Re: the assassination attempt.
It happened when Zakharchenko and Kiev agreed about the first exchange of captives. His big mistake was that he decided to meet Kiev representatives himself. I hope that he has learned his lesson now.
Kiev, apparently, decided to make a show of it and invited Ruslana, a famous Ukrainian pop star, to negotiate with Zakharchenko. The girl is also well-known in the West as the winner of Eurovision 2004 with her Wild Dances. In Ukraine, she is a famous pro-Maidan activist. In 2004, she actively supported Victor Yuschenko’s president election campaign. She promoted the ideas of Orange Revolution in every possible way, including making epic videos such as Dance with the Wolves for example. Hillary Clinton was her best friend:
As you see, it’s hard to find a better person to represent progressive Kiev in their talks with the “Eastern barbarians.” Imagine the picture: brave and gorgeous Ruslana returns from Donbass with liberated Ukrainian soldiers – what a show that could be for the pro-Kiev media space. But suddenly Ruslana returns and starts telling a completely different story about Donbass: she says that they are normal people who have nothing to do with terrorism. Ooops.
Here is my translation of what exactly she said (transcript of a VIDEO interview coverage from LifeNews):
So, the girl realized that Poroshenko is a liar and that there is a real war in the East of Ukraine. She also realized that Poroshenko is doing nothing to save the surrounded soldiers. I just wonder, if she also realized that the shelling of the car, in which she was sitting and talking with Zakharchenko, was not accidental either? Has it ever occurred to her that the same people who sent her to talk to him were later trying to kill both of them?
Obviously not. She had a good chance to see who is who, but she preferred to continue “dancing with the wolves”: on September 22, she organized an “anti Putin” meeting near the Consulate General of the Russian Federation in San Francisco. She also started actively backpedaling and claiming that Russia is lying about her impressions from meeting with Zakharchenko. Lying? But what about her own VIDEO interview then?
Returning to the subject of attempt to assassinate Zakharchenko: just think who are those people who first sent a young woman to him in order to release captive soldiers and then were trying to kill both her and him? Do they care about her, about captive soldiers or about anyone at all? Luckily, they both survived, only the driver was seriously injured. Zakharchenko invited her for a car trip to show her what was really going on in Donetsk. He showed her ruined schools and hospitals. She admitted herself that they were fighting not terrorists, but their own people. She admitted that Poroshenko is a big liar. Why condemning Putin then? In the interview partly transcribed above she mentioned that both sides don't want to fight each other. But someone is constantly provoking the fight: some snipers shooting, some shellings out of nowhere. She now thinks that it is Putin who is provoking further conflict. Yeah, sure.
It happened when Zakharchenko and Kiev agreed about the first exchange of captives. His big mistake was that he decided to meet Kiev representatives himself. I hope that he has learned his lesson now.
Kiev, apparently, decided to make a show of it and invited Ruslana, a famous Ukrainian pop star, to negotiate with Zakharchenko. The girl is also well-known in the West as the winner of Eurovision 2004 with her Wild Dances. In Ukraine, she is a famous pro-Maidan activist. In 2004, she actively supported Victor Yuschenko’s president election campaign. She promoted the ideas of Orange Revolution in every possible way, including making epic videos such as Dance with the Wolves for example. Hillary Clinton was her best friend:
As you see, it’s hard to find a better person to represent progressive Kiev in their talks with the “Eastern barbarians.” Imagine the picture: brave and gorgeous Ruslana returns from Donbass with liberated Ukrainian soldiers – what a show that could be for the pro-Kiev media space. But suddenly Ruslana returns and starts telling a completely different story about Donbass: she says that they are normal people who have nothing to do with terrorism. Ooops.
Here is my translation of what exactly she said (transcript of a VIDEO interview coverage from LifeNews):
“I came to Donetsk and saw something which I never expected to see. It hit my mind completely. I saw the shelling of our own people!” Exclaimed Ruslana. “We must simply stop the fire, stop the war and bloodshed. And if politicians think otherwise, it means that there is some chemistry, some dirty games.”
Ruslana thinks that Ukrainian journalists must visit the battle fields to find out the truth.
“If you are so brave, then let’s go with me next time”, Ruslana invited one of Kiev reporters. “Then you will see everything by yourself and will understand me.”
The artist also told that the car in which she was sitting with the prime minister of DPR Alexander Zakharchenko went under shelling. “It’s impossible to understand who is shooting, whose bullets those are. But what is perfectly clear is that we are shooting our own people. I used to shout louder than anyone that we have no civil war. I was wrong”, Ruslana confessed to the journalists.
Ruslana also said that she was disappointed with the new Ukrainian leader Petro Poroshenko. She described her participation in the meeting near the President’s administration building in Kiev on August 28. According to LifeNews, the meeting was made by the relatives and friends of the soldiers who were surrounded in Ilovaisk.
The singer was outraged that Poroshenko’s people never came out to talk to the meeting participants.
“They must communicate with people, they must explain their position. Maybe I will say something shocking now, but nevertheless: Poroshenko refused to hear me when I was standing near the president’s administration. But when I arrived at Donbass, Zakharchenko heard me”, she said.
Ruslana Lyzhychko, a Eurovision 2004 winner, was an active participant of Maidam protests. In early December she threatened to burn herself on the Kiev’s main square, unless “the country changes.” For her active participation she was proclaimed the “symbol of Maidan.” In February, Ukrainian politicians promised her a place in the new parliament.
So, the girl realized that Poroshenko is a liar and that there is a real war in the East of Ukraine. She also realized that Poroshenko is doing nothing to save the surrounded soldiers. I just wonder, if she also realized that the shelling of the car, in which she was sitting and talking with Zakharchenko, was not accidental either? Has it ever occurred to her that the same people who sent her to talk to him were later trying to kill both of them?
Obviously not. She had a good chance to see who is who, but she preferred to continue “dancing with the wolves”: on September 22, she organized an “anti Putin” meeting near the Consulate General of the Russian Federation in San Francisco. She also started actively backpedaling and claiming that Russia is lying about her impressions from meeting with Zakharchenko. Lying? But what about her own VIDEO interview then?
Returning to the subject of attempt to assassinate Zakharchenko: just think who are those people who first sent a young woman to him in order to release captive soldiers and then were trying to kill both her and him? Do they care about her, about captive soldiers or about anyone at all? Luckily, they both survived, only the driver was seriously injured. Zakharchenko invited her for a car trip to show her what was really going on in Donetsk. He showed her ruined schools and hospitals. She admitted herself that they were fighting not terrorists, but their own people. She admitted that Poroshenko is a big liar. Why condemning Putin then? In the interview partly transcribed above she mentioned that both sides don't want to fight each other. But someone is constantly provoking the fight: some snipers shooting, some shellings out of nowhere. She now thinks that it is Putin who is provoking further conflict. Yeah, sure.