here over these 90-some pages.
Yes, well said. But Webb hasn't been helpful in that process.
I'm glad he spoke up. What he's been subjected to is, in part, why we at SOTT are not 'weighing in heavily online'. In hindsight, it's very interesting that Goodman, Webb, 'Cullen', and Loomer all appear on the 'conspiracy scene' following the Las Vegas massacre, where they pushed either the 'helicopter theory' and/or the 'Saudi-assassination-plot-gone-wrong theory'.
I don't think that's Kirk's arm coming up, more likely someone closer down to Kirk? If so, that would explain why these three security guys we see 'don't have any blood on them' - they're not among those closest to Kirk.
Is that spot marked in yellow exactly where Kirk lay? How soon afterwards was this still/footage taken? Have objects (and the tent itself) since been moved around or altered? They're making a 'strange lack of blood' assessment based on very limited data and faulty assumptions.
